Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/462,615

ELECTRONICALLY SLIP-CONTROLLABLE POWER BRAKE SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 07, 2023
Priority
Dec 06, 2022 — DE 10 2022 213 133.9
Examiner
MORRIS, DAVID R.
Art Unit
3616
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
435 granted / 531 resolved
+29.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
558
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
33.3%
-6.7% vs TC avg
§102
31.9%
-8.1% vs TC avg
§112
31.9%
-8.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 531 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 6/12/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Claim 5 recites, “The electronically slip-controllable power brake system as recited in claim 1, wherein the vehicle brake system is equipped with a second electronic controller for activating the electromechanically actuatable wheel brakes in a wheel-specific manner”. Claim 1 previously recited “a second electronic controller activates the electromechanically actuatable wheel brakes in a wheel-specific manner”. Accordingly, the entirety of claim 5 has already been recited in claim 1 such that claim 1 cannot be infringed upon without necessarily infringing on claim 5, and therefore claim 5 fails to further limit claim 1. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-11 would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims, and if rewritten to overcome any 112 rejections, as appropriate. Reasons for allowance are commensurate with the reasons provided on page 10 of the remarks filed on 6/12/2026, namely that the prior art does not disclose or render obvious reason to provide for a brake system including the combination of limitation recited in claim 1, particularly in combination with the fault functionality of the last paragraph of the claim, such as closing the first pressure medium connection and opening the second pressure medium connection when fault occurs in the first power supply unit. Further reasons for allowance, if applicable, will be the subject of a separate communication to the Applicant or patent owner, pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.104 and MPEP § 1302.14. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID MORRIS whose telephone number is (571)270-3595. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday; 8:30 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Siconolfi can be reached at (571) 272-7124. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID MORRIS/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 3616 /DAVID R MORRIS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3616
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 07, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 26, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 25, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 12, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 12, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 22, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747766
BRAKE CONTROL DEVICE AND MOTOR DRIVE DEVICE
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12736995
PEDAL SIMULATOR OF VEHICLE
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735010
BRAKE SYSTEMS WITH A PLURALITY OF SINGLE-CHAMBER MASTER CYLINDERS
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729733
ACTUATOR FOR VEHICLE BRAKE
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12728830
TRACTOR TRAILER WITH SELF-CONTAINED BRAKE RELEASE CAPABILITIES FOR AUTONOMOUS YARD SHIFTING
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+14.3%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 531 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month