Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/479,930

TAPE ASSEMBLY FOR A SMART CATHETER

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Oct 03, 2023
Examiner
NORDMEYER, PATRICIA L
Art Unit
1788
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Freudenberg Medical LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allow Rate
645 granted / 1141 resolved
-8.5% vs TC avg
Strong +37% interview lift
Without
With
+37.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
1192
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
46.9%
+6.9% vs TC avg
§102
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
§112
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1141 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Withdrawn Rejections Any rejections and or objections, made in the previous Office Action, and not repeated below, are hereby withdrawn due to Applicant’s amendments and/or arguments in the response dated January 20, 2026. However, new rejections may have been made using the same prior art if still applicable to the newly presented amendments and/or arguments. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1 – 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over O’Dea et al. (WO 2009/001327 A2) in view of Ettre (USPN 3,655,496). O’Dea et al. disclose a tape assembly for transferring at least one circuit onto a catheter shaft (Abstract; Figures 9 – 14, 17 and 18), the tape assembly comprising: a removable transfer media layer extending between a first end and a second end (Figure 11, #74; Figure 9, #64; Figure 18, #119); a circuit assembly disposed in overlaying and releasably bonded relationship with said removable transfer media layer between said first and second ends (Figure 18, #114); said circuit assembly including a conductive circuit layer having at least one circuit (Page 32, line 24 to Page 37, line 6) as in claim 1. With respect to claim 2, said circuit assembly includes a dielectric layer disposed in overlaying relationship with said conductive circuit layer to dispose said conductive circuit layer in sandwiched relationship between said dielectric layer and said removable transfer media layer (Claims 69 – 93 and 106 – 117). Regarding claim 3, said circuit assembly includes an adhesive layer disposed in overlaying relationship with said dielectric layer for use in securing said circuit assembly to the catheter shaft (Page 32, line 24 to Page 37, line 6; Claims 69 – 93 and 106 – 117). For claim 4, said circuit assembly includes a seal layer disposed in sandwiched relationship between said transfer media layer and said conductive circuit layer for protecting said conductive circuit layer from an environment of the catheter shaft after removal of said removable transfer media layer (Page 32, line 24 to Page 37, line 6; Claims 69 – 93 and 106 – 117). In claim 5, said transferable media layer is a tape (Page 32, line 24 to Page 37, line 6; Claims 69 – 93 and 106 – 117). With regard to claims 6, 7, and 8, said tape is a heat transfer tape, said tape is a heat release tape, and said tape is a low adhesion tape (Claims 114 – 117). As in claim 9, said at least one circuit extends between at least one first contact pad disposed adjacent said first end of said removable transfer media layer and at least one second contact pad disposed adjacent said second end of said removable transfer media layer (Page 32, line 24 to Page 37, line 6; Claims 69 – 93 and 106 – 117). With respect to claim 10, said conductive circuit layer and said at least one circuit are comprised of conductive material (Page 32, line 24 to Page 37, line 6; Claims 69 – 93 and 106 – 117). Regarding claims 11 – 13, said conductive circuit layer is manufactured via conductive inks or chemical etching, and said circuit assembly is transferred to the catheter shaft via a heat transfer process (The recitation that the conductive circuit layer is formed by the “conductive inks or chemical etching”, and the assembly is transferred by “a heat transfer process” are process recitations in a product. Product claims including process recitations are not limited by the manipulation of the recited steps, only the structure implied by the steps. See MPEP2113. In the present instance, the process steps imply tis a circuit assembly on a catheter. The reference discloses such a product. See Page 32, line 24 to Page 37, line 6; Claims 69 – 93 and 106 – 117). However, O’Dea et al. fail to disclose said removable transfer media layer is removable from said circuit assembly after said circuit assembly is secured to the catheter shaft. Ettre et al. teach a tape assembly for transferring at least one circuit onto a substrate (Abstract; Figure 2), the tape assembly comprising: a removable transfer media layer extending between a first end and a second end (Figure #2, #22); a circuit assembly disposed in overlaying and releasably bonded relationship with said removable transfer media layer between said first and second ends (Figure 2, #14); said circuit assembly including a conductive circuit layer having at least one circuit (Figure 2, #14), said removable transfer media layer is removable from said circuit assembly after said circuit assembly is secured to a substrate fort the purpose of securing the circuit in the appropriate location (Figure 2, #22; Column 5, lines 8 – 27). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have removable transfer media layer for securing the circuit assembly to the catheter shaft in O’Dea in order to secure the circuit in the appropriate location as taught by Ettre et al. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1 – 13 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Please see the rejection in view of Ettre et al. that teaches it is well known to use transfer media layers in order get the desired placement of circuits on a substrate. Conclusion The prior art made of record on the PTO-892 and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The prior art is cited to show the state of the art with regard to the placement of circuits on a substrate using transfer media layers in order to get the desired placement on the surface. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Patricia L Nordmeyer whose telephone number is (571)272-1496. The examiner can normally be reached 10am - 6:30pm EST, Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alicia Chevalier can be reached at 571-272-1490. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Patricia L. Nordmeyer/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 1788 /pln/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1788 February 5, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 03, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jan 20, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 05, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12577436
EMBOSSING OR DEBOSSING OF A LABEL SUBSTRATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12557867
ADHESIVE MOUNTABLE STACK OF REMOVABLE LAYERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12552130
TRANSPARENT SOLDER MASK PROTECTION FILM, METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAME, AND METHOD FOR USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12547210
TAPE MEMBER AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12548474
LABEL WITH STAND-UP MECHANISM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+37.3%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1141 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month