Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/479,676

MULTIPLANAR BONE ANCHOR SYSTEM

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Oct 02, 2023
Examiner
MATTHEWS, TESSA M
Art Unit
3773
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Highridge Medical, LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
407 granted / 491 resolved
+12.9% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
53 currently pending
Career history
544
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
39.0%
-1.0% vs TC avg
§102
32.0%
-8.0% vs TC avg
§112
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 491 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 59 and 60 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 41 – 58 are allowed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a) the invention was known or used by others in this country, or patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country, before the invention thereof by the applicant for a patent. Claim(s) 59 and 60 is/are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) as being anticipated by Hammill, SR. et al (US 2011/0040336 A1). Regarding clam 59, Hammill discloses a multiplanar bone anchor system (Abstract), comprising: a bone anchor including a distal shank (ref. 16) and a proximal head (ref. 20); a multiplanar coupling system disposable about the proximal head of the bone anchor, wherein the multiplanar coupling system includes a connecting arm (ref. 42) with a first portion able to be disposed about the proximal head of the bone anchor (see remarked Fig. 13 which shows the connecting arm having a first and second portion about line A1, where the second portion is directly in contact with the head of the anchor); and a saddle (ref. 30) operable to receive the multiplanar coupling system (Figs. 4 – 5) and comprising a top portion (ref. 31) and a bottom portion (ref. 33); wherein the connecting arm includes a second portion sized to be received within the top portion of the saddle (see remarked Fig. 13 below), wherein the bottom portion of the saddle able to be coupled to the connecting arm (all components are connected to one another as shown in Fig. 5); and wherein the top portion of the saddle is operable to move in one or more planes relative to the connecting arm and relative to the second portion of the saddle (paragraph [0078] discloses various methos of connecting the top and bottom portions of the saddle, prior to final assembly such as welding, the top portion is able to rotate or in another interpretation the portions are threadedly connected, thus allowing for rotation through multiple planes prior to final assembly). PNG media_image1.png 412 614 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 60, Hammill discloses a multiplanar bone anchor system (Abstract), comprising: a bone anchor including a distal shank (ref. 16) and a proximal head (ref. 20); a multiplanar coupling system disposable about the proximal head of the bone anchor (ref. 42, Fig. 5), wherein the multiplanar coupling system includes a connecting arm (ref. 42); and a saddle (ref. 30) operable to receive the multiplanar coupling system, wherein the saddle includes a first portion (ref. 31) and a second portion (ref. 33), wherein the first portion of the saddle is operable to move in one or more planes relative to the connecting arm and relative to the second portion of the saddle (paragraph [0078] discloses various methos of connecting the first and second portions of the saddle, prior to final assembly such as welding, the first portion is able to rotate or in another interpretation the portions are threadedly connected, thus allowing for rotation through multiple planes prior to final assembly), and wherein at least a portion of the connecting arm is sized to be received within the second portion of the saddle (Fig. 5). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO-892. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TESSA M MATTHEWS whose telephone number is (571)272-8817. The examiner can normally be reached M - F 8am - 1pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eduardo Robert can be reached at (571) 272-4719. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TESSA M MATTHEWS/ Examiner, Art Unit 3773
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 02, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 08, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Oct 10, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599388
BONE GRAFT DELIVERY DEVICES AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599415
POLYAXIAL BONE ANCHORING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594098
TREATMENT SYSTEM FOR A SPINAL POSTEROLATERAL INSTRUMENTATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594129
TRACKABLE RETRACTOR SYSTEMS, APPARATUSES, DEVICES, AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594408
SURGICAL INSTRUMENT PORTS CONFIGURED FOR USE WITH WOUND RETRACTORS, AND RELATED DEVICES AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+24.4%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 491 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month