Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 18/471,300

BATTERY

Final Rejection §103§112
Filed
Sep 21, 2023
Priority
Oct 21, 2022 — JP 2022-169367
Examiner
HANYON, SAMANTHA LEE
Art Unit
1725
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Prime Planet Energy & Solutions Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
100%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 100% — above average
100%
Career Allowance Rate
1 granted / 1 resolved
+35.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
28
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
54.0%
+14.0% vs TC avg
§102
14.3%
-25.7% vs TC avg
§112
28.6%
-11.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment This Office action addresses claims 1-5 and 7-9. Claims 1-5 amended overcome the rejections under U.S.C 35 112 (b) but remain rejected under U.S.C. 35 103. Claim 7 remains rejected under U.S.C 35 112 (b) and U.S.C. 35 103. Claims 8 and 9 are newly rejected. Accordingly, this action is made final. Specification The title and the specifications have been amended. The respective rejections are withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1-5 and 7 have been amended. Claim 6 was canceled. The rejections of claim 1-5 under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) are withdrawn. The rejection of claim 7 is maintained. Claim 8 recites “and the stacked portion of the first electrode assembly or the second electrode assembly is arranged at an outer side more than a tab position of any one of a positive electrode tab and a negative electrode tab in a direction orthogonal to the thickness direction (X).” This is unclear. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1 and 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shangguan et al. (US20220285737; “Shangguan” hereinafter) in view of Chen et al. (US 20210320388 A1; “Chen” hereinafter). Regarding claim 1, Shangguan teaches a battery (a battery cell, [0005]), comprising: a first electrode assembly (a winding type electrode assembly [0005]) and a second electrode assembly (Shangguan discloses or more battery cells [0111]), each being a flat shaped wound electrode (flat [95]) assembly in which a positive electrode (positive electrode plate, element 231 figure 1) and a negative electrode ( negative electrode plate, element 232 figure 1) are wound via a separator (see dotted lines figure 1 or [0100]); and a battery case ( see figure 2) configured to accommodate the first and the second electrode assembly (Shangguan discloses one or more battery cells [0111] and shows 2 in figure 2). PNG media_image1.png 785 1058 media_image1.png Greyscale Figure 1: Shangguan modified 26 PNG media_image2.png 770 559 media_image2.png Greyscale Figure 2: Shangguan figure 3 Shangguan discloses a pair of bent portions, each having an outer surface being bent; and a flat part configured to couple the pair of bent portions (see figure 1), a positive electrode inner end comprises a first area elongating along the flat part (see element 23121, figure 1), a negative electrode inner end comprises: a second area elongating along the flat part (element 23221, figure 1); a folding part being folded from an end part of the second area (see curved portion of 231 following 23221); and a third area elongating from an end part of the folding part along the flat part (see second flat portion of 231 in figure 1), a stacked portion at the positive electrode inner end and the negative electrode inner end is provided where the first area, the second area, and the third area are overlapped in a thickness direction X reaching from one flat surface of the wound electrode assembly to the other flat surface (see stacked portion inside markings figure 1). Shangguan discloses one electrode assembly and discloses that the stacked portion of the first electrode assembly or the stacked portion of the second electrode assembly is overlapped with a tab position of any one of a positive electrode tab or a negative electrode tab (see tabs in marked area in figure 3 below). PNG media_image3.png 615 828 media_image3.png Greyscale Figure 3: Shangguan modified 26 Shangguan fails to disclose that the stacked portion of the first electrode assembly and the stacked portion of the second electrode assembly are mutually arranged at different sides with respect to a surface being along a wound axis of the first electrode assembly and a wound axis of the second electrode assembly. The mere duplication of parts itself is considered obvious. In re Harza, 274 F.2d 669, 124 USPQ 378 (CCPA 1960). Chen however, in the same field of endeavor namely secondary batteries discloses two jelly roll batteries arranged to pass through a wound axis of the first electrode assembly and a wound axis of the second electrode assembly, and mutually arranged at different sides with respect to a surface being along the wound axis of the first electrode assembly and the wound axis of the second electrode assembly (see inner ends of jelly-rolls arranged on opposing each other figure 4). Shangguan and Chen are analogous prior art to the current invention because they are concerned with the same field of endeavor, namely jelly-roll batteries. Therefore, prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, in seeking a battery housing that contains two jelly rolls it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, to modify the battery as taught by Shangguan and add an additional jelly rolls as disclosed by Chen and the motivation to do so would have been applying a known technique to a known device to yield predictable results (see MPEP(I)(D) 2143). PNG media_image4.png 461 805 media_image4.png Greyscale Figure 4: Chen figure 6 Regarding claim 4, Shangguan discloses the battery according to claim 1, wherein the battery case comprises: an outer package having an opening (see element 23, figure 2), and a sealing plate (see element 22, figure 2), wherein the sealing plate has a liquid injection hole, the battery case comprises a first surface on which a liquid injection hole is formed, and the first electrode assembly and the second electrode assembly are arranged in the battery case so as to make a wound axis of the first electrode assembly and a wound axis of the second electrode assembly be respectively arranged in directions perpendicular to the first surface sealing plate (see arrangement of bend portions in figure 2). Cheng similarly discloses a battery case. Claims 2, 3 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shangguan et al. (US20220285737; “Shangguan” hereinafter) in view of and Chen et al. (US20210320388 A1; “Chen” hereinafter) as applied to claim 1 and further in view of Ogawa et al. (WO2021131881 A1; “Ogawa” hereinafter). Regarding claim 2, modified Shangguan discloses the battery according to claim 1 but fails to disclose any winding-end tapes configured to fix outer end of the separators disposed on the outer periphery surfaces of the first electrode assembly and the second electrode assembly are arranged on the bent portions (winding-end tape is disposed on one of the two curved surface sections (Ogawa: abstract and figure 5). Shangguan and Ogawa are analogous prior art to the current invention because they are concerned with the same field of endeavor, namely jelly roll batteries. PNG media_image5.png 369 686 media_image5.png Greyscale Figure 5: Ogawa adapted figure 8 In seeking a battery with an increased formability and reduced rewinding of the electrode body before the effective filing date of the current invention, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to arrange the winding-end tape as disclosed by Ogawa on the battery disclosed by Shangguan as doing so would amount to nothing more than to use a known method for its intended use in a known environment to accomplish an entirely predictable result. Regarding claim 3, Shangguan discloses the battery according to claim 2 but fails to disclose winding-end tape disposed on the first electrode assembly and winding-end tape disposed on the second electrode assembly are arranged on the bent parts positioned at the same side. Ogawa discloses that the winding-end tape fixed a jellyroll on either one of the curved surfaces (page 4, line 11). The mere duplication of parts itself is considered obvious. In re Harza, 274 F.2d 669, 124 USPQ 378 (CCPA 1960). Regarding claim 5, Shangguan discloses the battery according to claim 2 but is silent with regard to an adhesion layer. Ogawa teaches an adhesion layer (a positive electrode protective tape (Ogawa: element 35 figure 5) is formed between the separator (Ogawa: element 30 figure 5) and at least one of the positive electrode (Ogawa: element 14 figure 5) and the negative electrode, and on each of the first electrode assembly and the second electrode assembly, a laminate number of the separator in the thickness direction is equal to or more than 20 layers (the electrode body 13 is wound with 10 or more turns, for example, 30 to 40 turns (Ogawa: [0044])). Shangguan and Ogawa are analogous prior art to the current invention because they are concerned with the same field of endeavor, namely jelly roll batteries. In seeking a method to protect the separator and positive or negative electrode plate before the effective filing date of the current invention, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to apply the adhesive tape as disclosed by Ogawa on the battery disclosed by Shangguan as doing so would amount to nothing more than to use a known method for its intended use in a known environment to accomplish an entirely predictable result. Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shangguan et al. (US20220285737; “Shangguan” hereinafter) in view of Chen et al. (US 20210320388 A1; Chen hereinafter) as applied to claim 1 and further in view of Hoen et al. (KR101254884B1; “Hoen” hereinafter; a machine translation is used for citations). Regarding claim 7, Shangguan discloses the battery according to claim 1, but fails to disclose that the electrode stacked portion at the inner end of the electrode is arranged at an outer side more than a tab position of any one of a positive electrode tab and a negative electrode tab in a direction orthogonal to the thickness direction. Hoen discloses such a configuration in figure 6. See stacked area marked with dotted line being at an outer position relative to tab 116. Shangguan and Hoen are analogous prior art to the current invention because they are concerned with the same field of endeavor, namely jelly roll batteries. In seeking to secure the inner curvature of a jelly role during winding and thus minimize the risk of breaking the electrode plate during winding before the effective filing date of the current invention, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to arrange the inner electrode plates disclosed by Shangguan similarly to Hoen as doing so would amount to nothing more than to use a known method for its intended use in a known environment to accomplish an entirely predictable result. PNG media_image6.png 713 994 media_image6.png Greyscale Figure 6: Hoen figure 4 Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shangguan et al. (US20220285737; “Shangguan” hereinafter) in view Chen et al. (US20210320388A1; Chen hereinafter) and in view of Hoen et al. (KR101254884B1; “Hoen” hereinafter; a machine translation is used for citations). Regarding claim 8, Shangguan teaches a battery (a battery cell, [0005]), comprising: a first electrode assembly (a winding type electrode assembly [0005]) and a second electrode assembly (Shangguan discloses or more battery cells [0111]), each being a flat shaped wound electrode (flat [95]) assembly in which a positive electrode (positive electrode plate, element 231 figure 1) and a negative electrode ( negative electrode plate, element 232 figure 1) are wound via a separator (see dotted lines figure 1 or [0100]); and a battery case ( see figure 2) configured to accommodate the first and the second electrode assembly (Shangguan discloses one or more battery cells [0111] and shows 2 in figure 2), wherein each of the first electrode assembly and the second electrode assembly comprises: a pair of bent portions, each having an outer surface being bent; and a flat part configured to couple the pair of bent portions (see figure 1), a positive electrode inner end comprises a first area elongating along the flat part (see element 23121, figure 1), a negative electrode inner end comprises: a second area elongating along the flat part (element 23221, figure 1); a folding part being folded from an end part of the second area (see curved portion of 231 following 23221); and a third area elongating from an end part of the folding part along the flat part (see second flat portion of 231 in figure 1), a stacked portion at the positive electrode inner end and the negative electrode inner end is provided where the first area, the second area, and the third area are overlapped in a thickness direction X reaching from one flat surface of the wound electrode assembly to the other flat surface (see stacked portion inside markings figure 1). Shangguan fails to disclose that the stacked portion of the first electrode assembly and the stacked portion of the second electrode assembly are mutually arranged at different sides with respect to a surface being along a wound axis of the first electrode assembly and a wound axis of the second electrode assembly. The mere duplication of parts itself is considered obvious. In re Harza, 274 F.2d 669, 124 USPQ 378 (CCPA 1960). Chen in the same field of endeavor namely secondary batteries discloses two jelly roll batteries arranged to pass through a wound axis of the first electrode assembly and a wound axis of the second electrode assembly, and mutually arranged at different sides with respect to a surface being along the wound axis of the first electrode assembly and the wound axis of the second electrode assembly (see inner ends of jelly-rolls arranged on opposing each other figure 4). Shangguan and Chen are analogous prior art to the current invention because they are concerned with the same field of endeavor, namely jelly-roll batteries. Therefore, prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, in seeking a battery housing that contains two jelly rolls it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, to modify the battery as taught by Shangguan and add an additional jelly rolls as disclosed by Chen and the motivation to do so would have been applying a known technique to a known device to yield predictable results (see MPEP(I)(D) 2143). Shangguan further fails to disclose that the stacked portion of the first electrode assembly or the second electrode assembly is an outer side more than a tab position of any one of a positive electrode tab and a negative electrode tab in a direction orthogonal to the thickness direction (X). Hoen discloses such a configuration in figure 6. (See stacked area marked with dotted line being at an outer position relative to tab 116.) Shangguan and Hoen are analogous prior art to the current invention because they are concerned with the same field of endeavor, namely jelly roll batteries. In seeking to secure the inner curvature of a jelly role during winding and thus minimize the risk of breaking the electrode plate during winding before the effective filing date of the current invention, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to arrange the inner electrode plates disclosed by Shangguan similarly to Hoen as doing so would amount to nothing more than to use a known method for its intended use in a known environment to accomplish an entirely predictable result. Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shangguan et al. (US20220285737; “Shangguan” hereinafter) in view Chen et al. (US20210320388A1; Chen hereinafter) and in view of Hoen et al. (KR101254884B1; “Hoen” hereinafter; a machine translation is used for citations). Regarding claim 9, Shangguan teaches a battery (a battery cell, [0005]), comprising: a first electrode assembly (a winding type electrode assembly [0005]) and a second electrode assembly (Shangguan discloses or more battery cells [0111]), each being a flat shaped wound electrode (flat [95]) assembly in which a positive electrode (positive electrode plate, element 231 figure 1) and a negative electrode ( negative electrode plate, element 232 figure 1) are wound via a separator (see dotted lines figure 1 or [0100]); and a battery case ( see figure 2) configured to accommodate more than 3 electrode assemblies comprising (Shangguan discloses one or more battery cells [0111]), the first electrode assembly and the second electrode assembly, wherein each of the first electrode assembly and the second electrode assembly comprises: a pair of bent portions, each having an outer surface being bent; and a flat part configured to couple the pair of bent portions (see figure 1), a positive electrode inner end comprises a first area elongating along the flat part (see element 23121, figure 1), a negative electrode inner end comprises: a second area elongating along the flat part (element 23221, figure 1); a folding part being folded from an end part of the second area (see curved portion of 231 following 23221); and a third area elongating from an end part of the folding part along the flat part (see second flat portion of 231 in figure 1), a stacked portion at the positive electrode inner end and the negative electrode inner end is provided where the first area, the second area, and the third area are overlapped in a thickness direction X reaching from one flat surface of the wound electrode assembly to the other flat surface (see stacked portion inside markings figure 1). Shangguan fails to disclose that the stacked portion of the first electrode assembly and the stacked portion of the second electrode assembly are mutually arranged at different sides with respect to a surface being along a wound axis of the first electrode assembly and a wound axis of the second electrode assembly. The mere duplication of parts itself is considered obvious. In reHarza, 274 F.2d 669, 124 USPQ 378 (CCPA 1960). Chen in the same field of endeavor namely secondary batteries discloses two jelly roll batteries arranged to pass through a wound axis of the first electrode assembly and a wound axis of the second electrode assembly, and mutually arranged at different sides with respect to a surface being along the wound axis of the first electrode assembly and the wound axis of the second electrode assembly (see inner ends of jelly-rolls arranged on opposing each other figure 4). Shangguan and Chen are analogous prior art to the current invention because they are concerned with the same field of endeavor, namely jelly-roll batteries. Therefore, prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, in seeking a battery housing that contains two jelly rolls it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, to modify the battery as taught by Shangguan and add an additional jelly rolls as disclosed by Chen and the motivation to do so would have been applying a known technique to a known device to yield predictable results (see MPEP(I)(D) 2143). Shangguan discloses that the stacked portion of the first electrode assembly or the stacked portion of the second electrode assembly is overlapped with a tab position of any one of a positive electrode tab or a negative electrode tab (see tabs in marked area in figure 3 below). Shangguan further discloses that the multiple battery assemblies can be connected in series, parallelly or hybrid but is silent regarding the positions of the stacked portion at the electrode inner end of the electrode assemblies are configured to be alternately different from each other with respect to the surface. Chen however discloses that the positions of the stacked portion at the electrode inner end are alternately different from each other with regard to the surface (See Chen figure 4). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 07/22/26 have been fully considered but they are moot. Claim 1 was amended and new grounds of rejection are presented accordingly. Conclusion US9991498B discloses an electrode assembly and discloses multiple jelly rolls. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAMANTHA LEE HANYON whose telephone number is (571)272-8881. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri. 7:30am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicole Buie-Hatcher can be reached at (571) 270-3879. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /S.L.H./Examiner, Art Unit 1725 /NICOLE M. BUIE-HATCHER/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1725
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 21, 2023
Application Filed
May 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Jul 04, 2026
Interview Requested
Jul 14, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 15, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jul 22, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 16, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
100%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+0.0%)
3y 2m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month