Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/480,696

SHOTCRETE GAUGE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 04, 2023
Priority
Sep 15, 2023 — CA 3212670
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANNA JOSEPHINE
Art Unit
2855
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Jdl Industries Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
36 granted / 46 resolved
+10.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
53
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
67.4%
+27.4% vs TC avg
§102
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
§112
8.4%
-31.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 46 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Loncaric (WO 2006105577) “Loncaric”, in view of Kodi (US Patent 8117796) “Kodi”. Regarding claims 1-8, Loncaric discloses a shotcrete gauge (1) for facilitating an application of shotcrete (45) to a surface (42), the shotcrete gauge (1) comprising: a main body (2); a pair of twist-on members (Fig. 17), a fastener-supporting bore (fig. 17) extending centrally inside the main body (2) and having internal threads (see labelled excerpt of fig. 17 below) for receiving a depth-setting fastener (5) wherein the depth-setting fastener (5) is a depth-setting bolt having a bolt head (30), wherein the bolt head (30) has a head color different from a shank color (page 10, paragraph 1), and a threaded shank having the external threads (threads shown in Fig. 17), wherein the bolt head (30) provides a visual indicator (20) for a user applying the shotcrete (45). The shotcrete gauge (1) comprises a threaded support bracket (60) that replaces the depth-setting fastener (5) after the shotcrete has been applied, the threaded support bracket (60) being adapted to support an object (66) wherein the object is a vent or hose (66). The depth-setting fastener (5) is one of a plurality of depth-setting fasteners (5) of different lengths (page 8; lines 17-23) that can be fastened into the fastener-supporting bore to set different thicknesses. PNG media_image1.png 140 330 media_image1.png Greyscale Loncaric does not disclose having parallel hooks to attach to a reinforcement mesh. Kodi teaches parallel hooks (34) to attach to a reinforcement mesh (52). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to use Kodi’s parallel hooks on Loncaric’s shotcrete gauge to more securely attach Loncaric’s shotcrete gauge to Kodi’s reinforcement mesh, ensuring the gauge is firmly locked into position to provide more accurate thickness measurements. Regarding claims 9-16, Loncaric discloses a shotcrete gauge (1) for applying shotcrete (45) to a surface (42), the shotcrete gauge (1) comprising: a main body (2); a pair of twist-on members (fig. 17), a fastener-supporting bore (fig. 17) extending centrally inside the main body (2) and having internal threads (see labelled excerpt of fig. 17 below) for receiving a depth-setting fastener (5) wherein the depth-setting fastener (5) is a depth-setting bolt having a bolt head (30), wherein the bolt head (30) has a head color different from a shank color (page 10, paragraph 1), and a threaded shank having the external threads (threads shown in Fig. 17), wherein the bolt head (30) provides a visual indicator (20) for a user applying the shotcrete (45). The shotcrete gauge (1) comprises a threaded support bracket (60) that replaces the depth-setting fastener (5) after the shotcrete has been applied, the threaded support bracket (60) being adapted to support an object (66) wherein the object is a vent or hose (66). The depth-setting fastener (5) is one of a plurality of depth-setting fasteners (5) of different lengths (page 8; lines 17-23) that can be fastened into the fastener-supporting bore to set different thicknesses. PNG media_image1.png 140 330 media_image1.png Greyscale Loncaric does not disclose having parallel hooks to attach to a reinforcement mesh. Kodi teaches parallel hooks (34) to attach to a reinforcement mesh (52). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to use Kodi’s parallel hooks to more securely attach Loncaric’s shotcrete gauge to Kodi’s reinforcement mesh, ensuring the gauge is firmly locked into position to provide more accurate thickness measurements. Regarding claims 17-20, Loncaric discloses a method of applying shotcrete (45) to a surface (42), the method comprising: attaching a reinforcement mesh (“screen”) to the surface (42); attaching a shotcrete gauge (1) to the reinforcement mesh (“screen”), the shotcrete gauge comprising: a main body (2); a pair of twist-on members (Fig. 17) to attach to a reinforcement mesh (“screen”) disposed against the surface (42); and a fastener-supporting bore (fig. 17) extending centrally inside the main body (2) and having internal threads (see labelled excerpt of fig. 17 below) for receiving a depth-setting fastener (5) having corresponding external threads (see labelled excerpt of fig. 17 below); fastening the depth-setting fastener (5) in the fastener-supporting bore (fig. 17) to set a depth of the shotcrete (45); removing the depth-setting fastener (5); and fastening a threaded support bracket (60) into the bore; hanging a vent or hose (66) from the threaded support bracket (60); wherein the depth-setting fastener is a depth-setting bolt (5) having a bolt head (30) and a threaded shank (5) having the external threads, wherein the bolt head (30) provides a visual indicator (20) for a user applying the shotcrete to the reinforcement mesh, wherein the bolt head has a head color different from a shank color (page 10, paragraph 1). PNG media_image1.png 140 330 media_image1.png Greyscale Loncaric does not disclose having parallel hooks. Kodi teaches parallel hooks (34). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to use Kodi’s parallel hooks to more securely attach Loncaric’s shotcrete gauge to reinforcement mesh during Loncaric’s method of applying shotcrete, ensuring the gauge is firmly locked into position to provide more accurate thickness measurements during shotcrete application. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANNA JOSEPHINE SAUNDERS whose telephone number is (571)272-6528. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30-5:00 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Peter Macchiarolo can be reached at 571-272-2375. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANNA JOSEPHINE SAUNDERS/Examiner, Art Unit 2855 /PETER J MACCHIAROLO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2855
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 04, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12693117
THREE-DIMENSIONAL PROJECTOR AND METHOD
2y 12m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12687392
TOOL FOR LEVELING AND ALIGNING SUSPENDED CEILING RAILS
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12674689
ROTARY ENCODER
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12663265
REFERENCE FREE CALIBRATION METHOD FOR A POINT CLOUD MEASURING MODULE COMBINED WITH A GEODETIC SINGLE POINT MEASUREMENT UNIT
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661750
MACHINE TOOL, POSITION INFORMATION CORRECTION METHOD, AND POSITION INFORMATION CORRECTION PROGRAM
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+13.2%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 46 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month