Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/465,408

PLANAR TRANSFORMER

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 12, 2023
Priority
Jul 04, 2023 — TW 112124922
Examiner
HOSSAIN, KAZI S
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Chicony Power Technology Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
511 granted / 639 resolved
+20.0% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
666
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
67.0%
+27.0% vs TC avg
§102
23.2%
-16.8% vs TC avg
§112
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 639 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Elections/Restrictions Applicant’s election of Species V (Claims 1-4, 9 and 14-15) in the reply filed on 08/19/2026 is acknowledged with Traverse. The traversal is on the ground(s) that "it should be no undue burden on the Examiner to consider all claims in the single application.” This is not found persuasive because there is a search and/or examination burden for the patentably distinct species for the following reasons: The species 1-12 are differing in structure. For an example the species 1-12 are differing in elements arrangement. For an example the arrangement of the elements of figure 5 [see element 30] is different from what is shown in figure 6, and different from of figure 7. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 9 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Choi (TW 202121457 A). Regarding Claim 1: Choi teaches that a planar transformer, comprising: a first magnetic core (112, Fig. 5; pages 5-15) and a second magnetic core (111), wherein the first magnetic core comprises a base (i.e. lower part of 112 in Fig. 5), a first magnetic column (not labeled; i.e. left side column in Fig. 5), a second magnetic column (not labeled; i.e. center column in Fig. 5),, and a third magnetic column (not labeled; i.e. right side column in Fig. 5), and the first magnetic column, the second magnetic column, and the third magnetic column form on a top surface of the base, and a circuit board (130, Fig. 2A), comprising a first side (left front part of 130 in Fig. 2A), a second side (right back part of 130 in Fig. 2A), and a through hole (not label; see Fig. 2A), wherein the through hole is sleeved (construed from Fig. 1) on the second magnetic column, and the first side and the second side are protruding from the first magnetic core, wherein the first magnetic core is connected with the second magnetic core, and the circuit board is disposed between the first magnetic core and the second magnetic core, wherein at least one separation component (121, 123, 131, 133; Fig. 2A) is disposed between the first magnetic core and the second magnetic core, or the first magnetic core and/or the second magnetic core have a plurality of separation components (121, 123, 131, 133).. Regarding Claim 2: As applied to claim 1, Choi teaches that wherein each separation component is made of electrical insulation material (see pages 1-2). Regarding Claim 3: As applied to claim 1, Choi teaches that a distance between the first magnetic column and the second magnetic column is equal to a distance between the second magnetic column and the third magnetic column (construed from word “symmetrical” in page 10; see Fig. 5). Regarding Claim 9: As applied to claim 1, Choi teaches that the number of the at least one separation component is plural (i.e. 121, 123, 131, 133), and the separation components are respectively symmetrically disposed between the first magnetic column and the second magnetic core, between the second magnetic column (see Fig. 2B) and the second magnetic core, and between the third magnetic column and the second magnetic core (construed from Fig. 2B). Regarding Claim 15: As applied to claim 1, Choi teaches that a thickness of each separation component is 0.07-0.08 mm (see page 1). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 4 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Choi in view of Kiyonaga (US 20240177914 A1). Regarding Claim 4: As applied to claim 1, Choi teaches that an outer edge (not labeled; see Fig. 5) of the first magnetic column, a first edge of the first side, and a first edge (see Fig. 2B) of the second side are substantially along a straight line, wherein an outer edge of the third magnetic column (not labeled; see Fig. 5), a second edge (see Fig. 2B) of the first side, and a second edge of the second side are substantially along a straight line except a first notch and a second notch, wherein the first magnetic column and the third magnetic column are respectively embedded in the first notch and the second notch. However, Kiyonaga teaches that a first notch (left side 32 in Fig. 2; para 0061-0066) and a second notch (right side 32 in Fig. 2), wherein the first magnetic column (23a) and the third magnetic column (23b) are respectively embedded in the first notch and the second notch (see Fig. 3). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to have a first notch and a second notch, wherein the first magnetic column and the third magnetic column are respectively embedded in the first notch and the second notch to provide a coil device capable of improving heat dissipation, and another object of the present disclosure is to provide a power conversion device to which such a coil device is applied (para 0010). Regarding Claim 14: As applied to claim 1, Choi teaches that the first magnetic core is an E-shaped magnetic core, except the second magnetic core is an I-shaped magnetic core. However, Kiyonaga teaches the second magnetic core (25, Fig. 2; para 0061) is an I-shaped magnetic core It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to have the second magnetic core is an I-shaped magnetic core to provide a coil device capable of improving heat dissipation, and another object of the present disclosure is to provide a power conversion device to which such a coil device is applied (para 0010). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. A list of pertinent prior art is attached in form 892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Kazi Hossain whose telephone number is 571-272-8182. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Thursday from Monday to Thursday 8:00 AM to 4:30 PM (EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at https:/www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Shawki Ismail can be reached on 571-272-3985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https:/www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent- center for more information about Patent Center and https:/www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KAZI HOSSAIN/ Examiner, Art Unit 2837 /SHAWKI S ISMAIL/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 12, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749634
ON-LOAD TAP CHANGER AND TAP-CHANGING TRANSFORMER HAVING AN ON-LOAD TAP CHANGER
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744155
COMPENSATION STRUCTURE FOR REDUCING CIRCULATING CURRENT IN WINDOW OF TRANSFORMER AND TRANSFORMER COMPRISING COMPENSATION STRUCTURE
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744154
COIL DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING COIL DEVICE
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738408
TRANSFORMER
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738407
Power Inductor, Preparation Method of Power Inductor, and System in Package Module
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+16.0%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 639 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month