Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/478,574

RECREATIONAL VEHICLE DOOR LOCKING SYSTEMS

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Sep 29, 2023
Examiner
SIDKY, YAHYA I
Art Unit
3675
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Rvlock & Co. LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allow Rate
152 granted / 198 resolved
+24.8% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
238
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
39.1%
-0.9% vs TC avg
§102
31.9%
-8.1% vs TC avg
§112
26.6%
-13.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 198 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 14 and 20 were previously objected to. Applicant has successfully addressed these issues in the amendments filed on 11/24/2025. Accordingly, the objections to the claims have been withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 20130133384 to Pickar. Regarding claim 1, Pickar discloses: A door handle assembly (fig 1), comprising: a single lock actuator (44/46) configured to actuate between an unlocked position (fig 9) and a locked position (fig 8); and one or more linkage bars (48/50) in mechanical communication with and extending from the single lock actuator (fig 3), the one or more linkage bars comprising: a first engagement (48) member configured to engage with a handle locking bolt (60) such that actuation of the lock actuator causes actuation of the handle locking bolt between an unlocked position (fig 9) and a locked position (fig 8), wherein, when in the locked position, the handle locking bolt is configured to prevent rotation of a handle (20/22) of the door handle assembly; and a second engagement member (50) configured to engage with a deadbolt (18) such that actuation of the single lock actuator causes actuation of the deadbolt between an unlocked position (fig 9) and a locked position (fig 8), wherein, when in the locked position, the deadbolt is configured to engage with a mortice to prevent opening of a door (not shown, see abstract) to which the door handle assembly is affixed. Regarding claim 2, Pickar discloses: The door handle assembly of claim 1, wherein the single lock actuator comprises a lock cam (44 is a loc cam) with one or more crank arms (56) connected to the lock cam. Regarding claim 3, Pickar discloses: The door handle assembly of claim 2, wherein the lock cam is actuatable by operation of a key cylinder (40), a thumb turn, or a motor system. Regarding claim 4, Pickar discloses: The door handle assembly of claim 3, wherein the door handle assembly comprises a single key cylinder (40 is a single key cylinder) accessible from an exterior face (12) of the door handle assembly. Regarding claim 5, Pickar discloses: The door handle assembly of claim 2, wherein the one or more linkage bars comprises a single linkage bar (70), and wherein the one or more crank arms comprises a single crank arm (56). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 14-20 is allowed. Claims 6-13 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 11/24/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Regarding Applicants arguments that 44/46 are 2 separate actuators, Examiner respectfully disagrees. 44 and 46 are two components that act together to be a lock actuator. They do not individually function, and so the both of them together are a single lock actuator. Therefore, rejection is maintained. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Yahya Sidky whose telephone number is (571)272-6237. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 8:30-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christine Mills can be reached at (571) 272-8322. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Y.S./Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3675 /CHRISTINE M MILLS/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3675
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 29, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Nov 18, 2025
Interview Requested
Nov 24, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 24, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 24, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 06, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601210
DOOR HANDLE SYSTEM FOR A SAFETY DOOR, ESPECIALLY FOR A SLIDING DOOR OR A SWING DOOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590480
COMPACT POWERED DOOR LATCH
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12577807
VERTICALLY ADJUSTABLE STRIKE PLATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577808
GATE LATCH
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12559991
MINIMALIST SECONDARY BARRIER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+20.5%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 198 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month