Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/475,596

PANEL CLAMPING AND MOUNTING MECHANISM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 27, 2023
Examiner
CHAN, KO HUNG
Art Unit
3631
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Solar Clam-P LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allow Rate
843 granted / 1272 resolved
+14.3% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1295
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
38.9%
-1.1% vs TC avg
§102
31.0%
-9.0% vs TC avg
§112
27.0%
-13.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1272 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. PNG media_image1.png 507 754 media_image1.png Greyscale Claims 1, 6, 9, 10, 12, 15, and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Strizki (US No. 20090250580) in view of Shingleton (US No. 6672018). Regarding claim 1, Strizki discloses a system for securing a panel (2000, figure 1) having a top surface and a bottom surface, the system comprising: a frame (1000) comprising a base (b, see examiner’s markup above), side walls (sw), and opposing grooves (sg),; a sliding element (se) having flange portions (f) on opposing sides of the sliding element such that the flange portion on each side of the sliding element fits slidably within the opposing grooves, and wherein the sliding element (se) includes at least one sliding element hole (hole where 116A passes through) passing therethrough; a panel anchoring element (100) comprising a first member (102A) and a second member (104B), said first member (102A) having a top surface, a bottom surface, and at least one first member hole (111 hole in 102A receiving fastener 112) extending through the top surface and the bottom surface of the first member; and a second member (114) having a top surface, a bottom surface and at least one second member hole (hole in 114 receiving fastener 112, figure 1) extending through the top surface and the bottom surface of the second member; wherein when at least a portion (102, figure 1) of the first member(102A) is fitted over the top surface of the panel (2000) and at least a portion of the second member (104B, figure 1) is fitted over the bottom surface of the panel (2000) such that the at least one first member hole in the first member is substantially aligned with the at least one second member hole in the second member, a mechanical fastener (112) is insertable through the first member hole and through the second member hole to secure the first and second members (102A and 104) to the panel; However, Strizk does not show wherein the base of the frame includes at least one hole passing therethrough and a mount for said frame, comprising a surface anchoring element having at least one mount hole therethrough and being securable to a surface. Shingleton teaches a system for securing a panel (15, figures 5 and 6) having a top surface and a bottom surface, the system comprising: a frame (111, figures 5 and 6)) comprising a base, side walls, and opposing grooves (groove formed by base and inward flange 114), wherein the base of the frame includes at least one hole (hole through base of 111 receiving fastener 134, figure 6 ) passing therethrough; a sliding element (128) having flange portions (end flange portions of 128, figure 6) on opposing sides of the sliding element (128) such that the flange portion on each side of the sliding element fits slidably within the opposing grooves, and wherein the sliding element includes at least one sliding element hole passing therethrough (hole wherein 127 passes through); a panel anchoring element (120 and 32); comprising a surface anchoring element (133, figure 6) having at least one mount hole (hole receiving 134 in anchoring element 133) therethrough and being securable to a surface. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art to have modify the system of Strizk such that the base of the frame includes at least one hole passing therethrough and a mount for said frame, comprising a surface anchoring element having at least one mount hole therethrough and being securable to a surface as taught to be desirable by Shingleton. Regarding claim 6, the combination of Strizk and Shingleton combined discloses the system of claim 1 wherein Shingleton teaches the at least one hole passing therethrough in the base of the frame (hole through base of 111 receiving fastener 134, figure 6 ) is substantially aligned with the at least one mount hole (133, figure 6, having at least one mount hole receiving 134 in anchoring element 133), a mechanical fastener (134) is insertable through the at least one hole passing therethrough in the base of the frame to secure the frame to the mount. Regarding claim 9, Strizki and Shingleton combined disclose the system of claim 1, wherein Strizk discloses the panel is a photovoltaic (PV) module. Regarding claim 10, Strizki discloses a system for securing a panel (2000, figure 1) having a top surface and a bottom surface, the system comprising: a frame (1000) for receiving a sliding element (se, see examiner’s markup above), said frame having a base (b, see examiner’s markup above), side walls (sw), and opposing grooves (sg),; a sliding element (se) having flange portions (f) on opposing sides of the sliding element such that the flange portion on each side of the sliding element fits slidably within the opposing grooves, and wherein the sliding element (se) includes at least one sliding element hole (hole where 116A passes through) passing therethrough; a first member (102A) having a top surface, a bottom surface, and at least one first member hole (hole in 102A receiving fastener 112) extending through the top surface and the bottom surface of the first member; and a second member (114) having a top surface, a bottom surface and at least one second member hole (hole in 114 receiving fastener 112) extending through the top surface and the bottom surface of the second member; wherein when at least a portion (102) of the first member(102A) is fitted over the top surface of the panel (2000) and at least a portion of the second member (104B, figure 1) is fitted over the bottom surface of the panel (2000) such that the at least one first member hole in the first member is substantially aligned with the at least one second member hole in the second member, a mechanical fastener (112) is insertable through the first member hole and through the second member hole to secure the first and second members (102A and 104) to the panel; However, Strizk does not show wherein the base of the frame includes at least one hole passing therethrough for securing the frame to a surface, Shingleton teaches a system for securing a panel (15, figures 5 and 6) having a top surface and a bottom surface, the system comprising: a frame (111, figures 5 and 6)) comprising a base, side walls, and opposing grooves (groove formed by base and inward flange 114), wherein the base of the frame includes at least one hole (hole through base of 111 receiving fastener 134, figure 6 ) passing therethrough; a sliding element (128) having flange portions (end flange portions of 128, figure 6) on opposing sides of the sliding element (128) such that the flange portion on each side of the sliding element fits slidably within the opposing grooves, and wherein the sliding element includes at least one sliding element hole passing therethrough (hole wherein 127 passes through); a panel anchoring element (120 and 32); comprising a surface anchoring element (133, figure 6) having at least one mount hole (hole receiving 134 in anchoring element 133) therethrough and being securable to a surface. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art to have modify the system of Strizk such that the base of the frame includes at least one hole passing therethrough and a mount for said frame, comprising a surface anchoring element having at least one mount hole therethrough and being securable to a surface as taught to be desirable by Shingleton. Regarding claim 15, Strizk and Shingleton combined discloses he system of claim 10 wherein Strizk discloses the frame (1000, figure 8) comprises a plurality of frame elements (1000, figure 8); wherein a frame element may be secured to said sliding element (se, see markup above). Regarding claim 17, Strizki and Shingleton combined disclose the system of claim 10, wherein Strizk discloses the panel is a photovoltaic (PV) module. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-5, 7-8, 11, 13-14, and 16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The prior art of record further demonstrate panel securing device of interest. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Ko (Korie) H Chan whose telephone number is (571)272-6816. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday -Friday, 8:00 - 5:00 EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Liu can be reached on 571-272-8227. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Ko H Chan/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3631 Khc
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 27, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 20, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599252
ORGANIZER WALL PANEL ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595694
LOCKING ASSEMBLY AND CHASSIS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12575677
Organizer wall panel assembly and mounting assembly
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12564261
Shelf for a cabinet for receiving bottles
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12545345
BICYCLE RACK
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+15.3%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1272 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month