Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/475,865

COMPONENTS PROTECTION LAYER

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 27, 2023
Priority
Oct 13, 2022 — IN 202211058508
Examiner
COPENHEAVER, BLAINE R
Art Unit
1781
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Honeywell International Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
39 granted / 47 resolved
+18.0% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
85
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
82.5%
+42.5% vs TC avg
§102
5.1%
-34.9% vs TC avg
§112
9.5%
-30.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 47 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Foreign Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority based on an application filed in India on October 13, 2022. It is noted, however, that applicant has not filed a certified copy of the IN202211058508 application as required by 37 CFR 1.55. As noted in the Priority Document Exchange report of March 13, 2024, the USPTO was unable to electronically retrieve a copy of this priority application. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group II (claims 17-20) in the reply filed on January 05, 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 1-16 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Group. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by KR 10-2057204. An English language machine translation of KR ‘204 is attached to this Office action. Regarding claim 17, Figure 2 of KR ‘204 discloses an electronic component (#40) having a multi-layered protective coating (#1, #2, #3, and #4). The protective coating comprises a soft layer (#1) which comprises an epoxy resin ([0061], [0065]), a hard layer (#2) which comprises a polyimide film [0025], and an adhesive layer (#3) which comprises an epoxy resin [0028]. With respect to the limitation that the multi-layered protective coating is configured to protect the electronic component from adverse effects from varying light intensities, this limitation is being read as a functional limitation and since KR ‘204 discloses the same materials, i.e., a coating having a polyimide sandwiched between two epoxy-containing layers, it is reasonable to conclude that the protective coating of KR ‘204 meets this claim limitation. Likewise, with respect to claims 18 and 19, the protective coating of KR ‘204 would provide protection from both mechanical and thermal shock. Moreover, any material, including the multi-layered protective coating of KR ‘204, would provide at least some protections to light, mechanical shock, and thermal shock. Regarding claim 20, KR ‘204 discloses that the electronic component is a sensor [0047]. Other Relevant Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Carney et al. (US Pub 2015/0166832) suggests an epoxy/polyimide/epoxy protective laminate useful as a coverlay for electronic components ([0002], [0119]). Qian et al. (US Pub 2021/0146670) discloses multilayer sheets comprising polyimides and epoxy resin layers. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Blaine Copenheaver whose telephone number is (571)272-1156. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Frank Vineis can be reached at (571)270-1547. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BLAINE COPENHEAVER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1781
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 27, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
May 11, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12638927
Molded Object
2y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12637583
MULTILAYER COATING SYSTEMS OBTAINED FROM BLOCK COPOLYMER CONTAINING BASECOAT COMPOSITIONS
2y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12629927
POLYMER FLOOR ELEMENT
3y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630683
MEDICAL DEVICE WITH TUNABLE HYDROPHOBICITY AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE
2y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12617914
COMPOSITE POLYMERIC FILM
3y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+19.7%)
2y 9m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 47 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month