Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/473,606

PASS THROUGH MODE IN BATTERY CHARGER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 25, 2023
Examiner
ZHOU, ZIXUAN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Renesas Electronics America Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
473 granted / 616 resolved
+16.8% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
641
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
82.5%
+42.5% vs TC avg
§102
11.0%
-29.0% vs TC avg
§112
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 616 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3, 5-10, 12-16, 19-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Su et al. US 2019/0393702 (hereinafter Su) in view of Wei et al. US 2014/0032953 (hereinafter Wei). Regarding claims 1 and 8, Su discloses a method for operating a battery charger, the method comprising: operating a battery charger under a charging mode to use an adapter (fig. 2, element 226; power adapter) power to support a system power (¶¶ 0025-0026, 0028; The system is viewed by the circuit 200 as a load of the circuit 200 such that the circuit provides VSYS to the node 230 for at least partially powering the system) at an output of the battery charger; detecting the adapter power reaches a maximum value (¶ 0037; when IIN (input current) is greater than IinDPM for a predefined period of time (e.g., such as for 500 microsecond or longer)); detecting the system voltage is less than a battery voltage of the battery by a predefined voltage offset (¶¶ 0043, 0050, 0069 and fig. 7; When VBUS is not greater in value than VBAT); and in response to detecting the system voltage is greater than the battery voltage by the predefined voltage offset (see fig. 3, step 315 and ¶¶ 0034-0035, 0049; When VSYS is approximately equal in value to VBUS [e.g., when VSYS is within about 10% of VBUS]), transitioning the battery charger from the discharging mode to a pass-through mode (PTM) (¶ 0021; when entering the pass-through mode from the buck-boost mode the charger controller controls the one or more of the other components to progressively over-regulate the signal provided to the load about a specified voltage level) that continues to discharge the battery (fig. 3, element 320; operating in pass-through mode of operation), wherein the PTM causes the battery charger to discharge the battery without performing switching (¶¶ 0030-0033, 0042-0045, 0056-0059 and fig. 2, 4; the circuit enters the pass-through mode and ceases performing power conversion). Su fails to disclose the method includes in response to the adapter power reaching the maximum value, transitioning the battery charger from the charging mode to a discharging mode to decrease a battery charging current in the battery charger to support the system power, wherein a system voltage at the output of the battery charger starts to decrease in response to the decreased battery charging current; and in response to detecting the system voltage is less than the battery voltage by the predefined voltage offset, transitioning the battery charger from the discharging mode to a pass-through mode (PTM). However, Wei further discloses the method includes in response to the adapter power reaching the maximum value (¶ 0045; when the battery 217 is present, switch 615 is closed and switch 617 is opened so that the modulator 613 regulates VSYS to a maximum level indicated by VSYS_MAX as VREF), transitioning the battery charger from the charging mode to a discharging mode to decrease a battery charging current in the battery charger to support the system power (¶¶ 0011, 0022, 0038; When the battery 217 is discharging, PMON=VADP·IADP+VBAT·IDIS which is the adapter power plus the battery discharging power. In this manner, PMON generally indicates the total power level provided via VSYS), wherein a system voltage at the output of the battery charger starts to decrease in response to the decreased battery charging current (¶¶ 0024, 0026, 0029-0030, 0034; in NVDC operation, Vsys is dynamically adjusted downward when charging current decreases and load shifts to battery support); and in response to detecting the system voltage is less than the battery voltage by the predefined voltage offset (¶¶ 0023-0024; When VBAT<VSYS_MIN indicating a deeply discharged battery having a voltage level below the minimum voltage level allowed for VSYS), transitioning the battery charger from the discharging mode to a pass-through mode (PTM) (¶¶ 0024-0028, 0031; then the controller 205 drives BFET to operate in a linear region). It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Su to incorporate with the teaching of Wei by supporting system power while the battery voltage is greater than the system voltage, because it would be advantageous to enhance the basic pass-through mode implementation with NVDC power path control techniques to handle various adapter power limits without excessive heat losses. Regarding claims 2, 9 and 16, Su discloses a method for operating a battery charger, the method comprising: wherein the battery charger comprises a first high side switching element (210), a second high side switching element (218), a first low side switching element (212) and a second low side switching element (216), and transitioning the battery charger from the charging mode to the PTM comprises turning on the first high side switching element and the second high side switching element and turning off the first low side switching element and the second low side switching element (¶ 0031; When the charger controller 202 controls the transistor 210 and the transistor 218 to tum on, with a remainder of transistors shown in the circuit 200 to be off, a critical path is formed from the power adapter 226, passing through the resistor 206, transistor 210, inductor 214, and transistor 218 to the node 230; When operating in the pass-through mode, the transistor 210 and the transistor 218 are each held on (e.g., maintained in a saturation region of operation)). Regarding claims 3 and 10, Su in view of Wei discloses the method further comprising: in response to the adapter power reaching the maximum value (¶ 0037; in at least some implementations a first comparator (such as a Vin dynamic power management (VinDPM) comparator) monitors a value of VBUS with respect to a threshold VinDPM and a second comparator (such as an IIN dynamic power management (IinDPM) comparator) monitors a value of IIN with respect to another threshold IinDPM), reducing an input voltage to the battery charger until the input voltage reaches a predefined input voltage (¶ 0036; controlled to not provide power conversion (e.g., switching) until the node 230 has discharged, causing VSYS to decrease to approximately the regulation point); and regulating the input voltage at the predefined input voltage until a start of the PTM (¶¶ 0037, 0049, 0059). Regarding claims 5, 12, and 19, Su in view of Wei discloses the method further comprising maintaining an input voltage to the battery charger at a voltage level greater than the system voltage (Wei, ¶ 0025; when VBAT > VSYS_MIN, then the controller 205 turns BFET on so that the battery 217 discharges to provide power to the system.). Regarding claims 6 and 13, Su discloses wherein an input voltage to the battery charger and the system voltage are shorted (turning ON 210 and 218) under the PTM (see fig. 2-4, 7 and ¶¶ 0032-0033). Regarding claims 7, 14 and 20, Su discloses wherein the charging mode is a narrow voltage direct charging (NVDC) mode and the discharging mode is an NVDC discharging mode (¶¶ 0015-0017, 0040, 0047). Regarding claim 15, Su discloses an apparatus comprising: a power delivery circuit (can be a transformer) configured to convert an input voltage (from a power source) into an adapter voltage (¶ 0023; the adapter 105 is, a physical port or terminal at which the system 100 is configured to receive power, such as from a mains power supply, a transformer, a battery); a switch converter (buck-boost converter) configured to switch the adapter voltage into a midpoint voltage (¶ 0026; In the buck-boost mode, the charger 110 operates as a traditional buck-boost power converter, performing power conversion along the critical path between the power adapter 105 and the load 120 to increase (e.g., boost) or decrease (e.g., buck) VBUS [a midpoint voltage] to generate VSYS); a battery charger (including/comprising elements 210, 212, 216, 218); and a battery (fig. 2, element 228 and ¶¶ 0028-0030); the battery charger is configured to: operate under a charging mode to use an adapter power provided by the midpoint voltage (Vbus) to support a system power (¶ 0026; Vsys) at an output of the battery charger (output of the switch 218; ¶¶ 0025-0026, 0028); detect the adapter power reaches a maximum value (¶ 0037; when IIN (input current) is greater than IinDPM for a predefined period of time (e.g., such as for 500 microsecond or longer)); detect the system voltage is less than a battery voltage of the battery by a predefined voltage offset (¶¶ 0043, 0050, 0069 and fig. 7; When VBUS is not greater in value than VBAT); and in response to detection that the system voltage is greaterthan the battery voltage by the predefined voltage offset (see fig. 3, step 315 and ¶¶ 0034-0035, 0049; When VSYS is approximately equal in value to VBUS [e.g., when VSYS is within about 10% of VBUS]), transition the battery charger from the charging mode to a pass-through mode (PTM) (¶ 0021; when entering the pass-through mode from the buck-boost mode the charger controller controls the one or more of the other components to progressively over-regulate the signal provided to the load about a specified voltage level) that continues to discharge the battery (fig. 3, element 320; operating in pass-through mode of operation), wherein the PTM causes the battery charger to discharge the battery without performing switching (¶¶ 0030-0033, 0042-0045, 0056-0059 and fig. 2, 4; the circuit enters the pass-through mode and ceases performing power conversion). Su fails to disclose the method includes in response to the adapter power reaching the maximum value, transitioning the battery charger from the charging mode to a discharging mode to decrease a battery charging current in the battery charger to support the system power, wherein a system voltage at the output of the battery charger starts to decrease in response to the decreased battery charging current; and in response to detecting the system voltage is less than the battery voltage by the predefined voltage offset, transitioning the battery charger from the discharging mode to a pass-through mode (PTM). However, Wei further discloses the method includes in response to the adapter power reaching the maximum value (¶ 0045; when the battery 217 is present, switch 615 is closed and switch 617 is opened so that the modulator 613 regulates VSYS to a maximum level indicated by VSYS_MAX as VREF), transitioning the battery charger from the charging mode to a discharging mode to decrease a battery charging current in the battery charger to support the system power (¶¶ 0011, 0022, 0038; When the battery 217 is discharging, PMON=VADP·IADP+VBAT·IDIS which is the adapter power plus the battery discharging power. In this manner, PMON generally indicates the total power level provided via VSYS), wherein a system voltage at the output of the battery charger starts to decrease in response to the decreased battery charging current (¶¶ 0024, 0026, 0029-0030, 0034; in NVDC operation, Vsys is dynamically adjusted downward when charging current decreases and load shifts to battery support); and in response to detecting the system voltage is less than the battery voltage by the predefined voltage offset (¶¶ 0023-0024; When VBAT<VSYS_MIN indicating a deeply discharged battery having a voltage level below the minimum voltage level allowed for VSYS), transitioning the battery charger from the discharging mode to a pass-through mode (PTM) (¶¶ 0024-0028, 0031; then the controller 205 drives BFET to operate in a linear region). It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Su to incorporate with the teaching of Wei by supporting system power while the battery voltage is greater than the system voltage, because it would be advantageous to enhance the basic pass-through mode implementation with NVDC power path control techniques to handle various adapter power limits without excessive heat losses. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4, 11, 17-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claims 4, 11 and 17, the method further comprising: in response to the adapter power reaching the maximum value: operating a first stage of the battery charger under an input current limit loop; decreasing a midpoint voltage being provided from the first stage to a second stage of the battery charger; in response to the midpoint voltage being decreased: operating the second stage under an input voltage loop to maintain the midpoint voltage at an input voltage limit; decreasing the system voltage; and in response to the system voltage being decreased, decreasing the battery charging current. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZIXUAN ZHOU whose telephone number is (571)272-6739. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 am to 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Julian Huffman can be reached at (571) 272-2147. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZIXUAN ZHOU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2859 05/30/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 25, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679235
WIRELESS CHARGING RECEIVER, TRANSMITTER, SYSTEM, AND CONTROL METHOD, AND ELECTRIC VEHICLE
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679553
CRYOGENIC FUEL BOIL OFF POWERED FUEL CELL
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12658737
ELECTRONIC DEVICE COMPRISING WIRELESS CHARGING CIRCUIT
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12636967
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR TIMING SCHEDULED CHARGING, AND TERMINAL EQUIPMENT
3y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12641359
CHARGING BOX
3y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+17.2%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 616 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month