Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/473,025

DEVICE, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR COLLECTING PARTICULATE MATTER FROM A MOTORIZED VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 22, 2023
Examiner
MEYER, JACOB B
Art Unit
3613
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
562 granted / 754 resolved
+22.5% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
768
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
42.5%
+2.5% vs TC avg
§102
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
§112
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 754 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Tabrizi (US Pub. No. 2006/0230729). Regarding claim 20, Tabrizi discloses a system for collecting particulate matter (Title, Abstract), comprising: a central module configured to be arranged in a motorized vehicle to collect particulate matter from at least one tire of the motorized vehicle, the central module including: at least one motor configured to provide suction; and at least one collection tank configured to receive the particulate matter from the at least one tire of the motorized vehicle, wherein the suction provided by the at least one motor draws the particulate matter from the at least one tire of the motorized vehicle into the at least one collection tank; a plurality of collection heads configured to be arranged about the motorized vehicle to receive the particulate matter from the at least one tire of the motorized vehicle; and a plurality of conduits configured to connect the collection heads of the plurality of collection heads with the at least one collection tank to convey the particulate matter received at the collection heads of the plurality of collection heads to the collection tank (see annotated figs below, paragraphs 14-15). PNG media_image1.png 574 768 media_image1.png Greyscale Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-19 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: the prior art when taken alone or in combination does not appear to teach or fairly suggest at this time the combination of limitations of independent claim 1 or 19. In particular, the prior art discloses arrangements of particle collection devices (at least Tabrizi noted above). However, the prior art does not appear to teach a system for collecting particulate matter, comprising: a central module configured to be arranged in a motorized vehicle to collect particulate matter from at least one tire of the motorized vehicle, the central module including: at least one motor configured to provide suction; at least one collection tank configured to receive the particulate matter from the at least one tire of the motorized vehicle, wherein the suction provided by the at least one motor draws the particulate matter from the at least one tire of the motorized vehicle into the at least one collection tank; and a control module configured to regulate the suction provided by the at least one motor; a plurality of collection heads configured to be arranged about the motorized vehicle to receive the particulate matter from the at least one tire of the motorized vehicle; and a plurality of conduits configured to connect the collection heads of the plurality of collection heads with the at least one collection tank to convey the particulate matter received at the collection heads of the plurality of collection heads to the collection tank [claim 1]; or a system for collecting particulate matter, comprising: a central module arranged in a motorized vehicle to collect particulate matter from at least one tire of the motorized vehicle, the central module including: at least one motor configured to provide suction; at least one collection tank configured to receive the particulate matter from the at least one tire of the motorized vehicle, wherein the suction provided by the at least one motor draws the particulate matter from the at least one tire of the motorized vehicle into the at least one collection tank; and a control module configured to regulate the suction provided by the at least one motor; a plurality of collection heads arranged about the motorized vehicle to receive the particulate matter from the at least one tire of the motorized vehicle; and a plurality of conduits connecting the collection heads of the plurality of collection heads with the at least one collection tank to convey the particulate matter received at the collection heads of the plurality of collection heads to the collection tank. Choi ‘893 cited herewith discusses regulating suction force based on vehicle speed (at least col 2, lines 32-38). However, Choi ‘893 does not have an effective filing date earlier than the effective filing date of the instant application and, therefore, does not constitute prior art. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JACOB B MEYER whose telephone number is (571)270-3535. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9-7. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, J Allen Shriver can be reached at 303.297.4337. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JACOB B. MEYER Primary Examiner Art Unit 3613 /JACOB B MEYER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3613
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 22, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 31, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12589480
Storage Device System
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582568
ULTRASOUND-GUIDED INTERVENTIONAL OPERATION VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12570132
FRAME FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12565409
CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE WITH A LATERAL CAB AND A BATTERY MODULE FASTENED BENEATH THE CAB
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12558950
INTEGRATED INTERNAL COMBUSTION ELECTRIC MOTOR (ICEM) CONCEPT FOR HYBRID AND PLUG-IN HYBRID VEHICLE APPLICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+16.8%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 754 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month