Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/465,796

ENDOSCOPE WITH LOW-PROFILE DISTAL SECTION

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Sep 12, 2023
Priority
Jan 07, 2020 — provisional 62/958,041 +4 more
Examiner
GHIMIRE, SHANKAR RAJ
Art Unit
3795
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Gyrus Acmi Inc. D/B/A Olympus Surgical Techologies America
OA Round
2 (Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
217 granted / 284 resolved
+6.4% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
328
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
80.6%
+40.6% vs TC avg
§102
9.4%
-30.6% vs TC avg
§112
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 284 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The amendment filed on 2/27/2026 has been entered. Claims 15-20, 39-44 are pending. Claims 1-14, 21-37, are cancelled. Applicant’s amendment to the claims have overcome 112 rejections and objections previously set forth in the Non-Final Office Action notified on 10/27/2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 15-17, 19, 39, 41-42, 44 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 as being anticipated by Mitani (US 20070118019). Regarding claim 15, Mitani discloses an endoscope (electronic endoscope system 1) comprising: an elongate tubular body (long flexible tube portion 13); a lumen extending through the elongate tubular body (Portion 13 has a tube; para [0065]); an elevator portion (Portion where the elevator 32 is disposed; FIG. 1 annotated below) at a distal section of the elongate tubular body and comprising: an elevator housing (FIG. 2, annotated) disposed at a distal end of the elongate tubular body, the elevator housing including a radially facing window (FIG. 2, annotated); an elevator (elevator 32; FIGS. 1, 3C; para [0005]) pivotably mounted within the elevator housing (Different tilt angles; FIGS. 28, 29; Para [0073]- [0074]) and configured to position and orient one or more endotherapy tools extending from the lumen (Treatment tool direction is changed by the elevator; Endotherapy tools are not claimed positively) through the window; a functional module (CCD 24 with camera module; FIG. 2 annotated; Para [0015]) comprising one or more of an illumination unit or an imaging unit (CCD 24), the functional module comprising a functional module housing being detachable from the elevator housing of the elevator portion (The CCD may be disassembled without damaging the frame. FIG. 14B shows the separation of the fixing member 128 and the CCD holding frame 134; Para [0118], [0121]) to separate the one or more of the illumination unit or the imaging unit from the elevator housing and elongate tubular body (Disassembling of the CCD holding frame from the fixing member 128; para [0121]); and a connection coupling (Note the connection coupling in FIG. 2, annotated, inside the elevator portion.) between the functional module housing and the elevator housing of the elevator portion for communicatively connecting one or more of the illumination unit or the imaging unit to the elevator portion. Regarding claim 16, Mitani discloses wherein the functional module is positioned longitudinally spaced apart (camera module is longitudinally spaced with the elevator) from the elevator portion in an in-line configuration (A line passing through the elevator and through the camera module can be considered as a refence line for providing an in-line configuration.) such that the functional module is positioned distal of the elevator housing (CCD is distal of the elevator housing; FIG. 2). PNG media_image1.png 721 1559 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 17, Mitani discloses wherein the functional module comprises: an imaging unit passageway (Optical pathway through the objective lenses provide the imaging unit passageway); an objective lens (FIG. 2 an annotated) coupled to a distal end of the imaging unit passageway; an illumination unit passageway (Optical pathway through the illumination lenses provide the illumination unit passageway); and an illumination lens (FIG. 2 coupled) coupled to a distal end of the illumination unit passageway. Regarding claim 19, Mitani discloses wherein the functional module comprises: an illumination lens (FIG. 2 as annotated); an objective lens (FIG. 2 as annotated); a first coupler (light guide 20 and a coupling between the light guide and illumination lens 21) configured to connect the illumination lens and the light conductor; and a second coupler (a coupling between the objective lens and signal cable 29; FIG. 2 annotated) configured to connect the objective lens and a cable. Regarding claim 39, Mitani discloses first coupler (light guide 20 and a coupling between the light guide and illumination lens 21) configured to connect an illumination lens of the functional module and a light conductor extending within the elongate tubular body and the elevator housing; and a second coupler (a coupling between the objective lens and signal cable 29; FIG. 2 annotated) configured to connect an objective lens of the functional module and a cable extending within the elongate tubular body and the elevator housing. Regarding claim 41, Mitani discloses wherein the functional module housing is positioned adjacent the elevator housing at a joint line (FIG. 2, annotated; Joint line is not defined). Regarding claim 42, Mitani discloses a cable (cable 29; FIG. 2) extending from the elongate tubular body and into the elevator housing; a photosensitive element (CCD 24 of the camera module) positioned within the elevator housing and connected to the cable; and an objective lens (FIG. 2)) positioned in the functional module housing aligned with the photosensitive element across the joint line (CCD has a photo sensitive material along the surface.). Regarding claim 44, Mitani discloses first an endoscope (electronic endoscope system 1) comprising: an elongate tubular body (long flexible tube portion 13); a lumen extending through the elongate tubular body (Portion 13 has a tube; para [0065]); an elevator portion (Portion where the elevator 32 is disposed; FIG. 1 annotated below) at a distal section of the elongate tubular body comprising an elevator configured to position and orient one or more endotherapy tools extending from the lumen; a functional module (CCD 24 with camera module; FIG. 2 annotated; Para [0015]) comprising a first lens (FIG. 2) for an illumination unit and a second lens for an imaging unit (lenses 21, 22); a cable (signal cable 29) extending from the elongate tubular body into the functional module; and a connection coupling (FIG. 2, annotated) between the functional module and the elevator portion for communicatively connecting the cable with the first lens and the second lens, wherein the connection coupling forms a joint line (A line is formed at the interface CCD and the elevator portion) between the elevator portion and the functional module. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mitani (US 20070118019) in view of Grant (US 20140221749). Regarding claim 18, Mitani discloses wherein the camera module comprises: a photosensitive element (CCD 24 of the camera module); an objective lens (FIG. 2) coupled to the photosensitive element; a light source (An illumination lens that emits illumination light. FIG. 2; Para [0010]); an illumination lens coupled to the light source (a light source device 3; Illumination lens; FIG. 2 annotated). Mitani does not expressly disclose a wireless communication device. Grant is directed to endoscope and a pannable camera (abstract) and teaches a wireless communication device (The connection may include wired communications between a controller in the base unit and a memory chip in the endoscope 10, or, for example wireless communications using an RFID device mounted in the endoscope 10. Para [0105]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Mitani to include a communication between the endoscope and an external device so that image signals or identification information of the endoscope could be transferred to an external device wirelessly. Claim(s) 40 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mitani (US 20070118019) in view of Benjamin (US 20140205235). Regarding claim 40, Mitani does not expressly disclose wherein the first coupler and the second coupler comprise magnetic couplers. Benjamin is directed to Optical connections for optical communication (abstract) and teaches wherein the first coupler and the second coupler comprise magnetic couplers (An optical connection includes a lens block having an optical interface portion that defines an in-line optical path without an optical turn for optical signals propagating through the lens block, and a magnetic coupling portion disposed about at least a portion of the lens block. Abstract; Magnetic coupling portion 162; magnetic coupling portion 122. lens block 124; module 164; FIGS. 6A-7; Para [0047]-[0059]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Mitani to include a magnetic coupling for connection/alignment between the illumination lenses and functional module, and objective and lens and functional module so that alignment between the lenses and module could be defined and conveniently provided during manufacturing of the device. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments submitted on 2/27/2026 have been fully considered. However, the arguments are not persuasive. On page 12, lines 7-9, of the argument/remarks applicant argues that “Mitani does not disclose a functional section housing that is releasably connected to an elevator housing to allow the illumination/imaging unit to be separated from the elevator housing”. The Examiner respectfully disagrees for the reasons stated below. The fixing member 128 and the CCD holding frame 134 can be separated. See FIGS. 14B-15B; Para [0122] of Mitani. Since the CCD holding frame 134 can be separated from the fixing member 128, the illumination/imaging unit can be separated from the elevator housing. Accordingly, the applicants’ arguments are persuasive. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 20 and 43 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Reasons for Allowance Claim 20 The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The prior art of record fails to explicitly teach or fairly suggest, alone or in combination, an endoscope wherein the functional module is user-detachable from the elevator portion via an attachment mechanism, wherein the attachment mechanism comprises: at least one locking tab extending from one of the functional modules or the elevator portion; and a recess provided in the other of the functional module or the elevator portion not having the at least one locking tab; wherein the at least one locking tab is actuatable by a user to attach or remove the camera functional module from the elevator portion, along with the remaining features of claims 20, 15. The closest art Mitani (US 20070118019) teaches a functional module (CCD 24), but its functional module CCD 24, FIG. 2, could not be modified to have the above feature of claim 20. Accordingly, claim 20 is allowed. Claim 43 The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The prior art of record fails to explicitly teach or fairly suggest, alone or in combination, an endoscope, wherein a first light conductor extending from the elongate tubular body and into the elevator housing; and a second light conductor positioned within the functional module housing aligned with the first light conductor across the joint line, along with the remaining features of claim 43, 41, 16, and 15. The closest art Mitani (US 20070118019 could not be modified to achieve/have the above feature of claim 43 because there is no need for a second light conductor positioned within the functional module housing because the functional module of Mitani communicates via electrical signals not with optical signal that travel through a waveguide. Accordingly, claim 43 is allowed. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHANKAR R GHIMIRE whose telephone number is (571)272-0515. The examiner can normally be reached 8 AM - 5 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anhtuan Nguyen can be reached on 571-272-4963. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHANKAR RAJ GHIMIRE/Examiner, Art Unit 3795 /ANH TUAN T NGUYEN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3795 04/18/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 12, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Feb 27, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 22, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12667239
Endoscopic Vessel Harvesting With Thermal Management and Augmented Reality Display
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12660984
SURGICAL METHODS USING MULTI-SOURCE IMAGING
4y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12653379
Endoscopic System With Attached Instruments
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12635862
ENDOSCOPE WITH OPTICAL FILTER ARRANGEMENT AND USE
2y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12629013
ARTHROSCOPIC PROBE DEVICE, SYSTEM AND METHOD
3y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+18.9%)
3y 1m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 284 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month