Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/468,983

PROSTHETIC HEART VALVE FRAME STRUCTURE AND METHOD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 18, 2023
Examiner
GHERBI, SUZETTE JAIME J
Art Unit
3774
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Medtronic Vascular, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
1160 granted / 1367 resolved
+14.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1396
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
39.6%
-0.4% vs TC avg
§102
25.8%
-14.2% vs TC avg
§112
10.7%
-29.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1367 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 8 15-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Braido et al. 2012/0078347 (hereafter Braido ‘347) in view of Braido et al. 2016/0361161 (hereafter Braido ‘161). PNG media_image1.png 673 457 media_image1.png Greyscale Noting figure 3-4 Braido et al. discloses a valve prosthesis comprising: a balloon-expandable stent structure (see [0025] and see 300), the stent structure comprising an inflow portion (see mark-up of proximal area) having a plurality of rows of inflow portion cells (306) and an outflow portion (see area 338) comprising a plurality of commissure posts (308), a plurality of non-commissure posts (305d), and an outflow crown ring (302) coupled to distal ends of the non-commissure posts and intersecting the commissure posts such that trident posts extend distally of a location where the distal crown ring intersects the commissure posts (see mark-up supra regarding trident post). However, Braido ‘347 does not detail a prosthetic valve coupled to the stent frame. Braido ‘161 teaches a prosthetic heart valve 200 which may include a prosthetic valve with leaflets (262) coupled to a frame (see [0026], Fig. 3). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify ‘347 with a prosthetic heart valve attached to the frame as taught by ‘161 in order to address patients that need total valve replacement due to diseased leaflets. Regarding claim 8 see [0046]. Regarding claims 15 and 16 and noting figure 9B (see below) PNG media_image2.png 139 152 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 437 351 media_image3.png Greyscale Braido ‘347 discloses a stent structure, the stent structure comprising: an inflow portion (bottom) comprising a plurality of rows of inflow portion cells, the inflow portion (bottom) comprising outflow crowns (see peak and valleys defining a distal) defining a distalmost row of cells of the plurality of rows; an outflow portion (top) comprising commissure posts (808) comprising axial frame members and trident posts extending distally from the axial frame members (see trident below where the members extend distally); and support struts (850) extending between outflow crowns directly adjacent to the commissure posts and to intersections of the axial frame members and the trident posts (see figures above). However, Braido ‘347 does not detail a prosthetic valve coupled to the stent frame. Braido ‘161 teaches a prosthetic heart valve 200 which may include a prosthetic valve with leaflets (262) coupled to a frame (see [0026]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify ‘347 with a prosthetic heart valve attached to the frame as taught by ‘161 in order to address patients that need total valve replacement due to diseased leaflets. Regarding claim 17, noting figure 4 below and the rejection of claim 1 above, Braido ‘347 in view of Braido ‘161 discloses the structure as claimed and further discloses that the inflow portion comprises a plurality of rows of inflow portion cells (area 340), the inflow portion comprising outflow crowns defining a distal most row of cells of the plurality of rows (see peaks and valleys); and an outflow portion comprising: commissure posts (308); and non-commissure posts (305d) disposed circumferentially between adjacent commissure posts, wherein each outflow crown of the inflow portion is attached to a corresponding one of the commissure posts or a corresponding one of the non-commissure posts (this is interpreted as such because the claim does not require that the outflow crown be directly attached). PNG media_image4.png 249 343 media_image4.png Greyscale Claim(s) 2 and 3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Braido et al. 2012/0078347 (hereafter Braido ‘347) in view of Braido et al. 2016/0361161 (hereafter Braido ‘161) and further in view of Drasler et al. 2018/0147061. Braido et al. ‘347 and ‘161 have been disclosed supra. Braido ‘161 teaches the use of anchoring structures on an inflow and outflow portion of a frame and further teaches spikes (6G) however does not specify that anti-migration spikes are self-expanding. Drasler et al. teaches that anchoring spike may be self-expandable (see 6G). It would have been obvious to modify the stent/frame of (347) with self-expandable anchors/spikes on the inflow and outflow end of the frame in order to secure the prosthetic valve securely to the surrounding tissue and are well-known in the art. Allowable Subject Matter 5. Claims 4-7, 9-14 and 18-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. 6. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The closets prior art has been disclosed supra however do not teach or disclose: that the inflow portion cells are formed by rows of struts and crowns, wherein crowns of adjacent rows of struts and crowns form nodes, and wherein the anti-migration spikes are attached to the nodes; or that the valve prosthesis has a first diameter at an inflow end of the valve prosthesis, a second diameter at a middle region of the valve prosthesis, and a third diameter at an outflow end of the valve prosthesis, the second diameter being less than the first diameter and less than the third diameter; or that the trident posts have an outward slant with respect to a longitudinal axis of the valve prosthesis., and wherein the prosthetic valve includes commissures attached to the trident posts; or wherein the prosthetic valve comprises valve leaflets a valve inflow cylinder proximal to the valve leaflets, further comprising a reinforcement member collagen bonded to the valve inflow cylinder or to commissures of the valve leaflets. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Suzette Gherbi whose telephone number is (571)272- 4751. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 7:00am-3:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http:/Avww.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Melanie Tyson can be reached on 571-272-9062. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent- center for more information about Patent Center and https:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197. /SUZETTE J GHERBI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3774 March 14, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 18, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599470
SURGICAL-USE MEDICAL APPARATUS AND SYSTEM THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12588996
CARDIAC VALVE REPAIR DEVICES AND ASSOCIATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588987
LOW PROFILE TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582518
HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT PROSTHESIS WITH VARIABLE SEALING FUNCTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582748
SELF-EXTENDABLE STENT FOR PULMONARY ARTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+8.8%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1367 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month