Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 28, 2026
Application No. 18/479,684

INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, COMMUNICATION DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Oct 02, 2023
Priority
Nov 17, 2017 — CN 201711146781.5 +2 more
Examiner
WEISSBERGER, LUNA T
Art Unit
2415
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
ZTE CORPORATION
OA Round
4 (Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
162 granted / 218 resolved
+16.3% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
252
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
95.2%
+55.2% vs TC avg
§102
3.5%
-36.5% vs TC avg
§112
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 218 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The Examiner thanks the Applicant for the well-prepared amendment. The Examiner appreciates the Applicant’s effort to carefully analyze the Office action, and make appropriate arguments and amendments. Status of Claims Claims 1-20 responded on September 29, 2025 are pending, claims 1, 6, 11 and 16 are amended. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3, 5-8, 10-13, 15-18 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Samsung (3GPP TSG RAN WG1 NR Ad-Hoc#2 R1-1710650, hereinafter "3GPP") in view of LEE et al. (US 2019/0238247 A1, hereinafter "Lee") and Ying et al. (US 2018/0368110 A1, Provisional application No. 62/519,730, filed on Jun 14, 2017, hereinafter "Ying"). Regarding claim 1, 3GPP discloses a method for wireless communication, comprising: transmitting, from a base station to a terminal, a Radio Resource Control (RRC) message that includes X sets of parameter values (3GPP, pg. 1 transmission parameters set 1… semi-static configuration via RRC for transmission parameter set 1: DMRS configuration, Time domain DMRS bundling, maximum number of layers for PDSCH/PUSCH, PRG candidate configuration, Configuration of PTRS, Resource allocation type and QCL parameter set configuration), wherein each of the X sets of parameter values jointly encodes (1) a configuration parameter of a Demodulation Reference Signal (DMRS) (3GPP, pg. 1 following parameters should be supported: DMRS configuration), and (2) a parameter for a Phase Tracking Reference Signal (PTRS) indicating whether the PTRS is present (3GPP, pg. 2 following parameters should be supported: configuration of PTRS…Based on the configuration, DCI can dynamically indicate that the presence of PTRS or type of PTRS), X being a positive integer, and wherein the X sets of parameter values are associated with a modulation and coding scheme (MCS) table for a data transmission (Samsung, pg. 1 Maximum number of layers for PDSCH/PUSCH assignment can be configured to UE. Based on this configuration, the number of MCS fields); and transmitting, from the base station to the terminal, a Downlink Control Information message that includes a selection indication indicating a set of parameter values from the X sets of parameter values included in the RRC (3GPP, pg.2 Transmission parameter set 2 is a set of parameter to be dynamically indicated to UE via DCI…QCL parameter set can be selected via DCI…presence of PTRS or transmitted PTRS type can be indicated via DCI). 3GPP does not a parameter for a Phase Tracking Reference Signal (PTRS) indicating whether the PTRS is present in RRC message. Lee from the same field of endeavor discloses a parameter for a Phase Tracking Reference Signal (PTRS) indicating whether the PTRS is present in RRC message (Lee, [0172] the BS may configure ON/OFF of transmission of the single type of PTRS through RRC). It would have been obvious for one with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified transmission parameter sets disclosed by 3GPP and PTRS configuration through RRC message disclosed by Lee with a motivation to make this modification in order to improve throughput (Lee, [0168]). Samsung in view of Lee does not explicitly disclose wherein the X sets of parameter values are associated with a hybrid automatic retransmission request (HARQ) parameter, the HARQ parameter related to coding block group (CBG) information. Ying from the same field of endeavor discloses wherein the X sets of parameter values are associated with a modulation and coding scheme (MCS) table for a data transmission and a hybrid automatic retransmission request (HARQ) parameter, the HARQ parameter related to coding block group (CBG) information (Ying, [0095] the CBG indicator may be jointly designed with a Modulation and Coding Scheme (MCS). The reserved, remaining or unused values of the MCS field may be reused to indicate CBGs of a TB are transmitted. For example, some values in NR MCS table may be reserved. If one of these values is used, it may mean that MCS of the CBG transmission is the same as the previous transmission in the same HARQ process and it may also indicate which CBGs of a TB are transmitted). It would have been obvious for one with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have to include the teachings of Ying’s system for parameter with MCS and HARQ into 3GPP’s transmission parameter set as modified by Lee with a motivation to make this modification in order to improve communication capacity, speed, flexibility and/or efficiency (Ying, [0004]). Regarding claim 2, 3GPP discloses wherein the parameter for the PTRS indicates a resource location used by the PTRS (3GPP, pg. 2 configuration of PTRS and resource allocation type). Regarding claim 3, 3GPP discloses the parameter for the PTRS but does not explicitly disclose a transmission density used by the PTRS. Lee from the same field of endeavor discloses wherein the parameter for the PTRS indicates a transmission density used by the PTRS (Lee, [0179] UE-dedicated PTRSs having different time density may be used depending on TRB sizes or MCS levels, and such a UE-dedicated PTRS may be configured for a UE through RRC). It would have been obvious for one with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified transmission parameter sets disclosed by 3GPP and PTRS configuration through RRC message disclosed by Lee with a motivation to make this modification in order to improve throughput (Lee, [0168]). Regarding claim 5, 3GPP discloses wherein the configuration parameter of the DMRS comprises a scrambling value for scrambling the DMRS (3GPP, pg. 2 DMRS sequence indication: In order to support dynamic point selection, indication of DMRS sequence can be dynamically delivered to UE based on DMRS configuration in transmission parameter set 1). Regarding claims 11-13 and 15, these claims recite "a device for wireless communication" that disclose similar steps as recited by the method of claims 1-3 and 5, thus are rejected with the same rationale applied against claims 1-3 and 5 as presented above. Regarding claim 6, 3GPP discloses a method for wireless communication, comprising: receiving, by a terminal from a base station, a Radio Resource Control (RRC) message that includes X sets of parameter values (3GPP, pg. 1 transmission parameters set 1… semi-static configuration via RRC for transmission parameter set 1: DMRS configuration, Time domain DMRS bundling, maximum number of layers for PDSCH/PUSCH, PRG candidate configuration, Configuration of PTRS, Resource allocation type and QCL parameter set configuration), wherein each set of parameter values jointly encodes (1) a configuration parameter of a Demodulation Reference Signal (DMRS) (3GPP, pg. 1 following parameters should be supported: DMRS configuration), and (2) a parameter for a Phase Tracking Reference Signal (PTRS) indicating whether the PTRS is present (3GPP, pg. 2 following parameters should be supported: configuration of PTRS…Based on the configuration, DCI can dynamically indicate that the presence of PTRS or type of PTRS), X being a positive integer, and wherein the X sets of parameter values are associated with a modulation and coding scheme (MCS) table for a data transmission (Samsung, pg. 1 Maximum number of layers for PDSCH/PUSCH assignment can be configured to UE. Based on this configuration, the number of MCS fields); and receiving, by the terminal from the base station, a Downlink Control Information message that includes a selection indication indicating a set of parameter values from the X sets of parameter values included in the RRC message (3GPP, pg.2 Transmission parameter set 2 is a set of parameter to be dynamically indicated to UE via DCI…QCL parameter set can be selected via DCI…presence of PTRS or transmitted PTRS type can be indicated via DCI). 3GPP does not a parameter for a Phase Tracking Reference Signal (PTRS) indicating whether the PTRS is present in RRC message. Lee from the same field of endeavor discloses a parameter for a Phase Tracking Reference Signal (PTRS) indicating whether the PTRS is present in RRC message (Lee, [0172] the BS may configure ON/OFF of transmission of the single type of PTRS through RRC). It would have been obvious for one with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified transmission parameter sets disclosed by 3GPP and PTRS configuration through RRC message disclosed by Lee with a motivation to make this modification in order to improve throughput (Lee, [0168]). Samsung in view of Lee does not explicitly disclose wherein the X sets of parameter values are associated with a hybrid automatic retransmission request (HARQ) parameter, the HARQ parameter related to coding block group (CBG) information. Ying from the same field of endeavor discloses wherein the X sets of parameter values are associated with a modulation and coding scheme (MCS) table for a data transmission and a hybrid automatic retransmission request (HARQ) parameter, the HARQ parameter related to coding block group (CBG) information (Ying, [0095] the CBG indicator may be jointly designed with a Modulation and Coding Scheme (MCS). The reserved, remaining or unused values of the MCS field may be reused to indicate CBGs of a TB are transmitted. For example, some values in NR MCS table may be reserved. If one of these values is used, it may mean that MCS of the CBG transmission is the same as the previous transmission in the same HARQ process and it may also indicate which CBGs of a TB are transmitted). It would have been obvious for one with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have to include the teachings of Ying’s system for parameter with MCS and HARQ into 3GPP’s transmission parameter set as modified by Lee with a motivation to make this modification in order to improve communication capacity, speed, flexibility and/or efficiency (Ying, [0004]). Regarding claim 7, 3GPP discloses wherein the parameter for the PTRS indicates a resource location used by the PTRS (3GPP, pg. 2 configuration of PTRS and resource allocation type). Regarding claim 8, 3GPP discloses the parameter for the PTRS but does not explicitly disclose a transmission density used by the PTRS. Lee from the same field of endeavor discloses wherein the parameter for the PTRS indicates a transmission density used by the PTRS (Lee, [0179] UE-dedicated PTRSs having different time density may be used depending on TRB sizes or MCS levels, and such a UE-dedicated PTRS may be configured for a UE through RRC). It would have been obvious for one with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified transmission parameter sets disclosed by 3GPP and PTRS configuration through RRC message disclosed by Lee with a motivation to make this modification in order to improve throughput (Lee, [0168]). Regarding claim 10, 3GPP discloses wherein the configuration parameter of the DMRS comprises a scrambling value for scrambling the DMRS (3GPP, pg. 2 DMRS sequence indication: In order to support dynamic point selection, indication of DMRS sequence can be dynamically delivered to UE based on DMRS configuration in transmission parameter set 1). Regarding claims 16-18 and 20, these claims recite "a device for wireless communication" that disclose similar steps as recited by the method of claims 6-8 and 10, thus are rejected with the same rationale applied against claims 6-8 and 10 as presented above. Claim(s) 4, 9, 14 and 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Samsung (3GPP TSG RAN WG1 NR Ad-Hoc#2 R1-1710650, hereinafter "3GPP") in view of LEE et al. (US 2019/0238247 A1, hereinafter "Lee") and Ying et al. (US 2018/0368110 A1, hereinafter "Ying") as applied to claim above, and further in view of Gao et al. (US 2021/0135922 A1, hereinafter "Gao"). Regarding claim 4, 3GPP in view of Lee does not explicitly disclose a type of the DMRS. Gao from the same field of endeavor discloses wherein the configuration parameter of the DMRS comprises a type of the DMRS (Gao, [0077] the RS configuration pattern may be indicated in advance (also referred to as “the first indication” in the following) to the terminal device 120 via higher layer signaling, such as signaling on Radio Resource Control (RRC) Layer, Medium Access Control (MAC) layer and so on. The first indication of RS configuration pattern may be conducted per bandwidth part, per sub-band, and/or per component carrier. For example, the DMRS configuration pattern, the number of DMRS symbols (i.e. type of the DMRS)). It would have been obvious for one with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have to include the teachings of Gao’s system for transmission parameter set into 3GPP’s transmission parameter set as modified by Lee and Ying with a motivation to make this modification in order to reduce signaling overhead for indicating the DMRS configuration (Gao, [0034]). Regarding claims 9, 14 and 19, these claims recite "a device for wireless communication" that disclose similar steps as recited by the method of claim 4, thus are rejected with the same rationale applied against claim 4 as presented above. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LUNA WEISSBERGER whose telephone number is (571)272-3315. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey Rutkowski can be reached at (571)270-1215. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LUNA WEISSBERGER/Examiner, Art Unit 2415
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Sep 25, 2024
Response Filed
Dec 11, 2024
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 11, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 19, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Sep 29, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 13, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 22, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640867
SOUNDING METHOD AND APPARATUS IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
3y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633989
TECHNIQUES FOR TRANSFORMATION OF ANALOG BEAMFORMING CODEBOOKS
4y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12628167
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR APPLYING LOGICAL CHANNEL LIMIT IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
3y 12m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12621856
ACTIVE TIME EXTENSION FOR BEAM FAILURE DETECTION
4y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12610384
METHOD AND DEVICE IN NODES USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
2y 9m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+27.3%)
3y 0m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 218 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month