Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/478,982

RE-DIMENSIONING SIDELINK POSITION REFERENCE SIGNAL CONFIGURATION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 29, 2023
Examiner
SINKANTARAKORN, PAWARIS
Art Unit
2409
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
757 granted / 881 resolved
+27.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+1.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
916
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.2%
-34.8% vs TC avg
§103
40.5%
+0.5% vs TC avg
§102
27.6%
-12.4% vs TC avg
§112
15.4%
-24.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 881 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION The following communication is in response to the application filed on September 29, 2023. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Objections Claims 1-11 and 15 are objected to because of the following informalities: Regarding claim 1 line 21, the limitation “transmit the SL-PRS using the selected of the plurality of modified SL-PRS” should be replaced with ---transmit the SL-PRS using the selected one of the plurality of modified SL-PRS---. Claims 2-11 depend on claim 1 and are, therefore, objected to for the same reason as claim 1. Regarding claim 15 line 15, the limitation ““transmitting the SL-PRS using the selected of the plurality of modified SL-PRS configurations” should be replaced with ---transmitting the SL-PRS using the selected one of the plurality of modified SL-PRS configurations---. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1 line 10, the limitation “transmission of the SL-PRS” has no antecedent basis. The limitations is preceded by the limitation “Sidelink Position Reference Signal (SL-PRS) configuration,” which is a configuration and is different from a SL-PRS itself. Therefore, the limitation “transmission of the SL-PRS” is the first reference to a SL-PRS (i.e., the signal itself) and should be amended to recite “transmission of a SL-PRS” for proper antecedent basis. The same rationale applies to claim 12 line 10 and claim 15 line 4. Claims 2-11, 13, and 14 depend on claims 1 and 12, respectively, and are therefore rejected for the same reasons as claims 1 and 12. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-15 are currently rejected and would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: One of the closest prior art references, U.S. Pub. No. 2025/0055621, discloses a technique for modifying SL-PRS transmission including discontinuing a transmission of a SL-PRS transmission, beginning transmission of a new SL-PRS, or adjusting time-frequency resources to be used for the SL-PRS transmission (see at least Fig. 4 and paragraphs 65-76). Another of the closest prior art references, U.S. Pub. No. 2026/0006572, discloses SL PRS configuration that can be adaptively selected based on the requirements for the SL positioning service and transmission channel conditions, where a device may perform a SL PRS transmission based on a SL PRS configuration among a plurality of SL PRS configurations based on a channel busy ratio measurement (see at least paragraphs 329-343). However, there is no combination of prior art of record that teaches or renders obvious the claimed invention as a whole, as arranged in independent claims 1, 12, and 15, and the dependent claims thereof. Specifically, the prior art of record fails to disclose or render obvious at least the following claim features: as recited in claim 1 and similarly recited in claim 15, modify the SL-PRS configuration into a plurality of modified SL-PRS configurations, wherein: each modified SL-PRS configuration in the plurality of modified SL-PRS configurations specifies a lower number of symbols for the transmission of the SL-PRS than the first number of symbols, and a power required for transmitting the SL-PRS using each of the plurality of modified SL-PRS configurations satisfies a minimum receiving power threshold of the receiving wireless terminal; select one of the plurality of modified SL-PRS configurations that results in a maximum number of SL-PRS symbols transmitted; and transmit the SL-PRS using the selected of the plurality of modified SL-PRS configurations; and as recited in claim 12, modify the SL-PRS configuration into a first modified SL-PRS configuration specifying a lower number of symbols for transmission of the SL-PRS than the first number of symbols; transmit the SL-PRS using the first modified SL-PRS configuration when the power required for transmitting the SL-PRS using the first modified SL-PRS configuration satisfies a minimum receiving power threshold of the receiving wireless terminal; modify the SL-PRS configuration into a second modified SL-PRS configuration when the power required for transmitting the SL-PRS using the first modified SL-PRS configuration does not satisfy the minimum receiving power threshold of the receiving wireless terminal, wherein the second modified SL-PRS configuration specifies a lower number of symbols for transmission of the SL-PRS than the first number of symbols; and transmit the SL-PRS using the second modified SL-PRS configuration when the power required for transmitting the SL-PRS using the second modified SL-PRS configuration satisfies the minimum receiving power threshold of the receiving wireless terminal. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. U.S. Pub. No. 2025/0055621 (Michalopoulos et al.) – SL-PRS configuration modification. U.S. Pub. No. 2025/0071522 (Zhang et al.) – activation message to support a dynamic change of a configuration for sending a SL-PRS. U.S. Pub. No. 2025/0227723 (Pan et al.) – a location management function (LMF) and a radio access network (RAN) that performs an interaction associated with a SL-PRS configuration. U.S. Pub. No. 2026/0006572 (Ko) – adaptive SL-PRS configuration selection. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Pawaris Sinkantarakorn whose telephone number is (571)270-1424. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00am-4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hadi Armouche can be reached at (571) 270-3618. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PAO SINKANTARAKORN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2409 03/06/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 29, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604215
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR UE ACTIONS UPON SCG ACTIVATION AND DEACTIVATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12580699
UPLINK SIGNAL ASSISTED PRECONFIGURED UPLINK RESOURCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581496
METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING UPLINK CONTROL INFORMATION IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, AND APPARATUS USING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574183
COMMUNICATION PROCESSING METHOD AND DEVICE, AND COMPUTER STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12568400
COMMUNICATION APPARATUS AND COMMUNICATION METHOD FOR COOPERATIVE TRANSMISSION BETWEEN A PLURALITY OF ACCESS POINTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+1.5%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 881 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month