Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 24, 2026
Application No. 18/472,918

COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INHIBITION OF ALPHAVIRUS INFECTION

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Sep 22, 2023
Priority
Jan 04, 2018 — provisional 62/613,658 +5 more
Examiner
CANELLA, KAREN A
Art Unit
1643
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Washington University
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
711 granted / 1142 resolved
+2.3% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+32.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
1198
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
§103
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
§102
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
§112
33.0%
-7.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1142 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are pending and examined on the merits. Priority Applicant’s claim for the benefit of a prior-filed application under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) or under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c) is acknowledged. Applicant has not complied with one or more conditions for receiving the benefit of an earlier filing date under 35 U.S.C. 120 or 35 U.S.C. 119(e) as follows: none of 16/959867, 62/672,080, 62/671,680 or 62/613,658 provide a written description of an Fc fusion comprising a first Mxra8 region and a second Mxra8 region, wherein the first Mxra8 region and the second Mxra8 region are not the same. Accordingly, the instant claims are not given benefit of priority to 16/959867, 62/672,080, 62/671,680 or 62/613,658, but are considered to have the priority date of 9/22/2023. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. (a)overall configuration The instant clams are reliant on a genus of fusion proteins comprising a first and second Mxra8 region and an Fc. The claims do not limit the fusion protein to a monomeric Fc or dimeric Fc, or to attachment to the Fc from the carboxyl terminus of the Mxra8 to the amino terminus of the Fc attachment of the amino terminus of the Mxra8 to the carboxyl terminus of the Fc. The claims do not limit the order in which the second Mxra8regions occurs relative to the first Mxra8 region. The claims do not specify if the first and second Mxra8 region are attached to the same Fc. The specification discloses the fusion protein of SEQ ID NO:18 wherein the amino terminus of the Fc region is attached to the carboxyl terminus of the Mxra8 ectodomain. This fail to adequate describe the genus of multiple configurations of the Fc, first Mxra8 and second Mxra8 because the genus is highly varied encompassing structures unlike that of SEQ ID NO:18 in terms of order of the various components and the presence or absence of an Fc dimer. (b)”Mxra8 region” and “D2” region. When given the broadest reasonable interpretation, an MxRa8 region can be any portion of the Mxra8 protein. Claims 5 encompasses a genus of fusion proteins wherein the first Mxra8 region comprises a “D2” mammalian or mouse Mxra8 region as the “second” Mxra8 region. The specification fails to provide a written description of the mammalian or mouse D2 region, or the second Mxra8 region. The art teaches that the Mxra8 region, D1, is directly targeted by the Mxra8 virus, the sequence of D1 being species specific,, but that the Mxra8 region, D2, on the cell membrane interacts with the virus surface glycoproteins to stabilize the host-virus binding. The specification provides a written description of SEQ ID NO: 141-162 as Mxra8 D1 sequences. The specification teaches that the fusion protein comprises the ectodomain and a D1 region of SEQ ID NO: 141-162. The specification states that the fusion protein can also comprise the D2 mammalian region, including mouse D2, but this region is not described in terms of sequence. The prior art does not describe a mammalian D2 region or mouse D2 region for the arithrogenic alpha virus. The specification describes the D2 regions in reference to the binding of the Mxra8 of the virus to the host cell observed using Cryo EM: [0054] FIG. 36A-FIG. 36D is an exemplary embodiment showing cryo-EM reconstruction of duck MXRA8 bound to WEEV in accordance with the present disclosure. FIG. 36A is a cryo-EM density map of WEEV-VLP bound to duck MXRA8 at 4.74 Å resolution. WEEV-E1, WEEV-E2, and MXRA8 are colored as light-blue, dark-blue, and violet, respectively. Rotational symmetries along the 2-fold, 3-fold, and 5-fold axes are displayed with white numbers. FIG. 36B is a map of WEEV-VLP bound to duck MXRA8. Asymmetric unit contains the entire quasi 3-fold spike (q3), and a single icosahedral spike (i3) E1-E2 heterodimer. Shown are two views of the asymmetric unit, a side view (left, parallel with the viral membrane) and a top-down view (right, perpendicular with the viral membrane). Local resolution of map is colored from blue (4.25 Å) to white (5.25 Å) to red (6.25 Å). Density maps are viewed at contour level=0.26 (0.966). FIG. 36C is a surface diagram of MXRA8 at site 3, detailing the three unique viral E1-E2 heterodimer contacts, wrapped (light gray), intraspike (gray), and interspike (dark gray). FIG. 36D is a surface diagram of MXRA8 at site 3 and interacting E1-E2 heterodimers, termed: E1-E2-wrapped, E1-E2-intraspike, or E1-E2-interspike. MXRA8 D1: light magenta; MXRA8 D2: dark magenta; E1 domain I: light gray; E1 domain II: medium-gray; E1 domain III: dark-gray; E1-TM (black); E2 Å domain: light-cyan; E2 β-linker: medium-cyan; E2 B domain: dark-cyan; E2 C domain: medium-blue; E2-TM: dark-blue. See also FIG. 45A-FIG. 45D, FIG. 46, and TABLE 7-TABLE 9. It is noted that Tables 8 and 9 provide contact residues between D2 regions and Mxra8. However, none of the cartoon diagrmas or lists of contact residues provide an adequate description of what a D2 region actually is in terms of a contiguous sequence that could be included in the claimed fusion protein. One of skill in the art would reasonably assume that applicant was not in possession of the genus of fusion protein at the time of filing. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1-3, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Diamond et al (WO2019/136,316). Diamond et al disclose the Mxra8 ectodomain fused to mouse Fc, wherein the molecule is a dimer (Figure 14a), thus meeting the limitations of a first and second Mxra8 region in the fusion protein of claims 1, 9 and 16, wherein the first and second regions are the same. Diamond et al disclose that fusion is a mouse Fc is IgG2b fused to the Mxra8 ectodomain (page 2, lines 9-11) which meets the limitation of claim 2, 3, 10 and 17. Diamond et al disclose that the dimer binds to the surface displayed E2 protein in virus infected cells (page 13, lines 2-10) which meets the limitation of claim 16. Diamond et al disclose that the subject is selected from the group consisting of: a mammal, such as a horse, dog, cat, sheep, pig, mouse, rat, monkey, hamster, guinea pig, chicken, and human., which meets the limitations of claim 14 and a chicken in claim 15. Diamond et al disclose that the administration of the fusion protein in a method of treating Mxra8-assoicated alpha virus (claims 6, 9 and 10 of ‘316) which reduces or prevents infection by the arthritogenic alphavirus (claim 11 of ‘316) and meets that limitation in instant claim 9. Diamond eet al disclose that the alphavirus is chikungunya, Ross River, Mayaro, and O’nyong nyong (ONNV) viruses (page 20, lines 9-11) which meets the limitations of claims 12 and 19. All claims are rejected. . Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KAREN A CANELLA whose telephone number is (571)272-0828. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10-6:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Julie Wu can be reached at 571-272-5205. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. KAREN A. CANELLA Examiner Art Unit 1643 /Karen A. Canella/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1643
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 22, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 18, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12760275
GENETICALLY ENGINEERED PLACENTAL MUCOSALASSOCIATED INVARIANT T (MAIT) CELLS AND USES THEREOF
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12753393
LIQUID CRYSTAL SCAFFOLDS AND USE THEREOF FOR ORGANOID, SPHEROID, AND 3D CELLAGGREGATE MANUFACTURING
1y 3m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12747250
CAMPTOTHECIN DERIVATIVES
4y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747265
FOXM1-DERIVED PEPTIDE, AND VACCINE INCLUDING SAME
4y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12734209
CD38 Antibody Drug Conjugate
4y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+32.8%)
3y 5m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1142 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month