DETAILED ACTION
It is hereby acknowledged that the following papers have been received and placed of record in the file: Amendment date 11/25/2025.
Claims 1-17 are presented for examination.
The rejections are respectfully maintained and reproduced infra for applicant's convenience.
Note: U.S.C. 112 rejections are withdrawn based on amendment filed on 11/25/2025.
Response to Arguments
Applicant's arguments filed 11/25/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive.
Applicant argues the following limitation(s):
Applicant argues, stated in the remark on pages 7-9, “Cho does not teach "obtaining a second signal by performing, by the first communication apparatus, frequency domain spectrum shaping (FDSS) processing on a first signal, to obtain a second signal, wherein the first signal is a signal obtained by performing polar encoding based on a modulation and coding scheme", as recited in independent claim 1 and similarly recited in independent claims 4 and 7”. On the contrary, Cho teaches obtaining a frequency domain spectrum shaped vector a, Lx1 size (corresponding to second signal) after the frequency domain spectrum shaping unit 130 processing on PAM data symbol Mx1 d size, and first signal Mx1 d is a signal obtain by constellation rotation unit 110 including pulse amplitude modulation. The pulse amplitude modulation is a signal that convert analog to digital 1’s and 0’s which is consider as polar code encoding. In addition, Per claim language does not specify “polar encoding based on modulation and coding scheme are used for error correction” or what is consider of polar encoding. In the broadest reason of interpretation, the limitation of “polar encoding” is a line coding technique used in digital communication where two voltage levels, one positive and one negative, represent binary data. Since Cho teaches the PAM include analog convert to digital to representing 1’s and 0’s, it is clearly teaches the polar encoding. Based on the reasons above, Applicant's arguments have been fully considered but they are not persuasive.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
(a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claim(s) 1-12 and 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Cho et al. (US 2023/0403185 A1).
Regarding claim 1, Cho teaches a communication method, applied to a first communication apparatus, wherein an operating frequency band of the first communication apparatus is between 30 gigahertz GHz and 300 GHz (frequency range see Cho: ¶[0020]), the method comprising:
obtaining a second signal by performing, by the first communication apparatus, frequency domain spectrum shaping (FDSS) processing on a first signal (obtaining a frequency domain spectrum shaped vector a, Lx1 size (corresponding to second signal) after the frequency domain spectrum shaping unit 130 processing on PAM data symbol Mx1 d size see Cho: Fig.1 elements 110-130; ¶[0043-0048]), wherein the first signal is a signal obtained by performing polar encoding based on a modulation and coding scheme (first signal Mx1 d is a signal obtain by constellation rotation unit 110 including pulse amplitude modulation “the constellation rotation unit 110 may constellation-rotate a symbol vector b including M pulse amplitude modulation (PAM) symbols by a constellation rotation angle ϕ to generate a constellation-rotated symbol vector” see Cho: Fig.1 element 110; ¶[0043-0044]); and
sending, by the first communication apparatus, a target signal, wherein the target signal is a signal obtained based on the second signal (sending (N+Nc)x1 signal (corresponding to target signal), where (N+Nc)x1 signal based on Lx1 size signal “The signal generation unit 150 may include an N-point inverse DFT (IDFT) unit 151 and a cyclic prefix (CP) insertion unit 153” see Cho: Fig.1 elements 150-153).
Regarding claim 2, Cho taught the method according to claim 1 as described hereinabove. Cho further teaches wherein the obtaining the second signal by the performing, by the first communication apparatus, the FDSS processing on the first signal comprises: performing, by the first communication apparatus, discrete Fourier transform (DFT) processing on the first signal, to obtain a third signal; and performing, by the first communication apparatus, filtering processing on the third signal, to obtain the second signal (Pruned DFT 120 generate Lx1 c signal based on Mx1 signal and pruned signal on Lx1 c to generate Lx1 a signal see Cho: Fig.1 elements 110-130; ¶[0046]).
Regarding claim 3, Cho taught the method according to claim 2 as described hereinabove. Cho further teaches wherein the performing, by the first communication apparatus, the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) processing on the first signal, to obtain the third signal comprises performing processing based on a first DFT point quantity, and the target signal is a signal obtained by performing inverse discrete Fourier transform (IDFT) processing on the second signal based on a second DFT point quantity (The pruned DFT-spread unit 120 may spread the constellation-rotated symbol vector d by using a pruned DFT matrix WL,M to generate a pruned DFT-spread vector c and N-point IDFT 151 see Cho: ¶[0046]; Fig.1 element 120; ¶[0051]).
Regarding claim 4, Cho teaches a communication apparatus, wherein an operating frequency band of the communication apparatus is between 30 GHz and 300 GHz (frequency range see Cho: ¶[0020]), and the apparatus comprises:
a processor, configured to perform frequency domain spectrum shaping (FDSS) processing on a first signal, to obtain a second signal (corresponding to second signal) after the frequency domain spectrum shaping unit 130 processing on PAM data symbol Mx1 d size see Cho: Fig.1 elements 110-130; ¶[0043-0048]), wherein the first signal is a signal obtained by performing polar encoding based on a modulation and coding scheme (first signal Mx1 d is a signal obtain by constellation rotation unit 110 including pulse amplitude modulation “the constellation rotation unit 110 may constellation-rotate a symbol vector b including M pulse amplitude modulation (PAM) symbols by a constellation rotation angle ϕ to generate a constellation-rotated symbol vector” see Cho: Fig.1 element 110; ¶[0043-0044]); and
a transceiver, configured to send a target signal, wherein the target signal is a signal obtained based on the second signal (sending (N+Nc)x1 signal (corresponding to target signal), where (N+Nc)x1 signal based on Lx1 size signal “The signal generation unit 150 may include an N-point inverse DFT (IDFT) unit 151 and a cyclic prefix (CP) insertion unit 153” see Cho: Fig.1 elements 150-153).
Regarding claim 5, claim 5 is rejected for the same reason as claim 2 as described hereinabove.
Regarding claim 6, claim 6 is rejected for the same reason as claim 3 as described hereinabove.
Regarding claim 7, Cho teaches a communication method, applied to a second communication apparatus, wherein an operating frequency band of the second communication apparatus is between 30 GHz and 300 GHz (frequency range see Cho: ¶[0020]), and the method comprises:
obtaining, by the second communication apparatus, a target signal, wherein the target signal is used to determine a first signal (DFT-spread OFDM receiver 600 receiving (N+Nc)x1 signal at 610 and the (N+Nc)x1 signal is used to determine Mx1 signal see Cho: Fig.6 elements 610-660; ¶[0060-0067]); and
performing, by the second communication apparatus, frequency domain spectrum shaping (FDSS) inverse processing on the first signal, to obtain a second signal (The frequency domain reception spectrum shaping unit 630 may the vector ã resulting from cutout of the part corresponding to the subcarrier in the allocated frequency range by a conjugate complex vector of the reception shaping vector s.sub.R to generate a frequency domain reception spectrum shaped vector to obtain Nx1 signal see Cho: Fig.6 element 630; ¶[0064]), wherein the second signal is used to perform polar decoding based on a modulation and coding scheme (The inverse constellation rotation unit 650 may inversely constellation-rotate the despread vector by an inverse constellation rotation angle −ϕ to generate the inversely constellation-rotated vector see Cho: Fig.6 element 650; ¶[0066]).
Regarding claim 8, Cho taught the method according to claim 7 as described hereinabove. Cho further teaches wherein the performing, by the second communication apparatus, the FDSS inverse processing on the first signal, to obtain the
Regarding claim 9, Cho taught the method according to claim 7 as described hereinabove. Cho further teaches wherein the performing, by the second communication apparatus, the FDSS inverse processing on the first signal, to obtain the
Regarding claim 10, claim 10 is rejected for the same reason as method of claim 3 as described hereinabove.
Regarding claim 11, Cho taught the method according to claim 3 as described hereinabove. Cho further teaches wherein a numerical ratio of the first DFT point quantity to the second DFT point quantity is 2 to 3 (ratio M to L and where 1≤i≤L, and 1≤j≤M. see Cho: ¶[0046-0047]; Fig.3).
Regarding claim 12, Cho taught the method according to claim 3 as described hereinabove. Cho further teaches wherein a numerical ratio of the first DFT point quantity to the second DFT point quantity is 4 to 5 (ratio M to L and where 1≤i≤L, and 1≤j≤M. see Cho: ¶[0046-0047]; Fig.3).
Regarding claim 15, Cho taught the method according to claim 1 as described hereinabove. Cho further teaches wherein a modulation manner of the modulation and coding scheme comprises at least 8-order quadrature amplitude modulation ( constellation rotation unit constellation-rotating a symbol vector b including M pulse amplitude modulation (PAM) symbols by a constellation rotation angle ϕ where M can be more than 8 see Cho: ¶[0008-0009]).
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) are summarized as follows:
1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art.
2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue.
3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art.
4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness.
Claims 13-14 and 16-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cho et al. (US 2023/0403185 A1) in view of Grant et al. (WO 2008/046163 A1).
Regarding claim 13, Cho taught the method according to claim 1 as described hereinabove. Cho does not explicitly teaches wherein a sampling rate of a baseband signal of the apparatus is a positive integer multiple of 30.72 megahertz MHz.
However, Grant teaches the wherein a sampling rate of a baseband signal of the apparatus is a positive integer multiple of 30.72 megahertz MHz (oversamping factor L see Grant: Page 11 lines 20-24) in order to reduce Peak to average power ratio in OFDM signals (see Grant: Page 1 lines 4-5).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to create the invention of Cho to include (or to use, etc.) the wherein a sampling rate of a baseband signal of the apparatus is a positive integer multiple of 30.72 megahertz MHz as taught by Grant in order to reduce Peak to average power ratio in OFDM signals (see Grant: Page 1 lines 4-5).
Regarding claim 14, Cho taught the method according to claim 1 as described hereinabove. Cho does not explicitly teaches wherein a code rate of the modulation and coding scheme comprises at least 15/16.
However, Grant teaches the wherein a code rate of the modulation and coding scheme comprises at least 15/16 (All of the above embodiments include the use of an encoding method. It is to be understood that this includes the use of codes with code rates of 1 and high code rates see Page 27 lines 8-9; Page 59 Section 1.4.1) in order to reduce Peak to average power ratio in OFDM signals (see Grant: Page 1 lines 4-5).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to create the invention of Cho to include (or to use, etc.) the wherein a code rate of the modulation and coding scheme comprises at least 15/16 as taught by Grant in order to reduce Peak to average power ratio in OFDM signals (see Grant: Page 1 lines 4-5).
Regarding claim 16, Cho taught the method according to claim 1 as described hereinabove. Cho does not explicitly teaches wherein a subcarrier spacing of the target signal is a positive integer multiple of 1.6 MHz or a positive integer multiple of 1.92 MHz.
However, Grant teaches the wherein a subcarrier spacing of the target signal is a positive integer multiple of 1.6 MHz or a positive integer multiple of 1.92 MHz (The N subcarriers possess the frequencies /.sub.m, given by: /.sub.m = mΔ/, m = 0, l, . . . , iV - l (1.1) where Δ/ = fβ/N and /β denotes entire bandwidth. The subcarriers are made orthogonal to each other by carefully selecting the frequency spacing. In practical OFDM systems, the subcarrier spacing is usually kept small compared to the coherence bandwidth of the channel see Grant: Section 1.2.1) in order to reduce Peak to average power ratio in OFDM signals (see Grant: Page 1 lines 4-5).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to create the invention of Cho to include (or to use, etc.) the wherein a subcarrier spacing of the target signal is a positive integer multiple of 1.6 MHz or a positive integer multiple of 1.92 MHz as taught by Grant in order to reduce Peak to average power ratio in OFDM signals (see Grant: Page 1 lines 4-5).
Regarding claim 17, Cho taught the method according to claim 1 as described hereinabove. Cho does not explicitly teaches wherein the target signal further comprises a cyclic prefix CP, and a time length of the CP comprises at least one of the following: 26.04 nanoseconds ns, 104.16 ns, 52.08 ns, and 208.32 ns.
However, Grant teaches the wherein the target signal further comprises a cyclic prefix CP, and a time length of the CP comprises at least one of the following: 26.04 nanoseconds ns, 104.16 ns, 52.08 ns, and 208.32 ns (adding cyclic prefix to the time domain signal and time length just design preference see Page 38 lines 8-12) in order to reduce Peak to average power ratio in OFDM signals (see Grant: Page 1 lines 4-5).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to create the invention of Cho to include (or to use, etc.) the wherein the target signal further comprises a cyclic prefix CP, and a time length of the CP comprises at least one of the following: 26.04 nanoseconds ns, 104.16 ns, 52.08 ns, and 208.32 ns as taught by Grant in order to reduce Peak to average power ratio in OFDM signals (see Grant: Page 1 lines 4-5).
Conclusion
Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GUANG W LI whose telephone number is (571)270-1897. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 7AM-5PMET.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Avellino can be reached at (571) 272-3905. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
GUANG W. LI
Primary Examiner
Art Unit 2478
March 6, 2026
/GUANG W LI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2478