Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/473,139

GLASSES DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING A POSE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 22, 2023
Priority
Nov 10, 2022 — DE 102022211923.1
Examiner
XIAO, DI
Art Unit
2178
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
481 granted / 618 resolved
+22.8% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
632
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
§103
66.5%
+26.5% vs TC avg
§102
14.9%
-25.1% vs TC avg
§112
11.6%
-28.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 618 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION In Applicant’s Response dated 6/18/2026, Applicant argued against all rejections previously set forth in the Office action dated 2/18/2026. In view of Applicant’s remarks, the 35 USC 103 rejections are withdrawn, however, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made. This action is made non final. Response to Argument Applicant’s arguments were considered, but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Moll et al., Pub. No.: 2023/0384928A1. in view of Tome, SelfPose: 3D Egocentric Pose Estimation From a Headset Mounted Camera (October 2020). With regard to claim 1: Moll discloses a glasses device, comprising: a frame structure configured to fix the glasses device to a head of a user (see fig. 1 for the frame structure and the glasses, paragraph 26: “FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an AR system composed of a head-worn device (e.g., glasses 100 of FIG. 1), in accordance with some examples. The glasses 100 can include a frame 102 made from any suitable material such as plastic or metal, including any suitable shape memory alloy. In one or more examples, the frame 102 includes a first or left optical element holder 104 (e.g., a display or lens holder) and a second or right optical element holder 106 connected by a bridge 112. A first or left optical element 108 and a second or right optical element 110 can be provided within respective left optical element holder 104 and right optical element holder 106. The right optical element 110 and the left optical element 108 can be a lens, a display, a display assembly, or a combination of the foregoing. Any suitable display assembly can be provided in the glasses 100.”); at least one at least partially transparent vision element, which can be positioned in front of at least one eye of the user and through which the user can look (A head-worn device may be implemented with a transparent or semi-transparent display through which a user of the head-worn device, paragraph 2: “A head-worn device may be implemented with a transparent or semi-transparent display through which a user of the head-worn device can view the surrounding environment. Such devices enable a user to see through the transparent or semi-transparent display to view the surrounding environment, and to also see objects (e.g., virtual objects such as a rendering of a 2D or 3D graphic model, images, video, text, and so forth) that are generated for display to appear as a part of, and/or overlaid upon, the surrounding environment. This is typically referred to as “augmented reality” or “AR.” A head-worn device may additionally completely occlude a user's visual field and display a virtual environment through which a user may move or be moved. This is typically referred to as “virtual reality” or “VR.” As used herein, the term AR refers to either or both augmented reality and virtual reality as traditionally understood, unless the context indicates otherwise.”); and at least one sensor arrangement arranged on the frame structure (see fig. 1 for camera sensors, paragraph 30 and 31: “The glasses 100 include a first or left camera 114 and a second or right camera 116. Although two cameras are depicted, other examples contemplate the use of a single or additional (i.e., more than two) cameras. In one or more examples, the glasses 100 include any number of input sensors or other input/output devices in addition to the left camera 114 and the right camera 116. Such sensors or input/output devices can additionally include biometric sensors, location sensors, motion sensors, and so forth. In some examples, the left camera 114 and the right camera 116 provide video frame data for use by the glasses 100 to extract 3D information from a real-world scene.”), wherein the sensor arrangement is configured to capture sensor data while the user wears the glasses device, wherein the sensor data at least partially represent at least one subarea of a body of the user during the wearing of the glasses device (system captures video frame data of detectable portions of the user's body paragraph 48: “During the gesture-based keyboard process 400, in operation 430, one or more cameras 420 of the AR system generate real-world scene video frame data 432 of a real-world scene from a perspective of a user of the AR system. The one or more cameras 420 communicate the real-world scene video frame data 432 to a tracking service 424. Included in the real-world scene video frame data 432 are tracking video frame data of detectable portions of the user's body including portions of the user's upper body, arms, hands, and fingers. The tracking video frame data includes video frame data of movement of portions of the user's upper body, arms, and hands as the user makes a gesture or moves their hands and fingers to interact with the virtual keyboard user interface 450; video frame data of locations of the user's arms and hands in space as the user makes the gesture or moves their hands and fingers to interact with the virtual keyboard user interface 450; and video frame data of positions in which the user holds their upper body, arms, hands, and fingers as the user makes the gesture or moves their hands and fingers to interact with the virtual keyboard user interface 450.”), and wherein a pose determination of a pose of the user can be carried out based on the sensor data (gesture recognition service 422 determines a detected gesture/pose, paragraph 50: “In operation 438, the gesture recognition service 422 receives the current tracking data 464 from the tracking service 424 and generates current detected gesture data 436 based on the current tracking data 464. In some examples, the gesture recognition service 422 generates one or more current skeletal models of the user's upper body, arms, hands, and fingers based on landmark data of landmarks included in the current tracking data 464. The gesture recognition service 422 compares the one or more current skeletal models to previously generated gesture skeletal models. The gesture recognition service 422 determines a detected gesture on a basis of the comparison of the one or more current skeletal models with the gesture skeletal models and generates the current detected gesture data 436 based on the detected gesture. In additional examples, the gesture recognition service 422 generates the one or more current skeletal models based on the landmark data. The gesture recognition service 422 determines the detected gesture on a basis of categorizing the current skeletal models using artificial intelligence methodologies and a gesture model previously generated using machine learning methodologies. The gesture recognition service 422 generates the current detected gesture data 436 based on the detected gesture.”). Moll does not disclose the aspect wherein the at least one sensor arrangement is oriented with at least one effective range configured to capture sensor data representing subareas of the body of the user in both frontal and lateral regions relative to the head of the user. However Tome discloses the aspect wherein the at least one sensor arrangement is oriented with at least one effective range configured to capture sensor data representing subareas of the body of the user in both frontal and lateral regions relative to the head of the user (See fig. 1 wherein the camera capture the chest which is the frontal and shoulder which is lateral regions of the user, 1. Instruction: “Fig. 1 illustrates the problem that this paper addresses: the goal is to infer 2D and 3D pose information, such as joint positions and rotations, from an egocentric camera perspective, necessary to transfer the motion from the original user to a generic avatar or to gather user pose information. The monocular camera used in our configuration is mounted on the rim of a HMD (as shown in Fig. 1a), approximately 2cm away from an average size nose, looking down. Fig. 2 provides a more clear visualization of the unique visual appearance of the images that the camera sees for different body configurations — the top row shows which body parts would become self-occluded from an ego centric viewpoint. The continuous gradation from bright red to dark green encodes the increasing pixel resolution for the corresponding colored area.”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the filing was made to apply Tome to Moll so the senser can detect image data of the user’s body from the frontal and lateral of the user’s body in order to better track the user’s body and generate an estimate of the poses of the user. With regard to claim 2: Moll and Tome disclose the glasses device according to claim 1, wherein the subarea of the body of the user includes one or more from the following list: upper body, shoulder, arm, upper arm, forearm, hand, torso, leg, thigh, lower leg, foot (Moll, paragraph 48: “During the gesture-based keyboard process 400, in operation 430, one or more cameras 420 of the AR system generate real-world scene video frame data 432 of a real-world scene from a perspective of a user of the AR system. The one or more cameras 420 communicate the real-world scene video frame data 432 to a tracking service 424. Included in the real-world scene video frame data 432 are tracking video frame data of detectable portions of the user's body including portions of the user's upper body, arms, hands, and fingers. The tracking video frame data includes video frame data of movement of portions of the user's upper body, arms, and hands as the user makes a gesture or moves their hands and fingers to interact with the virtual keyboard user interface 450; video frame data of locations of the user's arms and hands in space as the user makes the gesture or moves their hands and fingers to interact with the virtual keyboard user interface 450; and video frame data of positions in which the user holds their upper body, arms, hands, and fingers as the user makes the gesture or moves their hands and fingers to interact with the virtual keyboard user interface 450.”). With regard to claims 3 and 13: Moll and Tome disclose the glasses device according to claim 1, wherein the sensor arrangement is at least partially oriented in a viewing direction of the glasses device defined by the vision element and/or at an angle to the viewing direction (Moll, see fig. 1 for camera sensors pointing forward, paragraph 30 and 31: “The glasses 100 include a first or left camera 114 and a second or right camera 116. Although two cameras are depicted, other examples contemplate the use of a single or additional (i.e., more than two) cameras. In one or more examples, the glasses 100 include any number of input sensors or other input/output devices in addition to the left camera 114 and the right camera 116. Such sensors or input/output devices can additionally include biometric sensors, location sensors, motion sensors, and so forth. In some examples, the left camera 114 and the right camera 116 provide video frame data for use by the glasses 100 to extract 3D information from a real-world scene.”). With regard to claim 5: Moll and Tome disclose the glasses device according to claim 1, wherein the at least one sensor arrangement is at least partially integrated into a support body of the frame structure and/or of the temple element (Moll, see fig. 1 for camera sensors, paragraph 30 and 31: “The glasses 100 include a first or left camera 114 and a second or right camera 116. Although two cameras are depicted, other examples contemplate the use of a single or additional (i.e., more than two) cameras. In one or more examples, the glasses 100 include any number of input sensors or other input/output devices in addition to the left camera 114 and the right camera 116. Such sensors or input/output devices can additionally include biometric sensors, location sensors, motion sensors, and so forth. In some examples, the left camera 114 and the right camera 116 provide video frame data for use by the glasses 100 to extract 3D information from a real-world scene.”). With regard to claim 7: Moll and Tome disclose the glasses device according to claim 1, wherein the sensor arrangement includes one or more from the following list: camera sensor, stereo camera sensor, ultrasonic sensor, LiDAR sensor, edge emitter laser assembly, laser feedback interferometry sensor (Moll, see fig. 1 for camera sensors, paragraph 30 and 31: “The glasses 100 include a first or left camera 114 and a second or right camera 116. Although two cameras are depicted, other examples contemplate the use of a single or additional (i.e., more than two) cameras. In one or more examples, the glasses 100 include any number of input sensors or other input/output devices in addition to the left camera 114 and the right camera 116. Such sensors or input/output devices can additionally include biometric sensors, location sensors, motion sensors, and so forth. In some examples, the left camera 114 and the right camera 116 provide video frame data for use by the glasses 100 to extract 3D information from a real-world scene.”). With regard to claim 8: Moll and Tome disclose the glasses device according to claim 1, wherein the glasses device is configured as one from the following list: glasses, reading glasses, sunglasses, safety glasses, ski glasses, swim goggles, diving goggles (Moll, see fig. 1 for glasses, paragraph 30 and 31: “The glasses 100 include a first or left camera 114 and a second or right camera 116. Although two cameras are depicted, other examples contemplate the use of a single or additional (i.e., more than two) cameras. In one or more examples, the glasses 100 include any number of input sensors or other input/output devices in addition to the left camera 114 and the right camera 116. Such sensors or input/output devices can additionally include biometric sensors, location sensors, motion sensors, and so forth. In some examples, the left camera 114 and the right camera 116 provide video frame data for use by the glasses 100 to extract 3D information from a real-world scene.”). With regard to claim 9: Moll and Tome disclose the glasses device according to claim 1, further comprising: a computing unit configured to ascertain the pose determination of the pose of the user (Moll, paragraph 50: “In operation 438, the gesture recognition service 422 receives the current tracking data 464 from the tracking service 424 and generates current detected gesture data 436 based on the current tracking data 464. In some examples, the gesture recognition service 422 generates one or more current skeletal models of the user's upper body, arms, hands, and fingers based on landmark data of landmarks included in the current tracking data 464. The gesture recognition service 422 compares the one or more current skeletal models to previously generated gesture skeletal models. The gesture recognition service 422 determines a detected gesture on a basis of the comparison of the one or more current skeletal models with the gesture skeletal models and generates the current detected gesture data 436 based on the detected gesture. In additional examples, the gesture recognition service 422 generates the one or more current skeletal models based on the landmark data. The gesture recognition service 422 determines the detected gesture on a basis of categorizing the current skeletal models using artificial intelligence methodologies and a gesture model previously generated using machine learning methodologies. The gesture recognition service 422 generates the current detected gesture data 436 based on the detected gesture.”). based on the sensor data of the sensor arrangement (Moll, see fig. 1 for the sensors arrangement, paragraph 48: “During the gesture-based keyboard process 400, in operation 430, one or more cameras 420 of the AR system generate real-world scene video frame data 432 of a real-world scene from a perspective of a user of the AR system. The one or more cameras 420 communicate the real-world scene video frame data 432 to a tracking service 424. Included in the real-world scene video frame data 432 are tracking video frame data of detectable portions of the user's body including portions of the user's upper body, arms, hands, and fingers. The tracking video frame data includes video frame data of movement of portions of the user's upper body, arms, and hands as the user makes a gesture or moves their hands and fingers to interact with the virtual keyboard user interface 450; video frame data of locations of the user's arms and hands in space as the user makes the gesture or moves their hands and fingers to interact with the virtual keyboard user interface 450; and video frame data of positions in which the user holds their upper body, arms, hands, and fingers as the user makes the gesture or moves their hands and fingers to interact with the virtual keyboard user interface 450.”). With regard to claim 11: Moll and Tome disclose the glasses device according to claim 9, wherein a trained artificial intelligence is formed on the computing unit, and wherein the trained artificial intelligence is configured to ascertain the pose of the user based on the sensor data (Moll, paragraph 58: “In operation 414, the gesture text entry application 426 generates entered text data 456 based on the collected continuous motion gesture data of the continuous motion 454. In some examples, the gesture text entry application 426 maps the collected continuous motion gesture data to text data using artificial intelligence methodologies and a continuous motion gesture model previously generated using machine learning methodologies. The gesture text entry application 426 generates the current detected gesture data 436 based on the mapped text data.”). With regard to claim 12: Moll discloses a method for determining a pose of a user (gesture recognition service 422 determines a detected gesture/pose, paragraph 50: “In operation 438, the gesture recognition service 422 receives the current tracking data 464 from the tracking service 424 and generates current detected gesture data 436 based on the current tracking data 464. In some examples, the gesture recognition service 422 generates one or more current skeletal models of the user's upper body, arms, hands, and fingers based on landmark data of landmarks included in the current tracking data 464. The gesture recognition service 422 compares the one or more current skeletal models to previously generated gesture skeletal models. The gesture recognition service 422 determines a detected gesture on a basis of the comparison of the one or more current skeletal models with the gesture skeletal models and generates the current detected gesture data 436 based on the detected gesture. In additional examples, the gesture recognition service 422 generates the one or more current skeletal models based on the landmark data. The gesture recognition service 422 determines the detected gesture on a basis of categorizing the current skeletal models using artificial intelligence methodologies and a gesture model previously generated using machine learning methodologies. The gesture recognition service 422 generates the current detected gesture data 436 based on the detected gesture.”), comprising the following steps: receiving sensor data (system captures video frame data of detectable portions of the user's body paragraph 48: “During the gesture-based keyboard process 400, in operation 430, one or more cameras 420 of the AR system generate real-world scene video frame data 432 of a real-world scene from a perspective of a user of the AR system. The one or more cameras 420 communicate the real-world scene video frame data 432 to a tracking service 424. Included in the real-world scene video frame data 432 are tracking video frame data of detectable portions of the user's body including portions of the user's upper body, arms, hands, and fingers. The tracking video frame data includes video frame data of movement of portions of the user's upper body, arms, and hands as the user makes a gesture or moves their hands and fingers to interact with the virtual keyboard user interface 450; video frame data of locations of the user's arms and hands in space as the user makes the gesture or moves their hands and fingers to interact with the virtual keyboard user interface 450; and video frame data of positions in which the user holds their upper body, arms, hands, and fingers as the user makes the gesture or moves their hands and fingers to interact with the virtual keyboard user interface 450.”), of at least one sensor arrangement of a glasses device (see fig. 1 for the frame structure and the glasses, paragraph 26: “FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an AR system composed of a head-worn device (e.g., glasses 100 of FIG. 1), in accordance with some examples. The glasses 100 can include a frame 102 made from any suitable material such as plastic or metal, including any suitable shape memory alloy. In one or more examples, the frame 102 includes a first or left optical element holder 104 (e.g., a display or lens holder) and a second or right optical element holder 106 connected by a bridge 112. A first or left optical element 108 and a second or right optical element 110 can be provided within respective left optical element holder 104 and right optical element holder 106. The right optical element 110 and the left optical element 108 can be a lens, a display, a display assembly, or a combination of the foregoing. Any suitable display assembly can be provided in the glasses 100.”); wherein the sensor data at least partially represent at least one subarea of a body of a user of the glasses device (system captures video frame data of detectable portions of the user's body paragraph 48: “During the gesture-based keyboard process 400, in operation 430, one or more cameras 420 of the AR system generate real-world scene video frame data 432 of a real-world scene from a perspective of a user of the AR system. The one or more cameras 420 communicate the real-world scene video frame data 432 to a tracking service 424. Included in the real-world scene video frame data 432 are tracking video frame data of detectable portions of the user's body including portions of the user's upper body, arms, hands, and fingers. The tracking video frame data includes video frame data of movement of portions of the user's upper body, arms, and hands as the user makes a gesture or moves their hands and fingers to interact with the virtual keyboard user interface 450; video frame data of locations of the user's arms and hands in space as the user makes the gesture or moves their hands and fingers to interact with the virtual keyboard user interface 450; and video frame data of positions in which the user holds their upper body, arms, hands, and fingers as the user makes the gesture or moves their hands and fingers to interact with the virtual keyboard user interface 450.”), and wherein the sensor data were captured while the user wore the glasses device (paragraph 37: “In use, a user of the glasses 100 will be presented with information, content and various user interfaces on the near eye displays. As described in more detail herein, the user can then interact with the glasses 100 using a touchpad 126 and/or the buttons 128, voice inputs or touch inputs on an associated device (e.g., client device 826 illustrated in FIG. 8), and/or hand movements, locations, and positions detected by the glasses 100.”) performing a pose determination based on the sensor data and determining pose model information regarding a pose of the user of the glasses device (gesture recognition service 422 determines a detected gesture/pose, paragraph 50: “In operation 438, the gesture recognition service 422 receives the current tracking data 464 from the tracking service 424 and generates current detected gesture data 436 based on the current tracking data 464. In some examples, the gesture recognition service 422 generates one or more current skeletal models of the user's upper body, arms, hands, and fingers based on landmark data of landmarks included in the current tracking data 464. The gesture recognition service 422 compares the one or more current skeletal models to previously generated gesture skeletal models. The gesture recognition service 422 determines a detected gesture on a basis of the comparison of the one or more current skeletal models with the gesture skeletal models and generates the current detected gesture data 436 based on the detected gesture. In additional examples, the gesture recognition service 422 generates the one or more current skeletal models based on the landmark data. The gesture recognition service 422 determines the detected gesture on a basis of categorizing the current skeletal models using artificial intelligence methodologies and a gesture model previously generated using machine learning methodologies. The gesture recognition service 422 generates the current detected gesture data 436 based on the detected gesture.”). and providing the pose model information (The gesture recognition service 422 determines the detected gesture on a basis of categorizing the current skeletal models, paragraph 50: “In operation 438, the gesture recognition service 422 receives the current tracking data 464 from the tracking service 424 and generates current detected gesture data 436 based on the current tracking data 464. In some examples, the gesture recognition service 422 generates one or more current skeletal models of the user's upper body, arms, hands, and fingers based on landmark data of landmarks included in the current tracking data 464. The gesture recognition service 422 compares the one or more current skeletal models to previously generated gesture skeletal models. The gesture recognition service 422 determines a detected gesture on a basis of the comparison of the one or more current skeletal models with the gesture skeletal models and generates the current detected gesture data 436 based on the detected gesture. In additional examples, the gesture recognition service 422 generates the one or more current skeletal models based on the landmark data. The gesture recognition service 422 determines the detected gesture on a basis of categorizing the current skeletal models using artificial intelligence methodologies and a gesture model previously generated using machine learning methodologies. The gesture recognition service 422 generates the current detected gesture data 436 based on the detected gesture.”). Moll does not disclose the aspect wherein the at least one sensor arrangement is oriented with at least one effective range configured to capture sensor data representing subareas of the body of the user in both frontal and lateral regions relative to the head of the user. However Tome discloses the aspect wherein the at least one sensor arrangement is oriented with at least one effective range configured to capture sensor data representing subareas of the body of the user in both frontal and lateral regions relative to the head of the user (See fig. 1 wherein the camera capture the chest which is the frontal and shoulder which is lateral regions of the user, 1. Instruction: “Fig. 1 illustrates the problem that this paper addresses: the goal is to infer 2D and 3D pose information, such as joint positions and rotations, from an egocentric camera perspec tive, necessary to transfer the motion from the original user to a generic avatar or to gather user pose information. The monocular camera used in our configuration is mounted on the rim of a HMD (as shown in Fig. 1a), approximately 2cm away from an average size nose, looking down. Fig. 2 provides a more clear visualization of the unique visual appearance of the images that the camera sees for different body configurations — the top row shows which body parts would become self-occluded from an ego centric viewpoint. The continuous gradation from bright red to dark green encodes the increasing pixel resolution for the corresponding colored area.”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the filing was made to apply Tome to Moll so the senser can detect image data of the user’s body from the frontal and lateral of the user’s body in order to better track the user’s body and generate an estimate of the poses of the user. With regard to claim 15: Moll and Tome disclose the method according to claim 12, wherein the pose model information includes information regarding one or a plurality of the poses from the following list: finger pose, hand pose, forearm pose, arm pose, shoulder pose, upper body pose, lower body pose, overall body pose, movement poses comprising sitting pose, standing pose, lying pose, walking pose, running pose, jumping pose, dancing pose, arm movement pose, hand movement pose (Moll, The gesture recognition service 422 generates one or more current skeletal models of the user's upper body, arms, hands, and fingers, paragraph 50: “In operation 438, the gesture recognition service 422 receives the current tracking data 464 from the tracking service 424 and generates current detected gesture data 436 based on the current tracking data 464. In some examples, the gesture recognition service 422 generates one or more current skeletal models of the user's upper body, arms, hands, and fingers based on landmark data of landmarks included in the current tracking data 464. The gesture recognition service 422 compares the one or more current skeletal models to previously generated gesture skeletal models. The gesture recognition service 422 determines a detected gesture on a basis of the comparison of the one or more current skeletal models with the gesture skeletal models and generates the current detected gesture data 436 based on the detected gesture. In additional examples, the gesture recognition service 422 generates the one or more current skeletal models based on the landmark data. The gesture recognition service 422 determines the detected gesture on a basis of categorizing the current skeletal models using artificial intelligence methodologies and a gesture model previously generated using machine learning methodologies. The gesture recognition service 422 generates the current detected gesture data 436 based on the detected gesture.”). Claim 16 is rejected for the same reason as claim 12. Claim(s) 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Moll in view of Tome and further in view of Raffle et al., Patent No.: 9171198B1. With regard to claim 4: Moll and Tome disclose the glasses device according to claim 1, wherein the frame structure includes at least one temple element for fixing the glasses device to an ear of the user (Moll see fig. 1 for temple element of the glasses). Moll and Tome do not disclose the aspect wherein the at least one sensor arrangement is arranged at least partially on the temple element However Raffle discloses the aspect wherein the frame structure includes at least one temple element for fixing the glasses device to an ear of the user, and wherein the at least one sensor arrangement is arranged at least partially on the temple element (see part 120, paragraph 19: “The HMD 102 can include an on-board computing system 118, a video camera 120, a sensor 122, and a finger-operable touch pad 124. The on-board computing system 118 is shown to be positioned on the extending side arm 114 of the HMD 102. The on-board computing system 118 can be provided on other parts of the HMD 102 or can be positioned remote from the HMD 102. For example, the on-board computing system 118 could be wire- or wirelessly-connected to the HMD 102. The on-board computing system 118 can include a processor and memory, for example. The on-board computing system 118 can be configured to receive and analyze data from the video camera 120 and the finger-operable touch pad 124 (and possibly from other sensory devices, user interfaces, or both) and generate images for output by the lens elements 110 and 112. The on-board computing system can take the form of the computing system 300, which is discussed below in connection with FIG. 3.”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the filing was made to apply Raffle to Moll and Tome so the sensers are arranged at least partially on the temple element so they won’t obstruct the view of the user and able to sensor elements closer to either or both sides of the user’s head. Claim 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Moll, in view of Tome and further in view of Philips, Pub. No.: 20220225859 A1. With regard to claim 6: Moll and Tome do not disclose the aspect wherein the sensor arrangement further includes at least one deflection device, and wherein an orientation of the sensor arrangement can be varied via the deflection device. However Philips disclose the aspect wherein the sensor arrangement further includes at least one deflection device, and wherein an orientation of the sensor arrangement can be varied via the deflection device (the deflector allows changes to the camera sensor, Paragraph 65: “A block diagram is shown in FIG. 10, including an endoscope 1012 and a controller 1010. The connection between them may be wired (in which case they each have an electrical connector) or wireless (in which case they each include a wireless transceiver). The endoscope 1012 includes a camera 1030 and, in an embodiment, an orientation sensor 1056 at the distal end of the endoscope 1012. The orientation sensor 1056 may be an inertial measurement unit (INIU), accelerometer, gyroscope, or other suitable sensor. The endoscope 1012 also includes a light source 1062 and a wire deflector 1058 that is coupled to the controller 1010 and receives instructions that cause wire deflection in the endoscope 1012 to change the orientation of the distal end, and camera, of the endoscope 1012.”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the filing was made to apply Philips to Moll and Tome so the system can be more flexible, allowing the sensor to be adjusted to different orientations. Claim 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Moll in view of Tome and further in view of Li, CN 103654774 A. With regard to claim 10: Moll and Tome do not disclose the glasses device according to claim 1, further comprising: a transmitting/receiving unit configured to transmit the sensor data of the sensor arrangement to an external computing unit for a pose determination. However Li discloses the aspect of a transmitting/receiving unit configured to transmit the sensor data of the sensor arrangement to an external computing unit for a pose determination (paragraph 62: “In one variant embodiment, the processing unit 14 using the Bluetooth module 17 the multi-channel sEMG signal and front arm motion sensing signal transmitted to an external device such as PC machine, and for human body pose and hand gesture motion identification and modeling on the external device, preferably visual modeling, as gesture which can be identified for gesture control.”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the filing was made to apply Li to Moll and Tomeso the system can use an external device to make pose determination wherein the external device could have more computation power and provide better results and saving system resources for the local device. Claim 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Moll, in view of Tome, and further in view of PETERSEN, Pub. No.: WO 2022223192 A1. With regard to claim 14: Moll and Tome do not disclose A method according to claim 12, wherein the received sensor data include lidar data of at least one laser feedback interferometry sensor, and wherein performing of the pose determination includes: performing a laser feedback interferometry analysis and determining distance values and/or velocity values of at least subareas of the subareas of the body of the user represented by the sensor data. However Petersen disclose the aspect wherein the received sensor data include lidar data of at least one laser feedback interferometry sensor, and wherein performing of the pose determination includes: performing a laser feedback interferometry analysis and determining distance values and/or velocity values of at least subareas of the subareas of the body of the user represented by the sensor data. (“The method thus allows eye gestures to be recognized in a particularly simple and efficient manner with a particularly high level of user comfort. The special way of recognizing the eye gestures by means of laser feedback interferometry offers the advantage of a particularly high temporal sampling rate, so that the eye gestures can be recognized with a particularly high temporal resolution. In addition, the method offers the advantage that simple and inexpensive components that have a low energy requirement can be used. It is also advantageous that no moving components, such as scanning devices, are required, which means that flexible and robust application options are available.”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the filing was made to apply Petersen to Moll and Tome for the system to use Laser interferometry to determine user poses for a more precise determination at high resolution. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DI XIAO whose telephone number is (571)270-1758. The examiner can normally be reached 9Am-5Pm est M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephen Hong can be reached at (571) 272-4124. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DI XIAO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2178
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 22, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 08, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Dec 08, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 18, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 18, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12702483
Conformation Based Bone Model Generation and Associated Surgical Techniques
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12700494
MEDICAL INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, MEDICAL INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12675970
SYSTEMS FOR TARGETED IMAGE DETECTION THROUGHOUT COMPUTING NETWORKS
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12675631
INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND CONVERSION MODEL
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12657921
REALTIME ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND DEVICE CONTROL
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+21.2%)
3y 4m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 618 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month