Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 18/464,812

POSITION DETECTION DEVICE AND VEHICLE STEERING DEVICE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Sep 11, 2023
Priority
Sep 20, 2022 — JP 2022-149548 +1 more
Examiner
RODAK, LEE E
Art Unit
2858
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Proterial Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
268 granted / 372 resolved
+4.0% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+34.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
53 currently pending
Career history
372
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
53.5%
+13.5% vs TC avg
§102
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
§112
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 372 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Response to Amendment The amendments filed on 06/09/2026 have been fully considered and are made of record. Claims 1-3 and 6-7 have been amended. Claim 9 has been newly added. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 06/09/2026 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection has been applied to amended limitations. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Goto et al. (Patent NO. US 6,034,624; hereinafter Goto) in view of IRLE et al. (Pub NO. US 2023/0356776 A1; hereinafter Irle). Regarding Claim 1, Goto teaches a position detecting device configured to detect a position of a moving member, (position detecting device in Fig. 1-Fig. 15) comprising: a round bar (round bar 10 in Fig. 11; See col. 15, Lines 1-50) that forms a conductive portion (conductive portion 22 in Fig. 11) and a recessed portion (recessed portion 21b in Fig. 11; See col. 15, Lines 1-50) formed by notching the round bar (21b is notched in fig. 11; See col. 15, Lines 1-50), the conductive portion and non-conductive portion being provided side by side in an axial direction of the round bar (21b and 22 are formed in axial direction of 10 in Fig. 11; See col. 15, Lines 1-50), the round bar being configured to move in an axial direction (10 is moving in axial direction in Fig. 11), an exciting coil and a detection coil that are arranged extending in the moving direction of the round bar (11, 12, 13, 14 in Fig. 11 have exciting coil and detecting coil in Fig. 15), wherein a voltage is induced in the detection coil by a current flowing in the conductive portion due to a magnetic field generated by the exciting coil (voltage induced in detecting coil is secondary winding by current in exciting coil is primary winding in Fig. 15 and Fig. below; See Col. 8, Lines 30-60), and wherein a magnitude of the voltage induced in the detection coil varies with a position in the moving direction of the round bar relative to the detection coil (See Col. 9, Lines 1-30; Col. 12, Lines 10-30). PNG media_image1.png 858 842 media_image1.png Greyscale Goto is silent about recessed portion forms a non-conductive portion having greater electrical resistance than the conductive portion. Irle teaches regarding detecting position (See abstract) recessed portion forms a non-conductive portion having greater electrical resistance than the conductive portion (non-conductive recessed portions 5.1, 5.2, 5.3 have greater resistance than conductive portions 6.1, 6.2 in Fig. 4; See [0057]-[0058]). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention was made to modify the system of Goto by using recessed portion forms a non-conductive portion having greater electrical resistance than the conductive portion, as taught by Irle in order for a precise measurement of a position (Irle; [0009]). Regarding Claim 2, Goto in view of Irle teaches the position detection device, according to claim 1. Goto further teaches wherein the detection coil comprises a plurality of detection coils, and wherein a phase of the voltage induced in each of the plurality of detection coils during movement of the round bar is different from each other (See plurality of detection coils has phase induced due to movement in Fig. 15; See Col. 21 through Col. 22). Regarding Claim 3, Goto in view of Irle teaches the position detection device, according to claim 2. Goto further teaches wherein a magnitude of the voltage induced in each of the plurality of detection coils varies within a range of one cycle or less while the round bar moving moves from one moving end to an other moving end in an axial direction (See Col. 21 through Col. 22). Regarding Claim 4, Goto in view of Irle teaches the position detection device, according to claim 2. Goto further teaches wherein each of the plurality of detection coils comprises a combination of two sinusoidal-shaped conductor wires, whose shape as viewed from a direction perpendicular to the moving direction is symmetrical across a symmetry axis line parallel to the moving direction (See Col. 21 through Col. 22). Regarding Claim 5, Goto in view of Irle teaches the position detection device, according to claim 1. Goto further teaches the exciting coil and the plurality of detection coils are formed on a single substrate (all coils are on same substrate 20 in Fig. 11), and the exciting coil is formed on the substrate to surround the plurality of detection coils (See exciting coils surrounds detecting coils in Fig. 15). Regarding Claim 6, Goto in view of Irle teaches the position detection device, according to claim 5. Goto further teaches wherein the conductive portion of the bar has a circular cross-sectional shape (see conductive portion 22 in Fig. 11), the recessed portion of the bar formed is a recessed portion formed in a portion in a circumferential direction of an outer circumference surface of the bar and the substrate faces the recessed portion (See recessed potion 21b is in outer circumferential direction of 10 and substrate 20 faces recessed portion 21b in Fig. 11). he non-conductive portion. Regarding Claim 7, Goto teaches vehicle steering device (See Col. 31, Lines 25-35), comprising: a round bar (round bar 10 in Fig. 11; See col. 15, Lines 1-50) comprising a conductive metal (conductive portion 22 in Fig. 11) that moves axially forward and backward along a vehicle width direction (21b and 22 are formed in axial direction of 10 in Fig. 11; See col. 15, Lines 1-50), the round bar including a conductive portion (conductive portion 22 in Fig. 11) and a recessed portion (recessed portion 21b in Fig. 11; See col. 15, Lines 1-50) formed by notching the round bar (21b is notched in fig. 11; See col. 15, Lines 1-50), the conductive portion and recessed portion being provided side by side (22 and 21b are formed side by side in Fig. 11); a housing comprising a conductive metal that houses the bar (See the housing 79 have conductive metal 75 that houses bar 10 in Fig. 30); and a position detecting device that detects a position of the bar relative to the housing (See Col. 21 through Col. 23), wherein the bar is provided with a recessed portion formed by notching in a radial direction (bar 10 is provided in radial direction of recess portion 21b in Fig. 11), wherein the position detection device comprises an exciting coil and a detection coil that are arranged extending in the vehicle width direction on the bar (11, 12, 13, 14 in Fig. 11 have exciting coil and detecting coil in Fig. 15), wherein a voltage is induced in the detection coil by a current flowing in the shaft due to a magnetic field generated by the exciting coil (voltage induced in detecting coil is secondary winding by current in exciting coil is primary winding in Fig. 15 and Fig. below; See Col. 8, Lines 30-60), and wherein a magnitude of the voltage induced in the detection coil varies in accordance with a position of the bar relative to the housing (See Col. 9, Lines 1-30; Col. 12, Lines 10-30). PNG media_image1.png 858 842 media_image1.png Greyscale Goto is silent about recessed portion forms a non-conductive portion having greater electrical resistance than the conductive portion; wherein a wheel is steered by axial movement of the bar. Irle teaches regarding detecting position (See abstract) recessed portion forms a non-conductive portion having greater electrical resistance than the conductive portion (non-conductive recessed portions 5.1, 5.2, 5.3 have greater resistance than conductive portions 6.1, 6.2 in Fig. 4; See [0057]-[0058]); wherein a wheel is steered by axial movement of the bar (See [0070]-[0073]). Therefore t would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention was made to modify the system of Goto by using recessed portion forms a non-conductive portion having greater electrical resistance than the conductive portion; wherein a wheel is steered by axial movement of the bar, as taught by Irle in order for a precise measurement of a position (Irle; [0009]). Regarding Claim 8, Goto in view of Irle teaches the vehicle steering device, according to claim 7. Goto further teaches the exciting coil and a plurality of detection coils are formed on a single substrate (all coils are on same substrate 20 in Fig. 11). Goto is silent about wherein the housing comprises an opening extending in the vehicle width direction, and the vehicle steering device further comprises a lid member comprising a non-conductive material which closes the opening of the housing, and the substrate is attached to the lid member. Irle further teaches wherein the housing comprises an opening extending in the vehicle width direction (See [0072]-[0075]), and the vehicle steering device further comprises a lid member comprising a non-conductive material which closes the opening of the housing (lid member 12 is non-conductive and closes the opening of housing 14; See [0072]-[0074]), and the substrate is attached to the lid member (substrate 5 is attached to lid member 12; See [0070]-[0075]). Therefore t would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention was made to modify the system of Goto by using the housing comprises an opening extending in the vehicle width direction, and the vehicle steering device further comprises a lid member comprising a non-conductive material which closes the opening of the housing, and the substrate is attached to the lid member, as taught by Irle in order for a precise measurement of a position (Irle; [0009]). Regarding Claim 9, Goto in view of Irle teaches the position detection device, according to claim 1. Irle further teaches wherein the recessed portion is filled with non-conductive (See [0057]). Irle is silent about non-conductive is resin. However Goto teaches non-conductive is resin (See Col. 12, Lines 30-40). Therefore t would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention was made to modify the system of Irle by using resin as non-conductive, as taught by Goto in order for surface protection (Goto; Col. 12, Lines 30-40). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZANNATUL FERDOUS whose telephone number is (571)270-0399. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday 8ma to 5pm (PST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rodak Lee can be reached at 571-270-5628. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZANNATUL FERDOUS/Examiner, Art Unit 2858 /LEE E RODAK/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2858
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 11, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 22, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 22, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 09, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12415429
INDUCTIVE POWER TRANSFER SYSTEM AND METHOD
11y 3m to grant Granted Sep 16, 2025
Patent 12020829
CLAD WIRE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING CLAD WIRES
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 25, 2024
Patent 11994566
MAGNETIC SENSOR AND ITS MANUFACTURING METHOD
1y 5m to grant Granted May 28, 2024
Patent 11965912
PROBE CARD DEVICE HAVING A PROBE STRUCTURE WITH A PROTRUSION PORTION
2y 8m to grant Granted Apr 23, 2024
Patent 11953521
PROBE CARD
1y 8m to grant Granted Apr 09, 2024
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+34.3%)
2y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 372 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month