Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/475,362

ADAPTIVE TARGET CONTROL FOR CURVILINEAR OPTICAL PROXIMITY CORRECTION (OPC)

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 27, 2023
Examiner
NGO, BRIAN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
868 granted / 987 resolved
+27.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
995
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§103
36.3%
-3.7% vs TC avg
§102
34.3%
-5.7% vs TC avg
§112
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 987 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This Non-Final office is a response to the papers filed on 09/27/2023. Claims 1-20 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 9, and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lippincott (Pub. No. 2005/0273733 A1). Regarding claims 1, 9, and 14, Lippincott discloses: A method, executed by at least one processor of a computer (see Fig. and Fig. 6), comprising: receiving a layout design, the layout design being segmented into a plurality of points (see par [0006-0007], an optical and process correction (OPC) tool and other system constraints that are preventing a better OPC correction from being made for a feature in an IC layout…., an OPC tool assigns a priority to individual edge segments of a feature to be OPC corrected such that movement of a less important edge ….[wherein edges are points]), the plurality of points comprising at least one more important point and at least one less important point (see par [0006-0007], an optical and process correction (OPC) tool and other system constraints that are preventing a better OPC correction from being made for a feature in an IC layout…., an OPC tool assigns a priority to individual edge segments of a feature to be OPC corrected such that movement of a less important edge ….); performing a plurality of optical proximity correction iterations on the plurality of points to generate a modified layout design (see par [0025-0027], the OPC corrections are determined with an iterative process where edges are moved outward or inward until an acceptable solution is found…), each of the plurality of optical proximity correction iterations comprising: performing simulation to determine edge placement errors (EPE) for the plurality of points (see par [0022-0027], the EPE used for assigning priorities may be dynamic in accordance with the OPC corrections made to the edge segments…. To improve the edge placement error (EPE) of those edge segments…); determining at least one intermediate adjustment value for the at least one less important point in order to reduce the EPE for the at least one more important point (see par [0026-0027], a lower priority edge may be assigned a position during one iteration that prevents an OPC correction for a more important edge before being moved in another iteration to allow the better OPC correction for the higher priority edge…., [wherein assigned a position for a lower priority edge which is the intermediate adjustment value have been determined], the OPC correction of a lower priority edges are adjusted to permit the desired OPC adjustment of a higher priority edge…..); and generating, based on the at least one intermediate edge adjustment value (see par [0026-0027], a lower priority edge may be assigned a position during one iteration that prevents an OPC correction for a more important edge before being moved in another iteration to allow the better OPC correction for the higher priority edge…., [wherein assigned a position for a lower priority edge which is the intermediate adjustment value have been generated], the OPC correction of a lower priority edges are adjusted to permit the desired OPC adjustment of a higher priority edge…..), a modified layout design for the plurality of points for a next optical proximity correction iteration in the plurality of optical proximity correction iterations (see par [0026-0027], a lower priority edge may be assigned a position during one iteration that prevents an OPC correction for a more important edge before being moved in another iteration to allow the better OPC correction for the higher priority edge…., the OPC correction of a lower priority edges are adjusted to permit the desired OPC adjustment of a higher priority edge….); and generating a final modified layout design, which is to be used for photomask manufacture, based on the modified layout design (see par [0015], computer system 10 receives a number of manufacturing rules 16 that are either user-defined or depend on the photolithographic process used to create the IC….); and storing information of the final modified layout design (see Fig. 1, computer is used to store the final modified layout design, see par [0010]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-8, 10-13, and 15-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art of record does not teach or suggest the limitation as in the claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIAN NGO whose telephone number is (571)270-7011. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7AM-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jack Chiang can be reached at 5712727483. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRIAN NGO/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2851
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 27, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703257
Charging Circuit of On-Board Charger, On-Board Charger, and Charging Control Method
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12705520
PHYSICAL MEDIA INCORPORATING COLOUR CENTRES FOR USE IN QUANTUM SYSTEMS
3y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12699830
FIELD-NET FOR PLACEMENT EVALUATION
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12694189
DESIGN METHOD OF SHUTTLE MASK
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12691779
MOBILE CHARGING DEVICE AND MOBILE CHARGING METHOD
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+12.4%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 987 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month