Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/477,035

CONTACT ASSEMBLY AND METHOD OF MAKING SAME AND ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR INCLUDING THE CONTACT ASSEMBLY

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Sep 28, 2023
Examiner
NGUYEN, TRUC T
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Foxconn Interconnect Technology Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 0m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
1112 granted / 1274 resolved
+19.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
1314
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
33.7%
-6.3% vs TC avg
§102
39.8%
-0.2% vs TC avg
§112
21.7%
-18.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1274 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 6-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 6-7 recites the limitation "the length" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 6-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Little et al. (US 2022/0115818) in view of Chen et al. (US 2021/0075164). Regarding claims 1 and 10, Little et al. disclose an electrical connector comprising: an insulative housing (110); and a contact assembly received in the insulative housing, the contact assembly including: a signal contact module (140) including a first insulator (144a or 144b or 144c) and plural pairs of signal contacts (142) insert-molded with the first insulator; a plurality of ground contacts (132) mounted on a second insulator (also 144a or144b or 144c). Little et al. substantially disclosed the claimed invention except the ground contacts are insert-molded in the second insulator. However, Little et al. disclosed the signal contact are insert-molded with the first insulator. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention was made to insert-mold the ground contact to the second insulator for securely holding the ground contact with the second insulator. Little et al. substantially disclosed the claimed invention except the conductive plastic member. Chen et al. teach a lossy conductive plastic member (33). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention was made to provide the conductive plastic member into Little’s connector assembly, as taught by Chen et al. for absorbing electromagnetic wave. Regarding claim 6, in the modified contact assembly, Little et al. disclose the first insulator of the signal contact module includes three discrete portions (144a, 144b, 144c) along the length of each pair of signal contacts. Regarding claim 7, in the modified contact assembly, Little et al. disclose the second insulators of the ground contact module includes two discrete parts (also 144a, 144b) arranged along the length of the ground contacts, and each discrete part extends in a transverse direction. Regarding claim 8, in the modified contact assembly, Chen et al. disclose the conductive plastic member is a one-piece component extending in a transverse direction. Regarding claim 9, in method claim is deemed inherence by Little et al. in view of Chen et al. Little et al. in view of Chen et al. disclose a method of making a contact assembly, comprising the steps of: molding a first insulator with plural pairs of signal contacts to form a signal contact module; molding a second insulator with a plurality of ground contacts to form a ground contact module; assembling the first insulator to the second insulator; and molding an electrically lossy member to connect the plurality of ground contacts. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-5 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TRUC T NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-2011. The examiner can normally be reached monday-friday (7-4). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher M. Koehler can be reached at 5712723560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TRUC T NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 28, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592523
ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR WITH IMPROVED GROUND SHIELDING EFFECT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586952
CONNECTING ASSEMBLY AND RELATED ELECTRONIC APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580351
CABLE CAP WITH POWER INDICATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580342
CONNECTOR ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580338
CONNECTOR AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+7.2%)
2y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1274 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month