Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/477,377

PROCEDURES OF SIDELINK RESOURCE POOL RESOURCE USE WITH REDUCED SENSING

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 28, 2023
Priority
Sep 24, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2021120365 +1 more
Examiner
RAHMAN, SHAH M
Art Unit
2413
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Apple Inc.
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
388 granted / 479 resolved
+23.0% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
534
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
§103
60.2%
+20.2% vs TC avg
§102
20.5%
-19.5% vs TC avg
§112
10.0%
-30.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 479 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 04/29/2026 has been entered. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 06/22/2026 has been placed in record and considered by the examiner. Summary This action is in reply to Applicant's Amendments and Remarks filed on 04/29/2026. Claims 1, 7-9, 15-17 and 21-22 are pending. Claims 2-6, 10-14 and 18-20 are canceled. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments dated 04/29/2026 with respect to claims 1, 7-9, 15-17 and 21-22 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant presented argument that Huawei does not teach "wherein Preserve,re-ev further comprises a data periodicity value that is determined by the UE from the configured one or more SL resource pool supported periodicity values based on UE traffic", because the k values of Huawei are not "data periodicity values" as recited for claim 1, and similarly for claims 9 and 7. (REMARKS, Pages 6-7) The Examiner respectfully disagrees. The Examiner understands from Applicant’s REMARKS that the amendment requires a length of data periodicity values. The Examiner presents that Huawei also discloses – Page 5: 2.1.1.3 Insufficient sensing results handling ….. a UE implementation can adjust the density of Y candidate slots as well as the number of Y candidate slots based on a long term learning of the overall conditions (traffic, environment, etc.) as well as other assistance info (speed, location, etc.), ….. Page 6: 2.1.2 Contiguous partial sensing (CPS) 2.2.2.1 CPS triggering condition At RAN1#104-e, the following agreement were made: In a resource pool (pre-)configured with at least partial sensing, if UE performs contiguous partial sensing and resource (re-)selection is triggered in slot n, support the following option: Option 1: For the purpose of resource (re-)selection, the UE monitors slots between [n+TA, n+TB] and performs identification of candidate resources, in or after slot n+TB, based on all available sensing results, including periodic-based partial sensing results (if applicable). Pages 7-8: 2.1.2.2 CPS window determination At RAN1#105-e, the following agreement were made: In contiguous partial sensing for resource (re)selection, TA and TB values can be zero, positive or negative TA and TB values or range depend on different operating scenarios or conditions (e.g., periodic/aperiodic traffic, predictability of triggering slot n, remaining PDB, re-evaluation/pre-emption checking, HARQ feedback, CBR/CR parameter, power saving, etc) For the case that periodic reservation is enabled in the resource pool, the partial sensing RA needs to consider periodic reservation in addition to aperiodic reservation. Hence the design of partial sensing RA, including, e.g. determination candidate slots and partial sensing occasions, etc., needs to take into account both periodic and aperiodic reservations. Although the resource (re-)selection is triggered at slot n, in order to perform sensing at partial sensing occasions   t y 0 - k * P r e s e r v e S L , the set of Y candidate slots has to be determined in advance in order to perform sensing before slot n. In this case, for initial selection, the contiguous partial sensing window only needs to cover the most relevant 31 slots to the most recent possible selected candidate slot (i.e. t y 0 S L ) from the selection window, i.e. irrelevant of slot n, where t p r o c , 0 + T 1 represents the time gap between the last sensing slot and the most recent possible selected candidate slot, with   t p r o c , 0 , and T 1 as same definition as in Rel-16, which is shown in Error! Reference source not found.. Given that a SCI can reserve any resource within 31 slots, the contiguous partial sensing window needs to contain 31 slots in total to cover all possible aperiodic SCI reservation, otherwise, some SCIs may be missed, which results in unreliable resource exclusion. It is also noted, when the sl-ResourceReservePeriodList includes smaller periodicity values of less than 31 slots, the PBPS sensing occasions corresponding to these smaller periodicity values would be also coincidently sensed by CPS which spans 31 slots. That is, the partial sensing occasions are determined as a union set of slots t y 0 - k * P r e s e r v e S L and a window [ t y 0 S L - 31 , t y 0 S L - t p r o c , 0 - T 1 ]. As a consequence, the S A is determined as the remaining resource of all the candidate single-slot resources, i.e. the resources belong to the set of Y candidates, after resource exclusion based on both PBPS and CPS. PNG media_image1.png 303 1124 media_image1.png Greyscale Proposal 7: When a resource (re)selection procedure is triggered, if UE performs both periodic-based and contiguous partial sensing for the resource (re)selection procedure, the sensing results of the two schemes apply to the same resource selection window [n+T1, n+T2] and the same set of Y candidate slots. Only one candidate resource set ( S A ) is to be initialized based on the Y candidate slots selected for partial sensing. A UE monitors slots between slots [ t y 0 S L - 31 , t y 0 S L - t p r o c , 0 - T 1 ] for continuous partial sensing. In reference to slot n, CPS window is defined as follows: n + T A =   t y 0 S L - 31 n + T B = t y 0 S L - t p r o c , 0 - T 1 The reported S A for MAC layer is determined as the remaining resource of all the candidate single-slot resources (resources belong to the set of Y candidates) after resource exclusion based on both PBPS and CPS. It is obvious to a person skill in art, based on disclosure from Section 2.1.1.3 Option 1, Proposal 7 and Figure 5 and corresponding description cited above, that for Preserve,re-ev further comprises a data periodicity length value of Y candidate slots that is determined by the UE from the configured one or more SL resource pool supported periodicity values based on UE traffic monitored. Therefore Huawei teaches “wherein Preserve,re-ev further comprises a data periodicity value that is determined by the UE from the configured one or more SL resource pool supported periodicity values”, as required by amended claim 9, and similarly claims 1 and 17. Accordingly, claim 9 and similarly independent claims 1 and 17 with substantially similar features as in claim 9, are rejected. Dependent claims 7-8, 15-16 and 21-22, being dependent on claims 1, 9 and 17, are also rejected for the same as above. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1, 7-9, 15-17 and 21-22 are rejected under AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huawei et al. (R1-2106477 “Sidelink resource allocation to reduce power consumption”, of IDS, hereinafter ‘HUAWEI’) in view of Yue et al. (US 20240031999 A1 with priority of us-provisional-application US 63171006, of, IDS, hereinafter ‘YUE’). Regarding claim 9, HUAWEI teaches an apparatus of a user equipment (UE) (Section 2.1.1 Periodic-based partial sensing (PBPS): UE) that performs one of resource re-evaluation and resource pre-emption with periodic partial sensing (Pages 1-3, Section 2 Discussions, Figure 1. Multiple (most recent two) partial sensing occasions per priority for a given candidate resource. Page 17, Section 2.3 Re-evaluation and pre-emption check) the UE to: determine one or more periodicity values PNG media_image2.png 23 117 media_image2.png Greyscale used for the one of the resource re-evaluation and the resource pre-emption in a SL resource pool, wherein PNG media_image2.png 23 117 media_image2.png Greyscale comprises one or more SL resource pool supported periodicity values (Pages 1-2, Section 2.1.1 Periodic-based partial sensing (PBPS) When a resource pool is configured to enable periodic reservation, periodic-based partial sensing shall be always performed if a UE utilizes partial sensing RA for PSCCH/PSSCH transmission of which traffic types can be either periodic or aperiodic, and no additional conditions shall be applied to disable PBPS. 2.1.1.1 Remaining details on determination on Preserve At RAN1#105-e, the following agreement are made: For the set of Preserve values in periodic-based partial sensing, o If no (pre-)configuration (i.e., by default), Preserve corresponds to all values from the (pre-)configured set sl-ResourceReservePeriodList. o Otherwise, a single set of Preserve values can be (pre-)configured, where the set of Preserve values are restricted to a subset of the (pre-)configured set sl-ResourceReservePeriodList This is per mode 2 Tx resource pool (pre-)configuration A UE by implementation may also monitor other sl-ResourceReservePeriodList values not part of the restricted subset ….. On determination of Preserve , in order to maximize PPR performance, Preserve should correspond to all values from the (pre-)configured set sl-ResourceReservePeriodList. Furthermore, the network may provide a subset value, from network point of view, to allow UEs to reduce power consumption whilst obtain reliable sensing result to meet their QoS requirements. Pages 17-18, Section 2.3 Re-evaluation and pre-emption check At RAN#103-e, the following agreements were made: • Re-evaluation and pre-emption checking are supported by UEs that perform sensing Timeline of mode 2 resource allocation includes sensing, identification of candidate resources (i.e. determination of S_A) and report to MAC layer, re-evaluation/pre-emption on a set of resource provided by MAC layer, update of S_A, etc., as shown in Figure 14. See Figure 14 monitor all slots after sensing window for re-evaluation/pre-emption on selected resources); identify a trigger for the one of the resource re-evaluation and the resource pre-emption (Page 3, Figure 1, resource (re)selection trigger received in slot n, Page 2, Section 2.1.1.2 2.1.1.2 Remaining details on determination on k o By default, the UE monitors the most recent sensing occasion for a given reservation periodicity before the resource (re)selection trigger slot n or the first slot of the set of Y candidate slots subject to processing time restriction.); and perform the one of the resource re-evaluation and the resource pre-emption according to resource reservation information received during one or more sensing occasions prior to a slot PNG media_image3.png 21 17 media_image3.png Greyscale that is a first slot of periodic-based candidate slots within a resource selection window, wherein the one or more sensing occasions occur according to one or more periodicities corresponding to the PNG media_image2.png 23 117 media_image2.png Greyscale measured back from the slot PNG media_image3.png 21 17 media_image3.png Greyscale (Page 3, Figure 1, resource (re)selection trigger received in slot n, and sensing occasions before ty0, that is a first slot of periodic-based candidate slots Y within a resource selection window for resource re-evaluation and the resource pre-emption, Page 2, Section 2.1.1.2 2.1.1.2 Remaining details on determination on k o By default, the UE monitors the most recent sensing occasion for a given reservation periodicity before the resource (re)selection trigger slot n or the first slot of the set of Y candidate slots subject to processing time restriction. Pages 9-12 Section 2.2.1 2.2.1 Random selection with priority handling Page 10, Rel-17 already supports different RA types to be configured in the same resource pool. Page 11, Figure 7 RP configurations for ... Case 2. − Case 2 – All UEs (for P-UE & V-UE), regardless of type of RA, are in the same TX resource pool, i.e. configurations provides a single resource pool. Pages 11-12: In a resource pool configured for mixed full-sensing and reduced-sensing, a full-sensing UE can monitor all SCIs including those originated from reduced-sensing UEs, and decides whether to re-select its own resources based on re-evaluation and pre-emption checks. ….. ..In Rel-16, pre-emption can be enabled/disabled per resource pool with a priority handling design, where a pre-emption priority threshold is configured for the resource pool. With this configuration, only a PSSCH with a priority value smaller than the priority threshold is allowed to pre-empt resources in the resource pool. This can be re-used in a resource pool configured for mixed full-sensing and reduced-sensing RAs to prevent that full sensing UEs must always back off or collide in presence of a reduced sensing UE which may have a quite different service profiles. (Construed that a full-sensing UE monitors all SCIs (Sidelink Control Information) during sensing period for performing the one of the resource re-evaluation and the resource pre-emption based on priority according to resource reservation information received during one or more sensing occasions prior to a slot tyo or slot PNG media_image3.png 21 17 media_image3.png Greyscale ) Pages 17-18, Section 2.3 Re-evaluation and pre-emption check At RAN#103-e, the following agreements were made: • Re-evaluation and pre-emption checking are supported by UEs that perform sensing At RAN1#105-e, the following agreement are made: Relationship to re-evaluation and pre-emption operation for periodic-based partial sensing to be discussed separately FFS details including whether monitoring of periodic sensing occasions between triggering slot n and the first slot of the selected Y candidate slots subject to processing time restriction is performed as part of resource (re)selection or re-evaluation and pre-emption checking Timeline of mode 2 resource allocation includes sensing, identification of candidate resources (i.e. determination of SA) and report to MAC layer, re-evaluation/pre-emption on a set of resource provided by MAC layer, update of SA, etc., as shown in Figure 14. For Rel-17, the timing reference on determination of SA is changed to slot ty0 subject to processing timing restriction rather than slot n as in Rel-16, and therefore re-evaluation and pre-emption check are performed after determination of SA. In addition, a UE does not need to monitor every slot for e-evaluation and pre-emption check taking into account power consumption reduction. In order to detect periodic reservation after ty0-processing time, only sensing occasions corresponding to Preserve are monitored. See Page 18, Figure 14. See Figure 14 monitor all slots after sensing window for re-evaluation/pre-emption on selected resources), wherein the one or more sensing occasions are identified using period definition data PNG media_image4.png 21 65 media_image4.png Greyscale for the one of the resource re-evaluation and resource pre-emption that indicates one or more periods of each of the one or more periodicities during which the one or more sensing occasions occur ( Pages 2-3 Section 2.1.1.2 Remaining details on determination on k For the case k is (pre-)configured, UE additionally monitors PBPS occasions in addition to monitoring the most recent partial sensing slot for a given traffic periodicity for a candidate resource, i.e. this means a UE can monitor the multiple most recent partial sensing slots per traffic periodicity. For example, assuming the resource pool provides reservation periods P 1 and P 2 , and setting k = most recent two ( k = 1 and k = 2 ), which means most two recent slots for each P 1 and P 2 need to be monitored, that is, for a given candidate slot t y S L , the corresponding partial sensing occasions are determined as t y - k × p r e s e r v e S L     for preserve = P1. P2 and k = most recent two, as shown in Figure 1. With the assumption that the physical value P 1 and P 2   are converted to logical slots as p 1 ' = 15   slots and p 2 ' = 20 slots respectively, a UE should monitor at slot t y - 1 × 15 S L and t y - 1 × 20 S L to check if candidate resource in slot t y was periodically reserved by other UEs, Pages 17-18, Section 2.3 Re-evaluation and pre-emption check For Rel-17, the timing reference on determination of SA is changed to slot ty0 subject to processing timing restriction rather than slot n as in Rel-16, and therefore re-evaluation and pre-emption check are performed after determination of SA. …. In order to detect periodic reservation after ty0 - processing time, only sensing occasions corresponding to Preserve are monitored. . On the other hand, to detect aperiodic reservation after ty0 - processing time a UE only needs to monitor 31 slots prior to the set of Y candidate slots starting from t y 1 for re-evaluation and pre-emption check, because resource exclusion on slot t y 0 is already performed by PBPS and CPS during   S A determination, as shown in Figure 15. (HUAWEI using Figure 14 and Figure 15 showing monitoring/sensing for PBPS+CPS periods to determine candidate resource set SA, then continue monitoring or sensing for re-evaluation and/or pre-emption check on selected resources for further periods corresponding to P_resv and 31 slots which are resources for re-evaluation and/or pre-emption, which corresponds to period definition data Kre-ev for the one of the resource re-evaluation and resource pre-emption. See also Proposal 11 disclosing Preserve and a maximum of 31 slots for periodic and aperiodic reservations after tyo – processing time after candidate resource set SA determination indicating Preserve and a maximum of 31 slots as sensing period for re-evaluation and/or pre-emption check corresponding to Kre-ev,as defined in amended claim 9)), wherein the one or more configured SL resource pool supported periodicity values comprises periodicity values used with the SL resource pool for resource selection ( Page 1, Section 2.1.1 Periodic-based partial sensing (PBPS) When a resource pool is configured to enable periodic reservation, periodic-based partial sensing shall be always performed if a UE utilizes partial sensing RA for PSCCH/PSSCH transmission of which traffic types can be either periodic or aperiodic, and no additional conditions shall be applied to disable PBPS. 2.1.1.1 Remaining details on determination on Preserve At RAN1#105-e, the following agreement are made: For the set of Preserve values in periodic-based partial sensing, o If no (pre-)configuration (i.e., by default), Preserve corresponds to all values from the (pre-)configured set sl-ResourceReservePeriodList. o Otherwise, a single set of Preserve values can be (pre-)configured, where the set of Preserve values are restricted to a subset of the (pre-)configured set sl-ResourceReservePeriodList). Page 2: On determination of P reserve , in order to maximize PPR performance, P reserve   should correspond to all values from the (pre-)configured set sl-ResourceReservePeriodList. Pages 2-3 Section 2.1.1.2: Remaining details on determination on k At RAN1#105-e, the following agreement are made: For the k value in periodic-based partial sensing for resource (re)selection, o By default, the UE monitors the most recent sensing occasion for a given reservation periodicity before the resource (re)selection trigger slot n or the first slot of the set of Y candidate slots subject to processing time restriction. o If (pre-)configured, UE additionally monitors periodic sensing occasions that correspond to a set of values which can be (pre-)configured with at least one value (Construed that one or more SL resource pool supported periodicity values comprises periodicity values used for resource selection)), and wherein Preserve,re-ev further comprises a data periodicity value that is determined by the UE from the configured one or more SL resource pool supported periodicity values based on UE traffic ( Page 5: 2.1.1.3 Insufficient sensing results handling ….. a UE implementation can adjust the density of Y candidate slots as well as the number of Y candidate slots based on a long term learning of the overall conditions (traffic, environment, etc.) as well as other assistance info (speed, location, etc.), ….. Page 6: 2.1.2 Contiguous partial sensing (CPS) 2.2.2.1 CPS triggering condition At RAN1#104-e, the following agreement were made: In a resource pool (pre-)configured with at least partial sensing, if UE performs contiguous partial sensing and resource (re-)selection is triggered in slot n, support the following option: Option 1: For the purpose of resource (re-)selection, the UE monitors slots between [n+TA, n+TB] and performs identification of candidate resources, in or after slot n+TB, based on all available sensing results, including periodic-based partial sensing results (if applicable). Pages 7-8: 2.1.2.2 CPS window determination At RAN1#105-e, the following agreement were made: In contiguous partial sensing for resource (re)selection, TA and TB values can be zero, positive or negative TA and TB values or range depend on different operating scenarios or conditions (e.g., periodic/aperiodic traffic, predictability of triggering slot n, remaining PDB, re-evaluation/pre-emption checking, HARQ feedback, CBR/CR parameter, power saving, etc) For the case that periodic reservation is enabled in the resource pool, the partial sensing RA needs to consider periodic reservation in addition to aperiodic reservation. Hence the design of partial sensing RA, including, e.g. determination candidate slots and partial sensing occasions, etc., needs to take into account both periodic and aperiodic reservations. Although the resource (re-)selection is triggered at slot n, in order to perform sensing at partial sensing occasions   t y 0 - k * P r e s e r v e S L , the set of Y candidate slots has to be determined in advance in order to perform sensing before slot n. In this case, for initial selection, the contiguous partial sensing window only needs to cover the most relevant 31 slots to the most recent possible selected candidate slot (i.e. t y 0 S L ) from the selection window, i.e. irrelevant of slot n, where t p r o c , 0 + T 1 represents the time gap between the last sensing slot and the most recent possible selected candidate slot, with   t p r o c , 0 , and T 1 as same definition as in Rel-16, which is shown in Error! Reference source not found.. Given that a SCI can reserve any resource within 31 slots, the contiguous partial sensing window needs to contain 31 slots in total to cover all possible aperiodic SCI reservation, otherwise, some SCIs may be missed, which results in unreliable resource exclusion. It is also noted, when the sl-ResourceReservePeriodList includes smaller periodicity values of less than 31 slots, the PBPS sensing occasions corresponding to these smaller periodicity values would be also coincidently sensed by CPS which spans 31 slots. That is, the partial sensing occasions are determined as a union set of slots t y 0 - k * P r e s e r v e S L and a window [ t y 0 S L - 31 , t y 0 S L - t p r o c , 0 - T 1 ]. As a consequence, the S A is determined as the remaining resource of all the candidate single-slot resources, i.e. the resources belong to the set of Y candidates, after resource exclusion based on both PBPS and CPS. PNG media_image1.png 303 1124 media_image1.png Greyscale Proposal 7: When a resource (re)selection procedure is triggered, if UE performs both periodic-based and contiguous partial sensing for the resource (re)selection procedure, the sensing results of the two schemes apply to the same resource selection window [n+T1, n+T2] and the same set of Y candidate slots. Only one candidate resource set ( S A ) is to be initialized based on the Y candidate slots selected for partial sensing. A UE monitors slots between slots [ t y 0 S L - 31 , t y 0 S L - t p r o c , 0 - T 1 ] for continuous partial sensing. In reference to slot n, CPS window is defined as follows: n + T A =   t y 0 S L - 31 n + T B = t y 0 S L - t p r o c , 0 - T 1 The reported S A for MAC layer is determined as the remaining resource of all the candidate single-slot resources (resources belong to the set of Y candidates) after resource exclusion based on both PBPS and CPS. (It is obvious to a person skill in art, based on Option 1, Proposal 7 and Figure 5 and corresponding description cited above, that for Preserve,re-ev further comprises a data periodicity length value of Y candidate slots that is determined by the UE from the configured one or more SL resource pool supported periodicity values based on UE traffic monitored)). HUAWEI does not expressly disclose an apparatus of a user equipment (UE) that performs one of resource re-evaluation and resource pre-emption with periodic partial sensing, comprising: one or more processors, and a memory storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors. In an analogous art, YUE teaches an apparatus of a user equipment (UE) (Fig. 1, mobile devices 120, Fig. 2, UEs, Fig. 16 Processing Device 1600, [0167] …. the processing system 1600 is in a user-side device accessing a wireless or wireline telecommunications network, such as a mobile station, a user equipment (UE), a personal computer (PC), a tablet, a wearable communications device (e.g., a smartwatch, etc.), or any other device adapted to access a telecommunications network.), that performs one of resource re-evaluation and resource pre-emption with periodic partial sensing (Fig. 10, [0145] For a sensing UE with periodic traffic, as shown in FIG. 10, when resource (re)selection is triggered at slot n, the UE will select a resource from a set of Y candidate slots within a resource selection window [n+T1, n+T2]. The starting slot of the Y candidate slots is at slot ty0. If a UE performs contiguous based partial sensing, it monitors the slots between [TCPSst, TCPSend], with a problem of how to select TCPSst and TCPSend. [0148] It is possible that there is an overlap between the slots for contiguous partial sensing and the slots in periodic based partial sensing. Based on the sensing results from contiguous partial sensing and periodic partial sensing if available, UE selects the resource from the set of Y candidate slots within the resource selection window. After selecting the resource, the UE then performs re-evaluation and pre-emption if configured.), comprising: one or more processors, and a memory storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors (Fig. 16, Processing Device 1600 with Processor 1604, Memory 1606, [0166] …the processing system 1600 includes a processor 1604, a memory 1606, …. as shown in FIG. 16. The processor 1604 …. adapted to perform computations and/or other processing related tasks, and the memory 1606 …. adapted to store programming and/or instructions for execution by the processor 1604. In an embodiment, the memory 1606 includes a non-transitory computer readable medium. Supported by US 63171006 Figure 1 [0004-0006] UEs for LTE/NR sidelink (UE with Processor and memory is obvious), Figure 9, [0067-0070, 0081, 0086). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to take the technique of contiguous based partial sensing for Aperiodic Traffic of YUE to the system of contiguous partial sensing for combined periodic and aperiodic traffic of HUAWEI in order to take the advantage of method for sidelink communications using UE coordination mechanism where the UE shares resource for the other UEs to use in their resource selection for efficient sensing and power consumption (YUE: [0002, 0003, 0154]). Regarding claim 1, the claim is interpreted mutatis mutandis of claim 9 and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 9. Regarding claim 17, the claim is interpreted mutatis mutandis of claim 9 and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 9. Regarding claim 7, HUAWEI teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the one or more periods includes a first period of each of the one or more periodicities occurring prior to a restriction time for the one or more sensing occasions ( Page 2, Section 2.1.1.2 2.1.1.2 Remaining details on determination on k o By default, the UE monitors the most recent sensing occasion for a given reservation periodicity before the resource (re)selection trigger slot n or the first slot of the set of Y candidate slots subject to processing time restriction In periodic-based partial sensing for resource (re)selection, the UE at least monitors in periodic sensing occasion(s) for a given reservation periodicity before the first slot of the selected Y candidate slots subject to processing time restriction for the identification of candidate resources. o The processing time restriction includes Tproc,0SL and Tproc,1SL.). Regarding claim 8, HUAWEI teaches the method of claim 1, wherein PNG media_image4.png 21 65 media_image4.png Greyscale is equal to period definition data PNG media_image5.png 16 21 media_image5.png Greyscale used to identify sensing occasions for resource selection ( Pages 2-3 Section 2.1.1.2 Remaining details on determination on k For the case k is (pre-)configured, UE additionally monitors PBPS occasions in addition to monitoring the most recent partial sensing slot for a given traffic periodicity for a candidate resource, i.e. this means a UE can monitor the multiple most recent partial sensing slots per traffic periodicity. For example, assuming the resource pool provides reservation periods P 1 and P 2 , and setting k = most recent two ( k = 1 and k = 2 ), which means most two recent slots for each P 1 and P 2 need to be monitored, that is, for a given candidate slot t y S L , the corresponding partial sensing occasions are determined as t y - k × p r e s e r v e S L     for preserve = P1. P2 and k = most recent two, as shown in Figure 1). Regarding claim 15, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 7. Regarding claim 16, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 8. Regarding claim 21, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 7. Regarding claim 22, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 8. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Ko et al. (US 20240430867 A1), describing METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SELECTING RESOURCE ON BASIS OF PARTIAL SENSING IN NR V2X Hoang et al. (US 12048011 B2), describing Partial Sensing-based Resource Allocation Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHAH M RAHMAN whose telephone number is (571)272-8951. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30AM-5:30PM PST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, UN C CHO can be reached at 571-272-7919. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHAH M RAHMAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2413
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 9 earlier events
Nov 19, 2025
Interview Requested
Nov 26, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 26, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 01, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 30, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 29, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707302
Measuring Wireless Network Quality of Service on Mobile Devices
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12684431
METHOD, COMPUTER PROGRAM AND APPARATUS FOR SELECTING A BEAM FOR HANDOVER
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677289
FREQUENCY SELECTIVE PRECODER INDICATION IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12666473
PATH SECTION BETWEEN UU AND PC5
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12665664
SYSTEMS, APPARATUS, ARTICLES OF MANUFACTURE, AND METHODS FOR PRIVATE NETWORK MOBILITY MANAGEMENT
2y 12m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+24.8%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 479 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month