DETAILED ACTION
This action is in response to applicant’s amendment filed on 22 December 2025 (including supplemental filed on 21 January 2026). Claims 1, 4-6, 9-11, 14-15, and 19-21 are now pending in the present application and claims 2-3, 7-8, 12-13, and 16-18 are canceled. This office action is made Final.
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Priority
Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claim(s) 1-3, 5-13, and 15-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by ZTE-3GPP (“Identification and Access Restriction for RedCap”; R2-2100572).
Regarding claims 1, 6, and 11, ZTE-3GPP discloses a terminal (e.g., UE) comprising:
at least one processor (e.g., UE) with a memory (e.g., UE) storing computer program code, wherein the at least one processor (e.g., UE) with the memory (e.g., UE) is configured to { (see pp. 1-2, sec. 2.1; pp. 3-4, sec. 2.2) }:
receive (e.g., UE) a system information block 1 (SIB1) { (see pp. 1-2, sec. 2.1), where the system has SIB1 }; and
determine { (see pp. 1-2, sec. 2.1; pp. 3-4, sec. 2.2) }:
whether or not first information indicating that a Reduced Capability (RedCap) terminal is allowed to camp on a cell is included in the SIB1 { (see pp. 1-2, sec. 2.1; pp. 3-4, sec. 2.2), where the system provides a RedCap UE access }, and
whether or not second information indicating that whether or not the cell is barred for a RedCap terminal with a specific number of receivers is included in the SIB1 in a case where the first information is included in the SIB1 { (see pp. 1-2, sec. 2.1; pp. 3-4, sec. 2.2), where the system can allow/block access of a RedCap UE in which the feature a specific number of receivers is a parameter (specification/capability/criteria) of a RedCap UE (e.g., UE capabilities) (Note 1: also, see pg. 1, [0005] of orig. spec. of instant application that references 3GPP standard) },
determine whether or not the cell is barred for the RedCap terminal with the specific number of receivers based on the second information and a number of receivers of the terminal in a case where the second information is included in the SIB1 { (see pp. 1-2, sec. 2.1; pp. 3-4, sec. 2.2), where the system can allow/block access of a RedCap UE in which the feature a specific number of receivers is a parameter (specification/capability/criteria) of a RedCap UE (e.g., UE capabilities) (see Note 1 above) }; and
control selection or reselection of the cell based on a measured reception level in a case where the cell is not barred { (see pp. 1-2, sec. 2.1; pp. 3-4, sec. 2.2), where the system provides reselection (see ‘Proposals 3-4’}.
Regarding claims 5, 10, and 15, ZTE-3GPP discloses the terminal according to claim 1, wherein, in a case where the RedCap terminal is in an idle state, an inactive state, or a connected state during running of a specific timer, the at least one processor with the memory is configured to determine whether or not the first information is included in the SIB1 { (see pp. 1-2, sec. 2.1; pp. 3-4, sec. 2.2) }.
Regarding claims 10, ZTE-3GPP discloses the terminal according to claim 1, wherein the terminal is the RedCap terminal (UE) { (see pp. 1-2, sec. 2.1; pp. 3-4, sec. 2.2), where the system has a RedCap UE (see pp. 4-6, sec. 2.3-2.4) }.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claim(s) 4, 9, and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over ZTE-3GPP (“Identification and Access Restriction for RedCap”; R2-2100572) in view of further support Nokia-3GPP (“Initial Access for RedCap UEs”; R1-20008072).
Regarding claims 4 , 9, and 14, ZTE-3GPP discloses
the terminal according to any one of claims 1, wherein the specific number of receivers is a single receiver or two receivers { (see pp. 1-2, sec. 2.1; pp. 3-4, sec. 2.2) }.
ZTE-3GPP does not specifically disclose having the feature(s) single receiver. However, the examiner maintains that the feature(s) single receiver was well known in the art, as taught by Nokia-3GPP.
In the same field of endeavor, Nokia-3GPP discloses the feature(s) single receiver { (see sec. 2.1-2.2), }.
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of ZTE-3GPP as further supported by Nokia-3GPP to have the feature(s) single receiver, in order to provide procedure to reduce capability of devices, as taught by Nokia-3GPP (see pp. 1-2, sec. 1).
Response to Arguments
Applicant's arguments with respect to claims 1, 4-6, 9-11, 14-15, and 19-21 have been considered but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection necessitated by the amended language, new limitations, and/or new claims.
In response to applicant’s arguments, the Examiner respectfully disagrees as the applied reference(s) provide more than adequate support and to further clarify (see the above claims for relevant citations and comments in this section).
Conclusion
The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure.
Liu et al. (US 2021/0045054 A1) discloses cell selection based on class of user equipments.
Nagano et al. (US 2024/0015641 A1) discloses terminal, base station, and wireless communication method.
Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WILLIE J DANIEL JR whose telephone number is (571)272-7907. The examiner can normally be reached on 9 - 6.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gary Mui can be reached on 571-270-1420. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/WILLIE J DANIEL JR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2465
WJD,Jr
14 April 2026
Prosecution Insights