Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/479,342

MULTIPLE PROFILE DOWNLOADS FOR USER EQUIPMENT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 02, 2023
Examiner
JOHNSON, AMY COHEN
Art Unit
2400
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Google LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allow Rate
284 granted / 499 resolved
-1.1% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+22.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
342 currently pending
Career history
841
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
§103
55.7%
+15.7% vs TC avg
§102
21.4%
-18.6% vs TC avg
§112
10.9%
-29.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 499 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The Information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 01/19/2024 have been placed in record and considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1, 2, 3, 4, and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being unpatentable over Kang et al. (US PG Pub. 2022/0360968 A1, from IDS, hereinafter “Kang”). In regards to claim 1, Kang teaches A method comprising: identifying, at a user equipment (UE) a first plurality of available subscriber identity module (SIM) profiles (¶ [0079], [0082] terminal receives remote management instructions to download eSIM profiles); and in response to identifying the plurality of SIM profiles, concurrently downloading the first plurality of SIM profiles to the UE (¶ [0079], [0082] once the terminal receives these instructions, the terminal downloads the eSIM profiles). In regards to claim 2, Kang teaches concurrently downloading comprises concurrently downloading the first plurality of SIM profiles via corresponding ones of a plurality of logical secure element interfaces (LSIs) (¶ [0065], [0079], [0081] downloading eSIM profiles downloads eSIM ports, which are LSIs). In regards to claim 3, Kang teaches opening a first LSI of the plurality of LSIs in response to identifying the plurality of SIM profiles (¶ [0079], [0090] once the eSIM profiles are downloaded, profile 1, or the first LSI, is opened after a management command). In regards to claim 4, Kang teaches opening the first LSI comprises opening the first LSI in response to determining that a number of the available SIM profiles exceeds a number of open LSIs at the UE (¶ [0079], [0090] after downloading two SIM profiles, opening the eSIM port (LSI) on the terminal). In regards to claim 10, Kang teaches the plurality of SIM profiles are electronic SIM (eSIM) profiles (¶ [0081], [0082] both SIM profiles are eSIM profiles). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 5, 6, and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kang et al. (US PG Pub. 2022/0360968 A1, from IDS, hereinafter “Kang”) in view of Veneroso (US PG Pub. 2018/0295501 A1). In regards to claim 5, Kang does not teach after downloading the first plurality of SIM profiles, concurrently downloading a second plurality of SIM profiles to the UE. In an analogous art, Veneroso teaches after downloading the first plurality of SIM profiles, concurrently downloading a second plurality of SIM profiles to the UE (¶ [0114] device downloads plurality of profiles P1, the P2). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify Veneroso into Kang to more efficiently use RAM in the eUICC, preventing slowdowns that negatively affect the user experience (¶ [0118]). In regards to claim 6, the combination Kang and Veneroso, specifically Veneroso teach downloading the second plurality of SIM profiles comprises downloading the second plurality of SIM profiles after the first plurality in response to determining a total number of available SIM profiles exceeds a number of LSIs at the UE (¶ [0008], [0114] for each profile there is a secure domain, and once the device downloads the first profiles P1, there are less secure domains than there are available profiles, which prompts the device to download the second profiles P2. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify Veneroso into Kang to more efficiently use RAM in the eUICC, preventing slowdowns that negatively affect the user experience (¶ [0118]). In response to claim 7, the combination Kang and Veneroso, specifically Kang, teaches downloading the first plurality of SIM profiles comprises downloading a first SIM profile via a first LSI and a second SIM profile via a second LSI (¶ [0065], [0079], [0081] when downloading SIM profiles 1 and 2, each eSIM port is its own LSI). Claims 8 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kang et al. (US PG Pub. 2022/0360968 A1, from IDS, hereinafter “Kang”) in view of Veneroso (US PG Pub. 2018/0295501 A1) in further view of Xu et al. (US PG Pub. 2024/0137336 A1, hereinafter “Xu”). In regards to claim 8, the combination Kang and Veneroso does not teach downloading the second plurality of SIM profiles comprises downloading a third SIM profile via the first LSI and a fourth SIM profile via the second LSI. In an analogous art, Xu teaches downloading the second plurality of SIM profiles comprises downloading a third SIM profile via the first LSI and a fourth SIM profile via the second LSI (¶ [0071], [0088] device downloads various SIM profiles, storing multiple profiles in an eSIM card pool that comprises a trusted execution environment or having different profiles in different eSIM card pools). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify Xu into the combination Kang and Veneroso to scale beyond the amount of eSIM profiles a physical SIM card may have, allowing the user to have many more SIM profiles on their device increasing flexibility for the user (¶ [0088]). In response to claim 9, the combination Kang, Veneroso, and Xu, specifically Kang, teaches the first LSI is assigned to a first protocol stack of the UE and the second LSI is assigned to a second protocol stack of the UE (¶ [0095-0096] the first eSIM port is used for one baseband, and the second eSIM port is used for another baseband of the terminal). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Chughtai et al. (US PG Pub. 2024/0276199 A1) teaches a method of providing UICC data to a requesting cellular router, checking whether the data is cached or not before requesting it from an MSA. Muthurajan et al. (US PG Pub. 2022/0117008 A1) teaches connection settings of a mobile device, which are preloaded onto a SIM card, but then can also be updated through a remote file management operation. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANTHONY APOSTOLIDES whose telephone number is (571)272-4260. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Un Cho can be reached at (571) 272-7919. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /A.A./Examiner, Art Unit 2413 /UN C CHO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2413
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 02, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12381794
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PERFORMING AD HOC DIAGNOSTICS, MAINTENANCE, PROGRAMMING, AND TESTS OF INTERNET OF THINGS DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 05, 2025
Patent 12381816
POLICY PLANE INTEGRATION ACROSS MULTIPLE DOMAINS
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 05, 2025
Patent 12363582
METHOD FOR MANAGING QOS, RELAY TERMINAL, PCF NETWORK ELEMENT, SMF NETWORK ELEMENT, AND REMOTE TERMINAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 15, 2025
Patent 12363588
DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD AND APPARATUS, COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 15, 2025
Patent 12363337
CODING AND DECODING OF VIDEO CODING MODES
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 15, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+22.9%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 499 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month