Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/462,385

APPARATUS FOR TREATING SUBSTRATE AND METHOD FOR TREATING SUBSTRATE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 06, 2023
Priority
Sep 08, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0114192
Examiner
LEONG, NATHAN T
Art Unit
1718
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Psk Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
541 granted / 760 resolved
+6.2% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
774
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
83.2%
+43.2% vs TC avg
§102
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
§112
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 760 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of group II, claims 6-20 in the reply filed on 4/7/26 is acknowledged. Claim Objections Claims 6-20 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 6 contains several grammatically incorrect phrases (e.g., “plasma is generated at the treating space at the treating the substrate” or “whether a pulse distance matching a predetermined distance data according to a pulse valve of a driving unit which pulse-moves a moving body which moves the support unit in a top/down direction, matches a movement distance of the moving body is determined.”). These phrases are confusing as written. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 6-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 6 contains the limitation “whether the support unit moves normally”, but the word “normally” is subjective and unclear. What is considered normal? Claim 6 contains the limitations “plasma is generated at the treating space at the treating the substrate” and “whether a pulse distance matching a predetermined distance data according to a pulse valve of a driving unit which pulse-moves a moving body which moves the support unit in a top/down direction, matches a movement distance of the moving body is determined”. These phrases are confusing and unclear - is the plasma is generated at the treating space or at the treating the substrate? Furthermore, the claimed limitations regarding movement are confusing because it is unclear which parts are moving which other parts. Furthermore, the claim requires comparing “a pulse distance” and “predetermined distance data according to a pulse value of a driving unit” and matching this to a movement distance of the moving body. However, these limitations are unclear and it is confusing what is actually required in the claim as a “pulse distance” is not clearly defined. The dependent claims are likewise rejected as failing to cure the deficiencies of claim 6. Relevant Prior Art Lee et al US 2022/0051922 is considered particularly relevant to the claimed invention, but it is unclear if and how the prior art should be applied to the claim in view of the 112 rejection above. Lee teaches an apparatus and method for processing a substrate including plasma treatment (abstract, [0003]), wherein the apparatus is configured to generate an interlock when a certain gap is smaller than an upper limit [0021]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NATHAN T. LEONG whose telephone number is (571)270-5352. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10:00-6:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gordon Baldwin can be reached at 571-272-5166. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NATHAN T LEONG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1718
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 06, 2023
Application Filed
May 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12669289
METHOD FOR REPAIRING A TANK IN A GLASS MELTING FURNACE
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668534
HEAT-RESISTANT PRODUCT
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12655352
DEVICES COMPRISING A LIQUID CRYSTAL LAYER AND USES THEREOF
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12654198
SUBSTRATE-PROCESSING METHOD
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12649169
ANTIFOULING COATINGS AND METHODS FOR COATING SUBSTRATES
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+24.1%)
2y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 760 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month