Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/465,847

TWO-TERMINAL SYNTHESIS RESISTOR

Final Rejection §102§DP
Filed
Sep 12, 2023
Examiner
RETEBO, METASEBIA T
Art Unit
2842
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Analog Devices International Unlimited Company
OA Round
2 (Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 0m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
571 granted / 639 resolved
+21.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
670
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
46.0%
+6.0% vs TC avg
§102
32.6%
-7.4% vs TC avg
§112
13.3%
-26.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 639 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Terminal Disclaimer The terminal disclaimer filed on 11/13/2025 disclaiming the terminal portion of any patent granted on this application which would extend beyond the expiration date of Application No. 18/465,877 has been reviewed and is NOT accepted. See the Terminal Disclaimer review decision mailed out on 11/13/2025. Election/Restrictions Claims 6, 13-17, 21, 27, 34-38 and 42 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 07/21/2025. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP §2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claim 1 provisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 1 of copending Application No.18/465,877. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because claim of the instant application is directed to essentially similar limitation as in claim 1 of copending Application No. 18/465,877. Claim 1 of the instant application is broader than claim 1 of copending Application No.18/465,877 by omitting other features recited in claim 1 of copending Application No.18/465,877 such as “a second op amp; a two-terminal synthesis resistor connected across a non-inverting input of the first op amp and an output of the first op amp”. Claim 22 provisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 23 of copending Application No.18/465,877. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because claim of the instant application is directed to essentially similar limitation as in claim 23 of copending Application No. 18/465,877. Claim 22 of the instant application is broader than claim 23 of copending Application No.18/465,877 by omitting other features recited in claim 23 of copending Application No.18/465,877 such as “a second op amp; a two-terminal synthesis resistor to be connected across a non-inverting input of a first operational amplifier (op amp) and an output of the first op amp”. Instant application 18/465847 Co-pending application 18/465877 1. A two-terminal synthesis resistor, comprising: an operational amplifier (op amp); a current mirror having a first transistor, a second transistor, and a common node connected to the first transistor, the second transistor, and an output of the op amp; a resistor having a first side configured to be a first terminal of the two-terminal synthesis resistor, and a second side connected to an inverting input of the op amp, and the first transistor; and a second terminal of the two-terminal synthesis resistor connected to the second transistor, and a non-inverting input of the op amp. 1. An amplifier circuit, comprising: a first operational amplifier (op amp); a two-terminal synthesis resistor connected across a non-inverting input of the first op amp and an output of the first op amp, the two-terminal synthesis resistor comprising: a second op amp; a current mirror having a first transistor, a second transistor, and a common node connected to the first transistor, the second transistor, and an output of the second op amp; a resistor having a first side configured to be a first terminal of the two-terminal synthesis resistor, and a second side connected to an inverting input of the second op amp, and the first transistor; and a second terminal of the two-terminal synthesis resistor connected to the second transistor, and a non-inverting input of the second op amp. 22. (Original) A method for forming a two-terminal synthesis resistor, comprising: configuring a current mirror to have a first side a first transistor and a second side with a second transistor, the first side of the current mirror and the second side of the current mirror connected to a common node that is also connected to an output of an operational amplifier (op amp);configuring a resistor to have a first side configured to be a first terminal of the two- terminal synthesis resistor, and a second side connected to an inverting input of the op amp, the first transistor; and configuring a second terminal of the two-terminal synthesis resistor to be connected to the second transistor, and a non-inverting input of the op amp. 23. A method for forming an amplifier circuit, comprising: configuring a two-terminal synthesis resistor to be connected across a non-inverting input of a first operational amplifier (op amp) and an output of the first op amp; configuring the two-terminal synthesis resistor to include a resistor, a second op amp, and a current mirror having a first side with a first transistor and a second side with a second transistor, the first side of the current mirror and the second side of the current mirror connected to a common node that is also connected to an output of the second op amp; configuring the resistor to have a first side configured to be a first terminal of the two-terminal synthesis resistor, and a second side connected to an inverting input of the op amp, the first transistor; and configuring a second terminal of the two-terminal synthesis resistor to be connected to the second transistor and a non-inverting input of the first op amp. Claims 2-4, 7-12, 18-20 and 23-25, 28-33, 39-41 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 2-4, 7-12, 18-20 and 24-26, 29-34, 40-42 of copending Application No. 18/465,877. This is a provisional nonstatutory double patenting rejection because the patentably indistinct claims have not in fact been patented. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pg. 12-13, filed 11/06/2025, with respect to claims 1 and 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)(1) have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to METASEBIA T RETEBO whose telephone number is (571)272-9299. The examiner can normally be reached M - F 8:30 - 5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lincoln Donovan can be reached at 571-272-1988. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /METASEBIA T RETEBO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2842
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 12, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §DP
Nov 06, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 06, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 14, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 07, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603647
DRIVER CIRCUIT OF SWITCHING TRANSISTOR, LASER DRIVER CIRCUIT, AND CONTROLLER CIRCUIT OF CONVERTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603646
TRACK AND HOLD CIRCUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597915
CAPACITANCE CIRCUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592690
CONTROL CIRCUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592692
POWER DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+5.2%)
2y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 639 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month