Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/461,822

DOHERTY POWER AMPLIFIER SYSTEMS WITH ENVELOPE CONTROLLED STATE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 06, 2023
Examiner
CHOE, HENRY
Art Unit
2843
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Skyworks Solutions Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
65%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allow Rate
1238 granted / 1339 resolved
+24.5% vs TC avg
Minimal -27% lift
Without
With
+-27.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1368
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
37.4%
-2.6% vs TC avg
§102
47.1%
+7.1% vs TC avg
§112
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1339 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 6-13, 15, 16 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by [Hayes et al (Fig. 2); 10,148,228). Regarding claims 1 and 15, Hayes et al discloses an amplifier circuit comprising an input splitting circuit (236) configured to split a RF input signal (206) into a plurality of RF input signals (202) including a first RF input signal (upper input signal of 226) and a second RF input signal (upper input signal of 232) and a third RF input signal (upper input signal of 234), a plurality of amplifiers (226, 228, 232, 234) including a main amplifier (226) configured to amplify the first RF input signal (upper input signal of 226) to generate a first RF output signal (RF CARRIER AMP_1), a first auxiliary amplifier (232) configured to amplify the second RF input signal (upper input signal of 232) to generate a second RF output signal (RF PEAKING AMP_1), a second auxiliary amplifier (234) configured to amplify the third RF input signal (upper input signal of 234) to generate a third RF output signal (RF PEAKING AMP_2), and a bias circuit (220, 222) configured to receive an envelope signal (210) indicating an envelope of the RF input signals (202) and to control both a first biasing signal (260) of the first auxiliary amplifier (232) and a second biasing signal (262) of the second auxiliary amplifier (234) based on the envelope signal (210). Regarding claims 2 and 16, wherein the bias circuit (220, 222) controls the first biasing signal (260) and the second biasing signal (262) to set a state of the Doherty power amplifier system. Regarding claim 6, wherein the main amplifier (226) and the first auxiliary amplifier (232), and the second auxiliary amplifier (234) have a common amplifier topology. Regarding claim 7, wherein the main amplifier (226) and the first auxiliary amplifier (232), and the second auxiliary amplifier (234) have about equal size. Regarding claim 8, wherein the main amplifier (226) and the first auxiliary amplifier (232), and the second auxiliary amplifier (234) are powered by a common power supply voltage (VCC). Regarding claim 9, wherein the common power supply voltage (VCC) is fixed. Regarding claim 10, wherein the envelope signal (210) can be a differential analog signal. Regarding claim 11, wherein the envelope signal (210) is outputted from a discrete look-up table (discrete look up table in 208). Regarding claim 12, Hayes et al further comprising an output combining circuit (lower terminal of the element 244) configured to generate a RF output signal (RF OUT) based on combining the first RF output signal (RF CARRIER AMP_1) and the second RF output signal (RF PEAKING AMP_1), and the third RF output signal (RF PEAKING AMP_2). Regarding claim 13, wherein the first RF input signal (upper input signal of 226) is phase delayed by about 90 degrees (90o) relative to the second RF input signal (upper input signal of 232). Regarding claim 20, Hayes et al discloses an amplifier circuit comprising a transceiver (Fig. 2) configured to generate a RF input signal (202) and an envelope signal (210) indicating an envelope of the RF input signals (202), and a front end system (224, 230, 236, 208, 212, 214, 220, 222) including a Doherty power amplifier system (224, 230) configured to amplify the RF input signal (202) and the Doherty power amplifier system (224, 230, 236, 220, 222) including an input splitting circuit (236) configured to split the RF input signals (202) into first RF input signal (upper input signal of 226) and a second RF input signal (upper input signal of 232) and a third RF input signal (upper input signal of 234) and the Doherty power amplifier system (224, 230, 236, 220, 222) further includes a main amplifier (226) configured to amplify the first RF input signal (upper input signal of 226) to generate a first RF output signal (RF CARRIER AMP_1), a first auxiliary amplifier (232) configured to amplify the second RF input signal (upper input signal of 232) to generate a second RF output signal (RF PEAKING AMP_1), a second auxiliary amplifier (234) configured to amplify the third RF input signal (upper input signal of 234) to generate a third RF output signal (RF PEAKING AMP_2), and a bias circuit (220, 222) configured to control both a first biasing signal (260) of the first auxiliary amplifier (232) and a second biasing signal (262) of the second auxiliary amplifier (234) based on the envelope signal (210). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-5, 14 and 17-19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Henry Choe whose telephone number is (703)774-4614. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 6:00 AM- 6:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interview practice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Andrea J Lindgren Baltzell can be reached on (571)272-5918. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. /HENRY CHOE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2843 #2937
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 06, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603612
POWER SUPPLY CONTROL SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603625
STACKED DIGITAL CURRENT STEERING AUTOMATIC GAIN CONTROL ATTENUATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597890
OVER TEMPERATURE PROTECTION OF LDO CONTROLLING THE RF POWER AMPLIFIER COLLECTOR VOLTAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597893
SEMICONDUCTOR INTEGRATED CIRCUIT AND RADIO-FREQUENCY MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597888
ADAPTIVE STABILIZATION AND/OR PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION OF POWER AMPLIFIERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
65%
With Interview (-27.4%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1339 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month