Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/460,991

PROTECTIVE CASE FOR PRODUCT

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Sep 05, 2023
Examiner
LEON MUNOZ, EDWIN A
Art Unit
2831
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Spigen Korea Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
1323 granted / 1497 resolved
+20.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1526
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
§102
46.3%
+6.3% vs TC avg
§112
14.8%
-25.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1497 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Drawings The drawings are objected to because the show alternatives (Figs. 1-2) and improper exploded/detailed views (Figs. 3-11). Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites "some member" in Line 2. It is not understood which member is referred to. For examination purposes, the Examiner will read the limitation as being any member on a side. Claim 2 recites the phrase "a stop protrusion manner" in Lines 1-2. It is not understood what Applicant means. For examination purposes, the Examiner will read the limitation as a protruding part of the locking part. Claim 3 recites “a remaining side” in Line 7. It is not understood if the remaining side is the same as the one recited in Claim 1. For examination purposes, the Examiner will read the limitation as being –the remaining side--. Appropriate corrections are required. As best understood by the Examiner, the rejection stands as follows: Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Liautaud (U.S. Patent No. 4,178,751). Regarding Claim 1, Liautaud discloses a protective case (11, 55) coupled to a product (12) having a button (82, 84, 86), the protective case comprising: a cover part (11) provided with an operation unit (16) for operating the button when some member (20-22) on one side (Fig. 4) thereof is moved toward the button located on a remaining side (Fig. 4) thereof, and configured to be detachably coupled to the product; and a locking part (56) configured to be coupled to the operation unit to slide between the button and the member in forward and backward directions (91, 92, 93), and also configured to be selectively spaced apart from the member and disposed adjacent to the member according to the movement to allow or block an operation of the button by the member. Regarding Claim 2, Liautaud discloses the locking part being formed to be fixed in a stop protrusion manner (91, 92, 93) when moved forward or backward, and a distance (Fig. 4) by which the member is movable selectively increases and decreases in accordance with forward or backward movement. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The cited prior art discloses protective cases, similar to Applicant’s claimed invention, having cover parts, buttons and locking parts. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EDWIN A LEON whose telephone number is (571)272-2008. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Renee S Luebke can be reached on 5712722009. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EDWIN A. LEON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2833
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 05, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603238
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC TIMEPIECE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602011
TIMEPIECE COMPRISING AN EXTERNAL ELEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596334
CROWN FOR AN ELECTRONIC WATCH
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596331
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND WATCH
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591205
EXTERIOR MEMBER, CASE AND TIMEPIECE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+7.9%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1497 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month