Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/477,538

DIFFERENTIAL ALL-PASS COUPLING CIRCUIT WITH COMMON MODE FEEDBACK

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 28, 2023
Priority
Nov 02, 2022 — provisional 63/381,939
Examiner
CHOE, HENRY
Art Unit
2843
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
MediaTek Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
1252 granted / 1353 resolved
+24.5% vs TC avg
Minimal -1% lift
Without
With
+-1.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
1370
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
49.6%
+9.6% vs TC avg
§102
36.4%
-3.6% vs TC avg
§112
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1353 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 19 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by [Parkhurst et al (Fig. 3A); 11,658,626]. Regarding claim 19, Parkhurst et al discloses an amplifier circuit comprising the method steps of sensing (351, 353) an output common mode voltage (the voltage drop across the resistors 351 and 353) associated with a differential signal (VINP, VINM) of an input stage (304P, 306P) of a receiver (300), determining (350) a difference between the sensed output common mode voltage (the voltage applying to the upper input of 350) and a target output common mode voltage (VOCM), determining (350) whether the difference (difference between the top input of 350 and lower input of 350) satisfies a threshold (VOCM), and in response to determining (350) that the difference (difference between the top input of 350 and lower input of 350) satisfies the threshold (VOCM) and outputting (output of 350) a voltage to an all pass circuit (C0s, C1s) to adjust the output common mode voltage (the voltage applying to the upper input of 350). Regarding claim 20, Parkhurst et al discloses an amplifier circuit further comprising the method steps of comparing (350) the sensed output common mode voltage (the voltage applying to the upper input of 350) and the target output common mode voltage (VOCM) to determine the difference (difference between the top input of 350 and lower input of 350), and generating (350) the voltage (output voltage signal of 350) based on a first rail voltage (VDD) in response to determining (350) that the difference (difference between the top input of 350 and lower input of 350)represents that the sensed output common mode voltage (the voltage applying to the upper input of 350) is greater than the target output common mode voltage (VOCM). Reasons for Allowance Claims 1-18 are allowed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Henry Choe whose telephone number is (571)272-1760. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 6:00 AM- 6:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interview practice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Andrea J Lindgren Baltzell can be reached on (571)272-5918. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. /HENRY CHOE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2843 #2948
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 28, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640695
HIGH EFFICIENCY POWER AMPLIFIER
3y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640690
Radio-frequency Amplifier with Large Signal Protection
3y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633880
INDUCTORLESS SELF-TUNED INPUT-MATCHING LOW-NOISE AMPLIFIER WITH VERY LOW NOISE FIGURE AND Gm BOOST
3y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12627261
AMPLIFYING CIRCUIT
3y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12627265
METHODS FOR GENERATING A CONSTANT CURRENT
3y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (-1.3%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1353 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month