Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/468,708

SIGNAL RECEIVING APPARATUS AND METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Sep 16, 2023
Examiner
PHAM, TUAN
Art Unit
2649
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Smarter Microelectronics (Guang Zhou) Co., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
794 granted / 968 resolved
+20.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
982
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
§103
54.4%
+14.4% vs TC avg
§102
17.3%
-22.7% vs TC avg
§112
11.6%
-28.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 968 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Introduction This is a response to the applicant’s filing filed on 09/16/2023. In virtue of this filing, claims 1-10 are currently presented in the instant application. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Drawings The drawing submitted on 09/16/2023 has been considered by Examiner and made of record in the application file. Specification The specification submitted on 09/16/2023 has been considered by Examiner and made of record in the application file. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim(s) does/do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter because claims recite an embodiment of the applicants' invention directed towards " A storage medium, storing a computer program.....” as recites in claim 10. It is noted, however, the specification (page 15, PAR [0099-00100, pages 16-17, PAR [00106-00107]) provides open-ended examples of storage medium and silent with respect to “A non- transitory storage medium" Thus, under the broadest reasonable interpretation, "Storage medium" considered as a whole would be directed towards non-statutory mediums such as signals/carrier waves. The specification fails to define A storage medium excludes a signals/carrier waves, such as transitory signal as per the USPTO notice signed by David Kapposon 1/26/2010: "The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is obliged to give claims their broadest reasonable interpretation consistent with the specification during proceedings before the USPTO. See In re Zletz, 893 F.2d 319(Fed. Cir. 1989) (during patent examination the pending claims must be interpreted as broadly as their terms reasonably allow). The broadest reasonable interpretation of a claim drawn to a storage medium (also called machine readable medium and other such variations) typically covers forms of non-transitory tangible media and transitory propagating signals per se in view of the ordinary and customary meaning of computer readable media, particularly when the specification is silent. See MPEP 2111.01. When the broadest reasonable interpretation of a claim covers a signal per se, the claim must be rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as covering non-statutory subject matter. See In re Nuijten, 500 F.3d 1346, 1356-57 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (transitory embodiments are not directed to statutory subject matter) and Interim Examination Instructions for Evaluating Subject Matter Eligibility Under 35 U.S.C.j101, Aug. 24,2009; p. 2." REASONS FOR ALLOWANCE Claims 1-9 are allowed over the prior art of record. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Leiba (U.S. Patent No.: 9,774,076) teaches a filter, a lamina, and a bare die disposed on the lamina, wherein at least one IC is disposed on the bare die. Han et al. (U.S. Patent No.: 11,670,599) teaches a filter, a lamina, and a bare die disposed on the lamina, wherein at least one IC is disposed on the bare die. Lin et al. (U.S. Patent No.: 11,637,051) teaches a filter, a lamina, and a bare die disposed on the lamina, wherein at least one IC is disposed on the bare die. However, the prior art made of record, alone or in combination, fails to clearly teach or fairly suggest the connection of at least one radio frequency device and the filter are connected on the bare die; the filter is configured to filter a received signal, and the filter comprises at least one capacitor and at least one inductor; the at least one capacitor is disposed on the bare die; and the at least one inductor is disposed on the lamina, and the at least one inductor is connected to the bare die, in combination with other limitations, as specified in the independent claims 1 and 9, and further limitations of their respective dependent claims 2-8. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Tuan A. Pham whose telephone number is (571) 272-8097, the fax number is (571) 273-8097 and the email is tuan.pham01@uspto.gov. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday through Friday, 8:30 AM-5:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, Applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Yuwen (Kevin) Pan can be reached on (571) 272-7855. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TUAN PHAM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2649
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 16, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101
Mar 31, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597960
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND HARMONIC CONTROL METHOD OF ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587231
BROADBAND HIGH POWER TRX HYBRID IMPLEMENTATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580596
APPARATUS FOR RECEIVING DIFFERENTIAL SIGNAL, METHOD THEREFOR, AND COMMUNICATION METHOD INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12562759
RADIO-FREQUENCY CIRCUIT AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12557028
Systems and Methods for Controlling Radio-Frequency Exposure
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+0.4%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 968 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month