Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/478,825

STATE TRANSITION CONTROL FOR PARAMETRIC MEASUREMENT UNIT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 29, 2023
Priority
Mar 23, 2023 — IN 202341020378
Examiner
ALSHACK, OSMAN M
Art Unit
2112
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Texas Instruments Incorporated
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
457 granted / 530 resolved
+31.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
559
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
15.7%
-24.3% vs TC avg
§103
48.4%
+8.4% vs TC avg
§102
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
§112
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 530 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims 2. Claims 1-20 are presented for examination. Request for Continued Examination 3. A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant’s submission filed on 07/01/2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments 4. Applicant’s argument filed on 07/01/2026 with respect claims 1, 8, 14, and 20 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The applicant contends that the office action fails to teach or suggest the limitation of " wherein allowed mode changes are restricted to: from a DUT driving mode to a DUT non- driving mode, from a DUT non-driving mode to another DUT non-driving mode, or from a DUT non- driving mode to a DUT driving mode; and wherein the first DUT driving mode is different from the second DUT driving mode." As recited in claim 1, and similar feature in claims 8, 14, and 20. Examiner directs the applicant’s attention that during examination, a claim must be given its broadest reasonable interpretation (BRI) consistent with the specification as it would be interpreted by one of ordinary skill in the art (MPEP 2111). This feature of “allowed mode changes are restricted to: from a DUT driving mode to a DUT non- driving mode, from a DUT non-driving mode to another DUT non-driving mode, or from a DUT non- driving mode to a DUT driving mode” is extremely broad and does not show how and/or when these drive modes need to be changed, the drive change paths are restricted between only two modes (not three modes as the applicant alleged). For example, from a DUT driving mode to a DUT non- driving mode, from a DUT non-driving mode to another DUT non-driving mode, or from a DUT non- driving mode to a DUT driving mode. “Emphasis Added.” Therefore, the Examiner respectfully disagrees and asserts that Dinteman et al. (US 6,057,716 A) teaches the such limitation. For example, the present invention relates a drive circuit for an integrated circuit (IC) tester. In accordance with one aspect of the invention the drive circuit has two modes of operation: drive and termination. In the drive mode of operation, the drive circuit transmits a differential test signal to terminals of an integrated circuit device under test (DUT) through a matching pair of transmission lines. When the same pair of transmission lines are used to convey a DUT output signal back to the IC tester, the drive circuit operating in its termination mode provides proper termination for the transmission line and provides proper loading for the DUT output signal. With the load at the tester end of each transmission line properly adjusted, the DUT is able to produce its output signal under its specified load conditions. See column 2, lines 20-30.FIG. 1 illustrates in combined block and schematic diagram form, a pin electronics circuit 10 for an integrated circuit tester. Pin electronics circuit 10 includes a drive circuit 12 in accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention and a conventional compare circuit 14. In accordance with the present invention, drive circuit 12 is capable of operating in either of two modes. When an input INHIBIT data bit is low, drive circuit 12 enters a "drive" mode of operation in which it produces an output differential test signal (TEST) of a state determined the state of an input differential DRIVE signal. A pair of transmission lines 16A and 16B deliver the TEST signal to a pair of input/output (I/O) terminals 18A and 18B of an integrated circuit device under test (DUT) 20. The high and low levels of the differential TEST signal are set by input data D.sub.HIGH and D.sub.LOW. When the INHIBIT bit is high, drive circuit 12 enters a "termination" mode of operation. In this mode of operation, while comparing circuit 14 samples the state of a differential output signal DUT.sub.--OUT produced by the DUT 20 on transmission lines 16A and 16B, drive circuit 12 terminates transmission lines 16A and 16B with their characteristic impedances and provides an adjustable load voltage to the DUT.sub.-- OUT signal. Input data D.sub.TERM sets the magnitude of that adjustable load. Current Source Switching Drive Circuit. See column 3, lines 31-55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. 5. Claims 1-5, 8, 9, 11-15, and 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 (a) as being unpatentable over Walker et al. (US 2006/0132165 A1) "herein after as Walker" in view of Dinteman et al. (US 6,057,716 A) "herein after as Dinteman." As per claim 1: Walker substantially teaches or discloses a method comprising: operating a test control circuit in response to a first device under test (DUT) driving mode and a first set of configuration settings (see abstract, paragraph [0004], herein a semiconductor device tester includes a parametric measurement unit (PMU) stage for producing a DC test signal and a pin electronic (PE) stage for producing an AC test signal for testing the semiconductor device, and Fig. 1); receiving, in the test control circuit, a transition trigger signal and state information indicating a second DUT driving mode and a second set of configuration settings (see paragraph [0005], herein the semiconductor device tester may include of an output stage for providing the versions of the test signals from the driver circuit to the semiconductor device; and claim 1 “a driver circuit configured to provide, in a first mode, a version of the DC test signal to the semiconductor device and, in a second mode, configured to provide a version of the AC test signal to the semiconductor device); and transitioning the test control circuit, in response to receiving the transition trigger signal, from operating in response to the first DUT driving mode to operating in response to the second DUT driving mode by performing allowed mode changes (see paragraph [0005], herein the semiconductor device tester may include of an output stage for providing the versions of the test signals from the driver circuit to the semiconductor device, paragraph [0009], providing test signals to the semiconductor device may further include passing another DC test signal through a switch and sending this DC test signal through the output stage to the semiconductor device under test; and Fig. 5). Walker does not explicitly teach wherein allowed mode changes are restricted to: from a DUT driving mode to a DUT non-driving mode, from a DUT non-driving mode to another DUT non-driving mode, or from a DUT non-driving mode to a DUT driving mode; and wherein the first DUT driving mode is different from the second DUT driving mode. However, Dinteman in the same the field of endeavor teaches wherein allowed mode changes are restricted to: from a DUT driving mode to a DUT non-driving mode, from a DUT non-driving mode to another DUT non-driving mode, or from a DUT non-driving mode to a DUT driving mode; (see column 2, lines 21-29, herein the drive circuit has two modes of operation: drive and termination. In the drive mode of operation, the drive circuit transmits a differential test signal to terminals of an integrated circuit device under test (DUT) through a matching pair of transmission lines. When the same pair of transmission lines are used to convey a DUT output signal back to the IC tester, the drive circuit operating in its termination mode provides proper termination for the transmission line and provides proper loading for the DUT output signal, and column 3, lines 1-3, herein invention to provide a drive circuit that can switch quickly between its drive and termination modes with minimal noise in the output signal; and See column 3, lines 36-55, the present invention, drive circuit 12 is capable of operating in either of two modes. When an input INHIBIT data bit is low, drive circuit 12 enters a "drive" mode of operation in which it produces an output differential test signal (TEST) of a state determined the state of an input differential DRIVE signal. A pair of transmission lines 16A and 16B deliver the TEST signal to a pair of input/output (I/O) terminals 18A and 18B of an integrated circuit device under test (DUT) 20. The high and low levels of the differential TEST signal are set by input data D.sub.HIGH and D.sub.LOW. When the INHIBIT bit is high, drive circuit 12 enters a "termination" mode of operation. In this mode of operation); and wherein the first DUT driving mode is different from the second DUT driving mode (see abstract, and column 2, lines 18-20, The present invention relates a drive circuit for an integrated circuit (IC) tester. In accordance with one aspect of the invention the drive circuit has two modes of operation: drive and termination). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, to modify the system of Walker with the teachings of Dinteman by including allowed mode changes are restricted to: from a DUT driving mode to a DUT non-driving mode, from a DUT non-driving mode to another DUT non-driving mode, or from a DUT non-driving mode to a DUT driving mode; and wherein the first DUT driving mode is different from the second DUT driving mode. This modification would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, because one of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized the allowed mode changes are restricted to: from a DUT driving mode to a DUT non-driving mode, from a DUT non-driving mode to another DUT non-driving mode, or from a DUT non-driving mode to a DUT driving mode would have improved the test system performance. As per claim 2: Dinteman teaches that wherein the test control circuit does not drive a test signal to the DUT while the test control circuit is in a DUT non-driving mode (see column 6, lines 61-65, herein In the termination mode of operation, when drive circuit 92 is not needed to produce the TEST signal, the INHIBIT data is set so that switch 114 connects the bases of transistors 94 and 96 to a positive voltage source (+V) and so that switch 114 connects DAC 110 to current source 98). As per claim 3: Dinteman teaches that wherein the test control circuit transitions from operating in response to the first DUT driving mode to operating in response to the second DUT driving mode along a shortest mode change path according to the allowed mode changes (see column 3, lines 1-3, herein invention to provide a drive circuit that can switch quickly between its drive and termination modes with minimal noise in the output signal). As per claim 4: Dinteman teaches that wherein, in a DUT non-driving mode, the test control circuit prevents active or leakage signal transmission from the test control circuit to the DUT, or the test control circuit forces a zero current signal on a line coupling the test control circuit to the DUT (see column 5, lines 56-66, herein When drive circuit 62 is not needed to produce the TEST signal the INHIBIT data is set so that switch 74 delivers V.sub.LOAD to node 72 and so that switch 82 is open. With switch 82 open, the current I.sub.E drawn by current source 68 falls to zero. This produces a nearly zero current through transistors 64 and 66. The load driven by the DUT output signal DUT.sub.-- OUT is primarily a function of the impedance of resistors 69 and 70 and the magnitude of V.sub.LOAD supplied to node 72. The resistance R of resistors 69 and 70 is selected to match the characteristic impedance of the transmission lines connected to drive circuit 62 so that the transmission lines are properly terminated). As per claim 5: Walker teaches that wherein the transitioning includes looking up an operating state transition super-set sequence in a lookup table of the test control circuit, and sequencing commands in response to the super-set sequence to transition from operating in response to the first DUT driving mode and the first set of configuration settings to operating in response to the second DUT driving mode and the second configuration settings (see paragraph [0059], herein Referring to FIG. 10, a portion of IC chip 325 is shown that includes a PMU stage 485 for performing PMU testing. To initiate sending a PMU test signal to DUT 18, PMU control circuitry 425 sends a DC signal over conducting trace 505 to an input 525 of a driver circuit 545 that conditions (e.g., amplifies) the signal and sends it to an output 565). As per claim 8: Walker substantially teaches or discloses a test control circuit comprising (see Fig. 1, semiconductor device tester 12 such as an ATE or other similar testing device): a subsystem configured to output test signals to a device under test (DUT), and to receive and perform measurement of response signals of the DUT (see paragraph [0021], herein test routines may initiate the generating and sending of test signals to the semiconductor device-under-test (DUT) and collecting responses from the DUT. Various types of semiconductor devices may be tested by system 10. In this example, an integrated circuit (IC) chip 18 (e.g., memory chip, microprocessor, analog-to-digital converter, digital-to-analog converter, etc.) is tested as a DUT); and a transition control circuit configured to: operate the test control circuit in response to a first operational state information, the first operational state information indicating a first DUT driving mode and a first set of configuration settings (see abstract, paragraph [0004], herein a semiconductor device tester includes a parametric measurement unit (PMU) stage for producing a DC test signal and a pin electronic (PE) stage for producing an AC test signal for testing the semiconductor device, and Fig. 1); receive a transition trigger signal and a second operational state information, the second operational state information indicating a second DUT driving mode and a second set of configuration settings (see paragraph [0005], herein the semiconductor device tester may include of an output stage for providing the versions of the test signals from the driver circuit to the semiconductor device; and claim 1 “a driver circuit configured to provide, in a first mode, a version of the DC test signal to the semiconductor device and, in a second mode, configured to provide a version of the AC test signal to the semiconductor device); and transition the test control circuit, in response to receiving the transition trigger signal, to operating in response to the second operational state information by performing allowed mode changes (see paragraph [0005], herein the semiconductor device tester may include of an output stage for providing the versions of the test signals from the driver circuit to the semiconductor device, paragraph [0009], providing test signals to the semiconductor device may further include passing another DC test signal through a switch and sending this DC test signal through the output stage to the semiconductor device under test; and Fig. 5). Walker does not explicitly teach wherein allowed mode changes are restricted to: from a DUT driving mode to a DUT non-driving mode, from a DUT non-driving mode to another DUT non-driving mode, or from a DUT non-driving mode to a DUT driving mode; and wherein the first DUT driving mode is different from the second DUT driving mode. However, Dinteman in the same the field of endeavor teaches wherein allowed mode changes are restricted to: from a DUT driving mode to a DUT non-driving mode, from a DUT non-driving mode to another DUT non-driving mode, or from a DUT non-driving mode to a DUT driving mode (see column 2, lines 21-29, herein the drive circuit has two modes of operation: drive and termination. In the drive mode of operation, the drive circuit transmits a differential test signal to terminals of an integrated circuit device under test (DUT) through a matching pair of transmission lines. When the same pair of transmission lines are used to convey a DUT output signal back to the IC tester, the drive circuit operating in its termination mode provides proper termination for the transmission line and provides proper loading for the DUT output signal, and column 3, lines 1-3, herein invention to provide a drive circuit that can switch quickly between its drive and termination modes with minimal noise in the output signal; and See column 3, lines 36-55, the present invention, drive circuit 12 is capable of operating in either of two modes. When an input INHIBIT data bit is low, drive circuit 12 enters a "drive" mode of operation in which it produces an output differential test signal (TEST) of a state determined the state of an input differential DRIVE signal. A pair of transmission lines 16A and 16B deliver the TEST signal to a pair of input/output (I/O) terminals 18A and 18B of an integrated circuit device under test (DUT) 20. The high and low levels of the differential TEST signal are set by input data D.sub.HIGH and D.sub.LOW. When the INHIBIT bit is high, drive circuit 12 enters a "termination" mode of operation. In this mode of operation); and wherein the first DUT driving mode is different from the second DUT driving mode (see abstract, and column 2, lines 18-20, The present invention relates a drive circuit for an integrated circuit (IC) tester. In accordance with one aspect of the invention the drive circuit has two modes of operation: drive and termination). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, to modify the system of Walker with the teachings of Dinteman by including allowed mode changes are restricted to: from a DUT driving mode to a DUT non-driving mode, from a DUT non-driving mode to another DUT non-driving mode, or from a DUT non-driving mode to a DUT driving mode; and wherein the first DUT driving mode is different from the second DUT driving mode; and wherein the first DUT driving mode is different from the second DUT driving mode. This modification would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, because one of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized the allowed mode changes are restricted to: from a DUT driving mode to a DUT non-driving mode, from a DUT non-driving mode to another DUT non-driving mode, or from a DUT non-driving mode to a DUT driving mode would have improved the test system performance. As per claim 9: Dinteman teaches that wherein the test control circuit is configured to not drive a signal to the DUT while the test control circuit is in the DUT non-driving mode (see column 6, lines 61-65, herein In the termination mode of operation, when drive circuit 92 is not needed to produce the TEST signal, the INHIBIT data is set so that switch 114 connects the bases of transistors 94 and 96 to a positive voltage source (+V) and so that switch 114 connects DAC 110 to current source 98). As per claim 11: Dinteman teaches that wherein the test control circuit includes a driving prevention circuit, the driving prevention circuit configured to: drive a zero current signal to the DUT; or use negative feedback to reduce a leakage signal from an open switch of the test control circuit adapted to couple an output of the test control circuit to an input of the DUT (see column 5, lines 56-66, herein When drive circuit 62 is not needed to produce the TEST signal the INHIBIT data is set so that switch 74 delivers V.sub.LOAD to node 72 and so that switch 82 is open. With switch 82 open, the current I.sub.E drawn by current source 68 falls to zero. This produces a nearly zero current through transistors 64 and 66. The load driven by the DUT output signal DUT.sub.-- OUT is primarily a function of the impedance of resistors 69 and 70 and the magnitude of V.sub.LOAD supplied to node 72. The resistance R of resistors 69 and 70 is selected to match the characteristic impedance of the transmission lines connected to drive circuit 62 so that the transmission lines are properly terminated). As per claim 12: Walker teaches that wherein the transition control circuit includes a lookup table configured to store multiple operating state transition super-set sequences, different operating state transition super-set sequences corresponding to different possible mode change paths according to the allowed mode changes (see paragraph [0059], herein Referring to FIG. 10, a portion of IC chip 325 is shown that includes a PMU stage 485 for performing PMU testing. To initiate sending a PMU test signal to DUT 18, PMU control circuitry 425 sends a DC signal over conducting trace 505 to an input 525 of a driver circuit 545 that conditions (e.g., amplifies) the signal and sends it to an output 565). As per claim 13: Walker teaches that wherein the transition control circuit includes an execution circuit configured to translate an operating state transition super-set sequence into a sequence of control signals for controlling the subsystem (see paragraph [0045], herein to initiate a PMU test with PE stage 340, PE control circuitry 500 sends a control signal over conductor 540 to a current test signal generator 56 that is included in PE stage 340. Typically current test signal generator 560 uses the control signal for setting the current level of an output signal that is sent to the DUT). As per claim 14: Walker substantially teaches or discloses an automatic test equipment (ATE) comprising (see Fig. 1, semiconductor device tester 12 such as an ATE or other similar testing device): multiple test control circuits, ones of the test control circuits comprising: a subsystem configured to output test signals to one of multiple devices under test (DUTs), and to receive and perform measurement of response signals of the DUT, different ones of the test control circuit corresponding to different ones of the DUTs (see paragraph [0021], herein test routines may initiate the generating and sending of test signals to the semiconductor device-under-test (DUT) and collecting responses from the DUT. Various types of semiconductor devices may be tested by system 10. In this example, an integrated circuit (IC) chip 18 (e.g., memory chip, microprocessor, analog-to-digital converter, digital-to-analog converter, etc.) is tested as a DUT); a transition control circuit configured to: operate the test control circuit in response to a first operational state, the first operational state indicating a first DUT driving mode and a first set of configuration settings (see paragraph [0022], herein to provide test signals and collect responses from the DUT, semiconductor device tester 12 is connected to one or more connector pins that provide an interface for the internal circuitry of IC chip 18. To test some DUTs, as many as 64 or 128 connector pins may be interfaced to tester 12); receive a transition trigger signal and a second operational state, the second operational state indicating a second DUT driving mode and a second set of configuration settings (see paragraph [0005], herein the semiconductor device tester may include of an output stage for providing the versions of the test signals from the driver circuit to the semiconductor device; and claim 1 “a driver circuit configured to provide, in a first mode, a version of the DC test signal to the semiconductor device and, in a second mode, configured to provide a version of the AC test signal to the semiconductor device); and transition the test control circuit, in response to receiving the transition trigger signal, to operating the test control circuit in response to the second operational state by performing allowed mode changes (see paragraph [0005], herein the semiconductor device tester may include of an output stage for providing the versions of the test signals from the driver circuit to the semiconductor device, paragraph [0009], providing test signals to the semiconductor device may further include passing another DC test signal through a switch and sending this DC test signal through the output stage to the semiconductor device under test; and Fig. 5); and an interface communication circuit coupled to control the test control circuits, the interface communication circuit configured to provide corresponding transition trigger signals and second operational states to respective ones of the test control circuits (see Fig. 1). Walker does not explicitly teach wherein allowed mode changes are restricted to: from a DUT driving mode to a DUT non-driving mode, from a DUT non-driving mode to another DUT non-driving mode, or from a DUT non-driving mode to a DUT driving mode; and wherein the first DUT driving mode is different from the second DUT driving mode. However, Dinteman in the same the field of endeavor teaches wherein allowed mode changes are restricted to: from a DUT driving mode to a DUT non-driving mode, from a DUT non-driving mode to another DUT non-driving mode, or from a DUT non-driving mode to a DUT driving mode (see column 2, lines 21-29, herein the drive circuit has two modes of operation: drive and termination. In the drive mode of operation, the drive circuit transmits a differential test signal to terminals of an integrated circuit device under test (DUT) through a matching pair of transmission lines. When the same pair of transmission lines are used to convey a DUT output signal back to the IC tester, the drive circuit operating in its termination mode provides proper termination for the transmission line and provides proper loading for the DUT output signal, and column 3, lines 1-3, herein invention to provide a drive circuit that can switch quickly between its drive and termination modes with minimal noise in the output signal; and See column 3, lines 36-55, the present invention, drive circuit 12 is capable of operating in either of two modes. When an input INHIBIT data bit is low, drive circuit 12 enters a "drive" mode of operation in which it produces an output differential test signal (TEST) of a state determined the state of an input differential DRIVE signal. A pair of transmission lines 16A and 16B deliver the TEST signal to a pair of input/output (I/O) terminals 18A and 18B of an integrated circuit device under test (DUT) 20. The high and low levels of the differential TEST signal are set by input data D.sub.HIGH and D.sub.LOW. When the INHIBIT bit is high, drive circuit 12 enters a "termination" mode of operation. In this mode of operation); and wherein the first DUT driving mode is different from the second DUT driving mode (see abstract, and column 2, lines 18-20, The present invention relates a drive circuit for an integrated circuit (IC) tester. In accordance with one aspect of the invention the drive circuit has two modes of operation: drive and termination). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, to modify the system of Walker with the teachings of Dinteman by including allowed mode changes are restricted to: from a DUT driving mode to a DUT non-driving mode, from a DUT non-driving mode to another DUT non-driving mode, or from a DUT non-driving mode to a DUT driving mode; and wherein the first DUT driving mode is different from the second DUT driving mode. This modification would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, because one of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized the allowed mode changes are restricted to: from a DUT driving mode to a DUT non-driving mode, from a DUT non-driving mode to another DUT non-driving mode, or from a DUT non-driving mode to a DUT driving mode would have improved the test system performance. As per claim 15: Dinteman teaches that wherein ones of the test control circuits are configured to not drive a signal to the DUT while respective test control circuits are in the DUT non-driving mode(see column 6, lines 61-65, herein In the termination mode of operation, when drive circuit 92 is not needed to produce the TEST signal, the INHIBIT data is set so that switch 114 connects the bases of transistors 94 and 96 to a positive voltage source (+V) and so that switch 114 connects DAC 110 to current source 98). As per claim 17: Dinteman teaches that wherein ones of the test control circuits include a driving prevention circuit, the driving prevention circuit configured to: drive a zero current signal to the DUT; or use negative feedback to reduce a leakage signal from an open switch of the test control circuit adapted to couple an output of the test control circuit to an input of the DUT (see column 5, lines 56-61, herein When drive circuit 62 is not needed to produce the TEST signal the INHIBIT data is set so that switch 74 delivers V.sub.LOAD to node 72 and so that switch 82 is open. With switch 82 open, the current I.sub.E drawn by current source 68 falls to zero. This produces a nearly zero current through transistors 64 and 66). As per claim 18: Walker teaches that wherein ones of the control circuit include a lookup table configured to store multiple operating state transition super-set sequences, different ones of the operating state transition super-set sequences corresponding to each possible mode change path, wherein the possible mode change paths include a minimum number of mode changes and accord with the allowed mode changes (see paragraph [0059], herein Referring to FIG. 10, a portion of IC chip 325 is shown that includes a PMU stage 485 for performing PMU testing. To initiate sending a PMU test signal to DUT 18, PMU control circuitry 425 sends a DC signal over conducting trace 505 to an input 525 of a driver circuit 545 that conditions (e.g., amplifies) the signal and sends it to an output 565). As per claim 19: Walker teaches that wherein the transition control circuit includes an execution circuit configured to translate an operating state transition super-set sequence into a sequence of control signals for controlling the subsystem (see paragraph [0045], herein to initiate a PMU test with PE stage 340, PE control circuitry 500 sends a control signal over conductor 540 to a current test signal generator 56 that is included in PE stage 340. Typically current test signal generator 560 uses the control signal for setting the current level of an output signal that is sent to the DUT). As per claim 20: Walker substantially teaches or discloses a test control circuit comprising (see Fig. 1, semiconductor device tester 12 such as an ATE or other similar testing device): a subsystem configured to output test signals to a device under test (DUT), and to receive and perform measurement of response signals of the DUT (see paragraph [0021], herein test routines may initiate the generating and sending of test signals to the semiconductor device-under-test (DUT) and collecting responses from the DUT. Various types of semiconductor devices may be tested by system 10. In this example, an integrated circuit (IC) chip 18 (e.g., memory chip, microprocessor, analog-to-digital converter, digital-to-analog converter, etc.) is tested as a DUT); a memory storing multiple sets of sequenced operational state transition commands, and configured to store a first operational state information and a second operational state information (see paragraph [0024], herein IC chip 36 may initiate transmitting a vector of binary values to the DUT for storing on the DUT. Once stored, the DUT is accessed by tester 12 to determine if the correct binary values have been stored); and a transition control circuit configured to: operate the test control circuit in response to the first operational state information, the first operational state information indicating a first DUT driving mode and a first set of configuration settings (see paragraph [0022], herein to provide test signals and collect responses from the DUT, semiconductor device tester 12 is connected to one or more connector pins that provide an interface for the internal circuitry of IC chip 18. To test some DUTs, as many as 64 or 128 connector pins may be interfaced to tester 12); receive a transition trigger signal (see paragraph [0004], herein A driver circuit is capable of providing a version of the DC test signal and a version of the AC test signal to the semiconductor device under test, and Fig. 1); transition the test control circuit, in response to receiving the transition trigger signal, to operating in response to the second operational state information, the second operational state information indicating a second DUT driving mode and a second set of configuration settings (see paragraph [0005], herein the semiconductor device tester may include of an output stage for providing the versions of the test signals from the driver circuit to the semiconductor device, paragraph [0009], providing test signals to the semiconductor device may further include passing another DC test signal through a switch and sending this DC test signal through the output stage to the semiconductor device under test; and Fig. 5); wherein different ones of the sets of sequenced operational state transition commands correspond to different combinations of the first DUT driving mode and the second DUT driving mode (see paragraph [0024], herein IC chip 36 may initiate transmitting a vector of binary values to the DUT for storing on the DUT. Once stored, the DUT is accessed by tester 12 to determine if the correct binary values have been stored). Walker does not explicitly teach wherein the transition action includes transitioning the test control circuit from operating in response to the first DUT driving mode and the first configuration settings, to operating in response to the second mode and the second configuration settings, in an order responsive to the set of sequenced operational state transition commands corresponding to the first DUT driving mode and the second DUT driving mode; and wherein the set of sequenced operational state transition commands corresponding to the first DUT driving mode and the second DUT driving mode includes a command to transition to a third DUT mode that is a non-driving mode. However, Dinteman in the same the field of endeavor teaches wherein the transition action includes transitioning the test control circuit from operating in response to the first DUT driving mode and the first configuration settings, to operating in response to the second DUT driving mode and the second configuration settings, in an order responsive to the set of sequenced operational state transition commands corresponding to the first DUT driving mode and the second mode (see column 2, lines 21-29, herein the drive circuit has two modes of operation: drive and termination. In the drive mode of operation, the drive circuit transmits a differential test signal to terminals of an integrated circuit device under test (DUT) through a matching pair of transmission lines. When the same pair of transmission lines are used to convey a DUT output signal back to the IC tester, the drive circuit operating in its termination mode provides proper termination for the transmission line and provides proper loading for the DUT output signal, and column 3, lines 1-3, herein invention to provide a drive circuit that can switch quickly between its drive and termination modes with minimal noise in the output signal; and See column 3, lines 36-55, the present invention, drive circuit 12 is capable of operating in either of two modes. When an input INHIBIT data bit is low, drive circuit 12 enters a "drive" mode of operation in which it produces an output differential test signal (TEST) of a state determined the state of an input differential DRIVE signal. A pair of transmission lines 16A and 16B deliver the TEST signal to a pair of input/output (I/O) terminals 18A and 18B of an integrated circuit device under test (DUT) 20. The high and low levels of the differential TEST signal are set by input data D.sub.HIGH and D.sub.LOW. When the INHIBIT bit is high, drive circuit 12 enters a "termination" mode of operation. In this mode of operation); and wherein the set of sequenced operational state transition commands corresponding to the first DUT driving mode and the second DUT driving mode includes a command to transition to a third DUT mode that is a non-driving mode (see abstract, herein a drive circuit for an integrated circuit tester operates in either a drive mode of a termination mode. In the drive mode, the drive circuit supplies a differential test signal to an integrated circuit device under test (DUT) via a pair of transmission lines. In its termination mode, the drive circuit terminates the transmission lines with their characteristic impedances and provides an adjustable load to a DUT output signal appearing on the transmission lines; and column 2, lines 18-20; and column 6, lines 60-67 & column 7, lines 1-11). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, to modify the system of Walker with the teachings of Dinteman by including transitioning the test control circuit from operating in response to the first DUT driving mode and the first configuration settings, to operating in response to the second mode and the second configuration settings, in an order responsive to the set of sequenced operational state transition commands corresponding to the first DUT driving mode and the second mode; and wherein the set of sequenced operational state transition commands corresponding to the first DUT driving mode and the second DUT driving mode includes a command to transition to a third DUT mode that is a non-driving mode. This modification would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, because one of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized the test control circuit from operating in response to the first DUT driving mode and the first configuration settings, to operating in response to the second mode and the second configuration settings, in an order responsive to the set of sequenced operational state transition commands corresponding to the first DUT driving mode and the second mode would have improved the test system performance. Allowable Subject Matter 6. Claims 6, 10, and 16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Dependent claim 7 depend from on claim 6 and inherently include limitations therein and therefore are allowed as well. Examiner Notes 7. When amending the claims, applicants are respectfully requested to indicate the portion(s) of the specification which dictate(s) the structure relied on for proper interpretation and also to verify and ascertain the metes and bounds of the claimed invention. Prior Art 8. The prior art of record, considered pertinent to the applicant’s disclosure, is listed in the attached PTO-892 form. Conclusion 9. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OSMAN ALSHACK whose telephone number is (571)272-2069. The examiner can normally be reached on MON-FRI 8:30 AM-5:00 PM EST, also please fax interview request to (571) 273- 2069. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ALBERT DECADY can be reached on 5712723819. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OSMAN M ALSHACK/Examiner, Art Unit 2112
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 29, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 25, 2026
Response Filed
May 12, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 01, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 01, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 09, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12670078
STORAGE DEVICE INCLUDING TEST STORAGE BLOCK AND COMPUTING SYSTEM
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663462
ON-CHIP FAULT DETECTION DUE TO MALFUNCTIONS ON CHIP PINS
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12665698
SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO GENERATE COPIES OF DATA FOR TRANSMISSION OVER MULTIPLE COMMUNICATION CHANNELS
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12625759
REMEDIATING CHARACTERISTICS OF CONTENT CAPTURED BY A RECORDING APPLICATION ON A USER DEVICE
3y 9m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12619362
MEMORY SYSTEM AND CONTROL METHOD
2y 3m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+14.6%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 530 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month