Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/476,756

Fixing Device for Display Module and Display Device Including Same

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 28, 2023
Examiner
DHILLON, PUNEET S
Art Unit
2488
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
LG Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
232 granted / 281 resolved
+24.6% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
322
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
§103
49.1%
+9.1% vs TC avg
§102
17.5%
-22.5% vs TC avg
§112
24.9%
-15.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 281 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 18-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Deng et al., hereinafter referred to as Deng (US 2019/0159350 A1). As per claim 1, Deng discloses a display device (Deng: Abstract; [0003]; [0025]) comprising: a display module (display) comprising side portions (Deng: Fig. 3 & Para. [0105] disclose a displaying device such as a mobile phone, a display or a tablet computer is mounted between the first clamping part 3233 and the second clamping part 343, which implies the displaying device has side portions engaged by the clamping parts.); a side frame (member 32) supporting a portion of each of the side portions of the display module (Deng: Figs. 2-4 & Paras. [0081]-[0082], [0087] [0091] disclose the first clamping member 32 includes a top housing 3231 and a first clamping part 3233. These components form a clamping space that accommodates the display module.); and at least one fixing unit (second clamping member 34) configured to fix the display module to the side frame, the at least one fixing unit pressing a surface of the display module on the side frame (Deng: Figs. 2-4 & Paras. [0025], [0081], [0089], [0105] disclose the second clamping member 34 is slidably mounted on the first clamping member and includes a second clamping part 343. In operation, this unit moves to abut against the displaying device and applies a clamping force, which presses the side surface of the display module against the first clamping member 32 [side frame] to fix it in position.). As per claim 2, Deng discloses the display device according to claim 1, wherein while the display module is coupled to the side frame (32), the at least one fixing unit (34) is configured to move toward the side frame along an upward incline (see Fig. 2, 325 and Fig. 5, 34) on the display module such that the at least one fixing unit presses the surface of the display module (Deng: Figs. 2-5 & Paras. [0025], [0081], [0089], [0105] disclose the second clamping member 34 is slidably mounted on the first clamping member 32 and includes a second clamping part 343. In operation, this unit moves to abut against the displaying device and applies a clamping force, which presses the side surface of the display module against the first clamping member [side frame] to fix it in position to move along an upward incline (Fig. 5, 34).). As per claim 18, Deng discloses a fixing device of a display module (Deng: Abstract; [0003]; [0025]), the fixing device comprising: a side frame (member 32) supporting a portion of each of side portions of a display module (Deng: Figs. 2-4 & Paras. [0081]-[0082], [0087] [0091] disclose the first clamping member 32 includes a top housing 3231 and a first clamping part 3233. These components form a clamping space that accommodates the display module.); and at least one fixing unit (second clamping member 34) fixing the display module to the side frame by pressing a surface of the display module on the side frame (Deng: Figs. 2-4 & Paras. [0025], [0081], [0089], [0105] disclose the second clamping member 34 is slidably mounted on the first clamping member and includes a second clamping part 343. In operation, this unit moves to abut against the displaying device and applies a clamping force, which presses the side surface of the display module against the first clamping member 32 [side frame] to fix it in position.). As per claim 19, The fixing device according to claim 18, wherein while the display module is coupled to the side frame, the at least one fixing unit (34) is configured to move along an upward incline (Fig. 5, 34) on the display module toward the side frame to press the surface of the display module (Deng: Figs. 2-5 & Paras. [0025], [0081], [0089], [0105] disclose the second clamping member 34 is slidably mounted on the first clamping member 32 and includes a second clamping part 343. In operation, this unit moves to abut against the displaying device and applies a clamping force, which presses the side surface of the display module against the first clamping member [side frame] to fix it in position to move along an upward incline (Fig. 5, 34).). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Deng in view of Cho et al., hereinafter referred to as Cho (US 2018/0027672 A1). As per claim 3, Deng discloses the display device according to claim 1 (Deng: Abstract.), However, Deng does not explicitly disclose “… wherein the display module comprises: an organic light-emitting display panel; and at least one of a back cover covering a surface of the organic light-emitting display panel and a heat dissipation plate between the organic light-emitting display panel and the back cover.” Further, Cho is in the same field of endeavor and teaches wherein the display module comprises: an organic light-emitting display panel (Cho: Para. [0039] discloses "The display panel 100 may be an organic light emitting diode (OLED) panel.".); and at least one of a back cover covering a surface of the organic light-emitting display panel and a heat dissipation plate between the organic light-emitting display panel and the back cover (Cho: Para. [0047] discloses "The back cover 200 may be provided on the rear surface of the display panel 100 … The back cover 200 can support the rear surface of the display panel 100".). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, and having the teachings of Deng and Cho before him or her, to modify the display holding device system of Deng to include the back cover covering a surface of the organic light-emitting display panel feature as described in Cho. The motivation for doing so would have been to improve energy efficiency by providing a thin profile suitable for portable applications that yields necessary structural support and protection against exerted forces on the display. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-17 & 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure and can be viewed in the list of references. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PEET DHILLON whose telephone number is (571)270-5647. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 5am-1:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sath V. Perungavoor can be reached at 571-272-7455. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PEET DHILLON/Primary Examiner Art Unit: 2488 Date: 02-19-2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 28, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598346
A DISPLAY DEVICE AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12567263
IMAGING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12548338
OBJECT SAMPLING METHOD AND IMAGE ANALYSIS APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12536812
CAMERA PERCEPTION TECHNIQUES TO DETECT LIGHT SIGNALS OF AN OBJECT FOR DRIVING OPERATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12537911
VIDEO PROCESSING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+18.4%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 281 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month