DETAILED ACTION
This Office Action is in response to the Applicant Election filed on 02/18/2026.
Currently, claims 1-8 and 18-30 are pending in the application.
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Election/Restrictions
Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I (claims 1-8 and 18-21) and with traverse of Species C (Fig. 7J) in the reply filed on 05/14/2024 is acknowledged. Applicant argues that amended independent claim 1 is generic and that claims 1-8 read on the elected species. Claims 1-8 and 18-30 are examined in this Office action.
Information Disclosure Statement
The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 08/01/2022 and 02/28/2023 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the Examiner.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
(a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claims 1-4 and 18-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by HANAFI et al. (US Pub. No. 2003/0211681).
Regarding independent claim 1, Hanafi teaches a device (Fig. 12), comprising: a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate (Fig. 12, 14 + 12 + 10, ¶ [0025]) including:
first (Fig. 12, 14, ¶ [0025]) and second (Fig. 12, 10, ¶ [0025]) silicon layers, the first silicon layer having a first surface (Fig. 12, top of 14);
a first insulating layer (Fig. 12, 12, ¶ [0025]) between the first silicon layer and the second silicon layer; and
a recess (Figs. 8 & 12, opening in 14 vertically under topmost surface of 14, see Fig. 8) in the first surface of the first silicon layer;
a second insulating layer (Fig. 12, 36, ¶ [0040]) in the recess; and
a first gate (Fig. 12, 38, ¶ [0041]) on the second insulating layer, the first gate having a first gate portion (Fig.12, portion of 38 recessed in 14) in the recess and a second gate portion (Fig.12, portion of 38 vertically above topmost surface of 14/42, ¶ [0041]) on the first gate portion, the second gate portion being a different dimension than the first gate portion in a first direction (Figs. 8 & 12, top and bottom portions of 38 have different maximum widths).
Regarding claim 2, Hanafi teaches the device of claim 1, and Hanafi teaches that the recess is curved (Figs. 8 & 12, opening in 14 vertically under topmost surface of 14 is at least partially curved, see Fig. 8), the second insulating layer (Fig. 12, 36, ¶ [0040]) covering the curved recess (Fig. 12, 36 covers at least a portion of the opening in 14).
Regarding claim 3, Hanafi teaches the device of claim 2, and Hanafi teaches that the first gate portion (Fig.12, portion of 38 recessed in 14) has a first dimension (D1 in annotated Hanafi Fig. 12 below) along a first direction (horizontal in Fig. 12), and the second gate portion (Fig.12, portion of 38 vertically above topmost surface of 14/42, ¶ [0041]) has a second dimension (D2 in annotated Hanafi Fig. 12 below) between a first edge and a second edge (left and right curved portions of the recessed portion of 38) along the first direction (see annotated figure below), the first dimension being greater than the second dimension.
PNG
media_image1.png
577
640
media_image1.png
Greyscale
Regarding claim 4, Hanafi teaches the device of claim 3, and Hanafi teaches that the first gate portion (Fig.12, portion of 38 recessed in 14) has a third dimension (D3 in annotated figure below) along a second direction (vertical in Fig. 12) transverse to the first direction (horizontal in Fig. 12), and the second gate portion (Fig.12, portion of 38 vertically above topmost surface of 14/42, ¶ [0041]) has a fourth dimension (D4 in annotated Fig. 12 below) along the first direction, the first dimension (D1 in annotated figure above) being greater than the second dimension (D2 in annotated figure above).
PNG
media_image2.png
572
617
media_image2.png
Greyscale
Regarding independent claim 18, Hanafi teaches a device (Fig. 13), comprising:
a substrate (Fig. 12, 14 + 12 + 10, ¶ [0025]) having a surface (Fig. 12, top of 14), the substrate including:
a first silicon layer (Fig. 12, 14, ¶ [0025]), the surface is of the first silicon layer;
a buried oxide layer (Fig. 12, 12, ¶ [0025]);
a second silicon layer (Fig. 12, 10, ¶ [0025]), the buried oxide layer is on the second silicon layer and the first silicon layer is on the buried oxide layer, the substrate is a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate (¶ [0025]); and
a curved recess (Figs. 8 & 12, opening in 14 vertically under topmost surface of 14 is at least partially curved, see Fig. 8) in the surface;
a recessed gate (Fig. 12, 38, ¶ [0041]) having a curved portion (Fig.12, portion of 38 recessed in 14 is at least partially curved) in the curved recess and a central portion (Fig.12, portion of 38 vertically above topmost surface of 14/42) on the curved portion, the curved portion extending in a first direction (vertical in Fig. 12) to the central portion; and
a first oxide layer (Fig. 12, 36, ¶ [0040] teaches that 36 can be an oxide) between the recessed gate and the substrate (Fig. 12), the first oxide layer extending on the surface of the substrate and in the curved recess (Fig. 12, 36 is within the at least partially curved recess in 14).
Regarding claim 19, Hanafi teaches the device of claim 18, and Hanafi teaches that the central portion of the recessed gate (Fig.12, portion of 38 vertically above topmost surface of 14/42, ¶ [0041]) has a first dimension in (D1 in annotated Hanagi Fig. 12 below) the first direction (vertical in Fig. 12), the curved portion has a second dimension (D2 in annotated figure below) in the first direction, the second dimension is less than the first dimension (see annotated figure below).
PNG
media_image3.png
572
617
media_image3.png
Greyscale
Regarding claim 20, Hanafi teaches the device of claim 19, and Hanafi teaches that the central portion of the recessed gate (Fig.12, portion of 38 vertically above topmost surface of 14/42, ¶ [0041]) has a third dimension (D3 in annotated Hanafi Fig. 12 below) in a second direction (horizontal in Fig. 12) transverse the first direction, the curved portion has a fourth dimension (D4 in annotated Hanafi Fig. 12 below) in the second direction, the fourth dimension is greater than the third dimension (see annotated figure below).
PNG
media_image4.png
577
640
media_image4.png
Greyscale
Regarding claim 21, Hanafi teaches the device of claim 18, and Hanafi teaches that the curved portion of the recessed gate (Fig.12, portion of 38 recessed in 14 is at least partially curved) has a convex surface (Fig. 12, curved portions of 38 recessed in 14 are convex) in the substrate.
Regarding claim 22, Hanafi teaches the device of claim 18, and Hanafi teaches that the central portion of the recessed gate (Fig.12, portion of 38 vertically above topmost surface of 14/42) is surrounded by a plurality of spacers (Fig. 12, 26, ¶ [0033]) formed on the surface of the substrate.
Regarding claim 23, Hanafi teaches the device of claim 22, and Hanafi teaches that the spacers (Fig. 12, 26, ¶ [0033]) are entirely separated from the central portion (Fig.12, portion of 38 vertically above topmost surface of 14/42) of the recessed gate by an insulating layer (Fig. 12, 34, ¶ [0038]).
Regarding independent claim 24, Hanafi teaches a device (Fig. 12), comprising:
a substrate (Fig. 12, 14 + 12 + 10, ¶ [0025]) having a first surface (Fig. 12, top of 14) opposite a second surface (Fig. 12, 10, ¶ [0025]) along a first direction (vertical in Fig. 12);
a plurality (¶ [0034] teaches that Hanafi’s invention can include a plurality of their MOSFET devices across portions of their SOI structure ) of curved recesses (Figs. 8 & 12, opening in 14 vertically under topmost surface of 14 is at least partially curved, see Fig. 8) in the first surface;
a recessed gate (Fig. 12, 38, ¶ [0041]) in each curved recess, each recessed gate having a first, curved portion (Fig.12, portion of 38 recessed in 14 is at least partially curved) in the curved recess and a second portion (Fig.12, portion of 38 vertically above topmost surface of 14/42) on the first portion, the first portion extending along the first direction to the second portion (Fig. 12);
a first insulating layer (Fig. 12, 34, ¶ [0038]) between each recessed gate and the substrate, the first insulating layer extending in the curved recesses and along sidewalls of each second portion (Fig. 12); and
a second insulating layer (Fig. 12, 20, ¶ [0032]) on the first surface of the substrate.
Regarding claim 25, Hanafi teaches the device of claim 24, and Hanafi teaches that the substrate (Fig. 12, 14 + 12 + 10, ¶ [0025]) includes:
a first silicon layer (Fig. 12, 14, ¶ [0025]), the first surface (Fig. 12, top of 14) is of the first silicon layer;
a buried oxide layer (Fig. 12, 12, ¶ [0025]); and
a second silicon layer (Fig. 12, 10, ¶ [0025]), the buried oxide layer is on the second silicon layer and the first silicon layer is on the buried oxide layer (Fig. 12).
Regarding claim 26, Hanafi teaches the device of claim 24, and Hanafi teaches that the substrate (Fig. 12, 14 + 12 + 10, ¶ [0025]) is a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate (¶¶ [0025]-[0028]).
Regarding claim 27, Hanafi teaches the device of claim 24, and Hanafi teaches that each (¶ [0034] teaches that Hanafi’s invention can include a plurality of their MOSFET devices across portions of their SOI structure) first portion (Fig.12, portion of 38 recessed in 14) has a first dimension (D1 in annotated Hanafi Fig. 12 below) along the first direction (vertical in Fig. 12) and each second portion (Fig.12, portion of 38 vertically above topmost surface of 14/42, ¶ [0041]) has a second dimension (D2 in annotated figure below) along the first direction greater than the first dimension.
PNG
media_image3.png
572
617
media_image3.png
Greyscale
Regarding claim 28, Hanafi teaches the device of claim 24, and Hanafi teaches that each (¶ [0034] teaches that Hanafi’s invention can include a plurality of their MOSFET devices across portions of their SOI structure) first portion (Fig.12, portion of 38 recessed in 14) has a first dimension (D1 in annotated Hanafi Fig. 12 below) along a second direction (horizontal in Fig. 12) transverse to the first direction (vertical in Fig. 12) and each second portion (Fig.12, portion of 38 vertically above topmost surface of 14/42, ¶ [0041]) has a second dimension (D2 in annotated Hanafi Fig. 12 below) along the second direction smaller than the first dimension.
PNG
media_image1.png
577
640
media_image1.png
Greyscale
Regarding claim 29, Hanafi teaches the device of claim 24, and Hanafi teaches that the sidewalls of each second portion (Fig.12, portion of 38 vertically above topmost surface of 14/42) are surrounded by a plurality of spacers (Fig. 12, 26, ¶ [0033]).
Regarding claim 30, Hanafi teaches the device of claim 29, and Hanafi teaches that each (¶ [0034] teaches that Hanafi’s invention can include a plurality of their MOSFET devices across portions of their SOI structure) spacer (Fig. 12, 26, ¶ [0033]) is separated from a respective second portion (Fig.12, portion of 38 vertically above topmost surface of 14/42) by the first insulating layer and each spacer is on the second insulating layer (Fig. 12, 20, ¶ [0032]).
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
7. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claims 5-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being obvious over HANAFI et al. (US Pub. No. 2003/0162358) in view of MISTRY et al. (US Pub. No. 2001/0033000).
Regarding claim 5, Hanafi teaches the device of claim 1.
However, Hanafi does not explicitly teach that the recess is curved from a first side to an opposite second side (the Examiner notes that the portion of Hanafi’s recess between the left and right portions are not curved).
However, Mistry is a pertinent art that teaches that the recess (Figs. 18-20, 712, ¶ [0070]) is curved from a first side to an opposite second side (Mistry’s recess 712 is curved from the left side to the right side).
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the bottom surface of Hanafi’s recess to be curved according to the teaching of Mistry (Figs. 18-20) because Mistry teaches that a curvilinear shape is an obvious shape for a recessed channel portion (see Mistry ¶¶ [0009]-[0010], [0051], [0054], & [0074]).
Regarding claim 6, Hanafi modified by Mistry teaches the device of claim 5, and Hanafi teaches that the first gate portion (Fig.12, portion of 38 recessed in 14) has a first dimension (D1 in annotated Hanafi Fig. 12 below) between the first side (leftmost side of Hanafi modified by Mistry’s recess) and the second side (rightmost side of Hanafi modified by Mistry’s recess), and the second gate portion (Fig.12, portion of 38 vertically above topmost surface of 14/42, ¶ [0041]) has a second dimension (D2 in annotated Hanafi Fig. 12 below) between a first sidewall and a second sidewall (left and right sides of 38 above the recess), the first dimension being greater than the second dimension.
PNG
media_image1.png
577
640
media_image1.png
Greyscale
Regarding claim 7, Hanafi modified by Mistry teaches the device of claim 6, and Hanafi teaches that the first gate portion (Fig.12, portion of 38 recessed in 14) extends into the substrate (Fig. 12, 14 + 12 + 10, ¶ [0025]) past the first surface (Fig. 12, top surface of 14, ¶ [0025]) of the first silicon layer.
Regarding claim 8, Hanafi modified by Mistry teaches the device of claim 7, and Hanafi teaches that the second insulating layer (Fig. 12, 36, ¶ [0040]) is between the first silicon layer (Fig. 12, 14, ¶ [0025]) and the first gate portion (Fig.12, portion of 38 recessed in 14) that extends past the first surface (Fig. 12, top surface of 14, ¶ [0025]) of the first silicon layer.
Cited Prior Art
The Examiner has pointed out particular references contained in the prior art of record within the body of this action for the convenience of the Applicant.
Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings in the art and are applied to the specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply.
Conclusion
The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US Pub No. 2015/0037952 by Lim et al. discloses a transistor device.
The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US Pub No. 2009/0321820 by Yamakawa discloses a transistor device.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RHYS P. SHEKER whose telephone number is (703)756-1348. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7:30 am to 5 pm.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven B Gauthier can be reached on 571-270-0373. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/R.P.S./
Examiner, Art Unit 2813
/STEVEN B GAUTHIER/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2813
Prosecution Insights