Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/481,190

OPTIMIZATION OF ENERGY USE THROUGH MODEL-BASED SIMULATIONS

Non-Final OA §112§DP
Filed
Oct 04, 2023
Examiner
OGG, DAVID EARL
Art Unit
2119
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Uplight, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
241 granted / 290 resolved
+28.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
317
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
§103
41.0%
+1.0% vs TC avg
§102
10.9%
-29.1% vs TC avg
§112
30.9%
-9.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 290 resolved cases

Office Action

§112 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 24-43 are pending. Claims 1-23 are cancelled. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the "right to exclude" granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. See In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the conflicting application or patent is shown to be commonly owned with this application. See 37 CFR 1.131(c). A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional, the reply must be complete. MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The filing date of the application will determine what form should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/ patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 24, 26, 29 are rejected on the grounds of non-statutory double patenting of claims 1, 4-5 in U.S. Patent US11385664B2. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the cited instant application claims are anticipated by the cited claims of U.S. Patent US11385664B2. The differences between the conflicting claims are minor and do not distinguish the overall appearance of one over the other. These differences include: controlling an HVAC vs energy consumption goals of an HVAC; associating the collected data with a user profile vs associating the collected data with the user identity; in response to the input vs for each indication of the user presence; receiving an input from a user vs receiving an indication of a user presence; storing the associated data as a user pattern in the user profile vs storing the associated data as a user pattern; a time associated with the input vs a time associated with the user presence; providing the user profile to the HVAC system vs providing the user pattern to the HVAC system. Instant Application U.S. Patent US11385664B2 Claim 24 A method for controlling a heating, ventilation, and air condition (HVAC) system based on one or more user preferences for an environment coupled to the HVAC system, the method comprising: receiving an input from a user to adjust a setting of a first component from one or more components of the HVAC system; in response to the input: collecting data from the first component, and associating the collected data with a user profile for the user; storing the associated data as a user pattern in the user profile, wherein the associated data includes the collected data, the user profile, a time associated with the input, and wherein the user pattern identifies one or more adjustments for the user; and providing the user profile to the HVAC system for adjustment of a setting of at least one component of the one or more components to achieve at least one user preference in the environment. Claim 1 A method for achieving energy consumption goals for a heating, ventilation, and air condition (HVAC) system, the method comprising: identifying one or more components of the HVAC system; for each of the one or more components of the HVAC system— collecting data from the component, and receiving an indication of a user presence in a vicinity of the component from a presence sensor; and for each indication of the user presence from the presence sensor— receiving a user identity, associating the collected data with the user identity, storing the associated data as a user pattern, wherein the associated data includes the collected data, the user identity, a time associated with the user presence, and the indication of the user presence, wherein the user pattern identifies one or more adjustments for the user; and providing the user pattern to the HVAC system for adjustment of a setting of at least one component of the one or more components. Claims 32-34, 37 are rejected on the grounds of non-statutory double patenting of claims 8-9, 11, 16 in U.S. Patent US11385664B2. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the cited instant application claims are anticipated by the cited claims of U.S. Patent US11385664B2. The differences between the conflicting claims are minor and do not distinguish the overall appearance of one over the other. These differences include: controlling an energy consuming system vs achieving energy consumption goals for a HVAC system; for a first component from a plurality of components vs for at least one of a plurality of components; receiving an input from a user vs receiving an indication of a user presence; in response to the input vs for each received indication of the user presence; associating the collected data with a user profile associated with the user vs associating the collected data with the user; a time associated with the input vs a time associated with the user presence; providing the user profile to the energy consuming system vs providing the user pattern to the energy consuming system. Instant Application U.S. Patent US11385664B2 Claim 32 A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions for controlling an energy consuming system that, if executed by a computing system having a processor, cause the computing system to perform operations comprising: for a first component from a plurality of components in the energy consuming system, receiving an input from a user to adjust a setting of the first component; in response to the input: collecting data from the first component, and associating the collected data with a user profile associated with the user; storing the associated data as a user pattern in the user profile, wherein the associated data includes the collected data, a time associated with the input, and wherein the user pattern identifies one or more adjustments for the user; and providing the user profile to the energy consuming system for adjustment of a setting of at least one component of the plurality of components to achieve at least one user preference for the energy consuming system. Claim 8 A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions for achieving energy consumption goals for a heating, ventilation, and air condition (HVAC) system that, if executed by a computing system having a processor, cause the computing system to perform operations comprising: for at least one of a plurality of components of an energy-consuming system— collecting data from the component; receiving an indication of a user presence in a vicinity of the component from a presence sensor; and for each received indication of the user presence from the presence sensor— identifying a user present in the vicinity of the component, associating the collected data with the user, storing the associated data as a user pattern, wherein the associated data includes the collected data, a time associated with the user presence, and the indication of the user presence, wherein the user pattern identifies a one or more adjustments for the user; and providing the user pattern to the energy consuming system for adjustment of a setting of at least one component of the one or more components Claims 39, 41-43 are rejected on the grounds of non-statutory double patenting of claims 8, 16-17 in U.S. Patent US11385664B2. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the cited instant application claims are anticipated by the cited claims of U.S. Patent US11385664B2. The differences between the conflicting claims are minor and do not distinguish the overall appearance of one over the other. These differences include; a computer system vs a computing system; receive an input from a user vs receiving an indication of a user presence; in response to the input vs for each received indication of the user presence; collect data from the first component vs collecting data from the component; associate the collected data with a user profile vs associating the collected data with the user; a time associated with the input vs a time associated with the user presence; providing the user profile to the HVAC system vs providing the user pattern to the energy consuming system. Instant Application U.S. Patent US11385664B2 Claim 39 A computer system for controlling a heating, ventilation, and air condition (HVAC) system based on one or more user preferences, the computer system comprising: at least one processor; and at least one memory storing computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, control the computer system to: receive an input from a user to adjust a setting of a first component from one or more components of the HVAC system; in response to the input, the computer-executable instructions control the computer system to: collect data from the first component, and associate the collected data with a user profile for the user; store the associated data as a user pattern in the user profile, wherein the associated data includes the collected data, the user profile, a time associated with the input, and wherein the user pattern identifies one or more adjustments for the user; and provide the user profile to the HVAC system for adjustment of a setting of at least one component of the one or more components to achieve at least one user preference. Claim 8 A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions for achieving energy consumption goals for a heating, ventilation, and air condition (HVAC) system that, if executed by a computing system having a processor, cause the computing system to perform operations comprising: for at least one of a plurality of components of an energy-consuming system— receiving an indication of a user presence in a vicinity of the component from a presence sensor; and for each received indication of the user presence from the presence sensor— identifying a user present in the vicinity of the component, collecting data from the component; associating the collected data with the user, storing the associated data as a user pattern, wherein the associated data includes the collected data, a time associated with the user presence, and the indication of the user presence, wherein the user pattern identifies a one or more adjustments for the user; and providing the user pattern to the energy consuming system for adjustment of a setting of at least one component of the one or more components Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112(a) The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 24, 27, 31-32, 35, 39, 41, 43 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. The claim mentions “a user profile”, and describes storing user pattern data in the user profile, however the specification does not include any reference to “user profile”. The “user profile” limitation, and its related limitations, were introduced into the claim set with new claims 24-43 added on Dec 21, 2023 after cancelling original claims 1-23 which were posted on the application filing date of Oct 4, 2023, which did not include any reference to a “user profile”, rendering the limitation as being new material as it is not mentioned in the original disclosure of Oct 4, 2023. Dependent claims 25-26, 28-30, 33-34, 36-38, 40, 42 are rejected based on dependency on the claims 24, 27, 32, 35, 39. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112(b) The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim(s) 35 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Claim 35 recites the limitation “the second user” in line 7. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim(s) 36 is/are rejected based on dependency to rejected Claim 35 Allowable Subject Matter Claims 24, 32, and 39 are allowable. Dependent claim(s) 25-31, 33-38, and 40-43 is/are allowable over art based on their dependence upon claims 24, 32, 39 respectively. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Applicant’s claim defines over the prior art of record because the prior art of record, taken either alone or in combination, does not teach in response to an input from a user to adjust a setting of a component, collecting data from the component, associating the collected data with a user profile associated with the user, then storing the associated data as a user pattern in the user profile, where the associated data includes the collected data, a time associated with the input, and wherein the user pattern identifies one or more adjustments for the user, and providing the user profile to the system for adjustment of a setting of at least one component of the one or more components to achieve at least one user preference in the environment. Citation of Pertinent Prior Art Ehlers et al, US Patent Pub US 20040133314 relates to claims regarding monitoring and control of major loads, e.g., total electric load, HVAC systems, water heater, and pool pump. A scheduling feature allows the customer to customize the devices. The customer is able to view and modify various parameters associated with their user profile. A motion sensor that automatically sets back the temperature to a predetermined point based on the presence of a person in the area. Fadell et al, US Patent Pub US 20120130547 A1 relates to claims regarding a thermostat that detects user occupancy patterns, learned occupancy patterns and comfort preferences of the user. Kastner et al, "Using AI to Realize Energy Efficient Yet Comfortable Smart Homes", 2010, IEEE, PP 1-2 relates to claims regarding automations systems that are aware of users, their preferences, habits and desires, to determine an optimal strategy for controlling the environment. Barbato et al, "Home energy saving through a user profiling system based on wireless sensors", Nov 2009, BuildSys '09: Proceedings of the First ACM Workshop on Embedded Sensing Systems for Energy-Efficiency in Buildings, PP 49-53 relates to claims regarding a user profiling process using a mechanism for recording some events that can characterize the way in which users interact with the home and prediction algorithm that allows extracting from all these data some reasonable settings of the energy management system that is expected to be the most appropriate meet user requirements. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID E OGG whose telephone number is (469) 295-9163. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon - Thurs 7:30 am - 5:00 pm CT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mohammad Ali can be reached on 571-272-4105. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID EARL OGG/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2119
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 04, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596339
PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT DEVICE, PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591217
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING A CONFIGURATION PROCESS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12572134
I/O Server Services for Selecting and Utilizing Active Controller Outputs from Containerized Controller Services in a Process Control Environment
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12547153
METHOD, CONTROL UNIT, MEASUREMENT SYSTEM, COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12544834
AGENT DROPLET DEPOSITION DENSITY DETERMINATIONS FOR POROUS ARTICLES
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+12.1%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 290 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month