Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/470,546

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATION PERFORMANCE GRAPHING

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 20, 2023
Examiner
BROWN, CLAUDE J
Art Unit
3671
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Deere & Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
394 granted / 498 resolved
+27.1% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
524
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§103
43.5%
+3.5% vs TC avg
§102
26.8%
-13.2% vs TC avg
§112
21.9%
-18.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 498 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Introduction Claims 1-20 are currently pending in this application and are subject to examination herein. Information Disclosure Statement The four (4) information disclosure statements (IDSs) submitted on 09/20/2023; 10/04/2023; 11/21/2023; and 06/24/2025 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(5) because they include the following reference character(s) not mentioned in the description: 311 (Fig. 3); 1302 (Fig. 12). The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(4) because reference character “1416” has been used to designate both “GRAIN LOSS LIMIT” and “GRAIN CLEANLINESS (OR MOG/FOREIGN MATERIAL) LIMIT” (Fig. 13). It appears that “GRAIN LOSS LIMIT” should have been enumerated as reference character “1415” therein and the Examiner suggests Applicant may wish to amend Fig. 13 to recite “GRAIN LOSS LIMIT 1416”. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d), or amendment to the specification to add the reference character(s) in the description in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(b) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: it appears block 1302 may have inadvertently been recited in the Specification as block 1304 (Para. [00151]). Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6, 8, 10, 12-14, 16 and 18-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2015/0293507 to Burns et al. (hereinafter Burns). Regarding claim 1, Burns discloses a mobile agricultural harvester (mobile machine 102) (Figs. 1-2; Paras. [0017]-[0023], [0030]-[0037], [0041], [0044], [0049], [0054]-[0055], [0071]-[0077], [0084]) comprising: one or more sensors (on-board sensors 124) (Fig. 1; Paras. [0020], [0028], [0033]) configured to detect a grain processing quality characteristic (one or more quality metrics 196) (Fig. 4; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]), and generate sensor data indicative of the detected grain processing quality characteristic (one or more quality metrics 196) (Fig. 4; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]); a display screen (one or more of user interface displays 106, display device 118, display 174, display 228) (Abstract; Figs. 1-11; Paras. [0003], [0005], [0018], [0020]-[0021], [0029]-[0031], [0038], [0041], [0044]-[0045]); one or more processors (processor(s) 114, 17) (Fig. 2; Paras. [0020], [0079], [0086], [0090], [0093]) memory (Paras. [0029], [0039], [0079], [0086], [0090], [0093]-[0096], [0101]); and computer executable instructions (Paras. [0090], [0094], [0098]), stored in the memory (Paras. [0029], [0039], [0079], [0086], [0090], [0093]-[0096], [0101]), and executable by the one or more processors (processor(s) 114, 17) (Fig. 2; Paras. [0020], [0079], [0086], [0090], [0093]), the computer executable instructions, when executed by the one or more processors (processor(s) 114, 17) (Fig. 2; Paras. [0020], [0079], [0086], [0090], [0093]), configuring the one or more processors (processor(s) 114, 17) (Fig. 2; Paras. [0020], [0079], [0086], [0090], [0093]) to: generate (step 192) (Fig. 4; Para. [0033]) an interface (Abstract; Figs. 2-12; Paras. [0042]-[0048]) on the display screen (one or more of user interface displays 106, display device 118, display 174, display 228) (Abstract; Figs. 1-11; Paras. [0003], [0005], [0018], [0020]-[0021], [0029]-[0031], [0038], [0041], [0044]-[0045]), the interface (Abstract; Figs. 2-12; Paras. [0042]-[0048]) comprising: a limit interface display element (lines 250, 258) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0042]-[0043]) indicative of a limit of the grain processing quality characteristic (one or more quality metrics 196) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]); and a characteristic value interface display element (strip chart(s) 238, 240, 242, 252, 254, 256, 318 and/or 320) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0042]-[0043]) comprising a graph (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11) indicative of values of the grain processing quality characteristic (one or more quality metrics 196) (Fig. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]) over time (see Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11). Regarding claim 2, Burns discloses the mobile agricultural harvester of claim 1 (see above). Furthermore, Burns discloses a mobile agricultural harvester (mobile machine 102) (Figs. 1-2; Paras. [0017]-[0023], [0030]-[0037], [0041], [0044], [0049], [0054]-[0055], [0071]-[0077], [0084]) wherein the grain processing quality characteristic (one or more quality metrics 196) (Fig.; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]) is one of grain loss (Figs. 5-6, 9), grain brokenness (Figs. 5-6, 8, 11), or grain cleanliness (e.g., MOG) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11). Regarding claim 3, Burns discloses the mobile agricultural harvester of claim 1 (see above). Furthermore, Burns discloses a mobile agricultural harvester (mobile machine 102) (Figs. 1-2; Paras. [0017]-[0023], [0030]-[0037], [0041], [0044], [0049], [0054]-[0055], [0071]-[0077], [0084]) wherein the grain processing quality characteristic (one or more quality metrics 196) (Fig. 4; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]) comprises a first grain processing quality characteristic (e.g., one of quality metrics 196) (Fig. 4; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061])), wherein the limit interface display element (lines 250, 258) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0042]-[0043]) is a first limit display element (line 250) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0042]-[0043]) indicative of a first limit of the first grain processing quality characteristic (first of quality metrics 196) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]), wherein the characteristic value interface display element (strip chart(s) 238, 240 or 242 (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0042]-[0043]) is a first characteristic value interface display element (strip chart(s) 238, 240 or 242) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0042]-[0043]) comprising a first graph (strip chart(s) 238, 240 or 242) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0042]-[0043]) indicative of values of the first grain processing quality characteristic (first of quality metrics 196) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]) over time (See Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11), wherein the one or more sensors (on-board sensors 124) (Fig. 1; Paras. [0020], [0028], [0033]) are configured to detect a second grain processing quality characteristic (e.g., second of quality metrics 196) (Fig. 4; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]) and generate sensor data indicative of the second grain processing quality characteristic (e.g., second of quality metrics 196) (Fig. 4; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]) and wherein the computer executable instructions (Paras. [0090], [0094], [0098]), when executed by the one or more processors (processor(s) 114, 17) (Fig. 2; Paras. [0020], [0079], [0086], [0090], [0093]), further configure the one or more processors (processor(s) 114, 17) (Fig. 2; Paras. [0020], [0079], [0086], [0090], [0093]) to: generate (step 192) (Fig. 4; Para. [0033]) the interface (Abstract; Figs. 2-12; Paras. [0042]-[0048]), on the display screen (one or more of user interface displays 106, display device 118, display 174, display 228) (Abstract; Figs. 1-11; Paras. [0003], [0005], [0018], [0020]-[0021], [0029]-[0031], [0038], [0041], [0044]-[0045]), further comprising: a second limit interface display element (lines 258) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0042]-[0043]) indicative of a second limit of the second grain processing quality characteristic (e.g., second of quality metrics 196) (Fig. 4; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]); and a second characteristic value interface display element (strip chart(s) 252, 254 or 256) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0042]-[0043]) comprising a second graph (strip chart(s) 252, 254 or 256) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0042]-[0043]) indicative of values of the second grain processing quality characteristic (e.g., second of quality metrics 196) (Fig. 4; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]) over time (See Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11). Regarding claim 4, Burns discloses the mobile agricultural harvester of claim 3 (see above). Furthermore, Burns discloses a mobile agricultural harvester (mobile machine 102) (Figs. 1-2; Paras. [0017]-[0023], [0030]-[0037], [0041], [0044], [0049], [0054]-[0055], [0071]-[0077], [0084]) wherein the one or more sensors (on-board sensors 124) (Fig. 1; Paras. [0020], [0028], [0033]) are configured to detect a third grain processing quality characteristic (e.g., third of quality metrics 196) (Fig. 4; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]) and generate sensor data indicative of the third grain processing quality characteristic (e.g., third of quality metrics 196) (Fig. 4; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]) and wherein the computer executable instructions (Paras. [0090], [0094], [0098]), when executed by the one or more processors (processor(s) 114, 17) (Fig. 2; Paras. [0020], [0079], [0086], [0090], [0093]), further configure the one or more processors (processor(s) 114, 17) (Fig. 2; Paras. [0020], [0079], [0086], [0090], [0093]) to: generate (step 192) (Fig. 4; Para. [0033]) the interface (Abstract; Figs. 2-12; Paras. [0042]-[0048]), on the display screen (one or more of user interface displays 106, display device 118, display 174, display 228) (Abstract; Figs. 1-11; Paras. [0003], [0005], [0018], [0020]-[0021], [0029]-[0031], [0038], [0041], [0044]-[0045]), further comprising: a third limit interface display element (see, e.g., Figs. 5, 8-9, 11) indicative of a third limit (one or more of user interface displays 106, display device 118, display 174, display 228) (Abstract; Figs. 1-11; Paras. [0003], [0005], [0018], [0020]-[0021], [0029]-[0031], [0038], [0041], [0044]-[0045]) of the third grain processing quality characteristic (e.g., third of quality metrics 196) (Fig. 4; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]); and a third characteristic value interface display element (see, e.g., Figs. 5, 8-9, 11) comprising a third graph (see, e.g., Figs. 5, 8-9, 11) indicative of values of the third grain processing quality characteristic (e.g., third of quality metrics 196) (Fig. 4; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]) over time (see, e.g., Figs. 5, 8-9, 11). Regarding claim 5, Burns discloses the mobile agricultural harvester of claim 1 (see above). Furthermore, Burns discloses a mobile agricultural harvester (mobile machine 102) (Figs. 1-2; Paras. [0017]-[0023], [0030]-[0037], [0041], [0044], [0049], [0054]-[0055], [0071]-[0077], [0084]) wherein the limit interface display element (lines 250, 258) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0042]-[0043]) comprises a line (lines 250, 258) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0042]-[0043]) incorporated into the graph (strip chart(s) 238, 240, 242, 252, 254, 256, 318 and/or 320) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0042]-[0043]), wherein the graph (strip chart(s) 238, 240, 242, 252, 254, 256, 318 and/or 320) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0042]-[0043]) comprises an X axis comprising a time scale (see Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11) and a Y axis comprises a value scale (see Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11) corresponding to the grain processing quality characteristic (one or more quality metrics 196) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]), wherein the line is positioned at a location along the Y axis (see Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11). Regarding claim 6, Burns discloses the mobile agricultural harvester of claim 5 (see above). Furthermore, Burns discloses a mobile agricultural harvester (mobile machine 102) (Figs. 1-2; Paras. [0017]-[0023], [0030]-[0037], [0041], [0044], [0049], [0054]-[0055], [0071]-[0077], [0084]) wherein the graph further comprises a first graph display element (see Fig. 6) comprising a first graph display element line (e.g., line/curve of strip chart 238) (Fig. 6; Para. [0042]) and a first graph display element area (e.g., area below the line/curve of strip chart 238) (Fig. 6; Para. [0042]) that indicates a first proportion of the grain processing quality characteristic (e.g., grain loss) attributable to a first subsystem (e.g., separator 146) (Fig. 2; Para. [0022]) of the mobile agricultural harvester (mobile machine 102) (Figs. 1-2; Paras. [0017]-[0023], [0030]-[0037], [0041], [0044], [0049], [0054]-[0055], [0071]-[0077], [0084]) and a second graph display element comprising a second graph display element line (e.g., line/curve of strip chart 240) (Fig. 6; Para. [0042]) and a second graph display element area (e.g., area below the line/curve of strip chart 240) (Fig. 6; Para. [0042]) that indicates a second proportion of the grain processing quality characteristic (e.g., grain loss) attributable to a second subsystem (e.g., cleaning shoe 146) (Fig. 2; Para. [0022]) of the mobile agricultural harvester (mobile machine 102) (Figs. 1-2; Paras. [0017]-[0023], [0030]-[0037], [0041], [0044], [0049], [0054]-[0055], [0071]-[0077], [0084]), wherein the first graph display element and the second graph display element are stacked (e.g., overlaid) (See Fig. 6). Regarding claim 8, Burns discloses the mobile agricultural harvester of claim 1 (see above). Furthermore, Burns discloses a mobile agricultural harvester (mobile machine 102) (Figs. 1-2; Paras. [0017]-[0023], [0030]-[0037], [0041], [0044], [0049], [0054]-[0055], [0071]-[0077], [0084]) wherein the computer executable instructions (Paras. [0090], [0094], [0098]), when executed by the one or more processors (processor(s) 114, 17) (Fig. 2; Paras. [0020], [0079], [0086], [0090], [0093]), further configure the one or more processors (processor(s) 114, 17) (Fig. 2; Paras. [0020], [0079], [0086], [0090], [0093]) to: generate (step 192) (Fig. 4; Para. [0033]) the interface (Abstract; Figs. 2-12; Paras. [0042]-[0048]) further comprising: a limit adjuster interface display element (e.g., calibration user input mechanism) (Para. [0034]) that is interactable to provide for adjustment of the limit (Paras. [0033]-[0036]) of the grain processing quality characteristic (first of quality metrics 196) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]). Regarding claim 10, Burns discloses the mobile agricultural harvester of claim 1 (see above). Furthermore, Burns discloses a mobile agricultural harvester (mobile machine 102) (Figs. 1-2; Paras. [0017]-[0023], [0030]-[0037], [0041], [0044], [0049], [0054]-[0055], [0071]-[0077], [0084]) wherein the computer executable instructions (Paras. [0090], [0094], [0098]), when executed by the one or more processors (processor(s) 114, 17) (Fig. 2; Paras. [0020], [0079], [0086], [0090], [0093]), further configure the one or more processors (processor(s) 114, 17) (Fig. 2; Paras. [0020], [0079], [0086], [0090], [0093]) to: generate (step 192) (Fig. 4; Para. [0033]) the interface (Abstract; Figs. 2-12; Paras. [0042]-[0048]) further comprising: a productivity display portion (productivity display section 230) (Fig. 6; Para. [0042]) comprising a productivity interface display element (e.g., yield graph display 236) (Fig. 6; Para. [0042]) indicative of a value of a productivity characteristic (e.g., yield) (Fig. 6; Para. [0042]). Regarding claim 12, Burns discloses a computer implemented method (Fig. 4) comprising: obtaining sensor data, from one or more sensors (on-board sensors 124) (Fig. 1; Paras. [0020], [0028], [0033]), indicative of a grain processing quality characteristic (one or more quality metrics 196) (Fig. 4; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]) detected by the one or more sensors (on-board sensors 124) (Fig. 1; Paras. [0020], [0028], [0033]); generating (step 192) (Fig. 4; Para. [0033]), on a display screen (one or more of user interface displays 106, display device 118, display 174, display 228) (Abstract; Figs. 1-11; Paras. [0003], [0005], [0018], [0020]-[0021], [0029]-[0031], [0038], [0041], [0044]-[0045]), an interface (Abstract; Figs. 2-12; Paras. [0042]-[0048]) comprising: a limit interface display element (lines 250, 258) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0042]-[0043]) indicative of a limit of the grain processing quality characteristic (one or more quality metrics 196) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]); and a characteristic value interface display element (strip chart(s) 238, 240, 242, 252, 254, 256, 318 and/or 320) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0042]-[0043]) comprising a graph (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11) indicative of values of the grain processing quality characteristic (one or more quality metrics 196) (Fig. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]) over time (see Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11). Regarding claim 13, Burns discloses the computer implemented method of claim 12 (see above). Furthermore, Burns discloses a method wherein obtaining sensor data, from one or more sensors, indicative of the grain processing quality characteristic (one or more quality metrics 196) (Fig. 4; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]) comprises obtaining sensor data, from one or more sensors (on-board sensors 124) (Fig. 1; Paras. [0020], [0028], [0033]), indicative of a first grain processing quality characteristic (a first one of quality metrics 196) (Fig. 4; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]) and a second grain processing quality characteristic (a second one of quality metrics 196) (Fig. 4; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]); wherein generating (step 192) (Fig. 4; Para. [0033]), on the display screen (one or more of user interface displays 106, display device 118, display 174, display 228) (Abstract; Figs. 1-11; Paras. [0003], [0005], [0018], [0020]-[0021], [0029]-[0031], [0038], [0041], [0044]-[0045]), the interface (Abstract; Figs. 2-12; Paras. [0042]-[0048]) comprises generating (step 192) (Fig. 4; Para. [0033]), on a display screen (one or more of user interface displays 106, display device 118, display 174, display 228) (Abstract; Figs. 1-11; Paras. [0003], [0005], [0018], [0020]-[0021], [0029]-[0031], [0038], [0041], [0044]-[0045]), the interface (Abstract; Figs. 2-12; Paras. [0042]-[0048]) comprising: a first limit interface display element (line 250) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0042]-[0043]) indicative of a first limit of the first grain processing quality characteristic (first of quality metrics 196) (Fig. 4; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]); a first characteristic value interface display element (strip chart(s) 238, 240, 242) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0042]-[0043]) comprising a graph (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11) indicative of values of the first grain processing quality characteristic (first of quality metrics 196) (Fig. 4; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]) over time (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11); a second limit interface display element (lines 258) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0042]-[0043]) indicative of a second limit of the second grain processing quality characteristic (second of quality metrics 196) (Fig. 4; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]); and a second characteristic value interface display element (strip chart(s) 252, 254 or 256) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0042]-[0043]) comprising a second graph (strip chart(s) 252, 254 or 256) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0042]-[0043]) indicative of values of the second grain processing quality characteristic (second of quality metrics 196) (Fig. 4; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]) over time (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11). Regarding claim 14, Burns discloses the computer implemented method of claim 12 (see above). Furthermore, Burns discloses a method wherein obtaining sensor data from one or more sensors indicative of the grain processing quality characteristic comprises obtaining sensor data, from one or more sensors (on-board sensors 124) (Fig. 1; Paras. [0020], [0028], [0033]), indicative of a first grain processing quality characteristic (first of quality metrics 196, such as quantity of broken grain) (Figs. 4, 6; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]), a second grain processing quality characteristic (second of quality metrics 196, such as quantity of foreign material) (Figs. 4, 6; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]), and a third grain processing quality characteristic (third of quality metrics 196, such as quantity of un-threshed product in the tailings) (Figs. 4, 6; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]): wherein generating (step 192) (Fig. 4; Para. [0033]), on the display screen (one or more of user interface displays 106, display device 118, display 174, display 228) (Abstract; Figs. 1-11; Paras. [0003], [0005], [0018], [0020]-[0021], [0029]-[0031], [0038], [0041], [0044]-[0045]), the interface (Abstract; Figs. 2-12; Paras. [0042]-[0048]) comprises generating (step 192) (Fig. 4; Para. [0033]), on the display screen (one or more of user interface displays 106, display device 118, display 174, display 228) (Abstract; Figs. 1-11; Paras. [0003], [0005], [0018], [0020]-[0021], [0029]-[0031], [0038], [0041], [0044]-[0045]), the interface (Abstract; Figs. 2-12; Paras. [0042]-[0048]) comprising: a first limit interface display element (see Annotated Fig. 8 of Burns infra) indicative of a first limit of the first grain processing quality characteristic (e.g., quantity of broken grain) (Fig. 8; Para. [0043]); a first characteristic value interface display element (see Annotated Fig. 8 of Burns infra) comprising a graph (see Annotated Fig. 8 of Burns infra) indicative of values of the first grain processing quality characteristic (e.g., quantity of MOG Light) (Fig. 8; Para. [0060]) over time (See Fig. 8); and a second limit interface display element (see Annotated Fig. 8 of Burns infra) indicative of a second limit of the second grain processing quality characteristic (e.g., quantity of MOG Light) (Fig. 8; Para. [0060]); a second characteristic value interface display element (see Annotated Fig. 8 of Burns infra) comprising a second graph (see Annotated Fig. 8 of Burns infra) indicative of values of the second grain processing quality characteristic (e.g., quantity of MOG Light) (Fig. 8; Para. [0060]) over time (See Fig. 8); a third limit interface display element (see Annotated Fig. 8 of Burns infra) indicative of a third limit of the third grain processing quality characteristic (e.g., quantity of MOG Heavy) (Fig. 8; Para. [0060]); and a third characteristic value interface display element (see Annotated Fig. 8 of Burns infra) comprising a third graph (see Annotated Fig. 8 of Burns infra) indicative of values of the third grain processing quality characteristic (e.g., quantity of MOG Heavy) (Fig. 8; Para. [0060]) over time (See Fig. 8). [AltContent: textbox (First Characteristic Value Display Element(s))] [AltContent: textbox (Fourth Limit Interface Display Element(s))][AltContent: textbox (Third Limit Interface Display Element(s))][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (Fourth Characteristic Value Display Element(s))][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (Third Characteristic Value Display Element(s))][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (Second Characteristic Value Display Element(s))][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (Second Limit Interface Display Element(s))][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (First Limit Interface Display Element(s))] PNG media_image1.png 593 876 media_image1.png Greyscale Annotated Fig. 8 of Burns. Regarding claim 16, Burns discloses the computer implemented method of claim 12 (see above). Furthermore, Burns discloses a method wherein the graph (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11) comprises an X axis comprising a time scale (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11) and a Y axis comprising a value scale (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11) corresponding to the grain processing quality characteristic (one or more quality metrics 196) (Fig. 4; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]); wherein the limit interface display element (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11) comprises a line (See Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11) incorporated into the graph (See Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11) and disposed at a position along the Y axis (See Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11). Regarding claim 17, Burns discloses the computer implemented method of claim 16 (see above). Furthermore, Burns discloses a method wherein generating, on the display screen, the interface comprises generating, on the display screen, the interface further comprising a limit adjust interface display element that is interactable to adjust the limit of the grain processing quality characteristic, the computer implemented method further comprising: receiving interaction with the limit adjuster interface display element to adjust the limit of the grain processing quality characteristic; generating, on the display screen, an updated interface comprising: an updated characteristic value interface display element comprising the graph comprising the X axis and an updated Y axis comprising a rescaled value scale corresponding to the grain processing quality characteristic based on adjustment of the limit of the grain processing quality characteristic, the line incorporated into the graph and disposed at the position along the updated Y axis. Regarding claim 18, Burns discloses the computer implemented method of claim 12 (see above). Furthermore, Burns discloses a method wherein generating (step 192) (Fig. 4; Para. [0033]), on the display screen (one or more of user interface displays 106, display device 118, display 174, display 228) (Abstract; Figs. 1-11; Paras. [0003], [0005], [0018], [0020]-[0021], [0029]-[0031], [0038], [0041], [0044]-[0045]), the interface comprises generating (step 192) (Fig. 4; Para. [0033]), on the display screen (one or more of user interface displays 106, display device 118, display 174, display 228) (Abstract; Figs. 1-11; Paras. [0003], [0005], [0018], [0020]-[0021], [0029]-[0031], [0038], [0041], [0044]-[0045]), the interface further comprising: a productivity display portion (productivity display section 230) (Fig. 6; Para. [0042]) comprising a productivity interface display element (e.g., yield graph display 236) (Fig. 6; Para. [0042]) comprising a productivity graph (See Fig. 6) that indicates the values of one or more productivity characteristics (e.g., yield) (Fig. 6; Para. [0042]) over time (See Fig. 6). Regarding claim 19, Burns discloses the computer implemented method of claim 12 (see above). Furthermore, Burns discloses a method and further comprising: generating a control signal (Fig. 4; Para. [0050]) to control a controllable subsystem (Para. [0050]) of the agricultural harvester (mobile machine 102) (Figs. 1-2; Paras. [0017]-[0023], [0030]-[0037], [0041], [0044], [0049], [0054]-[0055], [0071]-[0077], [0084]) based on the limit of the grain processing quality characteristic (one or more quality metrics 196) (Fig. 4; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0050], [0059]-[0061]) and a value of the grain processing quality characteristic (Para. [0050]). Regarding claim 20, Burns discloses an agricultural harvesting system comprising: one or more sensors (on-board sensors 124) (Fig. 1; Paras. [0020], [0028], [0033]) configured to detect a first grain processing quality characteristic (first of quality metrics 196) (Fig. 4; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]) and a second grain processing quality characteristic (second of quality metrics 196) (Fig. 4; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]) and generate sensor data indicative of the detected first grain processing quality characteristic (first of quality metrics 196) (Fig. 4; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]) and the detected second grain processing quality characteristic (second of quality metrics 196) (Fig. 4; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]); a display screen (one or more of user interface displays 106, display device 118, display 174, display 228) (Abstract; Figs. 1-11; Paras. [0003], [0005], [0018], [0020]-[0021], [0029]-[0031], [0038], [0041], [0044]-[0045]); one or more processors (processor(s) 114, 17) (Fig. 2; Paras. [0020], [0079], [0086], [0090], [0093]) memory (Paras. [0029], [0039], [0079], [0086], [0090], [0093]-[0096], [0101]); and computer executable instructions (Paras. [0090], [0094], [0098]), stored in the memory (Paras. [0029], [0039], [0079], [0086], [0090], [0093]-[0096], [0101]), and executable by the one or more processors (processor(s) 114, 17) (Fig. 2; Paras. [0020], [0079], [0086], [0090], [0093]), the computer executable instructions (Paras. [0090], [0094], [0098]), when executed by the one or more processors (processor(s) 114, 17) (Fig. 2; Paras. [0020], [0079], [0086], [0090], [0093]), configure the one or more processors (processor(s) 114, 17) (Fig. 2; Paras. [0020], [0079], [0086], [0090], [0093]) to: generate (step 192) (Fig. 4; Para. [0033]) an interface (Abstract; Figs. 2-12; Paras. [0042]-[0048]) comprising: a first limit interface display element (line 250) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0042]-[0043]) indicative of a first limit of the first grain processing quality characteristic (first of quality metrics 196) (Fig. 4; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]); a second limit interface display element (lines 258) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0042]-[0043]) indicative of a second limit of the second grain processing quality characteristic (second of quality metrics 196) (Fig. 4; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]); a first characteristic value interface display element (strip chart(s) 238, 240, 242) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0042]-[0043]) comprising a graph (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11) indicative of values of the first grain processing quality characteristic (first of quality metrics 196) (Fig. 4; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]) over time (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11); and a second characteristic value interface display element (strip chart(s) 252, 254 or 256) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0042]-[0043]) comprising a second graph (strip chart(s) 252, 254 or 256) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0042]-[0043]) indicative of values of the second grain processing quality characteristic (second of quality metrics 196) (Fig. 4; Paras. [0033], [0042]-[0043], [0059]-[0061]) over time (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11); and display the interface (Abstract; Figs. 2-12; Paras. [0042]-[0048]) on the display screen (one or more of user interface displays 106, display device 118, display 174, display 228) (Abstract; Figs. 1-11; Paras. [0003], [0005], [0018], [0020]-[0021], [0029]-[0031], [0038], [0041], [0044]-[0045]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 7 and 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Burns in view of U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2018/0359919 to Blank et al. (hereinafter Blank) (cited by Applicant in IDS filed on 09/20/2023). Regarding claim 7, Burns discloses the mobile agricultural harvester of claim 1 (see above). Furthermore, Burns discloses a mobile agricultural harvester (mobile machine 102) (Figs. 1-2; Paras. [0017]-[0023], [0030]-[0037], [0041], [0044], [0049], [0054]-[0055], [0071]-[0077], [0084]) wherein the characteristic value interface display element (strip chart(s) 238, 240, 242, 252, 254, 256, 318 and/or 320) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0042]-[0043]) comprises a first characteristic value interface display element (strip chart(s) 238, 240, 242, 252, 254, 256, 318 and/or 320) (Figs. 5-6, 8-9, 11; Paras. [0042]-[0043]). However, Burns does not disclose an agricultural harvester wherein the computer executable instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, further configure the one or more processors to: generate (step 192) (Fig. 4; Para. [0033]) the interface (Abstract; Figs. 2-12; Paras. [0042]-[0048]) further comprising: a second characteristic value interface display element, separate from the first characteristic value interface display element and indicative of a current value of the grain processing quality characteristic. Nevertheless, Blank teaches an agricultural harvester (agricultural machine/combine 100) (Abstract; Figs. 1-2; Paras. [0034]-[0047]) wherein the computer executable instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, further configure the one or more processors to: generate the interface (See Fig. 13) further comprising: a second characteristic value interface display element (instant metric display section 430) (Fig. 13; Para. [0109]), separate from the first characteristic value interface display element (trend display element 428) (Fig. 13; Para. [0109]) and indicative of a current value of the grain processing quality characteristic (Fig. 13; Para. [0109]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the agricultural harvester with a display screen displaying strip charts disclosed in Burns with the displaying current values of the grain processing quality characteristic, as taught in Blank with a reasonable expectation of success in order to provide an easy-to-read display of the current value of the quality characteristic so the operator would not have to guess/estimate the current value displayed in the strip chart. Furthermore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the agricultural harvester with a display screen displaying strip charts disclosed in Burns with the displaying current values of the grain processing quality characteristic, as taught in Blank with a reasonable expectation of success, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to combine prior art elements according to known methods to yield predictable results is obvious. KSR International Co. v Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 416, 82 USPQ2d 1385, 1395-97 (2007). Regarding claim 15, Burns discloses the computer implemented method of claim 12 (see above). However, Burns does not expressly disclose a method wherein generating, on the display screen, the interface comprises generating, on the display screen, the interface further comprising: a fourth characteristic value interface display element next to the first characteristic value interface display element, the fourth characteristic value interface display element indicative of a current value of the first characteristic; a fifth characteristic value interface display next to the second characteristic value interface display element, the fifth characteristic value interface display element indicative of a current value of the second characteristic; and a sixth characteristic value interface display element next to the third characteristic value interface display element, the sixth characteristic value interface display element indicative of a current value of the third characteristic. Nevertheless, Blank teaches a method wherein generating, on the display screen, the interface comprises generating, on the display screen, the interface further comprising a characteristic value interface display element (instant metric display section 430) (Fig. 13; Para. [0109]), the characteristic value interface display element (instant metric display section 430) (Fig. 13; Para. [0109]) indicative of a current value of the first characteristic (Fig. 13; Para. [0109]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the agricultural harvester with a display screen displaying strip charts disclosed in Burns with the displaying current values of the grain processing quality characteristic, as taught in Blank with a reasonable expectation of success in order to provide an easy-to-read display of the current value of the quality characteristic so the operator would not have to guess/estimate the current value displayed in the strip chart. Furthermore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the agricultural harvester with a display screen displaying strip charts disclosed in Burns with the displaying current values of the grain processing quality characteristic, as taught in Blank with a reasonable expectation of success, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to combine prior art elements according to known methods to yield predictable results is obvious. KSR International Co. v Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 416, 82 USPQ2d 1385, 1395-97 (2007). Furthermore, while Burns in view of Blank does not disclose three separate current values each associated with a different quality characteristic, it would have been obvious to include as many metric displays taught in Blank as desired and associated with any quality measures desired, since it has been held that mere duplication of the essential working parts of a device involves only routine skill in the art. St. Regis Paper Co. v. Bemis Co., 193 USPQ 8 (CA7 1977). . Claim(s) 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Burns in view of European Pat. Pub. No. EP 4 183 443 A1 to Schmeling et al. (hereinafter Schmeling). Regarding claim 9, Burns discloses the mobile agricultural harvester of claim 8 (see above). However, Burns does not expressly disclose that the computer executable instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, further configure the one or more processors to: upon interaction with the limit adjuster interface display element, generate a limit adjuster interface comprising an interactable adjustment interface display element that is interactable to adjust the limit of the grain processing quality characteristic. Nevertheless, Schmeling teaches that the computer executable instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, further configure the one or more processors to: upon interaction with the limit adjuster interface display element, generate a limit adjuster interface (Figs. 6L, 6M; Para. [0140]) comprising an interactable adjustment interface display element (reaction-threshold widget(s) 609A, 690B) that is interactable to adjust the limit (recovery threshold(s) depicted in signal graph 686) (Figs. 6L, 6M; Para. [0140]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the agricultural harvester disclosed in Burns with the interactable adjustment interface display elements taught in Schmeling with a reasonable expectation of success in order to facilitate adjustment of thresholds to a user-desired level. Furthermore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the agricultural harvester disclosed in Burns with the interactable adjustment interface display elements taught in Schmeling with a reasonable expectation of success, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to combine prior art elements according to known methods to yield predictable results is obvious. KSR International Co. v Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 416, 82 USPQ2d 1385, 1395-97 (2007). Claim(s) 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Burns in view of U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2019/0084855 to Tirman. Regarding claim 11, Burns discloses the mobile agricultural harvester of claim 1 (see above). Furthermore, Burns discloses a mobile agricultural harvester (mobile machine 102) (Figs. 1-2; Paras. [0017]-[0023], [0030]-[0037], [0041], [0044], [0049], [0054]-[0055], [0071]-[0077], [0084]) wherein the computer executable instructions (Paras. [0090], [0094], [0098]), when executed by the one or more processors (processor(s) 114, 17) (Fig. 2; Paras. [0020], [0079], [0086], [0090], [0093]), further configure the one or more processors (processor(s) 114, 17) (Fig. 2; Paras. [0020], [0079], [0086], [0090], [0093]) to: generate (step 192) (Fig. 4; Para. [0033]) the interface (Abstract; Figs. 2-12; Paras. [0042]-[0048]) further comprising: a productivity display portion (productivity display section 230) (Fig. 6; Para. [0042]) comprising a productivity interface display element (e.g., strip charts 238, 240, 242) (Fig. 6; Para. [0042]) comprising a productivity graph (see Fig. 6) indicative of values of a first productivity characteristic (e.g., separator loss) over time (see Fig. 6) and indicative of values of a second productivity characteristic (e.g., shoe loss) over time (see Fig. 6); wherein the productivity graph (see Fig. 6) comprises an X axis comprising a time scale (see Fig. 6), a first Y axis comprising a first value scale (see Fig. 6) corresponding to the first productivity characteristic (e.g., separator loss), a first line (e.g., line of strip chart 238) (see Fig. 6) indicative of values of the first productivity characteristic (e.g., separator loss) across the time scale, and a second line (e.g., line of strip chart 240) (see Fig. 6) indicative of values of the second productivity characteristic (e.g., shoe loss) over the time scale. However, Burns does not expressly disclose a second Y axis comprising a second value scale corresponding to the second productivity characteristic. Nevertheless, it is exceptionally well-known in the art of displaying data on graphs to have two lines with different ranges that utilize a y-axis scale on a left side of the graph and a different y-axis scale on a right side of the graph to allow graphing two characteristics on the same graph. Tirman teaches a graph having a first Y axis comprising a first value scale (Fig. 17; Para. [0104]) and a second Y axis comprising a second value scale (Fig. 17; Para. [0104]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the agricultural harvester disclosed in Burns with the first and second Y axes taught in Tirman with a reasonable expectation of success in order to allow graphs of characteristics with dissimilar values to be presented on a single graph to provide greater data density on a single graph. Furthermore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the agricultural harvester disclosed in Burns with the first and second Y axes taught in Tirman with a reasonable expectation of success, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to combine prior art elements according to known methods to yield predictable results is obvious. KSR International Co. v Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 416, 82 USPQ2d 1385, 1395-97 (2007). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CLAUDE J BROWN whose telephone number is (571)270-5924. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph M. Rocca can be reached at (571) 272-8971. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CLAUDE J BROWN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3671
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 20, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Mar 23, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 09, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 09, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599059
ELECTRIC MOWER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593746
ROTARY MOWER BLADE POSITION SYNCHRONIZATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588584
ROBOT AND METHOD FOR ASCERTAINING A DISTANCE TRAVELED BY A ROBOT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582036
DECK PLATE AUTOMATIC ADJUSTMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582032
WORK MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+17.6%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 498 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month