Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/469,991

MITIGATING FIBER WEAVE EFFECT IN A PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 19, 2023
Examiner
TRINH, MINH N
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Dell Products L.P.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
1298 granted / 1515 resolved
+25.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
1562
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
58.4%
+18.4% vs TC avg
§102
8.4%
-31.6% vs TC avg
§112
21.6%
-18.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1515 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The abstract should be updated to reflect method invention. The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Objections Claims 1-8 are objected to because of the following informalities: The preamble is objected to because of the following: “A method of mitigating fiber weave effect, comprising:” (claim 1, line 1) should be more specific, the use of: --"“A method of mitigating fiber weave effect in a Printed Circuit Board (PCB), the method comprising steps of:” --. In the body of the claims each step should be in line or as same space as the first “two limitations” (see below) for claim 1 as well as claims 6, 8, 10, respectively. PNG media_image1.png 446 398 media_image1.png Greyscale It is unclear as to what being referring to as “obtaining” (claim 1, in line 2 and 5) appear to be missing step of “identifying PCB design image from a source of PCB design” should be inserted prior to step of “obtaining” (claim 1, line 2) for better understanding since it is not known as to where the laminate sheet is coming from. The phrase:” obtaining a cut laminate sheet from the laminate sheet, the laminate sheet including a first side and a second side opposite to the first side, the obtaining including:” (claim 1, lines 5-6) appear to be awkwardly worded and should be deleted. The phrase: “forming the PCB on the cut laminate sheet based on the rotation of the cut laminate sheet with respect to the PCB design image and the alignment between the cut laminate sheet and the PCB design image” (claim 1, lines 24-26) is not understood since it is not known as to how the alignment of the PCB design image with the laminate cut sheet would result or obtained “the PCB”. Please be more specific as to how the PCB is formed. It appears that the previous step of cutting all four marking lines to form “a PCB” from laminate sheet. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. whether or not “a first side and a second side opposite to the first side” occurrence in lines 5-6 of claim 1 is as same as that in previous line 3? “cutting the laminate sheet at the first, second, third, and fourth cutting lines to form first, second, third, and four sides, respectively, of the cut laminate sheet;” (claim 1, lines 18-19) is awkwardly worded and confusing the use of: --" cutting the laminate sheet at the marking of the first, second, third, and fourth cutting lines to form a cut laminate sheet; “-- “positioning a printed circuit board (PCB) design image in superimposition with the cut laminate sheet;” (claim 1, line 20-21) should be changed to: --“simultaneously, positioning and lapping the (PCB) design image in superimposition with the cut laminate sheet,” --. “rotating the cut laminate sheet such that each of the sides of the cut laminate sheet are aligned with a respective side of the PCB design image;” (claim 1, lines 22-23) should be updated to: --“wherein the simultaneously, positioning and lapping further comprises rotating and aligning the cut laminate sheet such that each of the sides of the cut laminate sheet are aligned with a respective side of the PCB design image;” “the PCB”(claim 1, line 24) lacks proper antecedent basis. “forming the PCB on the cut laminate sheet based on the rotation of the cut laminate sheet with respect to the PCB design image and the alignment between the cut laminate sheet and the PCB design image” (claim 1, lines 24-26) is awkwardly worded should be updated to: --"removing the cut laminate sheet after the rotating and aligning the cut laminate sheet from the PCB design image to obtain the PCB”--, for clarity of the method inventive claim. Claims 2-12 are rejected as indefinite, so rendered by virtue of their dependency upon the indefinite subject matter of independent claim 1 Potential Allowable claims Claims 10-12 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MINH N TRINH whose telephone number is (571)272-4569. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH ~5:00-3:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thomas J Hong can be reached at 571-272-0993. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MINH N TRINH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3729 Mt, 7/8/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 19, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12685183
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING WIRING BOARD, AND WIRING BOARD
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676589
COMPOSITE SUBSTRATE
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673425
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ASSEMBLING A ROTOR STACK FOR AN ELECTRIC MOTOR
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12665476
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A ROTOR AS WELL AS ROTOR
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12654209
LASER CLEANING BATTERY COMPONENTS
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+10.0%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1515 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month