Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/466,102

CANTILEVERED SENSOR ASSEMBLY

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 13, 2023
Examiner
DOUGLAS, STEVEN O
Art Unit
2482
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Ford Motor Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
1245 granted / 1575 resolved
+21.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
1583
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
43.2%
+3.2% vs TC avg
§102
13.4%
-26.6% vs TC avg
§112
15.7%
-24.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1575 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 4 and 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Frederick et al. (US 10,766,430). The Frederick et al. reference discloses a sensor assembly for the roof of a vehicle 3 comprising a bracket (see Fig. 2C) having cantilevered portions (17A,17B) and a sensor 5 mounted thereto. In regard to claim 4, see Figures 1A and 1B. In regard to claim 8, see col. 1, lines 38-47. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The Ohmoto reference pertains to a vehicle with a cantilevered sensor arrangement disposed distal to the front end thereof. The Burnette et al. reference pertains to a vehicle with a cantilevered sensor arrangement disposed out the side thereof. The Helm et al. reference pertains to a vehicle with sensor arrangements disposed in the front and rear thereof. The Yabe et al. reference pertains to a vehicle with a sensor arrangement mounted internally to the frame or chassis thereof. Claims 2, 3, 5-7 and 9-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: none of the prior art of record, with the applied Frederick et al. reference being the closest prior art device, alone or in combination, teach Applicant’s invention of a sensor assembly for the roof a vehicle with a sensor cantilevered a forward most point thereof and inclusive at least of details regarding a reinforcing beam, specific combined resonance frequency, specific gap and panel spacing dimensions, or specific sensor displacement dimensions and angles, as claimed. To modify the closest prior art device to have such limitations would require critical teachings gleaned on from the instant application for patent. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEVEN O DOUGLAS whose telephone number is (571)272-4885. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 5:30-4:00 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amy Weisberg can be reached at 571-270-5500. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEVEN O DOUGLAS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3612
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 13, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679186
Motor vehicle comprising a roof module and a vehicle body
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679259
REINFORCEMENT STRUCTURE FOR REAR SEAT INTERIM PORTION
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12678353
THIN PROFILE RETRACTOR
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679276
STORAGE DEVICE FOR SECURELY STORING OBJECTS IN A MOTOR VEHICLE
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679469
VEHICLE BODY FRONT STRUCTUREE
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+11.2%)
3y 1m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1575 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month