DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Response to Arguments
Applicant’s arguments, see section titled “Objections to the Claims”, with respect to claims 7, 12-13, 18, and 28-29 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The objection of claims 7, 12-13, 18, and 28-29 has been withdrawn.
Applicant’s arguments, see section titled “Independent Claims 11 and 26”, with respect to claims 11 and 26 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102 of claims 11 and 26 has been withdrawn.
Applicant’s arguments, see section titled “Dependent Claims 13, 14, 17, 20, and 28”, with respect to claims 13-14, 17, 20, and 28 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102 of claims 13-14, 17, 20, and 28 has been withdrawn.
Applicant’s arguments, see section titled “Independent Claims 1 and 21”, with respect to claims 1 and 21 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 1 and 21 has been withdrawn.
Applicant’s arguments, see section titled “Dependent Claims 2-7, 10, 12, 15, 16, 20, 22, 23, and 27”, with respect to claims 2-7, 10, 12, 15-16, 20, 22-23, and 27 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 2-7, 10, 12, 15-16, 20, 22-23, and 27 has been withdrawn.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b):
(b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph:
The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention.
Claim(s) 1-30 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention.
Regarding claim 1, it is unclear how there is both “a full-duplex slot within a random access occasion” and “the random access occasion within the full-duplex slot”. Claims 11, 21, and 26 recite similar limitations of claim 1 and are thus rejected under similar rationale. Claim(s) dependent on claim 1, 11, 21, or 26 fails to resolve the deficiency of their respective independent claim and is/are thus rejected under similar rationale.
Conclusion
Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PETER P CHAU whose telephone number is (571)270-7152. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30 A.M - 6 P.M. ET M-F.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ayaz Sheikh can be reached at 571-272-3795. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/PETER P CHAU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2476