Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/480,639

COMPRESSIBLE ROD FOR AN AEROSOL-GENERATING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 04, 2023
Examiner
GRAY, LINDA LAMEY
Art Unit
1745
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Altria Client Services LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
651 granted / 787 resolved
+17.7% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
810
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
37.3%
-2.7% vs TC avg
§102
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
§112
33.9%
-6.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 787 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 14-20, and 28-32 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Reevell (GB 2534210 A). Claims 1-2, 14-20, and 28-32, Reevell teaches a compressible rod 2 for an aerosol-generating device (abstract; pg23 L26; pg26 L10-11), the compressible rod 2 comprising: a first layer 10 including a first material including shredded tobacco (thermally conductive also) which is fibrous; and a wrapper 8 (having an aluminum metallic foil portion; and a tipping paper) circumscribing the first layer 10 (pg7 L21-23; pg24 L5-10), the compressible rod 2 having a circular cross-sectional shape (Fig1) and a hollow center (when pierced as in Figure 9 – and at areas around elements 52 and 54 as in Figure 13) (pg4 L10-12; pg15 L18 to pg16 L26; pg26 L30-36; pg28 L32 to pg29 L3), the compressible rod 2 configured to be compressed (pg24 L5-10), such that the compressible rod 2 has a non-circular cross-sectional shape after compression (Fig8). The compressible rod 2 includes a filter at an end without a hollow portion (pg23 L26-33). Reevell teaches an aerosol-generating device having an outer housing defining a cavity to receive the compressible rod 2 – and a heater with a blade heater (pg22 L24-25; pg24 L12 to pg25 L34; Fig5). Reevell teaches a power source, for heating, which is an electric battery – which has electrodes (pg20 L21-26). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 3-13 and 21-27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Reevell, as applied to claims 1-2, 14-20, and 28-32 above, and further in view of Hopkins (US 1,796,522). Claims 3-13 and 21-27, Reevell does not teach a second layer (and third) layer of tobacco fibers between under the wrapper 8. Hopkins teach a tobacco cigarette, with a wrapper, having area with two layers of tobacco fiber wherein one layer is stronger than the other layer which helps yield a uniform quality – wherein the layers are spaced along the cigarette providing at least three layers (pg1 c1 L18; pg2 L16-32). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, to have provided in Reevell a second layer (and third) of tobacco fibers under the wrapper 8 (areas with two layers of tobacco fibers where one layer is stronger than the other layer – wherein the layers are spaced along the cigarette providing at least three layers) in that Hopkins teaches that such helps yield a uniform quality. Reevell teaches a flavor material of encapsulated flavor beads (pg29 L22 to pg30 L19; Figs14-15). In Reevell modified each layer of tobacco has a different permeability and a different density given that the strength of each layer varies. In Reevell modified tobacco is present in each layer. Prior Art of Record The following prior art is made of record: Kido teaches a compressible smoking item. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LINDA GRAY whose telephone number is (571) 272-5778. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 9 AM to 5:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Phil Tucker can be reached at (571) 272-1095. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LINDA L GRAY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1745
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 04, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594752
IN-LINE LAMINATION PROCESS FOR PRODUCING THERMOPLASTIC COMPOSITE PANELS WITH TEXTURED FILM LAYERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588710
POWER LEVEL INDICATION IN A DEVICE FOR AN ELECTRONIC AEROSOL PROVISION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12576626
Laminator for Manufacture of Unit Structural Bodies with Increased Force of Adhesion
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12569006
ULTRASONIC-BASED AEROSOL GENERATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12564215
PAPER SHEET FILTER ELEMENT FOR A SMOKING ARTICLE, AND ASSOCIATED METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+16.9%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 787 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month