Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/466,192

MODULAR CONNECTOR ASSEMBLIES AND METHODS OF USE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 13, 2023
Priority
Sep 13, 2022 — provisional 63/406,143
Examiner
COTRONEO, STEVEN J
Art Unit
3773
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Medos International Sarl
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
649 granted / 935 resolved
-0.6% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+31.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
967
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
45.9%
+5.9% vs TC avg
§102
34.5%
-5.5% vs TC avg
§112
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 935 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 6/8/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 6, 8, 9, 12, 19-21, and 23-28 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lee et al. (US Pub 2018/0280063). With respect to claim 1, Lee et al. discloses a modular connector assembly (see figures 5D, E and J below) comprising: a first connector (fig 5J, 580) having a first opening (See fig 5J below) therein that is configured to receive a spinal fixation element; a second connector (fig 5D, 510) extending into the first connector through a second opening (See fig 5J below) formed therein, the second connector having a bore (see fig 5D below) formed in a first end thereof that is disposed within the first connector (fig 5J), wherein the second connector has a flat surface (see fig 5D below) at the first end and the bore is formed in the flat surface (fig 5D); and a coupler (fig 5J, 560) disposed within the first connector and passing through the bore of the second connector to prevent separation of the first connector (fig 5J) and the second connector; wherein the second opening of the first connector is shaped and sized to receive the first end of the second connector therein such that the second connector is only free to move axially along a longitudinal axis extending through the second connector (fig 5J can only move axially into the opening). With respect to claim 2, Lee et al. discloses further comprising a set screw (fig 5M, 522) threadably coupled to the first connector. With respect to claim 3, Lee et al. discloses further comprising a spinal fixation element (fig 5M, A5) disposed within the first opening of the first connector, wherein the set screw urges the spinal fixation element toward the coupler (fig 5M). With respect to claim 6, Lee et al. discloses wherein the first opening is substantially U-shaped (see fig 5J below) with an open proximal end and is defined by spaced apart arms (Fig 5J, 586, 588) of the first connector. With respect to claim 8, Lee et al. discloses wherein the first connector includes an inner threaded surface (see fig 5J below) configured to interface outer threads of a set screw. With respect to claim 9, Lee et al. discloses wherein the second opening of the first connector has a shape that substantially matches the shape of a portion of the second connector that extends therethrough (fig 5J shows the shapes matching). With respect to claim 12, Lee et al. discloses wherein the second connector comprises a rod (fig 5D, 514) extending from the first connector. With respect to claim 19, Lee et al. discloses wherein the coupler comprises a proximal-facing rod receiving surface (See fig 5J below). With respect to claim 20, Lee et al. discloses wherein the rod receiving surface comprises any of a curved surface (fig 5J shows a curved surface) and opposed planar surfaces that are angled toward one another. With respect to claim 21, Lee et al. discloses wherein the coupler comprises a distally-extending post (fig 5J, 570) configured to extend through the bore formed in the second connector. With respect to claim 23, Lee et al. discloses wherein the first end of the second connector (see fig 5D, the first end extends between the arrows shown) has a larger diameter than a second end (See fig 5D below) of the second connector and the second connector includes a taper (See fig 5D below) between the first end and the second end. With respect to claim 24, Lee et al. discloses wherein the first end includes a second flat surface (sere fig 5E below) opposite the flat surface. With respect to claim 25, Lee et al. discloses wherein the coupler includes an indent (See fig 5J below indented under the lip for 590) configured to facilitate securing the coupler within the first connector. With respect to claim 26, Lee et al. discloses wherein the first end of the second connector is press fit into the first connector (fig 5J). With respect to claim 27, Lee et al. discloses wherein the second connector extends between the first end and an opposing second terminal end (fig 5D), the second connector having a first portion (see fig 5D below) defining the first end, a second portion (see fig 5D below) defining the second terminal end, and an interconnecting portion (see fig 5D below) extending between the first and second portions, the interconnecting portion being tapered outwardly from the second portion to the first portion (fig 5D). With respect to claim 28, Lee et al. discloses wherein the flat surface extends distally into a majority of the first portion of the second connector from an edge of the first end toward the interconnecting portion (fig 5D, the flats extend the majority of the portion). PNG media_image1.png 685 552 media_image1.png Greyscale Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see remarks, filed 5/4/2026, with respect to the withdrawn claim 24 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Claim 24 is no longer withdrawn and has been examined above. Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-3, 6, 8-9, 23, 29-32 and 23-28 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEVEN J COTRONEO whose telephone number is (571)270-7388. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eduardo Robert can be reached at (571) 272-4719. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /S.J.C/Examiner, Art Unit 3773 /JULIANNA N HARVEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3773
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Aug 27, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 27, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 28, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 09, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
May 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 08, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 18, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12727926
A GRIPPING AND POSITIONING TOOL FOR A SPINAL POLY-AXIAL SCREW INSERTION GUIDE
5y 0m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727892
ARTHROSCOPIC DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS OF USE
4y 11m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727751
LIGHTED SURGICAL ACCESS SYSTEM
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727925
MIS MULTI-LEVEL COMPRESSOR / DISTRACTOR
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12714572
CURVED EXPANDABLE INTERBODY DEVICES AND DEPLOYMENT TOOLS
4y 4m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+31.9%)
3y 5m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 935 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month