Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/475,394

ELECTRONIC DEVICE PERFORMING PRESCRIBED OPERATION WHILE CONSUMING CONSUMABLE MOUNTED THEREIN

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Sep 27, 2023
Priority
Sep 30, 2022 — JP 2022-157632
Examiner
PACHOL, NICHOLAS C
Art Unit
2699
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
2 (Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allowance Rate
360 granted / 589 resolved
-0.9% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
605
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.6%
-32.4% vs TC avg
§103
62.3%
+22.3% vs TC avg
§102
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
§112
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 589 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-18 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-5, 7-11, 17, and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tanaka (US 2020/0361216) in view of Kaigawa (US 2022/0171318). Regarding Claim 1, Tanaka teaches an electronic device (Element 10B, wherein there is a printer) comprising: an accommodating portion in which a consumable is mountable (Paragraphs 47 and 48, wherein the cartridges can be mounted in the attachment case), the consumable having a consumable memory storing identification information for identifying the consumable (Paragraph 52, wherein information about the cartridge is stored); a main memory (Paragraph 61 and element 53, wherein there is memory); a communication interface (element 47, wherein there is a communication interface); and a controller (Element 51) configured to perform: in response to a consumable being mounted into the accommodating portion, an acquisition process to acquire identification information from a consumable memory of the mounted consumable currently mounted in the accommodating portion (Paragraphs 68 and 69, wherein the information about the cartridge is read, this includes identification information); and after performing the acquisition process, when an agreement has been concluded for the electronic device and the mounted consumable currently mounted in the accommodating portion satisfies a prescribed condition: a first storage process to store the acquired identification information acquired in the acquisition process in the main memory as first identification information (Paragraph 75, wherein the information is stored); and a permission process to permit a consumption process to perform a prescribed operation while consuming the mounted consumable (Paragraph 80, wherein a print permission is performed), wherein the controller is configured to further perform: a reception process to receive identification information of a consumable that has been mounted in another electronic device via the communication interface (Paragraphs 84 and 85, wherein the cartridge can be used by another device); and a second storage process to store the received identification information received in the reception process in the main memory as second identification information (Paragraph 86, wherein the information can be transmitted and stored), and wherein after performing the acquisition process, when an agreement has been concluded for the electronic device, the mounted consumable currently mounted in the accommodating portion does not satisfy the prescribed condition, and the acquired identification information acquired in the acquisition process matches one of the first identification information and the second identification information stored in the main memory, the controller performs the permission process (Paragraph 92, wherein the permission processing to allow for printing on another device can be performed). Tanaka does not teach a consumable that has been mounted in another electronic device, for which an agreement has been concluded. Kaigawa does teach a consumable that has been mounted in another electronic device, for which an agreement has been concluded (Paragraphs 101-104, wherein the contract is canceled with respect to the consumable to be able to use the consumable in another device). Tanaka and Kaigawa are combinable because they both deal with contract cartridges. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the application to combine the teachings of Tanaka with the teachings of Kaigawa for the purpose of easily utilizing a subscription cartridge for the user (Kaigawa: Paragraphs 3 and 4). Regarding Claim 2, Tanaka further teaches wherein the controller is configured to further perform: after performing the reception process, a first determination process to determine whether a write permission has been received via the communication interface, the write permission permitting storing of the received identification information received in the reception process in the main memory (Paragraphs 87 and 91, wherein the storage information can be updated), and wherein when the controller determines in the first determination process that the write permission has been received, the controller performs the second storage process, whereas when the controller determines in the first determination process that the write permission has not been received, the controller skips the second storage process (Paragraphs 84, 87, and 91, wherein only when the printer can be used with the cartridge the data is updated). Regarding Claim 3, Tanaka further teaches wherein the controller is configured to further perform: after performing the acquisition process, when the mounted consumable currently mounted in the accommodating portion satisfies the prescribed condition, a preparatory process to prepare for performing the consumption process (Paragraphs 94-96, wherein print preparation is done), and wherein after performing the acquisition process, when the mounted consumable currently mounted in the accommodating portion does not satisfy the prescribed condition, the controller skips the preparatory process (Paragraph 95, wherein the process can be terminated). Regarding Claim 4, Tanaka further teaches wherein the consumable includes a cartridge storing liquid therein (Paragraph 48, wherein the cartridge holds ink), wherein the electronic device further comprises: a liquid ejection head having a nozzle configured to eject the liquid stored in the cartridge (Paragraph 58, wherein there is a head), and wherein the preparatory process includes an initial introduction process to fill the liquid ejection head with the liquid in the cartridge (Paragraphs 95 and 96, wherein the ink is set to the head accordingly). Regarding Claim 5, Tanaka teaches an electronic device (Element 10B, wherein there is a printer) comprising: an accommodating portion in which a consumable is mountable, the consumable having a consumable memory storing identification information for identifying the consumable (Paragraphs 47 and 48, wherein the cartridges can be mounted in the attachment case); a main memory (Paragraph 61 and element 53, wherein there is memory); a communication interface (element 47, wherein there is a communication interface); and a controller (Element 51) configured to perform: in response to a consumable being mounted into the accommodating portion, an acquisition process to acquire identification information from a consumable memory of the mounted consumable currently mounted in the accommodating portion (Paragraphs 68 and 69, wherein the information about the cartridge is read, this includes identification information); and after performing the acquisition process, when an agreement has been concluded for the electronic device and the mounted consumable currently mounted in the accommodating portion satisfies a prescribed condition, a storage process to store the acquired identification information acquired in the acquisition process in the main memory (Paragraph 69, wherein the information is stored), wherein the controller is configured to further perform: a first determination process to determine whether a request to use the mounted consumable in another electronic device has been received via the communication interface (Paragraphs 84 and 85, wherein the cartridge can be used by another device); and in response to determining in the first determination process that the request has been received, a transmission process to transmit the identification information stored in the main memory to an external device (Paragraph 87, wherein the information can be transmitted). Tanaka does not teach a consumable that has been mounted in another electronic device, for which an agreement has been concluded. Kaigawa does teach a consumable that has been mounted in another electronic device, for which an agreement has been concluded (Paragraphs 101-104, wherein the contract is canceled with respect to the consumable to be able to use the consumable in another device). Tanaka and Kaigawa are combinable because they both deal with contract cartridges. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the application to combine the teachings of Tanaka with the teachings of Kaigawa for the purpose of easily utilizing a subscription cartridge for the user (Kaigawa: Paragraphs 3 and 4). Regarding Claim 7, Tanaka further teaches wherein the controller is configured to further perform: a third determination process to determine whether the transmission process has been performed (Paragraph 88, wherein there is a determination if a reply has been received); and in response to determining in the third determination process that the transmission process has been performed, a setting process to set the main memory to prohibit writing and reading of the identification information of the consumable (Paragraph 91, wherein the memory is updated accordingly). Regarding Claim 8, Tanaka teaches a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing a set of computer- readable instructions for controlling a server (Paragraph 37, wherein the device can be a server, paragraph 35), the server including: a server-side communication interface (Element 64, wherein there is a communication interface); and a computer (Element 61, wherein there is a controller), the server being communicable with a first electronic device and a second electronic device via the server-side communication interface (Paragraph 34, wherein the printers and server communicate), each of the first electronic device and the second electronic device being configured to perform a prescribed operation while consuming a consumable under an agreement concluded for the each of the first electronic device and the second electronic device (Paragraph 32, wherein the service is managed), the consumable satisfying a prescribed condition and having a consumable memory storing identification information for identifying the consumable (Paragraph 52, wherein information about the cartridge is stored), the first electronic device including a first main memory, the second electronic device including a second main memory (Paragraph 61 and element 53, wherein there is memory), the set of computer-readable instructions, when executed by the computer, causing the server to perform: (a) acquiring identification information of a mounted consumable from the first main memory via the server-side communication interface, the mounted consumable being a consumable currently mounted in the first electronic device (Paragraphs 81 and 82, wherein the information and permission is transmitted by the server from the first printer to the second printer. This would have to include identification information); and (b) transmitting notification information to the second electronic device via the server- side communication interface, the notification information notifying the second electronic device of the acquired identification information acquired in (a) as identification information of an available consumable that can be consumed in the second electronic device (Paragraph 86, wherein the permission is granted and the information is transmitted accordingly). Tanaka does not teach a consumable that has been mounted in another electronic device, for which an agreement has been concluded, an available consumable that can be consumed in the second electronic device under the agreement newly concluded for the second electronic device. Kaigawa does teach a consumable that has been mounted in another electronic device, for which an agreement has been concluded (Paragraphs 101-104, wherein the contract is canceled with respect to the consumable to be able to use the consumable in another device), an available consumable that can be consumed in the second electronic device under the agreement newly concluded for the second electronic device (Paragraphs 101-104, wherein a cartridge can be used through the cancellation of the contract, newly cancelled). Tanaka and Kaigawa are combinable because they both deal with contract cartridges. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the application to combine the teachings of Tanaka with the teachings of Kaigawa for the purpose of easily utilizing a subscription cartridge for the user (Kaigawa: Paragraphs 3 and 4). Regarding Claim 9, Tanaka further teaches wherein the notification information includes instruction information instructing the second electronic device to store the acquired identification information acquired in (a) in the second main memory as the identification information of the available consumable (Paragraphs 86 and 87, wherein the permission is granted and the information is transmitted accordingly. This would be stored accordingly). Regarding Claim 10, Tanaka further teaches wherein the server is communicable with a user terminal via the server-side communication interface, the user terminal being used by a user of the first electronic device (Paragraph 45, wherein the display is attached on the printer and can be interacted with by the user), wherein the set of computer-readable instructions, when executed by the computer, causes the server to further perform: prior to performing the acquiring in (a): (c) transmitting inquiry information to one of the first electronic device and the user terminal via the server-side communication interface, the inquiry information inquiring whether the mounted consumable currently mounted in the first electronic device is to be used in the second electronic device (Paragraph 85, wherein there is a permission screen); and (d) determining whether response information to the inquiry information transmitted in (c) has been received via the server-side communication interface, the response information indicating that the mounted consumable is to be used in the second electronic device (Paragraph 92, wherein there is a confirmation screen), and wherein the acquiring in (a) is performed when the determining in (d) determines that the response information has been received (Paragraph 92, wherein there is a confirmation screen). Regarding Claim 11, Tanaka further teaches wherein the consumable memory of the consumable is configured to store residual quantity information indicating residual quantity of the consumable (Paragraph 97, wherein the remaining ink can be stored), wherein the set of computer-readable instructions, when executed by the computer, causes the server to further perform: prior to performing the acquiring in (a): (e) acquiring residual quantity information of the mounted consumable currently mounted in the first electronic device from the first electronic device via the server-side communication interface (Paragraphs 96-101 and 111, wherein the residual amount of ink is communicated); and (f) determining whether the residual quantity indicated by the acquired residual quantity information acquired in (e) is greater than or equal to a threshold (Paragraphs 96-101 and 111, wherein the residual amount of ink is communicated and compared to a threshold), and wherein the acquiring in (a) is performed when the determining in (f) determines that the residual quantity is greater than or equal to the threshold (Paragraphs 96-101 and 111, wherein the residual amount of ink is communicated and compared to a threshold). Regarding Claim 17, Tanaka teaches a system (Paragraph 2) comprising: a first electronic device (Element 10A) configured to perform a prescribed operation while consuming a consumable satisfying a prescribed condition under an agreement concluded for the first electronic device (Paragraph 32, wherein the service is managed), the first electronic device comprising: a first main memory (Paragraph 61 and element 53, wherein there is memory); a second electronic device (Element 10B) configured to perform the prescribed operation while consuming the consumable satisfying the prescribed condition under the agreement newly concluded for the second electronic device (Paragraph 32, wherein the service is managed), the second electronic device comprising: a second main memory (Paragraph 61 and element 53, wherein there is memory); and a server (Paragraph 37, wherein the device can be a server, paragraph 35) communicable with the first electronic device and the second electronic device over a communication network (Paragraph 34, wherein the printers and server communicate), wherein the consumable has a consumable memory storing identification information for identifying the consumable (Paragraph 52, wherein information about the cartridge is stored), wherein the server is configured to perform: (a) acquiring identification information of a mounted consumable from the first main memory via the communication network, the mounted consumable being a consumable currently mounted in the first electronic device (Paragraphs 81 and 82, wherein the information and permission is transmitted by the server from the first printer to the second printer. This would have to include identification information); and (b) transmitting notification information to the second electronic device via the communication network, the notification information notifying the second electronic device of the acquired identification information acquired in (a) as identification information of an available consumable that can be consumed in the second electronic device (Paragraph 86, wherein the permission is granted and the information is transmitted accordingly). Tanaka does not teach a consumable that has been mounted in another electronic device, for which an agreement has been concluded, an available consumable that can be consumed in the second electronic device under the agreement newly concluded for the second electronic device. Kaigawa does teach a consumable that has been mounted in another electronic device, for which an agreement has been concluded (Paragraphs 101-104, wherein the contract is canceled with respect to the consumable to be able to use the consumable in another device), an available consumable that can be consumed in the second electronic device under the agreement newly concluded for the second electronic device (Paragraphs 101-104, wherein a cartridge can be used through the cancellation of the contract, newly cancelled). Tanaka and Kaigawa are combinable because they both deal with contract cartridges. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the application to combine the teachings of Tanaka with the teachings of Kaigawa for the purpose of easily utilizing a subscription cartridge for the user (Kaigawa: Paragraphs 3 and 4). Regarding Claim 18, the limitations are similar to those treated in and are met by the references as discussed in claim 8 above. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NICHOLAS PACHOL whose telephone number is (571)270-3433. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th: 8-4. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, George Eng can be reached at 571-272-7495. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NICHOLAS PACHOL/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2699
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 27, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 11, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750452
OPTICAL DEVICE, IMAGE READING UNIT, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS SORRECTING A WIDTH OF A SLIT FOR REFLECTED LIGHT
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12748560
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, INFORMATION TERMINAL, METHODS OF CONTROLLING IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS AND INFORMATION TERMINAL, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND IMAGE FORMING SYSTEM
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750450
IMAGE READING DEVICE AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12743264
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS THAT RESRICTS UPDATE OF PREDETERMINED FIRMWARE BEFORE COMPLETING SETUP FOR ACTIVATING A SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE, IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM, AND SOFTWARE UPDATE METHOD
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739336
IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR IMAGE PROCESSING
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+21.8%)
3y 6m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 589 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month