Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/474,682

DUAL WHEEL ACTUATOR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 26, 2023
Priority
Sep 30, 2022 — provisional 63/377,767
Examiner
PONTON, JAMES D
Art Unit
3783
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Insulet Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
449 granted / 560 resolved
+10.2% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+33.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
588
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
60.2%
+20.2% vs TC avg
§102
5.7%
-34.3% vs TC avg
§112
27.1%
-12.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 560 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yang (US 2022/0118176 A1) in view of Whitney et al. (US 4,269,185), hereafter “Whitney”, and further in view of Bell (US 2016/0076635 A1). As to claim 1, Yang discloses a drug delivery device drive mechanism (see Figs. 1-8), comprising: a first ratchet wheel having a first ratchet gear (first sub-wheel of driving wheel 130); a second ratchet wheel having a second ratchet gear (second sub-wheel of driving wheel 130); and a linear actuation mechanism including a pusher interface (driving unit 100) coupled to an actuator (180) (see para 0050, 0051), the pusher interface having at least one pusher tab (110a or 110b) operable to physically contact the first ratchet gear (see Fig. 7, para 0057). Yang is silent to the first ratchet gear coupled to a first spur gear, the second ratchet wheel coupled to a second spur gear, wherein the first ratchet wheel and the second ratchet wheel are coplanar and gear teeth of the first spur gear mesh with gear teeth the second spur gear. Whitney discloses a ratchet wheel having a first ratchet gear (52) coupled to a spur gear (51) (Figs. 1-3, para beginning line 16 col. 4). Bell discloses a first spur gear (110) that is coplanar with and has gear teeth meshed with gear teeth of a second spur gear (106) (see Fig. 2, para 0026). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the current design of Yang in view of Whitney and Bell such that the first ratchet gear is coupled to a first spur gear, the second ratchet gear is coupled to a second spur gear, wherein the first ratchet wheel and the second ratchet wheel are coplanar and gear teeth of the first spur gear mesh with gear teeth the second spur gear. One would have been motivated to do so as an alternate design for a gearing mechanism for delivering fluid. In other words, the drive mechanism of claim 1 amounts to a combination known components (i.e. ratchet gears, spur gears, linear actuation mechanisms, etc…) albeit in a non-expressly disclosed combination. However, one having ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to arrive at the invention of claim 1 as there is no change in the respective functions of any of the individual components, and each are used as part of a means for delivering a fluid (see abstract & paragraph beginning line 23 col. 1 of Whitney, also see abstract & para 0043-0045 of Bell). As to claims 2, Yang in view of Whitney and Bell teaches the drug delivery device drive mechanism of claim 1 as described above. Yang further discloses wherein the pusher interface (100) is substantially perpendicular to a gear face of the first ratchet wheel (see Fig. 7). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: As to claim 3, while Yang in view of Whitney and Bell teaches the drug delivery device drive mechanism of claim 1 as described above, each are silent to wherein the pusher interface is substantially parallel to a gear face of the first ratchet wheel in combination with the limitations of claim 1. As to claim 4, while Yang in view of Whitney and Bell teaches the drug delivery device drive mechanism of claim 1 as described above, each are silent to wherein the at least one pusher tab of the pusher interface further comprises: a first pusher tab operable to contact a respective gear tooth of a plurality of gear teeth of the first spur gear; and a second pusher tab operable to contact a respective gear tooth of a plurality of gear teeth of the second spur gear, wherein the actuator alternates between causing the first pusher tab to contact the respective gear tooth of the plurality of gear teeth of the first spur gear and causing the second pusher tab to contact the respective gear tooth of the plurality of gear teeth of the second spur gear in combination with the limitations of claim 1. Claims 5-11 depend from claim 4. As to claim 12, while Yang in view of Whitney and Bell teaches the drug delivery device drive mechanism of claim 1 as described above, each are silent to a pawl having an edge that rests between gear teeth of either the first spur gear or the second spur gear, wherein the pawl is operable to prevent free rotation of either the first ratchet wheel or the second ratchet wheel in combination with the limitations of claim 1. As to claim 13, while Yang in view of Whitney and Bell teaches the drug delivery device drive mechanism of claim 1 as described above, each are silent to wherein the linear actuation mechanism further comprises: an actuator arm coupled to the pusher interface, the actuator arm including a first end coupled to a pivot point and a second end coupled to the pusher interface, wherein the first and second ends are opposite ends of the actuator arm in combination with the limitations of claim 1. Claims 14 depends from claim 1. As to claim 15, while Yang in view of Whitney and Bell teaches the drug delivery device drive mechanism of claim 1 as described above, each are silent to wherein the linear actuation mechanism further comprises: a linear actuator arm, wherein the pusher interface is coupled to the linear actuator arm and the at least one pusher tab extends substantially perpendicularly from a horizontal surface of the pusher interface toward the first ratchet gear, and the linear actuator arm is operable to reciprocate to enable the at least one pusher tab to contact the first ratchet gear, and an actuator connection point at which the actuator is coupled to an end of the linear actuator arm in combination with the limitations of claim 1. Claims 16-19 depend from claim 15. As to claim 20, while Yang in view of Whitney and Bell teaches the drug delivery device drive mechanism of claim 1 as described above, each are silent to a pump mechanism coupling operable to connect either the first ratchet wheel or the second ratchet wheel to a drive element in combination with the limitations of claim 1. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to James D Ponton whose telephone number is (571)272-1001. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chelsea Stinson can be reached at 571-270-1744. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /James D Ponton/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3783
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 26, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678591
CATHETERS AND METHODS FOR MAKING THEM
4y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673165
PRECISION LOW-DOSE,LOW-WASTE SYRINGES AND ERGONOMIC ATTACHMENTS THEREFOR
4y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12661492
SANITIZING CAPS FOR MEDICAL CONNECTORS
5y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12653992
METHODS AND DEVICES FOR TREATING A DISEASE WITH BIOTHERAPEUTICS
4y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12653571
TAP BLOCK INJECTION DEVICE
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+33.4%)
2y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 560 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month