Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/469,275

RGB THREE-COLOR LASER LIGHT SOURCE SYNTHESIS AND BEAM SPLITTING DEVICES

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 18, 2023
Priority
Dec 07, 2022 — CN 202211560982.0
Examiner
WILKES, ZACHARY W
Art Unit
2872
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Xdmicro (Zhongshan) Optoelectronic Semiconductor Co. Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
616 granted / 925 resolved
-1.4% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
47 currently pending
Career history
983
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
40.5%
+0.5% vs TC avg
§102
28.5%
-11.5% vs TC avg
§112
24.0%
-16.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 925 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on July 16, 2026 has been entered. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement(s) filed on have/has been acknowledged and considered by the examiner. Initialed copies of supplied IDS(s) forms are included in this correspondence. Response to Amendment Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim 1 have been considered but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection, as necessitated by amendment. Regarding Applicant’s remarks July 16, 20261 as they pertain to the nature of laser light in section C, such remarks are not entirely correct regarding lasers and laser light. While laser is an acronym for Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission Radiation, and stimulated emission produces second/additional photons from a first photon having the same wavelength (and thus energy), direction, and polarization, a laser device as a whole is not so specific. Laser devices themselves routinely produce outputs with a range of wavelengths and bandwidths from narrow (e.g. continuous wave type such as a HeNe2) to broad bandwidth (e.g. pulsed lasers such as Ti:sapphire3). Thus Applicant’s position that laser light sources produce coherent, polarized light at a narrow bandwidth is correct, but only for some, not all lasers. Applicant’s specification has not specified what type of lasers and their associated bandwidths beyond generic semiconductors. Thus, so long as the prior art’s sources are lasers, the limitation the first, second, third light rays are laser light rays will be considered met. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a1),(a2) as being anticipated by Chien et al. (US 2022/0004092; Chien; of record). Examiner’s note: Chien’s disclosures uses the term “dichroic lens”, yet states such lens is also a beamsplitter, or any other optical component (Chien para. [0039]). In other words, Chien appears to be using “lens” as a stand-in for any optical component, which includes beamsplitters. As to claim 1, Chien teaches an RGB three-color laser light source synthesis and beam splitting device (Chien Figs. 2-6) having main light paths extending in a first direction (Chien Fig. 2 - left/right light paths; see below) and side light paths extending in a second direction perpendicular to the first direction (Chien Fig. 2 - up/down paths; see below) wherein the main light paths comprise a first main light path (Chien Fig. 2 - path from 44…36…32) and a second main light path (Chien Fig. 2 - path from 38…34), the second main light path is disposed in parallel with the first main light path (Chien Fig. 2), the side light paths comprise a first side light path (Chien Fig. 2 - path from 42…36…38) and a second side light path (Chien Fig. 2 - path from 40…32…34), and the second side light path is disposed in parallel with the first side light path (Chien Fig. 2); the device comprising a light source assembly comprising a first light source (Chien Fig. 2 - 44; para. [0002], [0023]), a second light source (Chien Fig. 2 - 42; para. [0002], [0023]), and a third light source (Chien Fig. 2 - 40; para. [0002], [0023]), emitting different colors (Chien Fig. 2 - B1, B2, B3; para. [0022]), the first light source, the second light source, and the third light source being configured to emit light simultaneously (Chien Fig. 2); wherein the first light source is disposed in the first main light path and is configured to emit first light rays in the first direction (Chien Fig. 2 - 44, B3), the second light source is disposed in the first side light path and is configured to emit second light rays in the second direction (Chien Fig. 2 - 42, B2), the third light source is disposed in the second side light path and is configured to emit third light rays in the second direction (Chien Fig. 2 - 40, B1), and the first light rays, the second light rays, and the third light rays are laser light rays (Chien para. [0002]); plurality of light splitters comprising a first light splitter (Chien Fig. 2 - 36; para. [0039], [0023]) and a second light splitter (Chien Fig. 2 - 32; para. [0039], [0023]), wherein each of the first light splitter and the second light splitter is a non-polarizing beam splitter configured to split incident light based on a predetermined intensity ratio independent of polarization states of the incident light (Chien Fig. 2 - 36, 32; para. [0039], [0032] - dichroic beam splitters split light based on wavelength, not polarization state); wherein the first light splitter is arranged at an intersection of the first main light path and the first side light path (Chien Fig. 2 - 36), and is configured to transmit part of the first light rays and reflect rest of the first light rays to the second direction (Chien Fig. 2 - B3; para. [0026]), as well as transmit part of the second light rays and reflect rest of the second light rays to the first direction (Chien Fig. 2 - B2; para. [0026]); and wherein the second light splitter is arranged at an intersection of the first main light path and the second side light path (Chien Fig. 2 - 32), and is configured to transmit both the first light rays and the second light rays from the first light splitter (Chien Fig. 2 - 32, B3, B2), as well as transmit part of the third light rays and reflect rest of the third light rays to the first direction (Chien Fig. 2 - 32, B1; para. [0026]); a reflector (Chien Fig. 2 - 38; para. [0023], [0039]) arranged at an intersection of the second main light path and the first side light path (Chien Fig. 2 - 38), wherein the reflector is configured to reflect both the first light rays and the second light rays from the second direction to the first direction (Chien Fig. 2 - 38); a wavelength-selective light filter (Chien Fig. 2 - 34; para. [0023], [0039]) arranged at an intersection of the second main light path and the second side light path (Chien Fig. 2 - 34), wherein the wavelength-selective light filter is configured to transmit both the first light rays and the second light rays from the reflector, and reflect the third light rays from the second light splitter to the first direction (Chien Fig. 2 - 34). PNG media_image1.png 608 927 media_image1.png Greyscale As to claim 27, Chien teaches all the limitations of the instant invention as detailed above with respect to claim 1, and Chien further teaches the wavelength selective light filter is disposed at an included angle of 45 degrees to the first direction and the second direction, respectively (Chien Fig. 2 - 34); the light splitters each are disposed at an included angle of 45 degrees to the first direction and the second direction, respectively (Chien Fig. 2 - 36, 32); the reflector is disposed at an included angle of 45 degrees to the first direction and the second direction, respectively (Chien Fig. 2 - 38). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chien (cited above). As to claim 6, Chien teaches all the limitations of the instant invention as detailed above with respect to claim 1, and while Chien discloses duplicating the synthesis and beam splitting device (Chien Fig. 3 - 54, 56; Fig. 4 - 54, 56, 72; Fig. 6 - 54, 56, 76, 72), but doesn’t specify an additional row, and thus a third main light path, a third light splitter, a fourth light splitter, the third splitter at the intersection of the second main light path and first side light path and the respective reflection/transmission, the fourth splitter at the intersection of the second main light path and the second side light path and the respective reflective/transmission, the reflector at the intersection of the third main light path and first side light path, the light filter at the intersection of the third main light path and the second side light path. Such additional row of splitters and locations of the reflector and filter is a duplication of parts of a row of Chien - i.e. duplicating the row of 36, 32. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention to duplicate the row of splitters, etc., since it has been held that a mere duplication of working parts of a device involves only routine skill in the art. In re Harza 124 USPQ 378 (CCPA 1960). Claim 3, 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chien as applied to claims 1, 6 above, and further in view of Ogino (US 2017/0176845; of record). As to claim 3, Chien teaches all the limitations of the instant invention as detailed above with respect to claim 1, but doesn’t specify the splitting ratios of the first and second splitters. In the same field of endeavor Kurita teaches providing a light source synthesis and beam splitting device where the splitters are half mirrors - i.e. 1/2 transmit, 1/2 reflect (Ogino Fig. 4 - 761; para. [0048]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention to provide the split as 1/2 since, as taught by Ogino, half mirrors are well known in the art for the purpose of reflecting 1/2 and transmitting 1/2 of the incident light (Ogino para. [0048]). As to claim 7, Chien teaches all the limitations of the instant invention as detailed above with respect to claim 6, but doesn’t specify the splitting ratios of the beam splitters. In the same field of endeavor Kurita teaches providing a light source synthesis and beam splitting device where the splitters are half mirrors - i.e. 1/2 transmit, 1/2 reflect (Ogino Fig. 4 - 761; para. [0048]) as well as well as 1/3 - 2/3 splitters (Ogino para. [0100]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention to provide the split as 1/2, 1/3 or 2/3 since, as taught by Ogino, such mirrors are well known in the art for the purpose of reflecting the desired 1/2, 1/3, or 2/3 amount of light (Ogino para. [0048], [0100]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZACHARY W WILKES whose telephone number is (571)270-7540. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-4 (Pacific). If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ricky Mack can be reached at 571-272-2333. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZACHARY W WILKES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872 September 1, 2026 1 Remarks July 16, 2026, page 21 2 https://www.rp-photonics.com/helium_neon_lasers.html 3 https://www.rp-photonics.com/titanium_sapphire_lasers.html
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 18, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 09, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Mar 09, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 27, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jul 16, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 20, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12710669
LENS AND METHOD FOR RETARDING MYOPIA PROGRESSION
4y 5m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12656537
OPTICAL ELEMENT AND OPTICAL MODULE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12631906
SPECTACLE LENS AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A SPECTACLE LENS
2y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12631905
OPHTHALMIC LENSES AND METHODS RELATING THERETO
1y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12622582
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING A REFRACTION FEATURE OF AN EYE OF A SUBJECT USING AN IMAGE-CAPTURE DEVICE
4y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+22.4%)
2y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 925 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month