Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/460,399

BATTERY MODULE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Sep 01, 2023
Priority
Sep 05, 2022 — JP 2022-140759
Examiner
ESTES, JONATHAN WILLIAM
Art Unit
1725
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Prime Planet Energy & Solutions Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
60 granted / 87 resolved
+4.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
145
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
57.5%
+17.5% vs TC avg
§102
20.7%
-19.3% vs TC avg
§112
20.7%
-19.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 87 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments The applicant’s drawings submitted on 06/10/2026 resolve the objection presented in the previous office action of record and said objection is accordingly withdrawn. The new title submitted by the applicant is sufficiently descriptive, and accordingly, the objection presented in the previous office action of record is withdrawn. Additionally, the applicant’s amendments have resolved the issues of indefiniteness presented in the previous office action of record, and they are accordingly withdrawn. Additionally, in regards to the limitation which requires that the wiring is provided at the connection portion and passes through a region not overlapping with the control board from the region overlapping with the control board, and extends to the region overlapping with the control board again, the applicant asserts that Dawley fails to disclose or teach said structure. This argument has been fully considered but is not persuasive. Here, this limitation is disclosed by Dawley in the alternative embodiment shown in their figure 4B, which the rejection below is modified to rely upon. Here, it is noted that this limitation does not provide any requirement for the direction from which the wiring and control board should be viewed from to determine the state of overlapping. Accordingly, where any two components overlap when all possible axes and viewpoints are considered, a consistent single axis must be used to determine the state of overlapping for the purpose of this limitation. Here, we look to Dawley’s figures 4B (Paragraph 0045, “FIGS. 4A and 4B correspond to the relative positioning of the flex circuit 18 and PCB 16 as shown in FIGS. 11C and 11B, respectively.”) which show an upside-down representation of the board assembly (See Paragraph 0044), which depict the flexible printed board being molded over the control board. Here, looking from a side axis, the wiring extends from a position where it overlaps with the side of the control board, extending to a region above the control board, where it no longer overlaps from the view point of the side axis, and then extends again to the other busbar, moving past the control board such that it again overlaps from a side axis point of view. Accordingly, this is structure where the wiring passes through a region not overlapping with the control board from the region overlapping with the control board, and extends to the region overlapping with the control board again. Additionally, where Dawley’s flexible printed circuit 18 is in contact with the control board 16, the wiring is therefore provided at the connection portion. Drawings The drawings were received on 06/10/2026. These drawings are accepted. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4, 6, and 10-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Dawley (US 20200274204 A1). Regarding Claim 1, Dawley discloses a battery module comprising a plurality of battery cells 24 arranged in a first direction, shown in figure 1, as well as a plate member 35 provided on a first side of the plurality of battery cells, also depicted in figure 1. Here, the first side is the top side of the battery cells. Additionally, Dawley discloses a flexible printed board 18 and control board 16 each provided on the plate member (Paragraph 0026, “the ICB assembly 14 of FIG. 1 includes a printed circuit board assembly (“PCBA”) 140, the integral components of which include a printed circuit board (“PCB”) 16 and a flexible printed circuit (“flex-circuit”) (FLX) 18.”). Additionally, the flexible printed board 18 has a wiring electrically connected to the control board 16 (Paragraph 0026, “joining the cell-monitoring PCB 16 to the flex circuit 18.”). Additionally, at least a portion of the wiring of the flexible printed board is located between the control board and at least one of the battery cells at a region overlapping with the control board when viewed from the first side. Here, a view from the first side is a view from the top face of the plurality of batteries as shown in figure 1, positioned internally within the battery module. Here, looking to the embodiment shown in figure 4B, which depicts an upside down view of the board assembly 14, where the batteries are therefore located above the busbars 30, at least a portion of the wiring of the flexible printed board 18 is located diaconally between the control board 16 and at least one of the plurality of battery cells. Additionally, where the wiring of the flexible printed circuit board 18 is located above the control board 18, it is therefore located at a region overlapping with the control board when viewed from the first side (in this case the direction from above). Additionally, Dawley discloses structure where the control board 16 has a connector portion and the flexible printed board 18 has a connection portion (Paragraph 0026, “The PCB 16 and flex circuit 18 are integrally formed or constructed, such as by using a reflow surface-mounted technology (SMT)-based soldering process or other suitable fabrication process as set forth herein.”), shown in figure 4B, which depicts the control board 16 connecting to the flexible printed board 18. Additionally, Dawley discloses that they are electrically connected to each other when the connector portion and connection portion are connected through being soldered together (Paragraph 0031, “The adjacent PCB 16 and flex circuit 18 may be subjected to the above-noted reflow SMT soldering process, with optional variations thereof described below with reference to FIGS.”). Additionally, in regards to the limitation which requires that the wiring is provided at the connection portion and passes through a region not overlapping with the control board from the region overlapping with the control board, and extends to the region overlapping with the control board again, Dawley discloses said structure. Here, where Dawley’s flexible printed circuit 18 is in contact with the control board 16, the wiring is provided at the connection portion. Here, it is noted that this limitation does not provide any requirement for the direction from which the wiring and control board should be viewed from to determine the state of overlapping. Accordingly, where any two components overlap when all possible axes and viewpoints are considered, a consistent single axis must be used to determine the state of overlapping for the purpose of this limitation. Here, we look to Dawley’s figures 4B (Paragraph 0045, “FIGS. 4A and 4B correspond to the relative positioning of the flex circuit 18 and PCB 16 as shown in FIGS. 11C and 11B, respectively.”) which show an upside-down representation of the board assembly (Paragraph 0044), which depict the flexible printed board being molded over the control board. Here, looking from a side axis, the wiring extends from a position where it overlaps with the side of the control board, extending to a region above the control board, where it no longer overlaps from the view point of the side axis, and then extends again to the other busbar, moving past the control board such that it again overlaps from a side axis point of view. Accordingly, this is structure where the wiring passes through a region not overlapping with the control board from the region overlapping with the control board, and extends to the region overlapping with the control board again. Regarding Claim 2, Dawley anticipates the invention of Claim 1. Additionally, Dawley discloses structure wherein at least the portion of the wiring of the flexible printed board 18 is located between the control board 16 and the plate member. Here, shown in figure 4B, the wiring portion of the flexible printed circuit board 18 is located to the side of the control board 16, between the control board 16 and the outermost portion of the plate member, here component 128. Additionally, the wiring portion, in extending from the contact point with the control board is therefore located at the region overlapping with the control board when viewed from the first side, which as discussed above from the top of figure 4B, where figure 4B depicts an upside down view of the board assembly. Regarding Claim 3, Dawley anticipates the invention of Claim 1. Additionally, Dawley discloses structure where the plate member has a protruding portion that positions the flexible printed board 18, as shown in figure 3A, where the flexible printed board 18 is positioned on a protrusion of the plate member. Regarding Claim 4, Dawley anticipates the invention of Claim 1. Additionally, Dawley discloses structure wherein at least the portion of the wiring of the flexible printed board 18 is located between the control board 16 and the plate member. Here, shown in figure 4B, the wiring portion of the flexible printed circuit board 18 is located to the side of the control board 16, between the control board 16 and the outermost portion of the plate member, here component 128. Additionally, the wiring portion, in extending from the contact point with the control board is therefore located at the region overlapping with the control board when viewed from the first side, which as discussed above from the top of figure 4B, where figure 4B depicts an upside down view of the board assembly. Additionally, Dawley discloses structure where the plate member has a protruding portion that positions the flexible printed board 18, as shown in figure 4B, where the protrusions of the plate member position the control board 16, and the flexible printed board 18 which rests on top of the control board. Regarding Claim 6, Dawley anticipates the invention of Claim 1. Additionally, in regards to the limitation of the instant claim which requires that in a state in which the connection portion is not connected to the connector portion, at least a portion of the connection portion is located between the portion of the control board and at least one of the plurality of battery cells when viewed from the first side, this limitation, in requiring that the connection portion is not connected to the connection portion, is Here, based on the depictions shown in Dawley’s figures 3A and 4B, the flexible printed board 18 can connect to either a top side or a bottom side of the control board 16. Accordingly, both the top side and bottom side of the control board 16 can be considered to be parts of the connection portion. Accordingly, the connection portion surrounds the control board 16, and at least a portion of the connection portion is located between a portion of the control board and at least one of the plurality of battery cells when viewed from the first side, based on the portioning of the batteries above the control board 16 in figure 4B, where the first side is the top side of the battery cells. Additionally, where the limitation states requires that “in a state in which the connection portion is not connected to the connector portion”, the limitation does not positively recite that this state is present and therefore requires that the condition of the claim to be met if the state would be present. Accordingly, where as discussed above Dawley discloses structure where the connection portion is located between a portion of the control board and at least one of the plurality of battery cells when viewed from the first side, this condition is always met, and would therefore continue to be met if the state of the claim were present. Regarding Claim 10, Dawley anticipates the invention of Claim 1. Additionally, Dawley discloses structure wherein the flexible printed board has a film layer, and a conductor portion formed on the film layer and forming the wiring, as shown in figure 10, which depicts the flexible printed board 18. Here, the flexible printed board has a film layer 38 (Paragraph 0033, “The substrate 18S may be coated with an electrically-insulating layer 38, e.g., polyethylene naphthalate (PEN), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyimide (PI), etc. An adhesive binder layer 47 such as epoxy may be used to adhere the substrate 18S to the insulating layer 38, or the insulating layer 38 may be self-adhering.”) and a conductor portion 18S formed on the film layer and forming the wiring (Paragraph 0032, “The flex circuit 18 in its various embodiments is constructed of a thin substrate 18S of conductive material, e.g., metal foil.”). Regarding Claim 11, Dawley anticipates the invention of Claim 1. Additionally, Dawley discloses structure wherein at least the portion of the wiring of the flexible printed board 18 is located between the control board 16 and the plate member. Here, shown in figure 4B, the wiring portion of the flexible printed circuit board 18 is located to the side of the control board 16, between the control board 16 and the outermost portion of the plate member, here component 128. Additionally, the wiring portion, in extending from the contact point with the control board is therefore located at the region overlapping with the control board when viewed from the first side, which as discussed above from the top of figure 4B, where figure 4B depicts an upside down view of the board assembly. Additionally, Dawley discloses structure where the plate member has a protruding portion that positions the flexible printed board 18, as shown in figure 4B, where the protrusions of the plate member position the control board 16, and the flexible printed board 18 which rests on top of the control board. Additionally, Dawley discloses structure wherein the flexible printed board has a film layer, and a conductor portion formed on the film layer and forming the wiring, as shown in figure 10, which depicts the flexible printed board 18. Here, the flexible printed board has a film layer 38 (Paragraph 0033, “The substrate 18S may be coated with an electrically-insulating layer 38, e.g., polyethylene naphthalate (PEN), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyimide (PI), etc. An adhesive binder layer 47 such as epoxy may be used to adhere the substrate 18S to the insulating layer 38, or the insulating layer 38 may be self-adhering.”) and a conductor portion 18S formed on the film layer and forming the wiring (Paragraph 0032, “The flex circuit 18 in its various embodiments is constructed of a thin substrate 18S of conductive material, e.g., metal foil.”). Regarding Claim 12, Dawley anticipates the invention of Claim 1. Additionally, Dawley discloses structure where the wiring 18S includes a first portion that is located at the region overlapping with the control board when viewed from the first side, when viewed from the first side as shown in figure 4B, as well as a second portion 22 which is contiguous to the first portion and that is located at a region exposed from the control board when viewed from the first side (Paragraph 0030, “The flex circuit 18 depicted in FIG. 2 defines a plurality of radial tabs which are spaced around its periphery. Such radial tabs, which are referred to hereinafter and in the general art as “flying leads” 22,”). Here, the second portion are located on a left side of the control board as shown in figure 3. Additionally, Dawley discloses a third portion which is the leads lower section of the insulating layer 38, located on a side opposite to the first portion which is on the top of the flexible printed board. Here it is contiguously connected to the second portion as shown in figures 3A and 10. Additionally, as shown in figure 4B, based on the position of the third portion, the third portion is located at the region overlapping with the control board when viewed from the first side. Regarding Claim 13, Dawley anticipates the invention of Claim 1. Additionally, Dawley discloses structure wherein at least the portion of the wiring of the flexible printed board 18 is located between the control board 16 and the plate member. Here, shown in figure 4B, the wiring portion of the flexible printed circuit board 18 is located to the side of the control board 16, between the control board 16 and the outermost portion of the plate member, here component 128. Additionally, the wiring portion, in extending from the contact point with the control board is therefore located at the region overlapping with the control board when viewed from the first side, which as discussed above from the top of figure 4B, where figure 4B depicts an upside down view of the board assembly. Additionally, Dawley discloses structure where the plate member has a protruding portion that positions the flexible printed board 18, as shown in figure 4B, where the protrusions of the plate member position the control board 16, and the flexible printed board 18 which rests on top of the control board. Additionally, Dawley discloses structure wherein the flexible printed board has a film layer, and a conductor portion formed on the film layer and forming the wiring, as shown in figure 10, which depicts the flexible printed board 18. Here, the flexible printed board has a film layer 38 (Paragraph 0033, “The substrate 18S may be coated with an electrically-insulating layer 38, e.g., polyethylene naphthalate (PEN), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyimide (PI), etc. An adhesive binder layer 47 such as epoxy may be used to adhere the substrate 18S to the insulating layer 38, or the insulating layer 38 may be self-adhering.”) and a conductor portion 18S formed on the film layer and forming the wiring (Paragraph 0032, “The flex circuit 18 in its various embodiments is constructed of a thin substrate 18S of conductive material, e.g., metal foil.”). Additionally, Dawley discloses structure wherein the flexible printed board has a film layer, and a conductor portion formed on the film layer and forming the wiring, as shown in figure 10, which depicts the flexible printed board 18. Here, the flexible printed board has a film layer 38 (Paragraph 0033, “The substrate 18S may be coated with an electrically-insulating layer 38, e.g., polyethylene naphthalate (PEN), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyimide (PI), etc. An adhesive binder layer 47 such as epoxy may be used to adhere the substrate 18S to the insulating layer 38, or the insulating layer 38 may be self-adhering.”) and a conductor portion 18S formed on the film layer and forming the wiring (Paragraph 0032, “The flex circuit 18 in its various embodiments is constructed of a thin substrate 18S of conductive material, e.g., metal foil.”). Additionally, Dawley discloses structure where the wiring 18S includes a first portion that is located at the region overlapping with the control board when viewed from the first side, when viewed from the first side as shown in figure 4B, as well as a second portion 22 which is contiguous to the first portion and that is located at a region exposed from the control board when viewed from the first side (Paragraph 0030, “The flex circuit 18 depicted in FIG. 2 defines a plurality of radial tabs which are spaced around its periphery. Such radial tabs, which are referred to hereinafter and in the general art as “flying leads” 22,”). Here, the second portion are located on a left side of the control board as shown in figure 3. Additionally, Dawley discloses a third portion which is the leads lower section of the insulating layer 38, located on a side opposite to the first portion which is on the top of the flexible printed board. Here it is contiguously connected to the second portion as shown in figures 4B and 10. Additionally, as shown in figure 3A, based on the position of the third portion, the third portion is located at the region overlapping with the control board when viewed from the first side. Regarding Claim 14, Dawley anticipates the invention of Claim 1. Additionally, Dawley discloses structure where the wiring includes a voltage detection line and a temperature detection line (Paragraph 0032, “The flex circuit 18 is configured to transfer measured voltage and/or temperature signals from individual cell electrode terminals 26 of the battery cells 24, both shown in FIG. 1.”). Regarding Claim 15, Dawley anticipates the invention of Claim 1. Additionally, Dawley discloses structure wherein at least the portion of the wiring of the flexible printed board 18 is located between the control board 16 and the plate member. Here, shown in figure 4B, the wiring portion of the flexible printed circuit board 18 is located to the side of the control board 16, between the control board 16 and the outermost portion of the plate member, here component 128. Additionally, the wiring portion, in extending from the contact point with the control board is therefore located at the region overlapping with the control board when viewed from the first side, which as discussed above from the top of figure 4B, where figure 4B depicts an upside down view of the board assembly. Additionally, Dawley discloses structure where the plate member has a protruding portion that positions the flexible printed board 18, as shown in figure 4B, where the protrusions of the plate member position the control board 16, and the flexible printed board 18 which rests on top of the control board. Additionally, Dawley discloses structure wherein the flexible printed board has a film layer, and a conductor portion formed on the film layer and forming the wiring, as shown in figure 10, which depicts the flexible printed board 18. Here, the flexible printed board has a film layer 38 (Paragraph 0033, “The substrate 18S may be coated with an electrically-insulating layer 38, e.g., polyethylene naphthalate (PEN), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyimide (PI), etc. An adhesive binder layer 47 such as epoxy may be used to adhere the substrate 18S to the insulating layer 38, or the insulating layer 38 may be self-adhering.”) and a conductor portion 18S formed on the film layer and forming the wiring (Paragraph 0032, “The flex circuit 18 in its various embodiments is constructed of a thin substrate 18S of conductive material, e.g., metal foil.”). Additionally, Dawley discloses structure wherein the flexible printed board has a film layer, and a conductor portion formed on the film layer and forming the wiring, as shown in figure 10, which depicts the flexible printed board 18. Here, the flexible printed board has a film layer 38 (Paragraph 0033, “The substrate 18S may be coated with an electrically-insulating layer 38, e.g., polyethylene naphthalate (PEN), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyimide (PI), etc. An adhesive binder layer 47 such as epoxy may be used to adhere the substrate 18S to the insulating layer 38, or the insulating layer 38 may be self-adhering.”) and a conductor portion 18S formed on the film layer and forming the wiring (Paragraph 0032, “The flex circuit 18 in its various embodiments is constructed of a thin substrate 18S of conductive material, e.g., metal foil.”). Additionally, Dawley discloses structure where the wiring 18S includes a first portion that is located at the region overlapping with the control board when viewed from the first side, when viewed from the first side as shown in figure 4B, as well as a second portion 22 which is contiguous to the first portion and that is located at a region exposed from the control board when viewed from the first side (Paragraph 0030, “The flex circuit 18 depicted in FIG. 2 defines a plurality of radial tabs which are spaced around its periphery. Such radial tabs, which are referred to hereinafter and in the general art as “flying leads” 22,”). Here, the second portion are located on a left side of the control board as shown in figure 3. Additionally, Dawley discloses a third portion which is the leads lower section of the insulating layer 38, located on a side opposite to the first portion which is on the top of the flexible printed board. Here it is contiguously connected to the second portion as shown in figures 4B and 10. Additionally, as shown in figure 3A, based on the position of the third portion, the third portion is located at the region overlapping with the control board when viewed from the first side. Additionally, Dawley discloses structure where the wiring includes a voltage detection line and a temperature detection line (Paragraph 0032, “The flex circuit 18 is configured to transfer measured voltage and/or temperature signals from individual cell electrode terminals 26 of the battery cells 24, both shown in FIG. 1.”). Regarding Claim 16, Dawley anticipates the invention of Claim 1. Additionally, Dawley discloses structure where the control board has a fastening portion with which the flexible printed board is fastened, which are the soldering portions of the control board which connect to the soldering portions 36 of the flexible printed board, fastening them together (Paragraph 0005, “One approach for ensuring the requisite integration of the PCB and flex circuit is the use of a reflow surface-mounted technology (SMT) soldering process. The reflow process may be selective in nature, e.g., through local application of heat, as in an example “hot bar” soldering.”; Paragraph 0032, “the flex circuit 18 is shown in schematic cross-sectional view in proximity to a discrete solder pad or landing 36.”). Regarding Claim 17, Dawley anticipates the invention of Claim 16. Additionally Dawley discloses structure wherein the flexible printed board 18 has an avoidance portion that avoids the fastening portion, as shown in figure 10, where the top portions of the insulating layer 38 avoid the fastening portion 36 through not being in direct contact, as shown in figure 10. Regarding Claim 18, Dawley anticipates the invention of Claim 1. Additionally, Dawley discloses structure wherein at least the portion of the wiring of the flexible printed board 18 is located between the control board 16 and the plate member. Here, shown in figure 4B, the wiring portion of the flexible printed circuit board 18 is located to the side of the control board 16, between the control board 16 and the outermost portion of the plate member, here component 128. Additionally, the wiring portion, in extending from the contact point with the control board is therefore located at the region overlapping with the control board when viewed from the first side, which as discussed above from the top of figure 4B, where figure 4B depicts an upside down view of the board assembly. Additionally, Dawley discloses structure where the plate member has a protruding portion that positions the flexible printed board 18, as shown in figure 4B, where the protrusions of the plate member position the control board 16, and the flexible printed board 18 which rests on top of the control board. Additionally, Dawley discloses structure wherein the flexible printed board has a film layer, and a conductor portion formed on the film layer and forming the wiring, as shown in figure 10, which depicts the flexible printed board 18. Here, the flexible printed board has a film layer 38 (Paragraph 0033, “The substrate 18S may be coated with an electrically-insulating layer 38, e.g., polyethylene naphthalate (PEN), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyimide (PI), etc. An adhesive binder layer 47 such as epoxy may be used to adhere the substrate 18S to the insulating layer 38, or the insulating layer 38 may be self-adhering.”) and a conductor portion 18S formed on the film layer and forming the wiring (Paragraph 0032, “The flex circuit 18 in its various embodiments is constructed of a thin substrate 18S of conductive material, e.g., metal foil.”). Additionally, Dawley discloses structure wherein the flexible printed board has a film layer, and a conductor portion formed on the film layer and forming the wiring, as shown in figure 10, which depicts the flexible printed board 18. Here, the flexible printed board has a film layer 38 (Paragraph 0033, “The substrate 18S may be coated with an electrically-insulating layer 38, e.g., polyethylene naphthalate (PEN), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyimide (PI), etc. An adhesive binder layer 47 such as epoxy may be used to adhere the substrate 18S to the insulating layer 38, or the insulating layer 38 may be self-adhering.”) and a conductor portion 18S formed on the film layer and forming the wiring (Paragraph 0032, “The flex circuit 18 in its various embodiments is constructed of a thin substrate 18S of conductive material, e.g., metal foil.”). Additionally, Dawley discloses structure where the wiring 18S includes a first portion that is located at the region overlapping with the control board when viewed from the first side, when viewed from the first side as shown in figure 4B, as well as a second portion 22 which is contiguous to the first portion and that is located at a region exposed from the control board when viewed from the first side (Paragraph 0030, “The flex circuit 18 depicted in FIG. 2 defines a plurality of radial tabs which are spaced around its periphery. Such radial tabs, which are referred to hereinafter and in the general art as “flying leads” 22,”). Here, the second portion are located on a left side of the control board as shown in figure 3. Additionally, Dawley discloses a third portion which is the leads lower section of the insulating layer 38, located on a side opposite to the first portion which is on the top of the flexible printed board. Here it is contiguously connected to the second portion as shown in figures 4B and 10. Additionally, as shown in figure 3A, based on the position of the third portion, the third portion is located at the region overlapping with the control board when viewed from the first side. Additionally, Dawley discloses structure where the wiring includes a voltage detection line and a temperature detection line (Paragraph 0032, “The flex circuit 18 is configured to transfer measured voltage and/or temperature signals from individual cell electrode terminals 26 of the battery cells 24, both shown in FIG. 1.”). Additionally, Dawley discloses structure where the control board has a fastening portion with which the flexible printed board is fastened, which are the soldering portions of the control board which connect to the soldering portions 36 of the flexible printed board, fastening them together (Paragraph 0005, “One approach for ensuring the requisite integration of the PCB and flex circuit is the use of a reflow surface-mounted technology (SMT) soldering process. The reflow process may be selective in nature, e.g., through local application of heat, as in an example “hot bar” soldering.”; Paragraph 0032, “the flex circuit 18 is shown in schematic cross-sectional view in proximity to a discrete solder pad or landing 36.”). Additionally Dawley discloses structure wherein the flexible printed board 18 has an avoidance portion that avoids the fastening portion, as shown in figure 10, where the top portions of the insulating layer 38 avoid the fastening portion 36 through not being in direct contact, as shown in figure 10. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JONATHAN W ESTES whose telephone number is (571)272-4820. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:00 - 5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Basia Ridley can be reached at 5712721453. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J.W.E./Examiner, Art Unit 1725 /BASIA A RIDLEY/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1725
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 01, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 10, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 01, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12620667
POWER TOOL HAVING A MULTI-LATCH BATTERY INTERFACE
2y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12597681
SECONDARY BATTERY COMPRISING INSULATED TAB GROUP
4y 1m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12573656
SINTERING AID MIXTURE, SOLID-STATE ION CONDUCTOR, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SOLID-STATE ION CONDUCTORS
4y 7m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12537191
NEGATIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL FOR RECHARGEABLE BATTERY, METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAME, AND RECHARGEABLE BATTERY
4y 10m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12537196
Positive Electrode Active Material for Secondary Battery and Lithium Secondary Battery Including the Same
3y 6m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+6.5%)
3y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 87 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month