Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/481,081

CYLINDRICAL SECONDARY BATTERY

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 04, 2023
Priority
Dec 06, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0168590
Examiner
MCCONNELL, WYATT P
Art Unit
1727
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
842 granted / 1046 resolved
+15.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1067
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
76.3%
+36.3% vs TC avg
§102
10.3%
-29.7% vs TC avg
§112
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1046 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2024/0088425 to Lee et al (“Lee”) in view of Japanese Patent Publication No. 2001-216997 to Ebi (citing to the enclosed machine translation “Ebi”). Regarding claims 1-6, 10-13, 15, and 17, Lee discloses a cylindrical battery including a rivet terminal penetrating a closed portion of the cylindrical housing. Lee at paragraph [0436]. The rivet terminal is connected to an uncoated portion of a first electrode plate. A sealing cap plate seals the open end of the cylindrical housing. Id. at paragraph [0450]. A second electrode plate is connected to the housing. Lee is open to either the first or second electrode being the negative electrode with the second electrode being opposite polarity. Id. at paragraph [0397]. The two electrodes are formed in a jelly roll assembly that includes the first electrode plate, a separator, and the second electrode plate. Id. at paragraph [0396]. The electrode plates may have active material coated on one or both sides of the current collector plate. Id. at paragraph [0127]. One long end of each of the electrode current collectors is uncoated with active material continuously along the entire length of the current collector, with the uncoated region of one of the electrodes being one side (upper/lower) and that of the other electrode being on the opposite side (lower/upper). This is considered to correspond to the upper-end uncoated portion of the negative electrode/lower-end coated portion of the positive electrode , where when each electrode has active material applied to both sides of the collector, the uncoated portion of a first side of the negative electrode corresponding to the recited first upper-end negative electrode uncoated portion and the uncoated portion of the second side of the negative electrode corresponding to the recited second upper-end negative electrode uncoated portion; and those of the positive electrode respectively corresponding to the first lower-end positive electrode uncoated portion and the second lower-end positive electrode uncoated portion. These uncoated portions are separated into tabs by laser notching. Id. at paragraph [0132] and [0135]. Lee shows that it was common to leave the shorter winding core end of each collector uncoated (front-end uncoated portion) and the short terminating end of the collector uncoated (terminating-end uncoated portion) so as to avoid short circuiting. Id. at Figure 2. However, Lee is silent regarding a length of a first negative electrode active layer formed on a first side of the collector being different than that of a second negative electrode active layer formed on the other side of the collector. Ebi discloses jelly-roll electrode assemblies for use is batteries where both sides of the collector of each electrode in the electrode assembly is coated with active material. Where the negative electrode is the innermost electrode of the jelly-roll assembly, Ebi discloses on the core end of the collector providing an innermost side of the collector with a front-end uncoated portion longer than the front-end uncoated portion of the outer side of the negative collector because this portion of the innermost side of the collector does not oppose positive electrode active material and thus is not electroactive. This results in a shorter active material layer on the innermost layer compared to the outermost layer, and also results in a longer front-end uncoated portion on the innermost layer compared to the outermost layer of the negative electrode collector. Ebi at paragraph [0006]. Similarly, Ebi discloses providing the outer surface of the positive electrode collector near the terminating end with a terminating-end uncoated potion that is longer than the terminating-end uncoated portion of the innermost surface of the positive electrode resulting in different lengths for the active material layers of the positive electrode as well. Ebi at paragraph [0006] Accordingly, in order to make the battery of Lee more compact the person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention would have had reason to ensure that an innermost layer of the negative electrode has a longer front-end uncoated region than the outermost layer of the negative electrode, and the outermost layer of the negative electrode has a longer terminating-end uncoated region than the innermost layer of the negative electrode, with the active material layer of the innermost layer and that of the outermost layer having different lengths. Regarding claims 7 and 14, the tabs of Lee do not appear regularly, with some embodiments having them not included at a core/winding end and a terminating end. Lee at figures 4b, 13 and 15 Regarding claims 8 and 9, as noted above, the second electrode of Lee is connected to the housing. Where the positive electrode is the one connected to the rivet, that makes the electrode connected to the housing the negative electrode. The Office finds that connecting any uncoated portion of the collector would have been an obvious means of achieving electrical connection. The separator necessarily continues to extend between the two electrodes and acts to shield the electrode not connecting to the housing from contacting the housing. Regarding claims 16 and 18, as noted above, Lee allows flexibility with whether the first or second electrode is the negative electrode. Thus, in embodiments where the innermost electrode is the positive electrode, then it will be the one with a first turn of the innermost portion of the collector being uncoated at the winding end (front-end). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WYATT P MCCONNELL whose telephone number is (571)270-7531. The examiner can normally be reached 9am to 5pm M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Barbara Gilliam can be reached at 571-272-1330. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WYATT P MCCONNELL/Examiner, Art Unit 1727
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 04, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683212
CONTROL SYSTEM FOR SECONDARY BATTERY, CONTROL CIRCUIT, AND VEHICLE USING THE SAME
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12671089
BINDER FOR RECHARGEABLE LITHIUM BATTERY, NEGATIVE ELECTRODE INCLUDING SAME, AND RECHARGEABLE LITHIUM BATTERY INCLUDING SAME
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665227
BATTERY MODULE, A BATTERY PACK, AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE, A BMM CARRIER, A BMM ARRANGEMENT AND A METHOD FOR ASSEMBLING A BATTERY MODULE
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12665254
MANUAL SERVICE DISCONNECT FOR A BATTERY SYSTEM
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12658463
System and Method for Manufacturing Secondary Battery
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+9.4%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1046 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month