Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/477,368

VIDEO RESOLUTION SWITCHING ALGORITHM FOR NETWORK STREAMING APPLICATIONS

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Sep 28, 2023
Examiner
MUNG, ON S
Art Unit
2486
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Sony Group Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
532 granted / 708 resolved
+17.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
728
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
§103
48.4%
+8.4% vs TC avg
§102
27.8%
-12.2% vs TC avg
§112
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 708 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Summary 2. This office action for US Patent application 18/477,368 is responsive to communications filed on 04/20/2026, in response to the Non-Final Rejection of 12/23/2025. Claims 1-8, 16-20 have been amended. Claims 9-15 have been withdrawn. Currently, claims 1-20 are pending and are presented for examination. Response to Arguments 3. In response to communication filed on 04/20/2026, the claim objections with respect to claim 4 have been withdrawn in view of the amendment and remarks. 4. Applicant's Remarks see pages 10-12, with respect to the amendment and argument have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, 35 U.S.C 102/103 rejections have been withdrawn. 5. Applicant's amendment has introduced claim language that has resulted in additional rejections. Please see the new grounds of rejection presented below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 6. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. 7. Claims 1 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claims contain subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor, at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 16 recite the limitations “a first reconstructed video data”, “a second reconstructed data”, and “determining a first quality metric based on the video data and the first reconstructed video data” in the claims. These limitations are not disclosed in the specification and/or in the figures and therefore, this claim is likewise rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph for failing to comply with the written description requirement. Claims 2-8, 17-20 are rejected to as being depended on a rejected base claims 1 and 16 respectively. Allowable Subject Matter 8. Claims 1-8, 16-20 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112 (a). Conclusion 9. Applicant’s amendment necessitated the new ground (s) of rejection presented in this office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. 10. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ON MUNG whose telephone number is (571) 270-7557 and whose direct farelax number is (571) 270-8557. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Fri, 9am - 6pm (ET). If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jamie Atala can be reached on (571)272-7384. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ON S MUNG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2486
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 28, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Apr 09, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 10, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 20, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12705699
GENERATING TOP VIEW OF VEHICLE WITH IMAGE HARMONIZATION BASED ON CAMERA ORIENTATION
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12695909
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ADAPTIVE WEIGHTS FOR PARALLELOGRAM PREDICTION
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689761
IMAGE CODING METHOD, IMAGE DECODING METHOD, IMAGE CODING APPARATUS, AND IMAGE DECODING APPARATUS
1y 6m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12652386
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ENCODING/DECODING IMAGE, AND RECORDING MEDIUM STORING BIT STREAM
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12641291
Systems and Methods for Error Concealment of Missing Image Data
2y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+8.5%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 708 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month