DETAILED ACTION
This communication is in response to Application No. 18/461,108 originally filed 09/05/2023. The Request for Continued Examination and Amendment presented on 12/23/2025 which provides amendments to claims 1, 3, 5, 10, 12, 14, 16 and claims 2, 4, 9, 11, 13, 15, and 20 is hereby acknowledged.
Currently claims 1, 3, 5-8, 10, 12, 14, 16-19, 21-22 are pending.
Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114
A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/23/2025 has been entered.
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Response to Arguments
Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1, 3, 5-8, 10, 12, 14, 16-19, 21-22 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument.
Claim Interpretation
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(f):
(f) Element in Claim for a Combination. – An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof.
The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph:
An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof.
The claims in this application are given their broadest reasonable interpretation using the plain meaning of the claim language in light of the specification as it would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. The broadest reasonable interpretation of a claim element (also commonly referred to as a claim limitation) is limited by the description in the specification when 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, is invoked.
As explained in MPEP § 2181, subsection I, claim limitations that meet the following three-prong test will be interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph:
(A) the claim limitation uses the term “means” or “step” or a term used as a substitute for “means” that is a generic placeholder (also called a nonce term or a non-structural term having no specific structural meaning) for performing the claimed function;
(B) the term “means” or “step” or the generic placeholder is modified by functional language, typically, but not always linked by the transition word “for” (e.g., “means for”) or another linking word or phrase, such as “configured to” or “so that”; and
(C) the term “means” or “step” or the generic placeholder is not modified by sufficient structure, material, or acts for performing the claimed function.
Use of the word “means” (or “step”) in a claim with functional language creates a rebuttable presumption that the claim limitation is to be treated in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. The presumption that the claim limitation is interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, is rebutted when the claim limitation recites sufficient structure, material, or acts to entirely perform the recited function.
Absence of the word “means” (or “step”) in a claim creates a rebuttable presumption that the claim limitation is not to be treated in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. The presumption that the claim limitation is not interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, is rebutted when the claim limitation recites function without reciting sufficient structure, material or acts to entirely perform the recited function.
Claim limitations in this application that use the word “means” (or “step”) are being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, except as otherwise indicated in an Office action. Conversely, claim limitations in this application that do not use the word “means” (or “step”) are not being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, except as otherwise indicated in an Office action.
This application includes one or more claim limitations that do not use the word “means,” but are nonetheless being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, because the claim limitation(s) uses a generic placeholder that is coupled with functional language without reciting sufficient structure to perform the recited function and the generic placeholder is not preceded by a structural modifier. Such claim limitation(s) is/are: “first determination unit”, “second determination unit”, “control unit”, in claim 10.
Because this/these claim limitation(s) is/are being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, it/they is/are being interpreted to cover the corresponding structure described in the specification as performing the claimed function, and equivalents thereof.
If applicant does not intend to have this/these limitation(s) interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, applicant may: (1) amend the claim limitation(s) to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph (e.g., by reciting sufficient structure to perform the claimed function); or (2) present a sufficient showing that the claim limitation(s) recite(s) sufficient structure to perform the claimed function so as to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claim(s) 1, 3, 6-7, 10, 12, 14, 17-18 and 21-22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lee et al. U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2018/0364881 A1 hereinafter Lee.
Consider Claim 1:
Lee discloses a display control method comprising: (Lee, See Abstract.)
determining a first display object and a second display object contained in current display content, the current display content being displayed on a current display screen of an electronic device, (Lee, [0181-0198], [0035], “In the illustrated example of FIG. 1, with an image 710 including an image area 712 displayed on the mobile terminal 600, mirroring is performed between the mobile terminal 600 and the image display apparatus 100, and a mirrored image 720 is displayed in a first area Ar1 of the image display apparatus 100.”)
wherein the determining the first display object and the second display object comprises: receiving operation information associated with the current display content from a user, (Lee, [0181-0198], [0161], “Referring to FIG. 6, the controller 170 of the image display apparatus 100 determines whether a mirroring input has been received (S605).”)
the first display object and the second display object being determined in response to the receiving of the operation information from the user, the current display content comprising a video displayed in a target window whose area is smaller than an area of a current display interface corresponding to the current display content; (Lee, [0181-0198], [0182], “If the mirrored image 720 includes the image area 725 and the text area 727 as illustrated in FIG. 7D or 7E, the controller 170 of the image display apparatus 100 may control to display the indicator IND for area selection in the image area 725, and control to display a zoomed-in image of the image area 725 on the display 180.”)
determining the video displayed in the target window as the first display object; recognizing, based on an image of the current display content, an image area having text content in the current display content; and extracting display content corresponding to the image area having the text content as the second display object; (Lee, [0181-0198], [0183], “The controller 170 of the image display apparatus 100 may distinguish the image area 725 from the text area 727 in the mirrored image 720 by area detection, and may control to display the indicator IND in the image area 725 by default.”)
determining, based on display configuration information of the electronic device, a first display screen for displaying the first display object and a second display screen for displaying the second display object; and (Lee, [0181-0198], [0182], “If the mirrored image 720 includes the image area 725 and the text area 727 as illustrated in FIG. 7D or 7E, the controller 170 of the image display apparatus 100 may control to display the indicator IND for area selection in the image area 725, and control to display a zoomed-in image of the image area 725 on the display 180.”)
in response to the first display object being directed to be displayed on full-screen of the first display screen, controlling a first display content corresponding to the first display object to be displayed on the first display screen and a second display content corresponding to the second display object to be displayed on the second display screen. (Lee, [0181-0198], [0187], “For example, if the indicator for selecting the first area is displayed in the image area of the mirrored image, the zoomed-in image 730 displayed in the area Ar2 of the image display apparatus 100 may be transmit a zoomed-in image transmission request for the image area of the mirrored image to the mobile terminal 600, and control to display a zoomed-in image received from the mobile terminal 600 on the display 180.”)
Consider Claim 3:
Lee discloses the method according to claim 1, wherein determining the first display object and the second display object based on the operation information includes: in response to the operation information including full-screen operation information for a second video, determining the second video corresponding to the full-screen operation information as the first display object; and determining display information outside the second video of the current display content as the second display object. (Lee, [0181-0198], [0187], “For example, if the indicator for selecting the first area is displayed in the image area of the mirrored image, the zoomed-in image 730 displayed in the area Ar2 of the image display apparatus 100 may be transmit a zoomed-in image transmission request for the image area of the mirrored image to the mobile terminal 600, and control to display a zoomed-in image received from the mobile terminal 600 on the display 180.”)
Consider Claim 6:
Lee discloses the method according to claim 1, wherein controlling the first display content corresponding to the first display object to be displayed on the first display screen and the second display content corresponding to the second display object to be displayed on the second display screen includes: in response to adjusting the first display object to a display format corresponding to the first display screen, controlling the first display content corresponding to the first display object with the adjusted display format to be displayed on the first display screen; and in response to adjusting the second display object to a display format corresponding to the second display screen, controlling the second display content corresponding to the second display object with the adjusted display format to be displayed on the second display screen. (Lee, [0096-0101], [0169], “Subsequently, in response to the mirroring input, the mobile terminal 600 may transmit, as a mirrored image, an image displayed on the display 680 of the mobile terminal 600 to the image display apparatus 100 (S610).”, [0170], “Therefore, the controller 170 of the image display apparatus 100 may receive the mirrored image through the interface 135 (S611), and may control to display the received mirrored image on the display 180 (S620).”)
Consider Claim 7:
Lee discloses the method according to claim 1, wherein determining, based on the display configuration information of the electronic device, the first display screen for displaying the first display object and the second display screen for displaying the second display object further includes: obtaining display screen connection configuration information of the electronic device on which the current display content is displayed; determining the first display screen and the second display screen of the electronic device based on the display screen connection configuration information. (Lee, [0137-0144], [0104], “The data processor (not shown) of the controller 170 may process the data signal obtained by demultiplexing the input stream signal. For example, if the demultiplexed data signal is a coded data signal, the data processor may decode the coded data signal. The coded data signal may be an EPG which includes broadcasting information specifying the start time, end time, and the like of a scheduled broadcast program of each channel.”)
Consider Claim 21:
Lee discloses the display control method according to claim 1, wherein the first display object is a display object with a user operation frequency that exceeds a threshold. (Lee, [0096], “The FRC 350 may change the frame rate of the input video signal or simply output the video signal without frame rate conversion.” [0098], “The formatter 360 may change the format of an input video signal to a video signal to be displayed on the display.”)
Consider Claim 10:
Lee discloses a display control device comprising: (Lee, See Abstract.)
a first determination unit configured to determine a first display object and a second display object contained in current display content, the current display content being displayed on a current display screen of an electronic device, (Lee, [0181-0198], [0035], “In the illustrated example of FIG. 1, with an image 710 including an image area 712 displayed on the mobile terminal 600, mirroring is performed between the mobile terminal 600 and the image display apparatus 100, and a mirrored image 720 is displayed in a first area Ar1 of the image display apparatus 100.”)
wherein the determining the first display object and the second display object comprises: receiving operation information associated with the current display content from a user, (Lee, [0181-0198], [0161], “Referring to FIG. 6, the controller 170 of the image display apparatus 100 determines whether a mirroring input has been received (S605).”)
the first display object and the second display object being determined in response to the receiving of the operation information from the user, the current display content comprising a video displayed in a target window whose area is smaller than an area of a current display interface corresponding to the current display content; (Lee, [0181-0198], [0182], “If the mirrored image 720 includes the image area 725 and the text area 727 as illustrated in FIG. 7D or 7E, the controller 170 of the image display apparatus 100 may control to display the indicator IND for area selection in the image area 725, and control to display a zoomed-in image of the image area 725 on the display 180.”)
determining the video displayed in the target window as the first display object; recognizing, based on an image of the current display content, an image area having text content in the current display content; and extracting display content corresponding to the image area having the text content as the second display object; (Lee, [0181-0198], [0183], “The controller 170 of the image display apparatus 100 may distinguish the image area 725 from the text area 727 in the mirrored image 720 by area detection, and may control to display the indicator IND in the image area 725 by default.”)
a second determination unit configured to determine, based on display configuration information of the electronic device, a first display screen for displaying the first display object and a second display screen for displaying the second display object; and (Lee, [0181-0198], [0182], “If the mirrored image 720 includes the image area 725 and the text area 727 as illustrated in FIG. 7D or 7E, the controller 170 of the image display apparatus 100 may control to display the indicator IND for area selection in the image area 725, and control to display a zoomed-in image of the image area 725 on the display 180.”)
in response to the first display object being directed to be displayed on full-screen of the first display screen, a control unit configured to control a first display content corresponding to the first display object to be displayed on the first display screen and a second display content corresponding to the second display object to be displayed on the second display screen, wherein the first display screen and second display screen are visible simultaneously. (Lee, [0181-0198], [0187], “For example, if the indicator for selecting the first area is displayed in the image area of the mirrored image, the zoomed-in image 730 displayed in the area Ar2 of the image display apparatus 100 may be transmit a zoomed-in image transmission request for the image area of the mirrored image to the mobile terminal 600, and control to display a zoomed-in image received from the mobile terminal 600 on the display 180.”)
Consider Claim 12:
Lee discloses an electronic device comprising: one or more processors; and (Lee, See Abstract.)
one or more memories storing a computer program that, when executed by the one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to: (Lee, [0280], “The method for operating an image display apparatus or a mobile terminal according to the present disclosure may be implemented as code that can be written on a computer-readable recording medium and thus read by a processor in the image display apparatus or the mobile terminal.”)
determine a first display object and a second display object contained in current display content, the current display content being displayed on a current display screen of the electric device; (Lee, [0181-0198], [0161], “Referring to FIG. 6, the controller 170 of the image display apparatus 100 determines whether a mirroring input has been received (S605).”)
determine, based on display configuration information of the electronic device, a first display screen for displaying the first display object and a second display screen for displaying the second display object, (Lee, [0181-0198], [0182], “If the mirrored image 720 includes the image area 725 and the text area 727 as illustrated in FIG. 7D or 7E, the controller 170 of the image display apparatus 100 may control to display the indicator IND for area selection in the image area 725, and control to display a zoomed-in image of the image area 725 on the display 180.”)
wherein the determining the first display object and the second display object comprises: receiving operation information associated with the current display content from a user, the first display object and the second display object being determined in response to the receiving of the operation information from the user, the current display content comprising a video displayed in a target window whose area is smaller than an area of a current display interface corresponding to the current display content; (Lee, [0181-0198], [0182], “If the mirrored image 720 includes the image area 725 and the text area 727 as illustrated in FIG. 7D or 7E, the controller 170 of the image display apparatus 100 may control to display the indicator IND for area selection in the image area 725, and control to display a zoomed-in image of the image area 725 on the display 180.”)
determining the video displayed in the target window as the first display object; recognizing, based on an image of the current display content, an image area having text content in the current display content; and extracting display content corresponding to the image area having the text content as the second display object; and (Lee, [0181-0198], [0183], “The controller 170 of the image display apparatus 100 may distinguish the image area 725 from the text area 727 in the mirrored image 720 by area detection, and may control to display the indicator IND in the image area 725 by default.”)
in response to the first display object being directed to be displayed on full-screen of the first display screen, control a first display content corresponding to the first display object to be displayed on the first display screen and a second display content corresponding to the second display object to be displayed on the second display screen. (Lee, [0181-0198], [0187], “For example, if the indicator for selecting the first area is displayed in the image area of the mirrored image, the zoomed-in image 730 displayed in the area Ar2 of the image display apparatus 100 may be transmit a zoomed-in image transmission request for the image area of the mirrored image to the mobile terminal 600, and control to display a zoomed-in image received from the mobile terminal 600 on the display 180.”)
Consider Claim 14:
Lee discloses the electronic device according to claim 12 wherein the one or more processors are further configured to: in response to the operation information including full-screen operation information for a second video, determine the second video corresponding to the full-screen operation information as the first display object; and determine display information outside the second video of the current display content as the second display object. (Lee, [0181-0198], [0187], “For example, if the indicator for selecting the first area is displayed in the image area of the mirrored image, the zoomed-in image 730 displayed in the area Ar2 of the image display apparatus 100 may be transmit a zoomed-in image transmission request for the image area of the mirrored image to the mobile terminal 600, and control to display a zoomed-in image received from the mobile terminal 600 on the display 180.”)
Consider Claim 17:
Lee discloses the electronic device according to claim 12, wherein the one or more processors are further configured to: in response to adjusting the first display object to a display format corresponding to the first display screen, control the first display content corresponding to the first display object with the adjusted display format to be displayed on the first display screen; and in response to adjusting the second display object to a display format corresponding to the second display screen, control the second display content corresponding to the second display object with the adjusted display format to be displayed on the second display screen. (Lee, [0096-0101], [0169], “Subsequently, in response to the mirroring input, the mobile terminal 600 may transmit, as a mirrored image, an image displayed on the display 680 of the mobile terminal 600 to the image display apparatus 100 (S610).”, [0170], “Therefore, the controller 170 of the image display apparatus 100 may receive the mirrored image through the interface 135 (S611), and may control to display the received mirrored image on the display 180 (S620).”)
Consider Claim 18:
Lee discloses the electronic device according to claim 12, wherein the one or more processors are further configured to: obtain display screen connection configuration information of the electronic device on which the current display content is displayed; determine the first display screen and the second display screen of the electronic device based on the display screen connection configuration information. (Lee, [0137-0144], [0104], “The data processor (not shown) of the controller 170 may process the data signal obtained by demultiplexing the input stream signal. For example, if the demultiplexed data signal is a coded data signal, the data processor may decode the coded data signal. The coded data signal may be an EPG which includes broadcasting information specifying the start time, end time, and the like of a scheduled broadcast program of each channel.”)
Consider Claim 22:
Lee discloses the display control device according to claim 10, wherein the display configuration information of the electronic device includes one or more of connection configuration information, split-screen control information, and screen display parameter configuration information. (Lee, [0085-0106], [0104], “The data processor (not shown) of the controller 170 may process the data signal obtained by demultiplexing the input stream signal. For example, if the demultiplexed data signal is a coded data signal, the data processor may decode the coded data signal. The coded data signal may be an EPG which includes broadcasting information specifying the start time, end time, and the like of a scheduled broadcast program of each channel.”)
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows:
1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art.
2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue.
3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art.
4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness.
This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention.
Claim(s) 5, 8, 16, and 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee et al. U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2018/0364881 A1 as applied to claims 1, 7, and 12, respectively, above, and further in view of Drake et al. U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0254045 A1 hereinafter Drake.
Consider Claim 5:
Lee discloses the method according to claim 1, wherein controlling the first display content corresponding to the first display object to be displayed on the first display screen includes: determining a quantity of target windows; and determining a quantity of first display screens corresponding to the quantity of the target windows to cause the first display content corresponding to each target window to be displayed on the first display screen corresponding to the target window.
Drake however teaches that it was a known technique to those of skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to provide wherein controlling the first display content corresponding to the first display object to be displayed on the first display screen includes: determining a quantity of target windows; and determining a quantity of first display screens corresponding to the quantity of the target windows to cause the first display content corresponding to each target window to be displayed on the first display screen corresponding to the target window. (Drake, [0009], [0067-0068], [0082], [0062], “Each display device 102, 104, 702, and 704 would display a portion based upon the relative screen size in the multi-display configuration. For example, the display devices 102 and 104 may each have a screen size that is one eighth of the overall screen size of the multi-display configuration whereas the display devices 702 and 704 may each have a screen size that is three eighths of the overall screen size of the multi-display configuration. Accordingly, the display devices 102 and 104 each display one eighth of the image whereas the display devices 702 and 704 each display three eighths of the image. In one aspect, the display screen dimensions of other display devices 102, 104, 702, and/or 704 are received as part of the configuration parameter so that a particular display device 102, 104, 702, and/or 704 may determine the respective portion of the image to be displayed based upon the dimensions of the overall multi-display configuration. In another aspect, the server 402 illustrated in FIG. 4 determines the size of the overall multi-display configuration and provides the portions to each of the display devices 102, 104, 702, and 704 for display or informs each of the display devices 102, 104, 702, and 704 which portions to display.”)
It therefore would have been obvious to those having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to divide portions of an original display screen to be displayed on differing screens as this was a known technique in view of Drake and would have been utilized for the art recognized purpose of devices that are often limited by the size constraints of their corresponding display screens can improve the limited viewing experience of video or image content. (Drake, [0006])
Consider Claim 8:
Lee discloses the method according to claim 7, however does not appear to further specify wherein: the electronic device includes a plurality of display screens; and determining the first display screen and the second display screen of the electronic device includes: obtaining a first display mode of the first display object and a second display mode of the second display object; and determining the first display screen and the second display screen from the plurality of display screens of the electronic device based on the first display mode and the second display mode, wherein a display configuration parameter of the first display screen matches the first display mode, and a display configuration parameter of the second display screen matches the second display mode.
Drake however teaches that it was a known technique to those of skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to provide wherein: the electronic device includes a plurality of display screens; and determining the first display screen and the second display screen of the electronic device includes: obtaining a first display mode of the first display object and a second display mode of the second display object; and determining the first display screen and the second display screen from the plurality of display screens of the electronic device based on the first display mode and the second display mode, wherein a display configuration parameter of the first display screen matches the first display mode, and a display configuration parameter of the second display screen matches the second display mode. (Drake, [0009], [0062], [0067-0068], [0082], [0072], “The display data illustrated in FIGS. 12 and 13 can include data other than the content data. For example, the display data may include display settings. The first display device 102 illustrated in FIG. 12 or the master device 1302 illustrated in FIG. 13 may adjust the display settings in addition to indicating which portions of the content should be displayed by which devices. For instance, the first display device 102 illustrated in FIG. 12 or the master device 1302 illustrated in FIG. 13 may adjust the contrast, brightness, and/or color of each display device so that the display devices 102, 104, 702, and 704 provide an optimal multi-device display in unison. As an example, the fourth display device 704 may have high resolution display capabilities, whereas the remaining display devices 102, 104, and 702 may only have low resolution display capabilities. The first display device 102 illustrated in FIG. 12 or the master device 1302 illustrated in FIG. 13 may adjust the contrast, brightness, and/or color of the fourth display device 704 to display the content in low resolution so that the multi-device display uniformly appears in low resolution rather than having different portions that are displayed according to different resolutions.”)
It therefore would have been obvious to those having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to divide portions of an original display screen to be displayed on differing screens as this was a known technique in view of Drake and would have been utilized for the art recognized purpose of devices that are often limited by the size constraints of their corresponding display screens can improve the limited viewing experience of video or image content. (Drake, [0006])
Consider Claim 16:
Lee discloses the electronic device according to claim 12 however does not appear to specify wherein the one or more processors are further configured to: determine a quantity of target windows; and determine a quantity of first display screens corresponding to the quantity of the target windows to cause the first display content corresponding to each target window to be displayed on the first display screen corresponding to the target window.
Drake however teaches that it was a known technique to those of skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to provide wherein the one or more processors are further configured to: determine a quantity of target windows; and determine a quantity of first display screens corresponding to the quantity of the target windows to cause the first display content corresponding to each target window to be displayed on the first display screen corresponding to the target window. (Drake, [0009], [0067-0068], [0082], [0062], “Each display device 102, 104, 702, and 704 would display a portion based upon the relative screen size in the multi-display configuration. For example, the display devices 102 and 104 may each have a screen size that is one eighth of the overall screen size of the multi-display configuration whereas the display devices 702 and 704 may each have a screen size that is three eighths of the overall screen size of the multi-display configuration. Accordingly, the display devices 102 and 104 each display one eighth of the image whereas the display devices 702 and 704 each display three eighths of the image. In one aspect, the display screen dimensions of other display devices 102, 104, 702, and/or 704 are received as part of the configuration parameter so that a particular display device 102, 104, 702, and/or 704 may determine the respective portion of the image to be displayed based upon the dimensions of the overall multi-display configuration. In another aspect, the server 402 illustrated in FIG. 4 determines the size of the overall multi-display configuration and provides the portions to each of the display devices 102, 104, 702, and 704 for display or informs each of the display devices 102, 104, 702, and 704 which portions to display.”)
It therefore would have been obvious to those having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to divide portions of an original display screen to be displayed on differing screens as this was a known technique in view of Drake and would have been utilized for the art recognized purpose of devices that are often limited by the size constraints of their corresponding display screens can improve the limited viewing experience of video or image content. (Drake, [0006])
Consider Claim 19:
Lee discloses the electronic device according to claim 12, however does not appear to further specify further comprising a plurality of display screens, wherein: the one or more processors are further configured to: obtain a first display mode of the first display object and a second display mode of the second display object; and determine the first display screen and the second display screen from the plurality of display screens of the electronic device based on the first display mode and the second display mode, wherein a display configuration parameter of the first display screen matches the first display mode, and a display configuration parameter of the second display screen matches the second display mode.
Drake however teaches that it was a known technique to those of skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to provide a plurality of display screens, wherein: the one or more processors are further configured to: obtain a first display mode of the first display object and a second display mode of the second display object; and determine the first display screen and the second display screen from the plurality of display screens of the electronic device based on the first display mode and the second display mode, wherein a display configuration parameter of the first display screen matches the first display mode, and a display configuration parameter of the second display screen matches the second display mode. (Drake, [0009], [0062], [0067-0068], [0082], [0072], “The display data illustrated in FIGS. 12 and 13 can include data other than the content data. For example, the display data may include display settings. The first display device 102 illustrated in FIG. 12 or the master device 1302 illustrated in FIG. 13 may adjust the display settings in addition to indicating which portions of the content should be displayed by which devices. For instance, the first display device 102 illustrated in FIG. 12 or the master device 1302 illustrated in FIG. 13 may adjust the contrast, brightness, and/or color of each display device so that the display devices 102, 104, 702, and 704 provide an optimal multi-device display in unison. As an example, the fourth display device 704 may have high resolution display capabilities, whereas the remaining display devices 102, 104, and 702 may only have low resolution display capabilities. The first display device 102 illustrated in FIG. 12 or the master device 1302 illustrated in FIG. 13 may adjust the contrast, brightness, and/or color of the fourth display device 704 to display the content in low resolution so that the multi-device display uniformly appears in low resolution rather than having different portions that are displayed according to different resolutions.”)
It therefore would have been obvious to those having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to divide portions of an original display screen to be displayed on differing screens as this was a known technique in view of Drake and would have been utilized for the art recognized purpose of devices that are often limited by the size constraints of their corresponding display screens can improve the limited viewing experience of video or image content. (Drake, [0006])
Conclusion
Prior art made of record and not relied upon which is still considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure is cited in a current or previous PTO-892. The prior art cited in a current or previous PTO-892 reads upon the applicants claims in part, in whole and/or gives a general reference to the knowledge and skill of persons having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention. Applicant, when responding to this Office action, should consider not only the cited references applied in the rejection but also any additional references made of record.
In the response to this office action, the Examiner respectfully requests support be shown for any new or amended claims. More precisely, indicate support for any newly added language or amendments by specifying page, line numbers, and/or figure(s). This will assist The Office in compact prosecution of this application. The Office has cited particular columns, paragraphs, and/or line numbers in the applied rejection of the claims above for the convenience of the applicant. Citations are representative of the teachings in the art and are applied to the specific limitations within each claim, however other passages and figures may apply. Applicant, in preparing a response, should fully consider the cited reference(s) in its entirety and not only the cited portions as other sections of the reference may expand on the teachings of the cited portion(s).
Applicant Representatives are reminded of CFR 1.4(d)(2)(ii) which states “A patent practitioner (§ 1.32(a)(1) ), signing pursuant to §§ 1.33(b)(1) or 1.33(b)(2), must supply his/her registration number either as part of the S-signature, or immediately below or adjacent to the S-signature. The number (#) character may be used only as part of the S-signature when appearing before a practitioner’s registration number; otherwise the number character may not be used in an S-signature.” When an unsigned or improperly signed amendment is received the amendment will be listed in the contents of the application file, but not entered. The examiner will notify applicant of the status of the application, advising him or her to furnish a duplicate amendment properly signed or to ratify the amendment already filed. In an application not under final rejection, applicant should be given a two month time period in which to ratify the previously filed amendment (37 CFR 1.135(c) ).
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL J JANSEN II whose telephone number is (571)272-5604. The examiner can normally be reached Normally Available Monday-Friday 9am-4pm EST.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Temesghen Ghebretinsae can be reached on 571-272-3017. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/Michael J Jansen II/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2626