Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/461,083

ADJUSTABLE HEIGHT UPPER DECK SYSTEM AND METHOD

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 05, 2023
Priority
Sep 08, 2022 — provisional 63/404,668
Examiner
OLSON, LARS A
Art Unit
3615
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Forest River Inc.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1575 granted / 1919 resolved
+30.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1935
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
38.7%
-1.3% vs TC avg
§102
28.8%
-11.2% vs TC avg
§112
24.0%
-16.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1919 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . An amendment was filed by the applicant on May 20, 2026. Claim 4 has been cancelled. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 5-8 and 20-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Harbin (US 8,925,475). Harbin discloses the same adjustable height cabin or cockpit for a marine vessel as claimed, as shown in Figures 1A-10, which is comprised of a marine vessel, defined as Part #10, with a hull, defined as Part #12, a lower deck, defined as Part #16, a floating cabin, defined as Part #14, with an upper deck, defined as Part #21, and a plurality of telescopic support legs or columns, each defined as Part #70, which extend and retract, and are each disposed with one end that is operatively connected to said lower deck, and another end that is operatively connected to said upper deck, as shown in Figure 7. Said upper deck includes a helm station or controller, defined as Part #11, and seats, which are not shown, for crew members and passengers, first and second side rails, and a front rail, as shown in Figure 7. Said upper deck is movable from a first position in which said upper deck is at a first height above said lower deck, and a second position in which said upper deck is at a second height above said lower deck, as indicated in Figures 1A-B. Each of said telescopic support legs or columns is further comprised of a fixed section, a movable section and a pneumatic actuator, as described in lines 7-13 of column 8, and as shown in Figure 7. Said upper deck of said floating cabin includes a walkable surface that is demonstrated to be flat, continuous and planar, as shown in Figure 7, and is configured to support passengers in an upright position. Said plurality of telescopic support legs or columns is further comprised of first and second legs or columns that are each positioned toward an aft end of said marine vessel and extend upwardly from said lower deck, and third and fourth legs or columns that are each positioned forward of said first and second legs or columns and extend upwardly from said lower deck, as shown in Figure 7. Said first and second, and said third and fourth legs or columns are spaced apart by a lateral distance, and said first and second legs or columns are spaced apart from said third and fourth legs or columns by a longitudinal distance, as shown in Figure 7. Said walkable surface of said upper deck has a length of at least 20% of the total length of said marine vessel, as shown in Figure 1A. Said first, second, third and fourth legs or columns are disposed perpendicular to said walkable surface of said upper deck when in said first and second positions, as shown in Figures 1A-B. Harbin also discloses the same method of operating a telescoping upper deck assembly for a marine vessel as claimed, as shown in Figures 1A-10, said method being comprised of the steps of receiving from a helm station or controller, defined as Part #11, an instruction to move an upper deck, defined as Part #21, from a first position in which said upper deck is at a first height above a lower deck, defined as Part #16, of a marine vessel, defined as Part #10, to a second position in which said upper deck is at a second height above said lower deck, as indicated in Figures 1A-B, where said upper deck includes a walkable surface that is flat, continuous and planar, and is configured to support passengers in an upright position, as shown in Figure 7, and sending signals from said helm station or controller to first, second, third and fourth support legs or columns, each defined as Part #70, with pneumatic actuators, as shown in Figure 7, where said signals cause movement of said upper deck from said first position to said second position based on the instruction received by said helm station or controller, as shown in Figures 1A-B. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 19 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Harbin in view of Pepper et al. (US 5,044,298). Harbin, as set forth above, discloses all of the features claimed except for the use of a marine vessel in the form of a pontoon boat. Pepper et al. discloses a movable boat canopy for a pontoon boat, as shown in Figures 1-6, which is comprised of a boat, defined as Part #10, with a deck, defined as Part #14, a pair of pontoons, each defined as Part #18, a movable canopy, defined as Part #46, four support members, each defined as Part #90, and a pair of hydraulic actuators, each defined as Part #94, where said movable canopy is configured to move between a first position that is at a first height above said deck, as shown in Figure 2, and a second position that is at a second height above said deck, as shown in Figure 1. Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to one of ordinary skill in the art, to utilize a pontoon boat with a movable canopy, as taught by Pepper et al., in combination with the adjustable height cabin or cockpit for a marine vessel as disclosed by Harbin for the purpose of providing a pontoon boat with an adjustable height cabin or cockpit for supporting passengers. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 9-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LARS A OLSON whose telephone number is (571) 272-6685. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 8:00am - 4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, MARC JIMENEZ can be reached at 571-272-4530. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. June 1, 2026 /LARS A OLSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3615B
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 05, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §102, §103
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
May 20, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12691975
LASHING DEVICE FOR BOAT COVER SUSPENSION SYSTEM
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12686474
FLOATABLE CONCRETE BLOCK STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12673757
WATER JET PROPULSION BOAT
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673747
GAS SUPPLY SYSTEM APPLICABLE TO GAS LAYER DRAG REDUCTION SHIP, AND SHIP
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673748
ADJUSTABLE CAVITATOR STRUCTURE HAVING DOUBLE LAYER RETRACTABLE SHEET
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+14.2%)
1y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1919 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month