Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/475,657

ORTHOPEDIC BONE SCREW

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Sep 27, 2023
Examiner
CHANG, OLIVIA C
Art Unit
3775
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Biomedtrix, LLC
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
612 granted / 726 resolved
+14.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
749
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
31.8%
-8.2% vs TC avg
§102
37.0%
-3.0% vs TC avg
§112
25.5%
-14.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 726 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on October 31, 2025 has been entered. As directed by the amendment, claims 1 and 21 have been amended and claims 24-26 have been added. Claims 4-5, 22 are cancelled. As such, claims 1-3, 6-21, 23-26 remain under consideration in the instant application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claim 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. The limitations of claim 20 were previously recited in claim 16 from which it depends. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 6-8, 10, 14-15, 23-25 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Muser (US 2021/0196331). Regarding claim 1, Muser discloses an orthopedic bone screw (100, FIG. 9), comprising: a head (104); and a shaft (portion distal of head 104) extending from the head and comprising threads (122), the threads comprising a major diameter and a minor diameter (FIG. 9); the shaft comprising a threadless atraumatic tip (114) opposite the head, the threadless atraumatic tip comprising a cylindrical portion (at 138) that is distal of the threads, and a round end portion (¶35) that is distal of the cylindrical portion and forms a tip of the orthopedic bone screw (FIG. 9); the shaft further comprising a thread runout region proximal of the threadless atraumatic tip in which a thread height of the threads gradually increases moving in a proximal direction from the threadless atraumatic tip (FIG. 9); wherein a length of the cylindrical portion of the threadless atraumatic tip is 25% to 150% of the major diameter of the threads (FIG. 9), and the major diameter of the threads is measured proximally of the thread runout region; and wherein the threads comprise a thread pitch, and the length of the cylindrical portion of the threadless atraumatic tip is 100% to 500% of the thread pitch (FIG. 9). Regarding claim 6, Muser teaches the orthopedic bone screw of claim 1, a diameter of the cylindrical portion of the threadless atraumatic tip is less than the minor diameter of the threads (FIG. 9), and the minor diameter of the threads increases in the thread runout region from the diameter of the cylindrical portion of the threadless atraumatic tip to a specified minor diameter (FIG. 9). Regarding claim 7, Muser teaches the orthopedic bone screw of claim 1, wherein the threadless atraumatic tip further comprises a fillet surface portion (tapered portion between cylindrical and round end portions) between the cylindrical portion and the round end portion. Regarding claim 8, Muser teaches the orthopedic bone screw of claim 7, wherein the round end portion of the threadless atraumatic tip comprises a spherical end surface (FIG. 9). Regarding claim 10, Muser teaches the orthopedic bone screw of claim 1, wherein: the threads of the shaft are first threads comprising a first thread pitch; the head further comprises second threads having a second thread pitch; and the second thread pitch is greater than the first thread pitch (¶28). Regarding claim 14, Muser teaches the orthopedic bone screw of claim 1, wherein the length of the cylindrical portion of the threadless atraumatic tip is (approximately) 25% to 100% of a diameter of the cylindrical portion of the threadless atraumatic tip (FIG. 9). Regarding claim 15, Muser teaches a method, comprising driving the orthopedic bone screw of claim 1 into a bone (nature of bone screw). Regarding claim 24, Muser discloses the orthopedic bone screw of claim 1, wherein an overall length of the threadless atraumatic tip is 200% to 600% of the thread pitch (FIG. 9). Regarding claim 25, Muser discloses the orthopedic bone screw of claim 1, wherein the threads on the shaft are single lead threads, and the thread runout region comprises two threads to five threads (FIG. 9). Regarding claim 23, Muser discloses an orthopedic bone screw, comprising: a head (104); and a shaft (portion distal of head 104) extending from the head and comprising threads (122), the threads comprising a major diameter and a minor diameter (FIG. 9); the shaft comprising a threadless atraumatic tip (114) opposite the head, the threadless atraumatic tip comprising a cylindrical portion (at 138) that is distal of the threads, and a round end portion (¶35) that is distal of the cylindrical portion and forms a tip of the orthopedic bone screw (FIG. 9); the shaft further comprising a thread runout region proximal of the threadless atraumatic tip in which a thread height of the threads gradually increases moving in a proximal direction from the threadless atraumatic tip (FIG. 9); wherein a length of the cylindrical portion of the threadless atraumatic tip is 25% to 150% of the major diameter of the threads (FIG. 9), a diameter of the cylindrical portion of the threadless atraumatic tip is less than the minor diameter of the threads (FIG. 9), and the minor diameter of the threads increases in the thread runout region from the diameter of the cylindrical portion of the threadless atraumatic tip to a specified minor diameter (FIG. 9). Claim(s) 16, 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Roth (US 2019/0008571). Regarding claim 16, Roth discloses an orthopedic bone screw (100, FIG. 1), comprising: a head (400); and a shaft (200 with 300 and 110) extending from the head and comprising threads (270), the threads comprising a major diameter and a minor diameter; the shaft comprising a threadless atraumatic tip (110) opposite the head, the threadless atraumatic tip comprising a cylindrical portion (120) that is distal of the threads, and a round end portion (190, circular cross section) that is distal of the cylindrical portion and forms a tip of the orthopedic bone screw; wherein at least the cylindrical portion of the threadless atraumatic tip comprises a plurality of cutting flutes (170); and wherein the threads comprise a thread pitch, and a length of the cylindrical portion of the threadless atraumatic tip is 100% to 500% of the thread pitch (FIG. 1). Regarding claim 20, Roth teaches the orthopedic bone screw of claim 16, wherein the threads comprise a thread pitch, and the length of the cylindrical portion of the threadless atraumatic tip is 100% to 500% of the thread pitch (FIG. 1). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 21 is allowable over the prior art. Claims 2-3, 9, 11-13, 17-19, 26 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OLIVIA C CHANG whose telephone number is (571) 270-5017. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 7:30AM-5:00PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, please contact the examiner’s supervisor, KEVIN TRUONG, at (571) 272-4705. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571 -273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, seehttp://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OLIVIA C CHANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3775
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 27, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Jul 29, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 05, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §112
Oct 09, 2025
Interview Requested
Oct 31, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 09, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Mar 30, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12582419
TIBIAL SUPRAPATELLAR ENTRY PORTAL SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12558135
OSSEOUS ANCHORING IMPLANT WITH CORTICAL STABILIZATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12514623
ORTHOPEDIC PLATE FOR TREATMENT OF TIBIAL FRACTURES AND RELATED METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent 12514624
BONE FIXATION DEVICE AND METHOD OF USE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent 12491014
OSTEOSYNTHESIS PLATE SUITABLE AS A REPLACEMENT OF A SYNARTHROSIS
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+13.3%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 726 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month