Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/462,811

GROUND CONES FOR PROVIDING ELECTRICAL CONTACT IN GROUNDING OF AN ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 07, 2023
Examiner
BURGOS-GUNTIN, NELSON R
Art Unit
2831
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
ABB Schweiz AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 11m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allow Rate
536 granted / 581 resolved
+24.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
597
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
26.3%
-13.7% vs TC avg
§102
69.4%
+29.4% vs TC avg
§112
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 581 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 4. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chavan et al. (US Patent Application Publication 20130157491 A1). As per claim 1, Chavan teaches a ground cone 16, for providing electrical contact (see paragraph 67) to an interior (figure 22-23, see paragraph 88) of a conduit 18, comprising: a cone body 40 comprising one or more tabs 42 positioned on the cone body 40 and extending radially outward from the cone body 40, the one or more tabs 42 positioned separately from one another (see figure 21-23), at least one of the one or more tabs 42 having a helical edge (seen in figure 23), the helical edge (seen in figure 23) shaped to be received in a groove (along 18, shown in figure 21) of a thread (see paragraph 4), the cone body 40 comprising a cap end (along 254) and a bottom end 182 opposite the cap end (along 254); and a cap (along 24) extending longitudinally from the cone body 40 at the cap end (along 254) and extending toward the bottom end 182, wherein the cone body 40 and the cap (along 24) define a channel 70 sized to receive an end (along 18 end portion) of a conduit 18 therein. As per claim 2, Chavan teaches a ground cone 16, wherein the helical edge (seen in figure 23) further comprises a projection (along end portion of 42) protruding radially outward from a remaining of the helical edge (seen in figure 23). As per claim 3, Chavan teaches a ground cone 16, wherein the cone body 40 comprises a bulging portion 72 extending radially outward from a remaining of the cone body 40. As per claim 4, Chavan teaches a ground cone 16, wherein the cone body 40 comprises a leading portion (along 182) positioned at the bottom end 182 of the cone body 40 and positioned longitudinally further away from the cap (along 24) than the helical edge (seen in figure 23). As per claim 5, Chavan teaches a ground cone 16, wherein the cone body 40 comprises a plurality of tabs 42, the helical edges (seen in figure 23) of the plurality of tabs 42 shaped to be received in grooves (along 18, shown in figure 21) of threads (see paragraph 4). As per claim 6, Chavan teaches a ground cone 16, wherein the ground cone 16 is integrally formed into one single piece (see figure 15-18). As per claim 7, Chavan teaches a ground cone 16, wherein the cap (along 24) further comprises a flange 254 extending radially outward away from a remaining of the cap (along 24). As per claim 8, Chavan teaches a ground cone 16, for providing electrical contact (see paragraph 67) to an interior (figure 22-23, see paragraph 88) of a conduit 18, comprising: a cone body 40 comprising one or more tabs 42 positioned on the cone body 40 and extending radially outward from the cone body 40, the one or more tabs 42 positioned separately from one another (see figure 21-23), at least one of the one or more tabs 42 having an edge 242 comprising a projection (along end portion of 42) protruding radially outward from a remaining of the edge 242, the cone body 40 comprising a cap end (along 254) and a bottom end 182 opposite the cap end (along 254); and a cap (along 24) extending longitudinally from the cone body 40 at the cap end (along 254) and extending toward the bottom end 182, wherein the cone body 40 and the cap (along 24) define a channel 70 sized to receive an end (along 18 end portion) of a conduit 18 therein. As per claim 9, Chavan teaches a ground cone 16, wherein at least one of the edges 242 is a helical edge (seen in figure 23), the helical edge (seen in figure 23) shaped to be received in a groove (along 18, shown in figure 21) of a thread (see paragraph 4). As per claim 10, Chavan teaches a ground cone 16, wherein the cone body 40 comprises a plurality of tabs 42, the helical edges (seen in figure 23) of the plurality of tabs 42 shaped to be received in grooves (along 18, shown in figure 21) of threads (see paragraph 4). As per claim 11, Chavan teaches a ground cone 16, wherein the cone body 40 comprises a bulging portion 72 extending radially outward from a remaining of the cone body 40. As per claim 12, Chavan teaches a ground cone 16, wherein the cone body 40 comprises a leading portion (along 182) positioned at the bottom end 182 of the cone body 40 and positioned longitudinally further away from the cap (along 24) than the edge 242. As per claim 13, Chavan teaches a ground cone 16, wherein the ground cone 16 is integrally formed into one single piece (see figure 15-18). As per claim 14, Chavan teaches a ground cone 16, wherein the cap (along 24) further comprises a flange 254 extending radially outward away from a remaining of the cap (along 24). As per claim 15, Chavan teaches a method, of fabricating a conduit assembly (figure 21, see paragraph 88), comprising: providing a conduit 18; providing a ground cone 16, wherein the ground cone 16 includes: a cone body 40 including one or more tabs 42 positioned on the cone body 40 and extending radially outward from the cone body 40, the one or more tabs 42 positioned separately from one another (see figure 21-23), at least one of the one or more tabs 42 having an edge 242 comprising a projection (along end portion of 42) protruding radially outward from a remaining of the edge 242, the cone body 40 including a cap end (along 254) and a bottom end 182 opposite the cap end (along 254); and a cap (along 24) extending longitudinally from the cone body 40 at the cap end (along 254) and extending toward the bottom end 182, wherein the cone body 40 and the cap (along 24) define a channel 70 sized to receive an end (along 18 end portion) of the conduit 18 therein; and coupling (see paragraph 22-23) the ground cone 16 with the conduit 18. As per claim 16, Chavan teaches a method, wherein the coupling (see paragraph 22-23) further comprises: pushing the cone body 40 into the conduit 18 such that the projection (along end portion of 42) engages with the conduit 18. As per claim 17, Chavan teaches a method, wherein at least one of the edges 242 is a helical edge (seen in figure 23), the helical edge (seen in figure 23) shaped to be received in a groove (along 18, shown in figure 21) of a thread (see paragraph 4) of the conduit 18, and the coupling (see paragraph 22-23) further comprises rotatably coupling (see paragraph 22-23) the ground cone 16 with the conduit 18 by: engaging the helical edge (seen in figure 23) with the thread (see paragraph 4) of the conduit 18. As per claim 18, Chavan teaches a method, wherein the cone body 40 includes a plurality of tabs 42, the helical edges (seen in figure 23) of the plurality of tabs 42 shaped to be received in grooves (along 18, shown in figure 21) of threads (see paragraph 4) of the conduit 18, and the coupling (see paragraph 22-23) further comprises rotatably coupling (see paragraph 22-23) the ground cone 16 with the conduit 18 by: engaging the helical edges (seen in figure 23) with the threads (see paragraph 4) of the conduit 18. As per claim 19, Chavan teaches a method, wherein the cone body 40 includes a bulging portion 72 extending radially outward from a remaining of the cone body 40, and the coupling (see paragraph 22-23) further comprising: coupling (see paragraph 22-23) the ground cone 16 with the conduit 18 such that the bulging portion 72 presses against the conduit 18. As per claim 20, Chavan teaches a method, wherein the cone body 40 includes a leading portion (along 182) positioned at the bottom end 182 of the cone body 40 and positioned longitudinally further away from the cap (along 24) than the edge 242, and the coupling (see paragraph 22-23) further comprising: inserting the leading portion (along 182) into the conduit 18; and coupling (see paragraph 22-23) the one or more tabs 42 with the conduit 18. Conclusion 5. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NELSON R BURGOS-GUNTIN whose telephone number is (571)270-0574. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00am-5:00PM, Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abdullah A. Riyami can be reached on (571)270-3119. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Nelson R. Burgos-Guntin/Examiner, Art Unit 2831 /ABDULLAH A RIYAMI/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2831
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 07, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604406
MULTILAYER ELECTRONIC SUBSTRATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595646
System and Method for Enabling Waste Disposer to be Coupled to Alternative Electric Power Sources
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12580332
GROUND BUS FOR A CABLE CARD ASSEMBLY OF AN ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12573776
CONNECTOR, BOARD ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12567698
ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS CONFIGURED FOR POSITIONING ON, AT, IN, OR NEAR BODIES OF AUTOMATIC SWIMMING POOL CLEANERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+4.6%)
1y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 581 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month